Justin E. Harlow III wrote:
Crash Course wrote:
snip
I installed the newest version of mozilla an our or so ago. Everything
seemed to run fine until I tried to run it as myself instead of as root
(I installed it as root of course though).
snip
I am running Mandrak 8.0 on a
Crash Course wrote:
Greetings!
I installed the newest version of mozilla an our or so ago. Everything
seemed to run fine until I tried to run it as myself instead of as root
(I installed it as root of course though).
Here is the dump I get when trying to run (by typing
Any idea about bugzilla # or timetable to be fixed.
thanks
bob
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Bob Davis wrote:
So is this a bug? It should be if it isn't
bob
It's a known bug, view source downloads a new copy from the server
rather than taking the page from the cache
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Bob Davis wrote:
So is this a bug? It should be if it isn't
bob
It's a known bug, view source downloads a new copy from the server
rather than taking the page from the cache
Sean Malloy wrote:
Bob Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.wef.net/invoicesOL/IOL_form.html
Its a form so you have to fill in some data which then takes you to a
page thats being generated by a cgi script.
So I cant give you a direct link.
The problem is when I save as or view source I
Ralinx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Alejandro Alvarez Melcon wrote:
I am having a lot of problems with Mozilla 0.9.2;
a bit surprised though, since 0.9.1 worked just fine.
Apparently the plugins do not work even if they are
copied into the plugins
Richard Kuryk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am a web developer and I really love the new mozilla but I have
noticed when you click to view source it downloads the page from the
server rather than the page you are looking at. Probably most times
So is this a bug?
It should be if it isn't
bob
Sean Malloy wrote:
Bob Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.wef.net/invoicesOL/IOL_form.html
Its a form so you have to fill in some data which then takes you to a
page thats being generated by a cgi script.
So I cant give you a direct
Bob Davis wrote:
So is this a bug? It should be if it isn't
bob
It's a known bug, view source downloads a new copy from the server
rather than taking the page from the cache
I am a web developer and I really love the new mozilla but I have
noticed when you click to view source it downloads the page from the
server rather than the page you are looking at. Probably most times
this is okay but much of the web today is dynamic and isn't always the
same source you
Richard Kuryk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a web developer and I really love the new mozilla but I have
noticed when you click to view source it downloads the page from the
server rather than the page you are looking at. Probably most times
this is okay but much of the web today is dynamic
Following the link below leads you to a clickable map for internet
resources in Thailand. It's clickable in NS 4.77 but not in Mozilla
0.9.2, at least not for me.
http://ntl.nectec.or.th/internet/map/current.html
Anyone else having the same problem? Do I need to make any changes in my
:
Hi everybody,
Did i miss something here?
Mozilla refuses to resolv host names (entering IP-address works)
1° I got netscape 4.77 working perfectly on same machine (Suse 7.1)
2° Configuration in mozilla 0.9.2 is identical to the one in netscape
4.77
3° My ISP forces me to use a http-proxy (via
Hello,
Sorry for disturbing, but I got
Internal error: Null plugin manager
after trying to see a page with java in mozilla 0.9.2 .
I checked the PATH and about:plugins
I installed as a normal user both packges: mozilla and j2re.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
I am using Mandrake 8.0, which I have been pretty happy with up till now. I
also had been using Mozilla 0.8 which comes with the package.
I have had no reported problems with system hiccups or the like.
Last night I downloaded the latest version of Mozilla from RPMFIND. The RPM
was developed
hihihi wrote:
Alejandro Alvarez Melcon wrote:
I am having a lot of problems with Mozilla 0.9.2;
a bit surprised though, since 0.9.1 worked just fine.
Apparently the plugins do not work even if they are
copied into the plugins directory
I have problems with java plugin.
0.9.2
Actually, Gerv, they're not required to. Section VI of the NPL:
IV. Inability to Comply Due to Contractual Obligation.
Prior to licensing the Original Code under this License, Netscape has licensed
third party code for use in Netscape's Branded Code. To the extent that Netscape
is limited
JTK wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
6.x are added/refined, etc.
That's not true;
That is 100%+ true and you damn well know it Mr.
Gervase Markham wrote:
JTK wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
6.x are added/refined, etc.
That's not true;
That is 100%+ true
On 06 Jul 2001 15:57:38 -0500, JTK wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
JTK wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
6.x are added/refined,
Bren.. wrote:
i'd wait.. i'm sure netscape will throw out another release in a month.
Saw a comment on a Bugzilla bug that indicated that NS planned to build
the first NS6.1 RTM candidate this past tuesday. Won't be very long now
until 6.1 is released.
--
http://www.classic-games.com/
No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
6.x are added/refined, etc.
That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making source
releases (at the same time it makes binary
In a certain LUG I came across an indication
of a possible bug in Mozilla 0.9.2 Someone
was complaining his mozilla died when opening
this trivial html file:
You need http://www.mozilla.org/quality/help/bug-form.html :-)
Gerv
Gervase Markham wrote:
No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
6.x are added/refined, etc.
That's not true;
That is 100%+ true and you damn well know it Mr. Markham. Do not try to
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Gervase Markham wrote:
No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
6.x are added/refined, etc.
That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making source
Gervase Markham wrote:
No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
6.x are added/refined, etc.
That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making source
releases (at
JTK wrote:
Netscape should, if we read the license,
*IF*.
You should do this, as I demonstrate below.
So where's the code for that sweet AIM program? Yeah.
AIM is not part of the browser, thus would not be required to have available
source code, even if NS were required to release their
Hi,
See subject...
Edwin Overmeer wrote:
See subject...
in my opinion yes, because I have the impression that bugs are removed faster.
What I don't understand, how mozilla 0.9x and Netscape Navigator 6.x coherent.
Somebody here who can tell me more about the philosophy behind this 2 productlines?
bye
ZZT wrote:
Edwin Overmeer wrote:
See subject...
in my opinion yes, because I have the impression that bugs are removed faster.
What I don't understand, how mozilla 0.9x and Netscape Navigator 6.x coherent.
Somebody here who can tell me more about the philosophy behind this 2
Jay Garcia wrote:
Mozilla is the Mozilla Open Source Project being developed by
engineers connected to Mozilla.Org as well as contributing
engineers/programmers outside of the Mozilla infrastructure. Netscape 6
is a co-branded version of Mozilla being developed by engineers employed
by
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], ZZT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't understand, how mozilla 0.9x and Netscape Navigator 6.x
coherent.
Netscape 6.1 PR1 is Mozilla 0.9.1 without Chatzilla and with Netscape
Instant Messenger, bundled plug-ins, Netscape partner stuff, branding
and
And it came to pass that ZZT wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Mozilla is the Mozilla Open Source Project being
developed by engineers connected to Mozilla.Org as well as
contributing engineers/programmers outside of the Mozilla
infrastructure. Netscape 6 is a co-branded version of
Mozilla being
Edwin Overmeer wrote:
Hi,
See subject...
personally i prefered netscape's PR1 release over the then current mozilla
release 0.9.1. however, as always the latest release contains a few things
that make it worth using over older releases.
if you don't have anything better to do and the
I am having a lot of problems with Mozilla 0.9.2;
a bit surprised though, since 0.9.1 worked just fine.
Apparently the plugins do not work even if they are
copied into the plugins directory (for instance flash player
does not work in 0.9.2). Also the .wav plugin does not work,
and I get
copied into the plugins directory (for instance flash player
does not work in 0.9.2).
Flash works for me just fine, running Linux 2.2.18 and Mozilla 0.9.2 .
Alejandro Alvarez Melcon wrote:
I am having a lot of problems with Mozilla 0.9.2;
a bit surprised though, since 0.9.1 worked just fine.
Apparently the plugins do not work even if they are
copied into the plugins directory
I have problems with java plugin.
0.9.2 crashes..
None
Alejandro Alvarez Melcon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am having a lot of problems with Mozilla 0.9.2;
a bit surprised though, since 0.9.1 worked just fine.
Apparently the plugins do not work even if they are
copied into the plugins directory (for instance flash player
does not work in 0.9.2
Hi,
In a certain LUG I came across an indication
of a possible bug in Mozilla 0.9.2 Someone
was complaining his mozilla died when opening
this trivial html file:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML//EN
HTML
HEAD
META HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html; charset=x-user-defined
ZZT wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Mozilla is the Mozilla Open Source Project being developed by
engineers connected to Mozilla.Org as well as contributing
engineers/programmers outside of the Mozilla infrastructure. Netscape 6
is a co-branded version of Mozilla being developed by engineers
Crash Course wrote:
I installed the newest version of mozilla an our or so ago.
Everything seemed to run fine until I tried to run it as myself instead
of as root (I installed it as root of course though).
Here is the dump I get when trying to run (by typing
Mozilla 0.9.2 is out and it's good. The browsing experience is
excellent. The menus are more responsive and stable. I still
From my personal experience, everything about it is excellent
EXCEPT that this build broke my ability to do any online banking at my
banking site. Admittedly it's
Jason Bassford wrote:
Mozilla 0.9.2 is out and it's good. The browsing experience is
excellent. The menus are more responsive and stable. I still
From my personal experience, everything about it is excellent
EXCEPT that this build broke my ability to do any online banking at my
Super-User wrote:
Hello all,
I hava a app that displays a outline populated by RDF data from a remote
server.
for some reason, the CPU goes to 99% and mozilla starts SUCKIN memory
and system just locks up. I can't even get to the start bar on windows.
Is anyone having problem??
Found
Al Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mozilla 0.9.2 is out and it's good. The browsing experience is
excellent. The menus are more responsive and stable. I still
notice a little roughness in the Mail and News client, but
everything works fine for me. The best news -- you can now turn
off
Greetings!
I installed the newest version of mozilla an our or so ago. Everything
seemed to run fine until I tried to run it as myself instead of as root
(I installed it as root of course though).
Here is the dump I get when trying to run (by typing
/usr/local/mozilla/mozilla on the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Crash Course wrote:
I installed the newest version of mozilla an our or so ago. Everything
seemed to run fine until I tried to run it as myself instead of as root
(I installed it as root of course though).
When you installed it as root, Mozilla runs with
Mozilla 0.9.2 is out and it's good. The browsing experience is
excellent. The menus are more responsive and stable. I still
notice a little roughness in the Mail and News client, but
everything works fine for me. The best news -- you can now turn
off those annoying GIF animation ads. This one
48 matches
Mail list logo
