Hi,
> > Hmmm I've tried the standard Unix version of fMSX.. It compiled okay but
> > said it couldn't open a window in X-Window...
> The colour depth of fMSX is fixed at compilation time. Does the colour
depth
> (BPP) specified in the fMSX Makefile match the colour depth of your X
server?
That w
lnetaide @paris @france1 (www.france1.org)
yoyo
- Original Message -
From: "David Heremans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: MSX Emulator comparison
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 11:37:24PM +0200, Beno?t D
Hi,
Whoops... My fault Anyhow, downloading now :)
> For the download:
>
> 1) go to http://openmsx.sf.net/
> 2) click 'project summary'
> 3) click 'Download'
>
> If you have troubles with openMSX, don't hesitate to contact the
> developers with details!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joost
>
> -
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:35:25PM +0200, Roel de Wit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Too bad I can't download it anywhere.. I've looked at the openmsx site a few
> times since Tilburg but there never was a (working) source/binary download
> link.
I think it depends on your definition of 'working'. It works al
Hi,
Too bad I can't download it anywhere.. I've looked at the openmsx site a few
times since Tilburg but there never was a (working) source/binary download
link.
> > I don't know why NLMSX is not in your TOP 5 of the MSX emulators, but I
must
> > precise one thing : NLMSX, as MESS, emulates the
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 11:37:24PM +0200, Beno?t Delvaux wrote:
> I don't know why NLMSX is not in your TOP 5 of the MSX emulators, but I must
> precise one thing : NLMSX, as MESS, emulates the SRAM, not only of the
> Panasonic FM-PAC, but also the SRAM of some cartridge games in "ASCII"
> format.
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 13:32, Roel de Wit wrote:
> Hmmm I've tried the standard Unix version of fMSX.. It compiled okay but
> said it couldn't open a window in X-Window...
The colour depth of fMSX is fixed at compilation time. Does the colour depth
(BPP) specified in the fMSX Makefile match th
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: MSX Emulator comparison
> I don't know why NLMSX is not in your TOP 5 of the MSX emulators, but I
must
> precise one thing : NLMSX, as MESS, emulates the SRAM, not only of the
> Panasonic FM-PAC, but also the SR
Hi,
> > Hmmm what's the best emulator currently available for Linux (in source
> > code) ?? I just received my Playstation 2 Linux Kit and want to do some
> > recompiling :)
> I know the following MSX emulators for Linux:
> - fMSX from Marat
> - fMSX-SDL (not sure if code is already available)
>
www.marsupone.com
et
http://www.marsupone.com/msxvalley
- Original Message -
From: yoyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: MSX Emulator comparison
> hello
>
> The best emulator is fmsx 2.6 for windows
> 2nd is fmsx-sdl
hello
The best emulator is fmsx 2.6 for windows
2nd is fmsx-sdl
3rd is para msx
4 fmsx-dos
5 RuMSX
this is my top 5
special mention for mess for this time only this emulator accept the
sram.
greeting from france !
Lionel aka yoyo
http://www.msx.fr.st tout sur l'emulation MSX
Contact : [E
> I know the following MSX emulators for Linux:
> - fMSX from Marat
> - fMSX-SDL (not sure if code is already available)
> - MESS (MSX1 only)
> - Zodiac (I don't know the status, look at SourceForge)
> - openMSX (most MSX2 features implemented)
> There may be more, does anyone (Sander?) know?
I b
On Friday 07 June 2002 10:01, Roel de Wit wrote:
> Hmmm what's the best emulator currently available for Linux (in source
> code) ?? I just received my Playstation 2 Linux Kit and want to do some
> recompiling :)
I know the following MSX emulators for Linux:
- fMSX from Marat
- fMSX-SDL (not sur
> Hmmm what's the best emulator currently available for Linux (in source
code)
> ?? I just received my Playstation 2 Linux Kit and want to do some
> recompiling :)
I just started working on a linux-comparison, but I will take my time for
that one
- like I did with the Windows version. Please hav
Hi,
>
> We're still looking for someone to port openMSX to Windows. For details,
visit
> http://openmsx.sourceforge.net/. If you're interested, post a message on
our
> mailinglist.
>
Hmmm what's the best emulator currently available for Linux (in source code)
?? I just received my Playstation
> It would be interesting to have some kind of MSX emulator testkit, which
runs
> various tests and displays how close to real a MSX the emulator is
> performing. Emulator programmers can use this to make their emulator more
> accurate. Apart from timing tests, feature tests and display/sound test
On Friday 07 June 2002 00:46, Sander Zuidema wrote:
> > About the speed test programs: could you publish those? I would like to
> > run them under openMSX and see how it scores.
>
> I'll mail them to you in private so not everyone can have a laugh at what I
> call benchmarks ;)
Thanks!
openMSX
> That's a nice and thorough review. Compliments!
*blush*
> Any chance of a similar review of MSX emulators running under Linux?
Yup, a Linux-emulator-comparison is on the to-do list ;)
> About the speed test programs: could you publish those? I would like to
run
> them under openMSX and see h
On Thursday 06 June 2002 23:34, Sander Zuidema wrote:
> The MSX Resource Center tested six popular MSX emulators for the Windows
> platform and compared them to each other. Are emulators as good as the real
> thing? Does all MSX software run on every emulator? Which of these
> emulators is the bes
Hello...
All the emulators can be found at: http://go.to/msx
As for the best emulator.. Well.. No emulator is perfect, they all have
their advantages and disadvantages, but these are the ones you really should
take a look at:
BrMSX (Very stable, especially in MSX-1 mode)
fMSXdos (Will run most g
>RuMSX (MSX 1,2,2+, Turbo-R. Quite stable, but slow and crappy sound (Sorry
>Rudolf !!)
I still can't gt anything to work with RuMSX on my Pentium 2, 233 Still
get confusing errors...
Only the diskimages delivered by RuMSX work fine...
Maybe it is time to get another version of this emulato
On Tue, 21 Jul 1998 22:41:48 +0200, Richard Bosch wrote:
>does anybody know where i can find a msx emulator that fully
>works.
In your imagination!
Specially if you want support for T-R and 2+ functions (and
more 'important', games).
Just kidding... It's the heat of the summer, I guess.
Really,
-Mensaje original-
De: Ramon Ribas Casasayas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: Jueves 23 de Julio de 1998 8:46 AM
Asunto: Re: msx emulator
>On Tue, 21 Jul 1998 22:41:48 +0200, Richard Bosch wrote:
>
>>does anybody kno
At 08:15 24/07/98 +0200, Stephanie & Arnaud wrote:
>BrMSX (MSX 1, MSX 2 soo to come, very stable, good sound, only SCC & PSG)
What? Ricardo Bittencourt told us here in Brazil that he'll take a
long time to finish MSX 1 emulation. Then, he'll work at MSX 2 emulation.
ByE!
Just go to my page, and download fmsx
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Richard Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: msx maillinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: dinsdag 21 juli 1998 23:24
Onderwerp: msx emulator
>hi
>
>does anybody know where i can find a msx emulator that fully works.
>
>
>
t;
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: donderdag 30 juli 1998 3:10
Onderwerp: Re: msx emulator
>At 08:15 24/07/98 +0200, Stephanie & Arnaud wrote:
>>BrMSX (MSX 1, MSX 2 soo to come, very stable, good sound, only SCC & PSG)
>
>What? Ricardo Bitt
your problem !!!
Greetz,
Arnaud de Klerk (The File-Hunter)
SysOp of FONY BASE...
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: M.H.M. van den Broek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: MSX-Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: zaterdag 25 juli 1998 18:53
Onderwerp: Re: msx emulator
>
>>May...
At 07:56 30/07/98 +0200, you wrote:
>I guess then we will have to wait a bit longer,, First planning was that MSX
>2 support would have been released in June... Ah well... As long as the
>development continues.. Who cares !!!
Maybe June 2000...
Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheir
gt;
Datum: vrijdag 24 juli 1998 5:28
Onderwerp: RE: msx emulator
>
>-Mensaje original-
>De: Ramon Ribas Casasayas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Fecha: Jueves 23 de Julio de 1998 8:46 AM
>Asunto: Re: msx emulator
>
>
>May... idon't know which version you have.. (0.13 is the newest.), but I
>dont have any problems... Just check your settings before you run anything
>(Right type of MSX, memory in correct slot, etc..)
Yesterday visited your HomePage and downloaded version 0.13... But still I
have problems runn
reetz...
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: M.H.M. van den Broek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: vrijdag 24 juli 1998 20:39
Onderwerp: Re: msx emulator
>>RuMSX (MSX 1,2,2+, Turbo-R. Quite stable, but slow and crappy sound (Sorry
>>Rudolf !!)
>
>
On Tue, 21 Jul 1998, Richard Bosch wrote:
> does anybody know where i can find a msx emulator that fully works.
>
I'm sorry but such a thing does not exist.
To prove it, try to run the 2-liner I'm attaching to the e-mail.
This is one of my entries to the brazilian 2-liner compo
]
] >May... idon't know which version you have.. (0.13 is the newest.), but I
] >dont have any problems... Just check your settings before you run anything
] >(Right type of MSX, memory in correct slot, etc..)
]
]
] Yesterday visited your HomePage and downloaded version 0.13... But still I
] ha
7:32
Subject: Re: msx emulator
| Maybe June 2000...
|
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
At 11:42 02/08/98 +0200, you wrote:
>Hmmm Doesn't that sound a little bit negative ???
>
Not at all, Ricardo said that he needs to do a lot of things to the
real MSX before doing MSX 2 emulation for BrMSX. And he wants to finish MSX
1 emulation completely.
ByE!
_ _
35 matches
Mail list logo
