Hello Everybody,
I think I found a bug in mutt, I was wondering if someone else could
try to reproduce it, so I can figure out if it is just a bug in my
setup. here's how:
startup mutt, type a !vim (it also works when I hit a m), when
vim starts up resize the XTerm's window for a bit, this Is w
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 02:10:13PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone else wanting additional features should use IMAP.
> >
> > But there lies the rub - 99% of users of MUAs DON'T HAVE THAT
> > CHOICE!!! We can't just "use IMAP", the choice isn't there!
>
> Then MAKE it happen! You a
Has anyone successfully built it on Rhapsody 5.3?
the autoconf script knows nothing about it, and there's quite a few
conflicting types ...
On 1999-12-13 21:10:21 +0100, Christoph Hertel wrote:
> So here's the question: Would there be a difference if I stop
> using the '-f'-flag and start using the 'userdb'-file to change
> the 'envelope-from' line in the mail-header?
First of all, there is no such thing as an envelope-from line in
This has been bothering me. What does the "asterisk" character, in the index,
for a thread indicate? Does that indicate priority? If yes, how do I set priority
on my mail?
TIA.
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/
=> Time is relative. Here is a new way to look at time. <
You may wish to take the CVS version and run the prepare script
first. Perhaps that works.
On 1999-12-14 13:49:34 +1100, Grant Beattie wrote:
> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 13:49:34 +1100
> From: Grant Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mutt on MacOS X?
>
> Has anyone succ
I believe mutt puts the asterisk when it is attempting to sort by
threads and finds matching subjects, but not in-reply-to fields, so
the asterisk is saying that it is "guessing" that this message goes
with this thread.
Brian
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 05:22:30AM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
>
> This h
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 05:22:30AM -0500, Subba Rao mentioned:
>
> This has been bothering me. What does the "asterisk" character, in the index,
> for a thread indicate? Does that indicate priority? If yes, how do I set priority
> on my mail?
It means that someone replyed to a thread with a cra
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 05:22:30AM -0500, Subba Rao mentioned:
>
> This has been bothering me. What does the "asterisk" character, in the index,
> for a thread indicate? Does that indicate priority? If yes, how do I set priority
> on my mail?
It also occured to me that it's shown when a mail is
Hi,
On Die, 14 Dez 1999, Subba Rao wrote:
>
>This has been bothering me. What does the "asterisk" character, in the index,
>for a thread indicate? Does that indicate priority? If yes, how do I set priority
>on my mail?
You do not have strict_threads set. This means, that not only _real_
threads
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 01:14:18AM -0700, shawn a. said:
>
> startup mutt, type a !vim (it also works when I hit a m), when
> vim starts up resize the XTerm's window for a bit, this Is where the
> bug happens for me -- mutt's interface overtakes vim but vim is still
> running. its like vim and
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 01:14:18AM -0700 or thereabouts, shawn a. wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
> I think I found a bug in mutt, I was wondering if someone else could
> try to reproduce it, so I can figure out if it is just a bug in my
> setup. here's how:
I tried this and can't make it happen. RH L
Hi, folks --
When reading a large mail folder, such as my mutt folder, I often collapse
all threads with an esc-V command. While new messages in an existing
thread drop into the collapsed thread as expected, I have found, however,
that new mail in new threads arrives and the threads are uncollap
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 11:37:07AM +, Telsa Gwynne mentioned:
> I tried this and can't make it happen. RH Linux 6.1, XFree86 (3.3.5),
> October Gnome, mutt-1.0pre3i (with slang) and either gnome-terminals
> or xterms. Sorry. However, I can imagine the effects as I once managed
> to get both
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 12:56:31PM + or thereabouts, John P . Looney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 11:37:07AM +, Telsa Gwynne mentioned:
> > or xterms. Sorry. However, I can imagine the effects as I once managed
> > to get both lynx and mutt apparently attempting to run in the same
>
Sean --
If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your
yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
your from address as yifan when it sees that the email was sent there.
If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you
m
Hi David!
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
> Sean --
>
> If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your
> yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
> your from address as yifan when it sees that the email was sent there.
>
> If that's
In a gloomy night of Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 10:26:42AM -, these thoughts were sent
throught the matrix...
-> Then MAKE it happen! You are here, trying to push Mutt into conforming
-> to an ill-fitting standard, simply because that's all your ISP offers
-> you. Why aren't you, instead, puttin
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 01:47:34PM +, Blinking wrote:
> In a gloomy night of Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 10:26:42AM -, these thoughts were sent
>throught the matrix...
>
> -> Then MAKE it happen! You are here, trying to push Mutt into conforming
> -> to an ill-fitting standard, simply because
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:39:23PM +, Sean Rima mentioned:
> Hi David!
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
>
> > Sean --
> >
> > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your
> > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
> > your
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 08:48:17AM +, Chris Green wrote:
:
:3 - If you search the list of UK ISPs (and there are hundreds) there
:are virtually none that offer IMAP4. It's just not going to
:happen I'm afraid, at least not for quite a while, in the meantime
:we are stuck with PO
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 07:56:33AM -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 08:48:17AM +, Chris Green wrote:
> :
> :3 - If you search the list of UK ISPs (and there are hundreds) there
> :are virtually none that offer IMAP4. It's just not going to
> :happen I'm afraid, at
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 01:42:00PM +, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 12:56:31PM + or thereabouts, John P . Looney wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 11:37:07AM +, Telsa Gwynne mentioned:
> > > or xterms. Sorry. However, I can imagine the effects as I once managed
> > >
shawn a. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> startup mutt, type a !vim (it also works when I hit a m), when
> vim starts up resize the XTerm's window for a bit, this Is where the
> bug happens for me -- mutt's interface overtakes vim but vim is still
> running. its like vim and mutt are both trying to
Sean --
...and then Sean Rima said...
% Hi David!
Hi there!
%
% On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
%
% > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
% >
% > If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you
% > might also want to specif
Hi David!
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
> Sean --
>
> ...and then Sean Rima said...
> % Hi David!
>
> Hi there!
>
>
> %
> % On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
> % >
> % > If that's correct, then
Hi John!
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, John P . Looney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:39:23PM +, Sean Rima mentioned:
> > Hi David!
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
> >
> > > Sean --
> > >
> > > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your
> > > yifan acc
David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> When reading a large mail folder, such as my mutt folder, I often collapse
> all threads with an esc-V command. While new messages in an existing
> thread drop into the collapsed thread as expected, I have found, however,
> that new mail in new threads arriv
Chris Green [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> The one thing that I would like (and I think some other people would
> like) is a means to interactively decide what to do with mail in a
> POP3 mailbox. Fetchmail can't do this, the interactive requirement
> puts the facility squarely into the MUA I'm afr
29 matches
Mail list logo
