[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Bill Hart
Please, be my guest. The directory is in my home directory. It is /home/wbhart/mpir-repo-working/ You won't be able to read the password file, but it's easy to create a new one. To check it out myself I typed: svn co file:///home/wbhart/mpir-repo-working/mpir-svn-repo/ mpir-test I don't know i

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Jason Martin
Hi Brian, I also modified gmp_h.in, but there is always a chance that I forgot to check it in or something else. However, I'm certainly willing to dig into the code and see what's going on when SVN is back up. I'll also run some performance comparisons on pre-versus-post patch code. Hi Bill,

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Cactus
On Nov 6, 5:28 pm, "Jason Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now you're starting to make me nervous that there is a repository > problem!!  I spent many hours merging Moller's gmp_h.in into ours.  I > also replaced the GMP gcd routine with Moller's so his routines should > be getting called.

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Cactus
On Nov 6, 5:46 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Cactus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 6, 5:28 pm, "Jason Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Now you're starting to make me nervous that there is a repository > >> problem!!  I spent

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Cactus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 6, 5:28 pm, "Jason Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Now you're starting to make me nervous that there is a repository >> problem!! I spent many hours merging Moller's gmp_h.in into ours. I >> also replaced th

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Jason Martin
I'm happy to switch to mercurial if everyone else agrees with it. Right now, I think the Bill has the definitive "repository" for eMPIRe, so I'll let him make that call. --jason Jason Worth Martin Asst. Professor of Mathematics http://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:46 PM,

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Jason Martin
No. I didn't do any speed tests. I just did correctness tests. I'm happy to do the speed tests as soon as SVN is back up, I just don't want to lose any work. (Since I work on several different computers, I **completely rely** on SVN to synchronize what I'm doing. The same is true with my pers

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Cactus
On Nov 6, 5:28 pm, "Jason Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now you're starting to make me nervous that there is a repository > problem!!  I spent many hours merging Moller's gmp_h.in into ours.  I > also replaced the GMP gcd routine with Moller's so his routines should > be getting called.

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Jason Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now you're starting to make me nervous that there is a repository > problem!! I spent many hours merging Moller's gmp_h.in into ours. I > also replaced the GMP gcd routine with Moller's so his routines should > be gettin

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Jason Martin
Now you're starting to make me nervous that there is a repository problem!! I spent many hours merging Moller's gmp_h.in into ours. I also replaced the GMP gcd routine with Moller's so his routines should be getting called. Anyway, get SVN back up and I'll be happy to dig in and see what's goin

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Bill Hart
Here is a page on svnserve: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch06s03.html If anyone can translate this for me I'd be happy to type the appropriate things in to sage.math. It's written in the typical style of linux documentation, assuming the reader already knows what they are doing. It's total

[mpir-devel] Re: Moller's gcd code

2008-11-06 Thread Cactus
On Nov 5, 6:18 pm, "Bill Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just compiled and linked again from a fresh session on sage.math and > the result is the same. > > I can only guess that something is wrong on the amd64. Either that, or > the most recent version in the copy of the svn repo that I hav