Brian Z Jones wrote:
> I disagree. I figure, you know what you sent me, you want to see what
> I'm saying in reply first. I've only left your part quoted to refresh
Your own message is a perfect counter example. Until I scrolled down, I
didn't even know you were replying to my post, much les
Peter Lairo wrote:
> consider to be wrong, but is done frequently anyhow), then the user
> should be allowed to decide where his sig goes too - it's that simple,
> because it doesn't break anything, it is only considered bad form by
> some. So should we top posters be dictated where our signat
Brian Z Jones wrote:
>> 3. On mailing lists, I usually didn't write the original message, and so
>>there is no way I can remember "what I wrote".
I run my own mailing list for me and my friends. Just a place for
people to spill their thoughts and for us to plan stuff and such. It
gets a
Crash Course wrote:
> I installed the newest version of mozilla an our or so ago.
> Everything seemed to run fine until I tried to run it as myself instead
> of as root (I installed it as root of course though).
>
> Here is the dump I get when trying to run (by typing
> "/usr/local/mozil
> passed, I now prefer sending and receiving e-mail HTML formatted. It
> just looks nicer.
If that's the only reason, set your mail program to display plain text
mails in a proportional font, and dump this HTML mail rubbish which causes
so much grief to others ;-)
> Now, as for newsgroup posts,
In article <9hp0b9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave
Huang) wrote:
> I'm running the Win32 build of Mozilla 0.9.2, and was wondering if the
> Display resolution setting in the Fonts settings page actually does
> anything. I've set it to 133dpi (which is my LCD screen's res), and
> the
> Mozilla 0.9.2 is out and it's good. The browsing experience is
> excellent. The menus are more responsive and stable. I still
From my personal experience, everything about it is excellent
EXCEPT that this build broke my ability to do any online banking at my
banking site. Admittedly it's
Pleeease Mozilla: add a search engine to the newsgroup account -
just like Netscape has. Had to hunt all over the place to find this ng -
Shsh!
Cheers
John
Jason Bassford wrote:
>> Mozilla 0.9.2 is out and it's good. The browsing experience is
>> excellent. The menus are more responsive and stable. I still
>>
>
> From my personal experience, everything about it is excellent
> EXCEPT that this build broke my ability to do any online banking at
> -- Original Message ---
>
> From: Asa Dotzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To : mozilla-announce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc :
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:28:07 -0700
> Subject : mozilla.org releases Mozilla 0.9.2
>
>
> On June 29, 2001 mozilla.org made available for
Bob Davis wrote:
> There are cookies that never get written to disk.
> Is there a way to display these?
> I was trying to do it with jscript but dont know enough.
>
> thanks
> bob
>
>
Care to run this by again ?? What's the point of a "cookie" that never
gets written to disk, unless you have
Tried to import all the email addresses from Netscape - failed! This is
because the options shown in the Wizard do not include Netscape (but
include everything else though!!!) - how crazy is that??? Anybody knows
any solutions?
Rasonably impressed with Mozilla. Bit buggy - typing is slight
And it came to pass that jv wrote:
> Tried to import all the email addresses from Netscape -
> failed! This is because the options shown in the Wizard do
> not include Netscape (but include everything else though!!!)
> - how crazy is that??? Anybody knows any solutions?
>
> Rasonably impress
Okay, thanks, guys!
but how did you learn what mime time the server was sending? Where did
you look to find that out?
also, if the mime type is that far our, how come jpeg display correctly
when displayed on an html page?
Thanks again,
Steve
Justin H. wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>>I'm
On Sun, 01 Jul 2001 23:29:09 -0700, Brian Z Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>1) That is what the SUBJECT line is for, to refresh you seemingly
>limited memory with regard to our conversation.
On newsgroups and mailing lists, a single subject line can encompass a
hundred
There are cookies that are used only for the life of the browser. When
you make a cookie with no expiration date it goes away as soon as the
browser is exited. You can see this happening by setting mozilla to ask
when you get a cookie and then going to a site that needs to keep
"state". Like a
On Mon, 02 Jul 2001 00:15:52 -0400, DeMoN_LaG
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> somehow managed to type:
>You should NOT send HTML messages to newsgroups.
All blanket statements have exceptions.
There are a number of situations in which HTML mail and news postings are
appropriate (think intranets, for e
Hi,
system is win32. Use the following html-code for your test, copy the one tablerow
600x, so the table gets 600 rows:
XX-XXX-XXX-XX-000XX XX XXX wekopwe pkwepof
kpwoeblablabla2209.01.2001-XX-000_2_M.ZIP
Feedbac
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Bassford) wrote:
> From my personal experience, everything about it is excellent
> EXCEPT that this build broke my ability to do any online banking at my
> banking site.
Interesting. Here it fixed the bank access that had worked before 0.
Steve Carroll wrote:
>
> Okay, thanks, guys!
>
> but how did you learn what mime time the server was sending? Where did
> you look to find that out?
>
> also, if the mime type is that far our, how come jpeg display correctly
> when displayed on an html page?
>
> Thanks again,
> Steve
>
> Jus
Jon Hall wrote:
>
> I hadn't come across this yet, but I would have eventually. This is
> really stupid if you ask me. I hope they remove this and fix the actual
> problem.
>
Place your bets gentlemen, when will the Maozilla Politburo fix an
actual problem?
> jon
>
> Carlfish wrote:
>
> > On
On my Windows NT box, I have Netscape 6.1PR1 installed. Now, I've also
installed Mozilla 0.92. When I open 0.92, the Modern theme's toolbar
looks ugly (around each button, there is a rectangular area that is
lighter than the rest of the toolbar, making the whole toolbar ugly). It
seems this is
I think there is a better way out to solve this:
Just as in forwarding, there could be two ways to quoting text in a
reply - either reply inline or put the quoted text as an attachment.
Now the reply inline feature is meant for people who would like to
interleave their matter with the original, i
Brian Z Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you are using a mail client which highlights text based on the ">"
>> nesting level, you won't miss a thing.
>
>
>PINE doesn't do this, and was my main reader for a long time [until
>about six months ago]. I've noticed Outlook do this occasionally,
Jay Garcia wrote:
> Eyes to the Skies. wrote:
>
>
>>Jay Garcia wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Nick L-S wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Has anyone actually got this to 'play a sound' ?
Im not sure if it actually works, as i've never heard a squeak out of
mozilla when new mail arrives. Im using win2
Session variables should be accessible like any other cookie:
alert(document.cookie);
--Jason
Bob Davis wrote:
> There are cookies that are used only for the life of the browser. When
> you make a cookie with no expiration date it goes away as soon as the
> browser is exited. You can see this
RM wrote:
>
> > JTK wrote:
>
> > Uh. don't you mean "Communicator 4.x", you know, the web
> > browser/mail reader/news client that still is somehow able to put
> > Maozilla to shame almost four years later?
> >
>
> wow, you really don't have a clue, do you?
Oh I have plenty of clues, w
>
>> please go back to your windows
>>machine and stay there.
>>
>
> Done and done. Dearly wish sombody'd give me an option.
>
haha, i knew it.
>
>> please use microsoft products for all your
>>projects.
>>
>
> Please capitalize the first letter of each sentence, to make it less
> obviou
I just asked my bank (CIBC) why they have a notice saying that they
don't support nav 6.
Here is their explination:
"I am sorry to learn of the difficulties that you experienced with PC
Banking. CIBC PC Banking does not currently support Netscape 6.x
browsers.
The issue with Netscape, is that th
I've found that this is a bug (88576) which has already been fixed in
the latest nightlies.
Rajendra Shrestha wrote:
> On my Windows NT box, I have Netscape 6.1PR1 installed. Now, I've also
> installed Mozilla 0.92. When I open 0.92, the Modern theme's toolbar
> looks ugly (around each button
I had related problems in that the lock in the lower right hand corner
did not always indicate that the site was secure. It works just fine in
M 0.9.2
N. Marshall wrote:
> I just asked my bank (CIBC) why they have a notice saying that they
> don't support nav 6.
>
> Here is their explination:
Hello all,
I hava a app that displays a outline populated by RDF data from a remote
server.
for some reason, the CPU goes to 99% and mozilla starts SUCKIN memory
and system just locks up. I can't even get to the start bar on windows.
Is anyone having problem??
Gervase Markham wrote:
>>Now, as for newsgroup posts, that's a different thing, and I understand
>>that I probably should send in text format. How much of an issue is that
>>these days?
>
> Still a big one.
Which prompts the question . . . why is it still, or should it be? I
can understand,
Okay I understand how that works BUT I guess my problem is that only
shows the cookies for the site I am on.
There is now way I can think of that I can execute a jscript with out
changing sites(domains). For example when I put a jscript file on my
machine it executes but does not show the cooki
Mark wrote:
>
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> >>Now, as for newsgroup posts, that's a different thing, and I understand
> >>that I probably should send in text format. How much of an issue is that
> >>these days?
> >
> > Still a big one.
>
> Which prompts the question . . . why is it still, or sho
Mark wrote:
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>
>
>>>Now, as for newsgroup posts, that's a different thing, and I understand
>>>that I probably should send in text format. How much of an issue is that
>>>these days?
>>>
>>Still a big one.
>>
>
>
> Which prompts the question . . . why is it still, or s
I have most of my commonly used bookmarks set up in sub folders by topic
within my personal toolbar folder. This gives the effect of dropdown
menus, which is very handy.
In Mozilla 0.9.1 (and earlier), holding down the mouse button over one
of these sub folders on my toolbar popped up the men
And it came to pass that Justin H. wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>>
>> Gervase Markham wrote:
>>
>> >>Now, as for newsgroup posts, that's a different thing,
>> >>and I understand that I probably should send in text
>> >>format. How much of an issue is that these days?
>> >
>> > Still a big one.
>>
>>
Super-User wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I hava a app that displays a outline populated by RDF data from a remote
> server.
>
> for some reason, the CPU goes to 99% and mozilla starts SUCKIN memory
> and system just locks up. I can't even get to the start bar on windows.
>
> Is anyone having problem??
Justin H. wrote:
> The easiest way with netscape is to try to load the picture (even if you
> get garbled text) and then click on View -> Page Info (or CTRL+I).
Unfortunately, mozilla's view page info doesn't tell you a thing! I
assume that'll change soon. I don't need to open a special
Peter,
Afraid your going to lose on this one. I think Topposting is more logical and because
I read a lot of emails anews post its a time saver to me to see the reply first at
next thread. USENET Rules since back in the 60's and UNiX Days have an absolutely
strict rule about here the signature is
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The display resolution only affects font size defined in physical units
>(pt, pc, mm, cm, in). The other ways are setting the size in pixels and
>setting the size relative to your font size pref.
Well the font size _is_
JTK wrote:
> DeMoN_LaG wrote:
>
>>JTK wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Jon Hall wrote:
>>>
>>>
I hadn't come across this yet, but I would have eventually. This is
really stupid if you ask me. I hope they remove this and fix the actual
problem.
>>>Place your bets gentlemen, when will th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Garcia says...
>
>JTK wrote:
[snip]
>Actually he didn't spell it wrong. It's a "sniglette"
YOU SPELLED SNIGLET WRONG!
BAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
Or were you using the French spelling? In which case I retract my
BAHAHAHAAH
And it came to pass that JTK wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Garcia
> says...
>>
>>JTK wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>Actually he didn't spell it wrong. It's a "sniglette"
>
> YOU SPELLED SNIGLET WRONG!
>
A "sniglette" is like a "sniglet", but not as big.
--
}:-) Christopher Jah
Bob Davis wrote:
> There are cookies that never get written to disk.
> Is there a way to display these?
> I was trying to do it with jscript but dont know enough.
>
> thanks
> bob
>
Tasks|Privacy & Security|Cookie Manager|View Stored Cookies
--Asa
In article <9hr5n1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dave Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well the font size _is_ specified in physical units on the Fonts
>Preferences pane...
Hmm, well on closer inspection, it looks like those are pixels after all.
However, I get the feeling that the intention was for the u
Justin H. wrote:
> Because there are still people on per-minute dial-ups, or
> pay-per-connection telcos. Quite a LOT of people, in fact.
There ya go. That's a *very* good reason, and I should hang my head in
shame for forgetting that there are folks outside of the US, who might
incur very
Holger Metzger wrote:
> Would you like to receive a snail
> mail letter written in different colors, different font sizes, different
> background pictures?
Well, not necessarily, but I *do* appreciate an occasional underline for
emphasis. :) Yes, I know we can do _this_ and *that*, but after
Christopher Jahn wrote:
> And you must also figure in the fact that all these new
> 'internet appliances' - including cellphones, beepers, as well
> as those special units - will only display plaintext, OR have a
> message size limit.
That's true too. Geez . . . I definitely chose the right
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>multipart/meowbot wrote:
[snip]
>>Plus, multipart/alternative
>>doesn't deliver on the hope that it would appease those who would have
>>mail and news remain plaintext-only media forever (it just makes
>>curmudgeons angrier about the increased size),
>ROTFL! Y
Hello,
I've noticed that at least a few of the latest (now using 20010701)
Mozilla builds (running on Windows 2000 Server (SP2)) hang when loading
the following address:
http://www.huuto.net/fi/showlist.php3?tits=saab&status=N&cat=%&lcat=Z
It seems that also Internet Explorer has problems load
Ere Maijala wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that at least a few of the latest (now using 20010701)
> Mozilla builds (running on Windows 2000 Server (SP2)) hang when loading
> the following address:
> http://www.huuto.net/fi/showlist.php3?tits=saab&status=N&cat=%&lcat=Z
>
> It seems that also
jv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Pleeease Mozilla: add a search engine to the newsgroup account -
> just like Netscape has. Had to hunt all over the place to find this ng -
> Shsh!
>
Done. http://groups.google.com/groups?group=netscape.public.mozil
54 matches
Mail list logo
