On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Cactus wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 23, 10:52 pm, mabshoff dortmund.de> wrote:
>> On Feb 23, 2:44 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Do Brian and Mariah have trac accounts?
>>
>> I am not sure, but I would tend to say no.
>>
>> > Is it easy to upload a whole
>> > p
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Hi Mariah and Brian,
>
> I don't think I am the group owner, so whoever it is, could they
> enable file upload for us.
The owner's of mpir-devel are me, Michael Abshoff, Jason Martin, and Bill Hart.
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of M
On Feb 23, 9:29 pm, Mariah wrote:
> Bill,
>
> > We need to be slightly careful. Note that the license for gmpbench
> > states that we may not report our results as gmpbench results, as we
> > are not comparing official releases of GMP. For this reason we have
> > forked gmpbench and called it m
On Feb 23, 10:52 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2:44 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Do Brian and Mariah have trac accounts?
>
> I am not sure, but I would tend to say no.
>
> > Is it easy to upload a whole
> > pile of files to a ticket without uploading them all individually?
>
> No, it
On Feb 23, 2:44 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
Hi,
> Do Brian and Mariah have trac accounts?
I am not sure, but I would tend to say no.
> Is it easy to upload a whole
> pile of files to a ticket without uploading them all individually?
No, it has to be one by one unless you attach a tarball.
> Bill
On Feb 23, 10:41 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2:32 pm, Cactus wrote:
>
> > On Feb 23, 10:26 pm, Cactus wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Does file uploading need to be enabled in some way?
>
> > It looks as if the group owner has not enabled file uploading for
> > members.
>
> > I run this group:
>
> >
Do Brian and Mariah have trac accounts? Is it easy to upload a whole
pile of files to a ticket without uploading them all individually?
Bill.
2009/2/23 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Feb 23, 2:32 pm, Cactus wrote:
>> On Feb 23, 10:26 pm, Cactus wrote:
>
>
>
>> > Does file uploading need to be enabled
Hi Mariah and Brian,
I don't think I am the group owner, so whoever it is, could they
enable file upload for us.
Yes, I think it would be good for both of you (Brian and Mariah) to
upload your copies of what will be mpirbench. My version is not that
much different. I only changed the name and th
On Feb 23, 2:32 pm, Cactus wrote:
> On Feb 23, 10:26 pm, Cactus wrote:
> > Does file uploading need to be enabled in some way?
>
> It looks as if the group owner has not enabled file uploading for
> members.
>
> I run this group:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sunday-times-teaser-solut
On Feb 23, 10:26 pm, Cactus wrote:
> On Feb 23, 9:29 pm, Mariah wrote:
>
>
>
> > Bill,
>
> > > We need to be slightly careful. Note that the license for gmpbench
> > > states that we may not report our results as gmpbench results, as we
> > > are not comparing official releases of GMP. For thi
On Feb 23, 9:29 pm, Mariah wrote:
> Bill,
>
> > We need to be slightly careful. Note that the license for gmpbench
> > states that we may not report our results as gmpbench results, as we
> > are not comparing official releases of GMP. For this reason we have
> > forked gmpbench and called it m
Bill,
> We need to be slightly careful. Note that the license for gmpbench
> states that we may not report our results as gmpbench results, as we
> are not comparing official releases of GMP. For this reason we have
> forked gmpbench and called it mpirbench. We should report the results
> as mpir
Done
On Monday 23 February 2009 17:21:25 Bill Hart wrote:
> Yes we can.
>
> 2009/2/23 Cactus :
> > On Feb 23, 3:22 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> >> I've finished with the core2 and K8 branches now , so I can delete them
> >> , I assume the svn log will be transfered/kept in trunk?
> >>
Yes we can.
2009/2/23 Cactus :
>
>
>
> On Feb 23, 3:22 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>> I've finished with the core2 and K8 branches now , so I can delete them , I
>> assume the svn log will be transfered/kept in trunk?
>>
>> Is this OK , Brian?
>>
>> Jason
>
> Yes, that is fine by me. I
On Feb 23, 3:22 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> I've finished with the core2 and K8 branches now , so I can delete them , I
> assume the svn log will be transfered/kept in trunk?
>
> Is this OK , Brian?
>
> Jason
Yes, that is fine by me. I think we can also delete the toom3 branch
as w
I've finished with the core2 and K8 branches now , so I can delete them , I
assume the svn log will be transfered/kept in trunk?
Is this OK , Brian?
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir
I have one of those. But I can't give access to it. If you have
trouble with yours I can try on mine, I believe.
Bill.
2009/2/23 :
>
>
> I should have access to a Pentium D 64 bit machine tonight , so I can test the
> new code on it , and if its any good we can have a directory for that as well
I should have access to a Pentium D 64 bit machine tonight , so I can test the
new code on it , and if its any good we can have a directory for that as well
Jason
On Monday 23 February 2009 13:42:17 Cactus wrote:
> On Feb 23, 12:17 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > On Monday 23 February
On Feb 23, 12:17 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Monday 23 February 2009 12:06:28 Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
>
> > 2009/2/23 Cactus :
> > > On Feb 23, 10:03 am, Bill Hart wrote:
> > >> I've closed all the MPIR 0.9.0 trac tickets which were resolved.
>
> > >> I opened a few new ones for MPIR
If the sage.math machine is overloaded you could try ssh mod
That machine is identical. It is officially for modular forms
development, but if you have access and it is not loaded I am sure no
one will mind you running some short timings.
Bill.
2009/2/23 :
>
> On Monday 23 February 2009 12:12:
On Monday 23 February 2009 12:12:59 Bill Hart wrote:
> I think SkyNet/eno is a Core 2. It would be interesting to see what
> score one obtains on a slower Core 2 machine to test the idea that
> these scores scale linearly with clock speed.
>
> At the moment it looks like we'd be about 10% behind G
On Monday 23 February 2009 12:12:59 Bill Hart wrote:
> I think SkyNet/eno is a Core 2. It would be interesting to see what
> score one obtains on a slower Core 2 machine to test the idea that
> these scores scale linearly with clock speed.
>
> At the moment it looks like we'd be about 10% behind G
Good point.
2009/2/23 :
>
> On Monday 23 February 2009 12:06:28 Bill Hart wrote:
>> 2009/2/23 Cactus :
>> > On Feb 23, 10:03 am, Bill Hart wrote:
>> >> I've closed all the MPIR 0.9.0 trac tickets which were resolved.
>> >>
>> >> I opened a few new ones for MPIR 1.0.0 and made some blockers,
>>
On Monday 23 February 2009 12:06:28 Bill Hart wrote:
> 2009/2/23 Cactus :
> > On Feb 23, 10:03 am, Bill Hart wrote:
> >> I've closed all the MPIR 0.9.0 trac tickets which were resolved.
> >>
> >> I opened a few new ones for MPIR 1.0.0 and made some blockers,
> >> including the two serious issues
I think SkyNet/eno is a Core 2. It would be interesting to see what
score one obtains on a slower Core 2 machine to test the idea that
these scores scale linearly with clock speed.
At the moment it looks like we'd be about 10% behind GMP 4.3 if the
benchmarks do scale linearly.
Bill.
2009/2/23
2009/2/23 Cactus :
>
>
>
> On Feb 23, 10:03 am, Bill Hart wrote:
>> I've closed all the MPIR 0.9.0 trac tickets which were resolved.
>>
>> I opened a few new ones for MPIR 1.0.0 and made some blockers,
>> including the two serious issues Mariah reported.
>>
>> Can you guys scan down the list to s
I've done the merge , it is only marginally faster than before ,probably
because there were not many inc/dec's , and there is probably a still a fair
amount of slack in the functions.
I got a bench of 10364 on sage.math
On Sunday 22 February 2009 22:34:11 Jason Martin wrote:
> Sounds fine.
>
On Feb 23, 10:03 am, Bill Hart wrote:
> I've closed all the MPIR 0.9.0 trac tickets which were resolved.
>
> I opened a few new ones for MPIR 1.0.0 and made some blockers,
> including the two serious issues Mariah reported.
>
> Can you guys scan down the list to see if any other tickets should
I've closed all the MPIR 0.9.0 trac tickets which were resolved.
I opened a few new ones for MPIR 1.0.0 and made some blockers,
including the two serious issues Mariah reported.
Can you guys scan down the list to see if any other tickets should be
made blockers for the 1.0.0 release.
How do peo
29 matches
Mail list logo
