Thanks Brian, I'll issue RC3 with this fix.
Bill.
2009/4/22 Cactus :
>
>
>
> On Apr 22, 6:48 pm, Cactus wrote:
>> On Apr 22, 6:29 pm, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Cactus wrote:
>> > > To overcoem this problem I hence had to drop all the test project
>>
On Apr 22, 6:48 pm, Cactus wrote:
> On Apr 22, 6:29 pm, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Cactus wrote:
> > > To overcoem this problem I hence had to drop all the test project
> > > dependencies and this means that it is no longer possible to build
> > > them al
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 17:45:43 Bill Hart wrote:
> Do you want to fix this for the release or just in trunk? If you are
> sure it can't be hit in the release, no need to fix it there.
>
x86_64 is OK , and pentium are definitely OK
so I'll just fix it in trunk
> 2009/4/22 Jason Moxham :
> >
On Apr 22, 6:29 pm, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Cactus wrote:
> > To overcoem this problem I hence had to drop all the test project
> > dependencies and this means that it is no longer possible to build
> > them all at once.
>
> Ah ok.
>
> > The way I now do this i
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Cactus wrote:
> To overcoem this problem I hence had to drop all the test project
> dependencies and this means that it is no longer possible to build
> them all at once.
Ah ok.
> The way I now do this is to build the test library first and then
> select all th
On Apr 22, 6:05 pm, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> Brian, another thing I'm confused about for MSVC testing. I load
> mpir-tests.sln and it has 143 projects. If I do a Build Solution
> (with Release and x64 selected like I used for building the MPIR
> library) I get an error about test-lib.lib not b
Brian, another thing I'm confused about for MSVC testing. I load
mpir-tests.sln and it has 143 projects. If I do a Build Solution
(with Release and x64 selected like I used for building the MPIR
library) I get an error about test-lib.lib not being present. If I
select that project and build it,
Another MSVC issue. The MPIR library itself now compiles but when I
try to load mpir-tests.sln to compile the test code, I get an error
about the following project is missing:
build.vc9\mpir-tests\mpn.divebybm1of.vcproj
Small documentation changes in readme.txt, it still refers to gmp.lib
in so
Do you want to fix this for the release or just in trunk? If you are
sure it can't be hit in the release, no need to fix it there.
2009/4/22 Jason Moxham :
>
>
> There is potential error in mul.c , the mul_2 is assumed to give the correct
> result for size=1 . mul_n and addmul_n require size>=n
There is potential error in mul.c , the mul_2 is assumed to give the correct
result for size=1 . mul_n and addmul_n require size>=n in general . We are OK
because the current mul_2 for x86_64 and pentium (the only two cpus that have
one) happen to be correct for size=1 .
The refmpn.c also ass
On Apr 22, 5:23 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> Brian,
>
> Just to confirm, you test the Windows build only, on these machines.
Yes, that's correct.
Brian
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" g
Brian,
Just to confirm, you test the Windows build only, on these machines.
Bill.
2009/4/22 Cactus :
>
>
>
> On Apr 22, 3:57 pm, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Bill Hart
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks Jeff. I've added a testing matrix on the
>> > website:http://www.mpir.or
On Apr 22, 3:57 pm, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
> > Thanks Jeff. I've added a testing matrix on the website:http://www.mpir.org/
>
> > Can you look down the list and make sure I have listed your systems on
> > which MPIR 1.1.1 now passes. I thin
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 17:07:41 Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> Penryn cygwin just passed all test with RC2 as well.
Is it just me , or does the above line read
Penguin singwin just passed :)
>
> Jeff.
>
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message becaus
Penryn cygwin just passed all test with RC2 as well.
Jeff.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from thi
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Yep, that's right. I'll add that too. I'll be interested to see if you
> hit the t-export test failure. Note that you can't have spaces in the
> path to the source directory if you want to run make check. This is an
> issue with libtools and I
Yep, that's right. I'll add that too. I'll be interested to see if you
hit the t-export test failure. Note that you can't have spaces in the
path to the source directory if you want to run make check. This is an
issue with libtools and I'm told the sun will implode before it gets
fixed. That exclu
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 16:08:28 Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Bill Hart
wrote:
> > Thanks. I will add that now.
> >
> > We should be able to expand our list of machines for regular testing
> > later today. I've sent out some emails and expect to expand the list
>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Thanks. I will add that now.
>
> We should be able to expand our list of machines for regular testing
> later today. I've sent out some emails and expect to expand the list
> quite a bit - though surely this will lead to new test failures.
I
2009/4/22 Jeff Gilchrist :
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jeff. I've added a testing matrix on the website: http://www.mpir.org/
>>
>> Can you look down the list and make sure I have listed your systems on
>> which MPIR 1.1.1 now passes. I think I got them. E
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Thanks Jeff. I've added a testing matrix on the website: http://www.mpir.org/
>
> Can you look down the list and make sure I have listed your systems on
> which MPIR 1.1.1 now passes. I think I got them. Even better, could
> you make a list of
Thanks Jeff. I've added a testing matrix on the website: http://www.mpir.org/
Can you look down the list and make sure I have listed your systems on
which MPIR 1.1.1 now passes. I think I got them. Even better, could
you make a list of those you have tested on and I will make sure I put
the right
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Cactus wrote:
> There is a problem but it is mul_2.asm that is missing, not
> addmul_2.asm. I'll commit it to trunk shortly so that it can be moved
> into the next 1.1.1 RC.
Sorry I meant mul_2.asm but pasted the wrong filename in the e-mail.
So many asm files,
On Apr 22, 9:55 am, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:38:13AM -0700, Cactus wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 9:15?am, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> > > svn checkouthttp://modular.math.jmu.edu/svn/mpir/mpir/trunkmpir-trunk
> > > cp -a mpir-trunk mpir-1.1
> > > cd mpir-1.1
> > > sv
Did we ever get around to backing up the actual svn db itself ?
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 09:55:13 Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:38:13AM -0700, Cactus wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 9:15?am, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> > > svn checkouthttp://modular.math.jmu.edu/svn/mpir
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:38:13AM -0700, Cactus wrote:
> On Apr 22, 9:15?am, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> > svn checkouthttp://modular.math.jmu.edu/svn/mpir/mpir/trunkmpir-trunk
> > cp -a mpir-trunk mpir-1.1
> > cd mpir-1.1
> > svn switchhttp://modular.math.jmu.edu/svn/mpir/mpir/mpir-1.1
> >
>
On Apr 22, 9:15 am, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:54:42AM +0100, Jason Moxham wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
> > It's hard to believe that svn(or the others) dont have a solution for this.
> > How about something like this
>
> > Brian wants branch-xyz , he logs into svn server ,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:21:30AM +0100, Bill Hart wrote:
> I wonder actually if we do use switch whether making changes to the
> currently "switched" branch also automatically makes those changes to
> trunk. I guess not, as that would probably be illogical. But then
> again, I don't know how it
I believe the graphical Windows TortoiseSVN client offers the switch
command. At least it shows up in my client (which is admittedly 32 bit
Windows).
Sorry for not paying more attention to this issue before now.
Eventually a transition to a distributed system will also fix this
issue (and others)
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:54:42AM +0100, Jason Moxham wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> It's hard to believe that svn(or the others) dont have a solution for this.
> How about something like this
>
> Brian wants branch-xyz , he logs into svn server , runs a diff of trunk
> directory against branch to create
Hi
It's hard to believe that svn(or the others) dont have a solution for this.
How about something like this
Brian wants branch-xyz , he logs into svn server , runs a diff of trunk
directory against branch to create a patch file. He only has to download the
patch file and apply it against his
On Apr 22, 8:31 am, Cactus wrote:
> On Apr 22, 6:38 am, Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Jeff,
>
> > I just downloaded the tarball and the file is there for me in
> > mpn/x86_64w/addmul_2.asm
>
> > There must be something up with the paths in the project files.
> > Perhaps Brian can take a look a
On Apr 22, 6:38 am, Bill Hart wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I just downloaded the tarball and the file is there for me in
> mpn/x86_64w/addmul_2.asm
>
> There must be something up with the paths in the project files.
> Perhaps Brian can take a look at this.
>
> Bill.
>
> 2009/4/22 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> >
Hi Jeff,
I just downloaded the tarball and the file is there for me in
mpn/x86_64w/addmul_2.asm
There must be something up with the paths in the project files.
Perhaps Brian can take a look at this.
Bill.
2009/4/22 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Apr 21, 5:25 pm, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 21
On Apr 21, 5:25 pm, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
> > I've put release candidate 1 for MPIR 1.1.1 up on the website.
>
> Houston we have a problem (you guys must really love me by now)...
Well, as long as you are finding bugs I don't see any prob
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> I've put release candidate 1 for MPIR 1.1.1 up on the website.
Houston we have a problem (you guys must really love me by now)...
First the good news, it works fine with my gcc 3.x k8 system, and to
good core2 system. The one causing us prob
36 matches
Mail list logo
