> Yes, it is, but a 360kb image was not released. The easyest way is creating
> a 360kb image from a 720kb floppy just copying the necessary files (and,
> of course, installing the kernel into it). With 360kb, at least, you'll be
> able
> to full access the Internet.
> > Yeah, it would be possible
voyager wrote:
Yeah, it would be possible if I could use a Doouble sided drive, but I only
have single sided drives :-(
Use a PC to copy files from the 720K disk to the 360K disks!
___
MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Info page: http://lists.stack.n
25, 2003 8:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
>
>
> > By the way, is it possible to run it from single side floppy drive?
(360k)
>
> Yes, it is, but a 360kb image was not released. The easyest way is
creating
> a 360kb image from a 720kb floppy just
Re: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
> By the way, is it possible to run it from single side floppy drive? (360k)
Yes, it is, but a 360kb image was not released. The easyest way is creating
a 360kb image from a 720kb floppy just copying the necessary files (and,
of course, installing
> By the way, is it possible to run it from single side floppy drive? (360k)
Yes, it is, but a 360kb image was not released. The easyest way is creating
a 360kb image from a 720kb floppy just copying the necessary files (and,
of course, installing the kernel into it). With 360kb, at least, you'll
By the way, is it possible to run it from single side floppy drive? (360k)
- Original Message -
From: "Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha"
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:00 AM
Subject: [MSX] New release of previous UZIX 0.2.1
>
> Hi, guys.
>
> I hope this
I'm not dead ^^
Keep your project until I complete my H/W project ^^
Greeting,
- Jun.
- Original Message -
From: "Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:00 AM
Subject: [MSX] N
Hi, guys.
I hope this list isn`t dead... :P
I released again UZIX 0.2.1. The new release fix the corrupted
FudeBrowZer program of the previous release. It also contains better
network modules (their power will be demonstrated next weekend, at
MSXRio2003 - stay tuned).
The address, as
For those who are interested:
Now the setup.dat file for UZIX 0.2.1 fits on a single floppy.
Sorry for the inconvenience and the delay to fix this.
Regards,
Adriano
http://uzix.sf.net
___
MSX mailing list ([EMAIL
http://uzix.sf.net
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diretor Executivo - A&L Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br
http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage
___
MSX mailing list ([EMAIL PRO
it doesnt receive the ctrl-d to
close the file.
Maybe Adriano can have a look at that..
Greetings
P.S. Bas: UZIX telnetd can't handle termination of processes upon
disconnect very well yet, it seems. So if you disconnect, your ed
session will just wait forever, and keep the telnetd
Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz wrote:
> PS: a convertion of CR (or LF) to CR+LF would be better, but it's not
> important, the important is that it WORKS!!!
That's something you should configure in your telnet client,
not in the telnet daemon...
Eric
--
For info, see http://www.stac
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> Since now I have a power beta tester for UZIX, Tristan, and now that all of
> you know that UZIX rulez a lot, I feel compelled to make things better on
> UZIX.
> I'll c
Hi, folks.
Since now I have a power beta tester for UZIX, Tristan, and now that all of
you know that UZIX rulez a lot, I feel compelled to make things better on
UZIX.
I'll check carefully the bugs reported about telnet daemon and try to fix
them. Most of them are caused because I didn&#
> wrong!
> cat puts its inputchannel simply trough to its outputchannel.
> If you specify a file(s) it will use the file(s) as its input,
> otherwise it will simply use (just as every other 'good' unix
> program) the std-in.
You're right, stupid.
Vincent
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wy
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:37:19AM +0200, Vincent van Dam wrote:
> > Anyway, I had some problems. I usually use ``cat >file'' to create
> > simple files. But that didn't work with a ``file: file not found''
> > error.
>
> cat displays a file, thus uses a file as input, i think you were
> confuse
> Anyway, I had some problems. I usually use ``cat >file'' to create
> simple files. But that didn't work with a ``file: file not found''
> error.
cat displays a file, thus uses a file as input, i think you were
confused with 'echo this > file'
Vincent
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynk
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:40:37AM +0200, Tristan wrote:
> Warning. This is *beta* software. There are still plenty bugs so
> things might go wrong. Also please be kind and use logout to finish
> your session so another person can login. Do not just disconnect
> because that will hang the telne
> For now, I've
> loaded telnetd instead of httpd, so you guys can telnet into the MSX
> and have a look at UZIX.
Congratulations, Tristan. :)
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diretor Executivo - A&L Software http://www
t it WORKS!!!
---
Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz http://www.lsi.usp.br/~mdalpoz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "old Fords never die, just get better"
UZIX operating system at (localhost)
K
Two remarks for Windows users: set "local echo" on and use VT-52
terminal.
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diretor Executivo - A&L Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br
http://www.alsoftware.com.br/adrianpage
--
For info, see htt
Hi people,
The webserver is down atm... It didnt keep up with all hits very
well, but at least some managed to get the html :) For now, I've
loaded telnetd instead of httpd, so you guys can telnet into the MSX
and have a look at UZIX.
Just use any telnet application and conne
ah ok last night it didn't work on 81 , but now it does :)
kalter
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens J. Lukens
Verzonden: dinsdag 23 april 2002 9:35
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
Yes! It worked
>
> Tomorrow I'll send you a special version of tupiniquim, with
> port definition in command-line, ok?
>
Thank you but the port definition is really not that important to me.
Its allright as it is! :)
Tristan
--
a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org)
FUNET MSX archi
ril 22, 2002 5:27 AM
Subject: MSX running UZIX webserver
> Hi all,
>
> Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver:
>
> http://msx.rulez.nl:81
>
> :)
>
> I hope it stays up for a few days.
>
> Bye,
>
> Tristan
>
> --
>
> a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Underne
> Oh my god. I never changed the hostname. Now who is the bigger
> fudeba? :)
You, of course... :P
> Btw, when can we expect the next kernel release?? :))
Tomorrow I'll send you a special version of tupiniquim, with
port definition in command-line, ok?
Adriano Camargo Rod
not found on this server.
Tupiniquim Web Server for UZIX vr. 1.0 at msx.rulez.nl Port 80
Btw, when can we expect the next kernel release?? :))
Bye,
Tristan
--
a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org)
FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx)
MSX Radio oper
> When accessing url http://msx.rulez.nl:81/blaat.html :
> 404 Not Found.
> The requested URL /blaat.html was not found on this server.
> Tupiniquim Web Server for UZIX vr. 1.0 at msx.alsoft.com Port 80
> ^^
> You h
e requested URL /blaat.html was not found on this server.
Tupiniquim Web Server for UZIX vr. 1.0 at msx.alsoft.com Port 80
^^
You hardcode the server hostname in a 404 error message?! rofl! ;)
Tristan
--
a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Undernet
> it should be :80 :)
It should. But it isn't, since now Tristan has two webservers running on his
IP. :)
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diretor Executivo - A&L Software http://www.alsoftware.com.br
http://www.alsoftware.com.
it should be :80 :)
Kalter
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Adriano
Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Verzonden: maandag 22 april 2002 23:36
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: MSX running UZIX webserver
> Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.
> Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver:
> http://msx.rulez.nl:81
Congratulations, Tristan.
Here at home I could see the page. :)
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diretor Executivo - A&L Software http://www.alsoftw
> Yet still, if to many people start trying to connect/reconnect, I think
> your UZIX webserver or perhaps the IP stack will very easially run out
> of memory?
This is a big problem, because MSX connection is slow. So, people enter the
URL and wait for 30s. If they don't see anyt
'Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha' wrote about 'Re: MSX running UZIX webserver' -
Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 04:59:11PM CEST
>
> > Alas, it went down within a few hours. httpd only printing '+'
> > repeatedly on console.. Reboot fixed this for now.
>
> Alas, it went down within a few hours. httpd only printing '+'
> repeatedly on console.. Reboot fixed this for now.
'+' signs are the secret signal for 'fudeba, i am out of memory!'. :P
Too much broken connections in a short period of time causes this. I must
get a better way of dealing with
> > Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver:
> > http://msx.rulez.nl:81
>
> Can't reach the page. :(
> Monday, 1:33pm, TZ=GMT-3
>
> > I hope it stays up for a few days.
>
> Me too! :P
Alas, it went down within a few hours. httpd only printing
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:27 AM
Subject: MSX running UZIX webserver
> Hi all,
>
> Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver:
>
> http://msx.rulez.nl:81
>
> :)
>
> I hope it stays up for a few days.
>
> Bye,
>
> Tristan
>
>
Fords never die, just get better"
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Tristan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver:
>
> http://msx.rulez.nl:81
>
> :)
>
> I hope it stays up for a few days.
>
> Bye,
>
> Tristan
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Hi all,
Check my MSX running the UZIX 0.2.1 webserver:
http://msx.rulez.nl:81
:)
I hope it stays up for a few days.
Bye,
Tristan
--
a.k.a. OmegaMSX @ Undernet #msx (http://www.undernet.org)
FUNET MSX archive maintainer (ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx)
MSX Radio operator (http://www.live365
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Sander Zuidema wrote:
> Hey guyz,
>
> Because of the time difference, bad English and a not-so-well known April
> Fools Day
> some people in Japan actually believed this pun.
>
> So errr. Uzix is not dead yet ;)
>
I live in Brazil but when I
Hey guyz,
Because of the time difference, bad English and a not-so-well known April
Fools Day
some people in Japan actually believed this pun.
So errr. Uzix is not dead yet ;)
But considering the huge coding efforts of Chaos, I suggest we carry on with
our development
of Windows msXP. I think
26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UZIX is dead
> > Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December
>
> Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind,
> but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-)
>
> Eric
looks like the spainish are ahead 93 days :-)
and aprils
At 10:16 02/04/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st:
>
>>Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December
>
>Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind,
>but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-)
>
> Eric
Or 272, depends
--
For info, see http://w
> > Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December
>
> Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind,
> but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-)
>
> Eric
looks like the spainish are ahead 93 days :-)
and aprils fools day is started in brielle the netherlands.
At 10:16 2-4-02 +0200, you wrote:
>Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st:
>
>>Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December
>
>Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind,
>but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-)
Of which year? :)
GreeTz, BiFi
Visit my Home Page at www.bifi.ms
d-fader wrote:
> here we go:
>
> 10 cls
> 20 color 15,4,4
> 23 width 80
Nah, make that a "width 132:height 55"
More text on the screen is cool
Eric
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st:
> Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December
Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind,
but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-)
Eric
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
I prefer this one in WIDTH 40
;)
Sander
http://www.msx.org
http://www.benjaminb.nl
- Original Message -
From: "d-fader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 23:13
Subject: Re: UZIX is dead
> Hey,
>
> I wanna help to
Hey,
I wanna help too, that's why I've been working since I received the message.
Ofcourse, new operating systems need to crash a lot, that's why I already
made that part!
(it's taken from the Teddy's In Action windows emulator...), problem is that
routine was in asm, so that's a bit too fast (y
] screen. You could use a penguin... no, not a penguin... Maybe you can buy the
] rights to BCF's elephant called Snout? I'm sure users would love to get
] useful advice (and some jokes) from Snout.
I would certainly love to get advice and assistance from Snout. I'm totally
in favour of it.
K
On Monday 01 April 2002 15:53, you wrote:
> So, I'll quit UZIX development and will start another OS for our beloved
> MSX. I'll put my efforts on a beautiful GUI, nice animation effects and
> strong user interference avoidance. In other words, I'll start a new
> oper
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:53:25PM +, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After many crashes of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC,...
I told you that micorsoft is always right :-)
> operating system called Windows msXP.
Yep, it's all in the name. Free (386)BSD made th
Em 01 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>I definately support your idea. I can even offer some assistance! About a
>year ago I wrote some MMU routines, with complete support for virtual
>memory, memory protection and memory swapping.
>Those routines are already written in MSX BASIC so can
Em 01 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>I definately support your idea. I can even offer some assistance! About a
>year ago I wrote some MMU routines, with complete support for virtual
>memory, memory protection and memory swapping.
>Those routines are already written in MSX BASIC so can
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all
> Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does,
> but what about the other countries?
Actually it was invented in 1948 by the United States of
At 13:53 1-4-02 +, you wrote:
>After thinking a lot about it, I decided to kill UZIX. After many crashes
>of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC, I realized that I don't want
>it happening on my MSX.
>So, I'll quit UZIX development and will start another OS for
At 14:08 01/04/2002 -0300, you wrote:
>Hmmm,
>
>After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all
>Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does,
>but what about the other countries?
>
>PS: I joined the Windows MSXP team in order to work with Adriano i
Adriano,
>So, I'll quit UZIX development and will start another OS for our beloved
>MSX. I'll put my efforts on a beautiful GUI, nice animation effects and
>strong user interference avoidance. In other words, I'll start a new
>operating system called Windows m
Hmmm,
After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all
Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does,
but what about the other countries?
PS: I joined the Windows MSXP team in order to work with Adriano in his new
OS.
[]s
Mauricio Braga.
Hi,
After thinking a lot about it, I decided to kill UZIX. After many crashes
of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC, I realized that I don't want
it happening on my MSX.
So, I'll quit UZIX development and will start another OS for our beloved
MSX. I'll put my effort
> Actually, the script is not targeted at all :-) I would like to know
> what the exact differences are between the UZIX version of the HiTech C
> package and the original... Adriano?
Just library, header files and CRT0.OBJ (which is C0U.OBJ in UZIX).
=
Adriano Camargo Rod
> - the version Adriano got from us is not the latest version. We found
> some bugs last weekend. Eric is fixing them.
Don't forget to send me a copy. :)
> - the script is *not* UZIX targeted, but MSX-DOS targeted.
The script Eric sent me (and that is available at UZIX s
Eric Boon wrote:
> Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> Actually, the script is not targeted at all :-) I would like to know
> what the exact differences are between the UZIX version of the HiTech C
> package and the original... Adriano?
Good point.
Also: are there any other libraries (excep
Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
>
> Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
> > Eric Boon and Manuel Bilderbeek made a new script to compile UZIX
> > programs under Linux. This script has the advantage of using
> > subdirectories;
> > and you don't need to p
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
> Eric Boon and Manuel Bilderbeek made a new script to compile UZIX
> programs under Linux. This script has the advantage of using
> subdirectories;
> and you don't need to put everything in a single directory to compile
> anymo
Hi,
Eric Boon and Manuel Bilderbeek made a new script to compile UZIX
programs under Linux. This script has the advantage of using
subdirectories;
and you don't need to put everything in a single directory to compile
anymore. It's very useful.
The new scr
Hello Manuel
> > That guy I was talking about is Jurgen Kramer. He send me the image
files of
> > the 1.59 novaxis bios.
> No other documentation or information that can explain why Uzix works on
> Novaxis 1.51 but not on 1.59?
nope...
greetings
Maico Arts
MSX-NBNO
Maico Arts wrote:
> That guy I was talking about is Jurgen Kramer. He send me the image files of
> the 1.59 novaxis bios.
No other documentation or information that can explain why Uzix works on
Novaxis 1.51 but not on 1.59?
--
Grtjs, Manuel
PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? Se
Hello
> > And that guy did not react to my email for asking for info...
> > Maybe Gert de Boom can shine any light on this...
>
> Gert told me he doesn't know about this version. He thought it was the
> one that is adapted by NWO... But afaik that is another different
> version (with rolled out l
27;t know about this version. He thought it was the
one that is adapted by NWO... But afaik that is another different
version (with rolled out ldirs).
HELP! I want to be able to run Uzix on my MSX!
--
Grtjs, Manuel
PS: MSX 4EVER! (Questions? See http://www.faq.msxnet.org/)
PPS: Visit my hom
]
] Hi, MSXers.
]
] Since the MSX scene is too calm and people prefer fighting
] about useless topics, I decided to release UZIX 0.2.1. I'm calling it
] 'alpha' because I didn't update the docs and I wanna add some more
] improvements in this version (hi, Alex!).
Hello
> I need the help of the guy
> who made the ROM vr. 1.59 (or anyone who knows this ROM in deep).
And that guy did not react to my email for asking for info...
Maybe Gert de Boom can shine any light on this...
greetings
Maico Arts
MSX-NBNO
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl
Manuel,
> >>What's new in this version? I can't find it on the web site.
> > Go to download section of UZIX 2.0. Check "UZIX alphas" section.
> Found it. Thanks!
You're welcome.
> Any support yet for Novaxis ROM 1.59.64?
No. As I already said
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
>>What's new in this version? I can't find it on the web site.
> Go to download section of UZIX 2.0. Check "UZIX alphas" section.
Found it. Thanks!
Any support yet for Novaxis ROM 1.59.64?
If not (general call): w
Manuel,
> What's new in this version? I can't find it on the web site.
Go to download section of UZIX 2.0. Check "UZIX alphas" section.
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
> Hi, MSXers.
>
> Since the MSX scene is too calm and people prefer fighting
> about useless topics, I decided to release UZIX 0.2.1. I'm calling it
> 'alpha' because I didn't update the docs and I wanna a
Hi, MSXers.
Since the MSX scene is too calm and people prefer fighting
about useless topics, I decided to release UZIX 0.2.1. I'm calling it
'alpha' because I didn't update the docs and I wanna add some more
improvements in this version (hi, Alex!). System i
> No, you didn't read it wrong.
> Checkout the results of ethernet card prototype on UZIX.
Far out, man! ;)
Keep up the good work!
-Dan
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
> No, you didn't read it wrong.
> Checkout the results of ethernet card prototype on UZIX.
Rocking! :-)
What about the idea of ethernet card Sunrise is developing? They want to
use an eZ80 in it... I don't know th
Hi, MSXers.
No, you didn't read it wrong.
Checkout the results of ethernet card prototype on UZIX.
http://uzix.sourceforge.net/uzix2.0/ethernet/
Regards,
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.adrpage.cj
Hello Adriano
> Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with
> (UZIX kernel) AND (Novaxis OR MegaSCSI)?
Well, I can, but as I said I haven't had mauch time lately...
greetings
Maico Arts
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Eric,
> > Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with
> > UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI?
> You mean, the beta test, with the uzix version in
> http://uzix.sourceforge.net/test/uzix021.pma?
That's right.
> I'll see if I can spare a few minutes
> > Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with
> > UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI?
> To do both test that is possible no one can do it...
Sorry, I mean:
Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with
(UZIX kernel) AND (Novaxis OR MegaSCSI)?
Hi,
> Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with
> UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI?
You mean, the beta test, with the uzix version in
http://uzix.sourceforge.net/test/uzix021.pma?
I'll see if I can spare a few minutes one of these days
to run the test on
Hello Adriano
> Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with
> UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI?
To do both test that is possible no one can do it...
I want to do the test, but I haven't had much time lately...
Greetings
Maico Arts
--
For info, see http://w
Hi,
Is it possible that nobody could do the test I asked for with
UZIX kernel and Novaxis/MegaSCSI?
Regards,
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz
If Windows is user
Hi,
I'm looking for people who can beta test UZIX for me.
I need MSX users who have an ESE MegaSCSI or a Novaxis.
The procedure is described in this e-mail and also in a text
included in the files indicated below.
Download the file
Hi,
This message is sent from my turbo R, connected to the net using a Sunrise
IDE+RS232C interface and a null modem cable to my Linux box. Uzix 0.2.0 is
really cool!
Bye,
Maarten
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Hi, MSXers.
If you thought that UZIX project was dead, you're wrong.
UZIX page got a major update.
Here are the news:
- New site layout
To handle the news of the project.
- Site update
Including project status, introductio
Eric,
> > I can send you the Novaxis info that Maico Arts sent me.
> Please, I'd like to have all info anyway - even if I don't get
> to write the Novaxis driver for Uzix32 :-)
Ok.
> Erh, can't I use/rewrite the MegaSCSI routines and keep
> floppy support? Or is the floppy als
Adriano de Cunha wrote:
> Get UZIX sources from UZIX page.
Will do, will do :-)
> I can send you the Novaxis info that Maico Arts sent me.
Please, I'd like to have all info anyway - even if I don't get
to write the Novaxis driver for Uzix32 :-)
> You will need to rewrite
Eric,
> Hm, I still would like to see Novaxis stuff in the Uzix I have now.
> If the sources of Uzix32 are released, will there be enough info to
> hack in the novaxis support (and e.g. cut out the IDE or MegaSCSI
> stuff...) ?? Or would it be possible to take the Novaxis drive
- Original Message -
From: "Manuel Bilderbeek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: UZIX is dead
> > UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :)
>
> Okay, that's right... Forgot that... :-)
Ivan,
> But, is the new Uzix going to be called Uzix48k?
> I don't like this name. I prefer simply "Uzix".
I like "UZIX" also. I like it so much that UZIX will not be named
UZIX48k,
but only "UZIX". The difference will be the version nu
about kernel size. As Adriano
> already said, Uzix48k will have a 64Kb kernel. 48k means that
> all apps will have 48kb of linear address available, instead of
> the actual 32Kb of Uzix32k.
But, is the new Uzix going to be called Uzix48k?
I don't like this name. I prefer simply &q
8k will have a 64Kb kernel. 48k means that
all apps will have 48kb of linear address available, instead of
the actual 32Kb of Uzix32k.
48Kb is almost what is given by MSXDOS, but the difference
is Uzix provide lots and lots of services DOS will never imagine
to provide, and of course, the multitask
> UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :)
Okay, that's right... Forgot that... :-)
> Sorry, but it's impossible to put anything else on UZIX32k kernel. So,
you'll
> have to wait relatively long...
Okay, we'll do that. I'm looking forward to Uzix48k! Keep us updated! :-)
Grtjs, Manuel
PS: MSX
Hi,
> I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k
> kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ?
UZIX48k kernel will have 64kb. :)
Regards,
=
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.
> UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :)
> Sorry, but it's impossible to put anything else on UZIX32k kernel. So,
you'll
>have to wait relatively long...
Hi!
I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k
kernel, why not make the next one larger than 4
Manuel,
> > Yes. Maico Arts send me interestings docs and sources of Novaxis.
> > Next UZIX HD drivers will use direct access to MegaSCSI/IDE/Novaxis/
> > floppy/etc BIOS (for floppies I'll use Alex Wulms's FastCopy drivers, so
> no
> > more slowd
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
