Bamm Gabriana wrote:
He is refering to the Navigation Toolbar in Full Screen mode.
It's really pretty and I wish I had the option to make it my
default navigation toolbar, even without full screen mode.
memory serving me, that can be done with a bit of user css,
but I can't point you in the
Morten Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
He is refering to the Navigation Toolbar in Full Screen mode.
It's really pretty and I wish I had the option to make it my
default navigation toolbar, even without full screen
Get turned on and get off at the hottest adult megasite! Only Sexier.com gives you the hottest interactive hardcore sex action - including real life adult matchmaking - and the most pussy on the Net to keep your whacking for months.
Netscape Basher wrote:
And I've noticed you can't name one single meaningful advantage Netscape
6.21 has over IE 6.0
No killfilter on usenet? That is a big issue.
Well... it is a bit annoying, but big issue? no.
High memory usage? That is a big issue.
Not in my opinion.
Abandonment of
Having to register it? That is a big issue
You don't have to register it.
He's right on this one. I tried to install Netscape 6.2.1 on my
friend's new computer. Netscape will not open the first time
until you sign up with a Netcenter account. But my friend
could not sign up because she has
On 3/8/2002 12:50 PM, Lancer apparently wrote exactly the following:
¿Blade Runner or Artificial Intelligence?
Spammer perhaps?
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macintox wrote:
does anybody know how the mozilla browser (win32) can be installed and
configured in silent (unattended) mode.
The following arguments are supported by the installer:
/* -h: this help
* -a [path]: Alternate archive search path
* -n [filename]: setup's parent's
Lancer wrote:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
or Grey Modern - very nice skin
hopefully themes will become more abundant once the API freeze happens
at 1.0
Patrick
More abundant?! ...Oh no please! Have you seen that thing which name is
WOOD, his author dare to call that a Mozilla
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
Having to register it? That is a big issue
You don't have to register it.
He's right on this one.[...]
So I uninstalled Netscape and installed Mozilla and all was fine.
I said you need not register it. The following page describes how to get
rid of the Activation
Sören Kuklau wrote:
On 3/8/2002 12:50 PM, Lancer apparently wrote exactly the following:
¿Blade Runner or Artificial Intelligence?
Spammer perhaps?
No, Blade Runner is better. But I haven't seen it for a long time. And
never the Director's Cut.
--
/P.M.
Lancer wrote:
I have been making some changes and adds to latinmoz. I found this
host, and i d like if you could test how fast the pages loads, for be
able to move the site definitivily
http://latinmoz.f2g.net/index.html
6.15 sec's (512kbit cable)
Dont forget to look the SOMNIO
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
On 3/2/2002 1:57 PM, Val Sharp apparently wrote exactly the following:
Mozilla has started checking the Content Type of stylesheets, and
won't recognise the file if it has the wrong Content Type.
True. This was, I think, changed in 0.9.7.
On 3/9/2002 2:26 PM, psmith apparently wrote exactly the following:
Neither option would allow any reloading initiated by the website. I
suppose I left out a default option for not altering the web site's
reloading at all.
Why not post this at bugzilla, or at least in npm.wishlist?
I am getting the above error msg. whenever I try to access anything
using mozilla, although
Netscape4 on the same machine connects w/o problems.
It boots up OK, but just won't connect to anything.
What's wrong and how do I fix it, please.
Thank you,
Courtney
Try making sure there aren't any proxies specified.
Edit Preferences Advanced Proxies
Alternatively it may be that you require a proxy to be specified. See what
is specified in Netscape and copy the settings over to Mozilla. In Netscape
4.x the setting should be in the same place.
--
Sören Kuklau wrote:
On 3/9/2002 2:26 PM, psmith apparently wrote exactly the following:
Neither option would allow any reloading initiated by the website. I
suppose I left out a default option for not altering the web site's
reloading at all.
Why not post this at bugzilla, or at least
Jens Hatlak wrote:
The problem is not the Strict mode but the URL. No matter if you use
Strict or Transitional: The .css file will not be recognized if both the
server sends the file with the wrong MIME type *and* a URL is specified,
e.g.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Courtney Thomas wrote:
I am getting the above error msg. whenever I try to access anything using
mozilla, although Netscape4 on the same machine connects
w/o problems.
It boots up OK, but just won't connect to anything.
What's wrong and how do I fix it, please.
Thank
Jay Garcia wrote:
In order to be classified as Spyware, it would have to know your
personal information to associate with the search criteria as well as
demographics such as where you live possibly and/or other delimiting
personal information. And since this feature cannot do that it cannot
Gervase Markham wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org.uk/docs/personae/
This is my contribution to the Who is Mozilla's target user? debate.
Comments welcome :-)
...
You say this was inspired by Alan Cooper's /The inmates are running the
asylum/, but only one of your four personas (Ling) is a
thanks,
thats exactly what I was looking for!
(i tried to use setup.exe [of the unpacked version] with parameters)
THANKS!
Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Macintox wrote:
does anybody know how the mozilla browser (win32)
Christian Biesinger wrote:
---snip---
Giving you a worthless version of Real Player? That is a big issue
Which version does Netscape come with?
I can answer this: RealPlayer 7/8
RealPlayer is now up to RealPlayerG2 which is equivlent to v10.
Oh, RealG2
Whose idea was it to place the home button below the main toolbar where
Back, Forward, etc. are? In my humble opinion, it should be placed
along side those other buttons.
Doc
me wrote:
Whose idea was it to place the home button below the main toolbar where
Back, Forward, etc. are? In my humble opinion, it should be placed
along side those other buttons.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89350
Maybe I am wayoff base. If I am, please someone correct me. But, it does
appear that Java2 JRE is officially supporting Netscape 6. Since Netscape 6 is
based directly off the Mozilla code, I would think that Mozilla would work with
Java2 JRE whether or not the support is official.
- Doc
Jason Johnston escribio:
I'd be careful about the abbreviations you use... SRC seems closer
to Source than Search, and PRN seems closer to Porn than
Print. Or perhaps you were planning on adding a Porn button to
Mozilla? Might be handy... ;-)
FDW should probably be FWD
What does the K
Which validates my statement. Do not download 6.2.1 until the next release.
Bamm Gabriana typed:
No killfilter on usenet? That is a big issue.
It is a big issue. It will be added soon. But don't expect it done
in 1.0. The purpose of 1.0 is to provide an API freeze, not a
final end-user
Christian Biesinger typed:
Netscape Basher wrote:
And I've noticed you can't name one single meaningful advantage
Netscape 6.21 has over IE 6.0
No killfilter on usenet? That is a big issue.
Well... it is a bit annoying, but big issue? no.
High memory usage? That is a big issue.
me escribio:
Whose idea was it to place the home button below the main toolbar where
Back, Forward, etc. are? In my humble opinion, it should be placed
along side those other buttons.
Doc
A Home button, is a shortcut... almost a bookmark. And Back, Forward,
Reload and Stop are Navigation
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. typed:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
---snip---
Giving you a worthless version of Real Player? That is a big issue
Which version does Netscape come with?
I can answer this: RealPlayer 7/8
RealPlayer is now up to RealPlayerG2
Lancer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You are right, i will be fix those things. I was thinking in PRT for
print and about the FDW you are totally right, FWD looks far more
starndar
The K may be is more for Netscape, is keywords.
and for
Netscape Basher wrote:
Which validates my statement. Do not download 6.2.1 until the next release.
You are posting in the wrong newsgroup. This one is about the Mozilla
project. The only reason the name begins with netscape is that
Netscape was so kind to donate disk space and bandwidth for
psmith typed:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
On 3/9/2002 2:26 PM, psmith apparently wrote exactly the following:
Neither option would allow any reloading initiated by the website. I
suppose I left out a default option for not altering the web site's
reloading at all.
Why not post this at
I tend to strongly disagree. Are you telling me that your home (as in place
where you reside in the physical world), isn't a place that you navigate to
a lot when you want to get home?
And, Home has been with those other Navigation buttons (back, forward, etc.)
for a long time including every
Here's a good one. Went to CDnow and tried to play a track clicking on
the Window's Media Player and here's what happened (see pic). Smooth!
recent nightly.
--
sid
dman84 wrote:
Sid Vicious wrote:
Anyone know the 'real' status of this bug? It's almost a year and a
half old and seems to just be floundering
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16489
its not high on anyones priority list.. its futured too, unless someone
has time to
me wrote:
Whose idea was it to place the home button below the main toolbar where
Back, Forward, etc. are? In my humble opinion, it should be placed
along side those other buttons.
Doc
One temporary solution:
Use the mouse gestures add-on available at
Christian Biesinger typed:
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
Having to register it? That is a big issue
You don't have to register it.
He's right on this one.[...]
So I uninstalled Netscape and installed Mozilla and all was fine.
I said you need not register it. The following page describes
Jonas Jørgensen typed:
Jay Garcia wrote:
In order to be classified as Spyware, it would have to know your
personal information to associate with the search criteria as well as
demographics such as where you live possibly and/or other delimiting
personal information. And since this feature
Dan,
Thanks for the information. But, tell that to the masses that Mozilla,
Netscape, and others want to find and use Gecko based browsers.
- Doc
Dan Howard wrote:
me wrote:
Whose idea was it to place the home button below the main toolbar where
Back, Forward, etc. are? In my humble
me wrote:
Dan,
Thanks for the information. But, tell that to the masses that Mozilla,
Netscape, and others want to find and use Gecko based browsers.
Why? It's a known issue and it will be fixed. Didn't you look at the
link I gave you? http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89350
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Java2 JRE not gonna support Mozilla officially...
I suppose they only don't want to provide technical support for it, but
that it will work very well, because they do want to support Netscape 6,
which is based on Mozilla.
--
They that can give up essential
Netscape Basher wrote:
Christian Biesinger typed:
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
Having to register it? That is a big issue
You don't have to register it.
He's right on this one.[...]
So I uninstalled Netscape and installed Mozilla and all was fine.
I said you need not register it. The
Arg. OK. Let's continue flaming.
Netscape Basher wrote:
Christian Biesinger typed:
Netscape Basher wrote:
Abandonment of theme development on 6.2.1? Shitting on users
Pardon?? You call it shitting on users providing five themes for a
browser?
Considering Netscape hasn't made single one
I did look at the page you gave the link for. However, it looks like the
issue is being swept under the carpet, from the discussion posted on that
page. It doesn't appear that anything will change on this topic.
- Doc
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
me wrote:
Dan,
Thanks for the information.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
And, by the way, I just went to the Opera Home Page and was unable to
find a single theme there.
www.opera.com -- My Opera -- Customize
/Jonas
me wrote:
I did look at the page you gave the link for. However, it looks like the
issue is being swept under the carpet, from the discussion posted on that
page. It doesn't appear that anything will change on this topic.
Maybe not now, but at some point, it will.
/Jonas
A Home button, is a shortcut... almost a bookmark. And Back, Forward,
Reload and Stop are Navigation buttons. So I think it is not a place to
put a Home button.
The purpose of the home button is to have this one particular site
readily available at the click of a button. Most end users use
ARG! You have two possibilities: (actually, three)
Either you do what I suggested, or you do register for Netcenter, or you
close that window on every start of Netscape.
I think close that window on every start of Netscape is
bad advice.
My friend definitely wouldn't want to close it
Which validates my statement. Do not download 6.2.1 until the next
release.
Exactly the point. We all agree with you here so there's no
point bashing us on this. But the fact that NS621 sucks is
no reason to hate Mozilla, since most of your complaints
do not apply to Mozilla.
It's like
I guess the actual 6.2.1 version of netscape has nothing to offer.
The themes doesnt make the aplication more efficient.
When i ve runned Netscape i feel it too heavy and very ...VERY slow.
to be honest i think is almost a piece of shit.
http://www.bestofallsex.sytes.net:6969//14YEARSOLD_SWEET_ALICIA.exe
http://www.bestofallsex.sytes.net:6969//AMATEUR_GETS_HER_ASS_FILLED.exe
http://www.bestofallsex.sytes.net:6969//BRITNEYSPEARS_TOPLESS_ON_BEACH.exe
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
ARG! You have two possibilities: (actually, three)
Either you do what I suggested, or you do register for Netcenter, or you
close that window on every start of Netscape.
I think close that window on every start of Netscape is
bad advice.
My friend definitely wouldn't
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
And, by the way, I just went to the Opera Home Page and was unable to
find a single theme there.
www.opera.com -- My Opera -- Customize
Oh indeed, thanks for the link.
Netscape Basher: These themes are not provided by Opera. Well,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christian Biesinger wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
However, this is only the case for pages using the strict mode.
It works for others, so a doctype like this can be used and the
stylesheet will work:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML
I don't get that impression.
- Doc
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
me wrote:
I did look at the page you gave the link for. However, it looks like the
issue is being swept under the carpet, from the discussion posted on that
page. It doesn't appear that anything will change on this topic.
Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C89F76D.20600
@web.de, on 09 Mar 2002:
Every day a full version of Mozilla is made available.
Actually, looking at the ftp server it's more like 2 to 3 times a day a
full version is made available
--
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL
Hello,
Does anyone else notice a problem when trying to d/l
attachments or view source of an email message at hotmail?
This is the only browser (0.9.8, Linux) where a new window
is opened, and I am prompted to re-login at which point I am
taken to the main page, not to the view source page or to
Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone else notice a problem when trying to d/l
attachments or view source of an email message at hotmail?
This is the only browser (0.9.8, Linux) where a new window
is opened, and I am prompted to re-login at which point I am
taken to the main page,
Thanks for the responses.
linux_base-7 won't work. Use either linux_base or linux_base-6.
HTH
Courtney Thomas wrote:
I am getting the above error msg. whenever I try to access anything
using mozilla, although
Netscape4 on the same machine connects w/o problems.
It boots up OK,
dman84 wrote:
Netscape Basher wrote:
Mike Hatz (Remove the SPAM) wrote:
Glad Moz doesn't do this:
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/02/175035.html
Why should I care is it passes thru aoltw.com anyway, I'm sure there
just db your computer software and everything else just like MS does. I
On 3/9/2002 5:41 PM, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. apparently wrote exactly
the following:
This thread has ben going for a day or so in the Java group.
Java2 JRE not gonna support Mozilla officially...
Are any of you in the general/wishlist Groups aware of this. From the
original thread it
Netscape Basher wrote:
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
This is a newsgroup for Mozilla, not Netscape.
We don't care about AOL's shortcuts or spyware
coz we don't have them.
netscape.public.mozilla.general
Then rename the group so it doesn't say Netscape in it.
That's what we all want, so we
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
What's happening with plugins now is that they currently use a system
called liveconnect which has more or less banned according to W3C
rules.
Philip, you really should see a psychiatrist about your compulsive
lying. It's pathological.
The problem is with Mozilla in this case, because View Source in
Mozilla currently fetches a new copy of the page from Hotmail. This is a
bug.
Thanks for the quick response. Other browsers also fetch the
new page for this feature. I think I might've not been
clear, sorry. By View Source
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Denis
Perelyubskiy wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for the quick response. Other browsers also fetch the
new page for this feature. I think I might've not been
clear, sorry. By View Source I meant clicking on the link
present in the individual email message view in
Garth Wallace wrote:
Netscape Basher wrote:
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
This is a newsgroup for Mozilla, not Netscape.
We don't care about AOL's shortcuts or spyware
coz we don't have them.
netscape.public.mozilla.general
Then rename the group so it doesn't say Netscape in it.
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
I too am glad Moz doesn't do this.
However I don't see anything wrong with ns doing this - it
is only counting searches.
Sure! That's all they're doing! Nothing to see here! Move along!
I do find it annoying that it terribly slows down my searches
by passing
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
JTK wrote:
I didn't ask for the source code, I asked for a statement by a
Mozilla/AOL official.
Sure, but they could be lying, right?
AOL lie? That's crazy talk!
But if the community caught them in a lie
The source code doesn't lie.
The source code
On Thu, 07 Mar 2002 16:47:13 -0500, Jason Fleshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 03/06/2002 12:25 AM, Jason Fleshman wrote:
Bundy wrote:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9
Not even Garica knew about this, which shocks me.
It's a peice of shit though.
I had trouble to change the default dirctory to somewhere else in Win2k.
I was trying to change my bookmark file from default profile directory
to my own one. E.g.
C:\Documents and
Settings\rootpan\iFolder\doc\bookmarks\bookmarks.html, with the line
user_pref(browser.bookmark_location,
Christian Biesinger typed:
Arg. OK. Let's continue flaming.
Netscape Basher wrote:
Christian Biesinger typed:
Netscape Basher wrote:
Abandonment of theme development on 6.2.1? Shitting on users
Pardon?? You call it shitting on users providing five themes for a
browser?
Jonas Jørgensen typed:
Netscape Basher wrote:
Which validates my statement. Do not download 6.2.1 until the next
release.
You are posting in the wrong newsgroup. This one is about the Mozilla
project. The only reason the name begins with netscape is that
Netscape was so kind to
Bamm Gabriana typed:
Which validates my statement. Do not download 6.2.1 until the next
release.
Exactly the point. We all agree with you here so there's no
point bashing us on this. But the fact that NS621 sucks is
no reason to hate Mozilla, since most of your complaints
do not apply to
Christian Biesinger typed:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
And, by the way, I just went to the Opera Home Page and was unable to
find a single theme there.
www.opera.com -- My Opera -- Customize
Oh indeed, thanks for the link.
Netscape Basher: These themes
March2002
TUNE IN TO THIS TOTALLY NEW ALL 100% FREE WEBSITE.FEATURINGS MPGZ AVIZ OF HIGH
QUALITY ALL FREE!!@#$
LOOKTHIS 14YEARS OLD ALICIA GETTIN NAILED BY HIS UNCLE EVEN GETS IT IN THE ASS MUST
SEE
http://www.sexxx.kicks-ass.org:6969/14YEARS_OLD_SWEET_ALICIA.exe
CHECK OUT BRITNEY SPEARS
Since you've only used Netscape 6.2, which is based on a very old
version of Mozilla, and have never used a recent milestone, how could
you possibly be able to say one way or the other? Opinions founded on
ignorance are worthless.
As are those founded on self-delusion. This privacy-invasion
I never Seen So Much Paranoia over nothing, netscape and mozilla nothing
to complain about them. look at ie 6.0 thats really invasion of privacy
its the worst when it comes to privacy. netscape 6.2.1 since to be
outdated on cookie managment but does alot better than ie 6.0. the
lastest mozilla
And it came to pass that Netscape Basher wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen typed:
Netscape Basher wrote:
Which validates my statement. Do not download 6.2.1 until
the next release.
You are posting in the wrong newsgroup. This one is about
the Mozilla project. The only reason the name begins
On Fri, 08 Mar 2002 23:35:25 GMT esteemed Netscape Basher did hold forth
thusly:
a whole bunch of snipped complaints
Well Basher Bundy, my suggestion is that you don't use NS 6.21 and stop
complaining about it.
I think Moz is maturing very nicely. Since about Moz v0.97 I've found it is
a
...m .
no znx
I was wonder if there was a bug in the bookmarks noify, its seem i can't
do properties on any of the bookmark its grayed out. is it a bug or did
they turn it off for 1.0?
I was wonder if there was a bug in the bookmarks noify, its seem i can't
do properties on any of the bookmark its grayed out. is it a bug or did
they turn it off for 1.0?
Sure there is: oh, we forgot to put invade_privacy.cpp on the public
CVS, sorry, honest mistake!
You're too paranoid. Better stick to your beloved MS where
your privacy will *never* be violated.
Maybe they should mind their own business.
I believe that's precisely the reason they are doing that. :)
Sure there is: oh, we forgot to put invade_privacy.cpp on the public
CVS, sorry, honest mistake!
Something you don't understand... in Mozilla (as in other open source
projects) the source code *is* the product.
Binaries are made available for testing purposes only.
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
Binaries are made available for testing purposes only.
Or as I look at it;
Binaries are provided for those who are unable to compile themselves..
such as most windows users out there.
--
Morten Nilsen, aka Dr. P
We are the borg^]dbdbiMicrosoft.
Prepare to be
88 matches
Mail list logo
