Re: threading problem

2000-05-23 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:18:07 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > 1001: > > Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 07:33:38 EDT > > Subject: Re: Mapping problem > > I think the root of the problem is here. The date isn't properly > formatted, instead of having the timezone in the +/- formatting

Re: newsfetch

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: >Has anyone tried a program called newsfectch. url, please >newsfetch is a powerfull utility to fetch news from an NNTP server and >stores in the mailbox format. The files created by newsfetch can be used >with any mail reader sounds like a fe

newsfetch

2000-05-23 Thread jgh
Has anyone tried a program called newsfectch. newsfetch is a powerfull utility to fetch news from an NNTP server and stores in the mailbox format. The files created by newsfetch can be used with any mail reader Could this be used as a standard news mailing program in cooperation with mutt? --

Re: metoo not removing my address

2000-05-23 Thread Brian D. Winters
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:23:30PM -0500, Corey G. wrote: > I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation. > It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate > what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as > an "alternative" or not the

Re: Location of signature in replies

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Brian D. Winters proclaimed on mutt-users that: >On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:30:23PM -0500, Corey G. wrote: >> By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am >> curious. > >The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is >http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.

Re: Location of signature in replies

2000-05-23 Thread Brian D. Winters
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:30:23PM -0500, Corey G. wrote: > By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am > curious. The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFCs, this is rather long, and som

Re: metoo not removing my address

2000-05-23 Thread clemensF
> Corey G.: > I would be more than happy to write a better explanation if someone > really wants me to for the documentation. I only want to make Mutt > better like everyone else. sounds great! i vote ``yes'' both for the effort and the offer. thanks Corey! -- clemens

Re: Using multiple mailboxes with Mutt (& procmail filtering).

2000-05-23 Thread clemensF
> Mikko Hänninen: > Jacob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000: > > > I think I could accomplish this with a wrapper that monitors all my > > mailboxes for new mail and display that on a menu, pushing me into > > mutt on that mailbox when I select one, but I don't want to reinvent

Re: forwarding including all attachments

2000-05-23 Thread G.Embery
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:20:36PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > G.Embery proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >The default binding for view-attachments is `v', which ... > > > >You can also reply to the current message from this menu, and > >only the current attachment (

test, i am receiving failings...

2000-05-23 Thread jgh
test -- /helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/D75E0A36

[OT] Recommend an IMAP server

2000-05-23 Thread Shao Zhang
Hi, Several people on this list has suggested me to switch the IMAP server(I am using the UW one), because it generates those anonying "DON'T NOT DELETE THIS MESSAGE". So what is the best alternative? I also found that cyrus-imapd is quite popular. But I co

Re: metoo not removing my address

2000-05-23 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000: > I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation. > It only states addresses as alternates. The name is not accurate, and the description isn't either... I would guess the name is some historical issue or something, al

Re: threading problem

2000-05-23 Thread clemensF
> Mikko Hänninen: > PATH=C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\RUN;C:\WINDOWS\CRASH you got your path all wrong. with windows it =must= look like this: PATH=C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\CRASH;C:\WINDOWS\RUN -- clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using multiple mailboxes with Mutt (& procmail filtering).

2000-05-23 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jacob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000: > (Hi, I just subscribed to mutt-users :) Hi, welcome! :-) > I've been using mutt for a while as a nice elm replacement with good MIME > handling, and I just started looking at how to use it with mail filtered > into different folders f

problems solved.

2000-05-23 Thread Mipam
Hi Folks, I asked you about the problem i got with pgp. However, i forgot to add source = pgp5.rc etc. Now its working great. Bye, Mipam

Re: Location of signature in replies

2000-05-23 Thread Corey G.
This is quite funny. You are explaining proper netiquette with a signature that contains "Fuck you". I guess netiquette and etiquette are not considered the same.:) By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am curious. n Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:08:31AM +0200, Ge

Re: metoo not removing my address

2000-05-23 Thread Corey G.
I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation. It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as an "alternative" or not the original. Thus, not the original which would be referring to your

Using multiple mailboxes with Mutt (& procmail filtering).

2000-05-23 Thread Jacob Davies
(Hi, I just subscribed to mutt-users :) I've been using mutt for a while as a nice elm replacement with good MIME handling, and I just started looking at how to use it with mail filtered into different folders for mailing lists and users by procmail. So far, I have a procmailrc that dumps mail

Re: threading problem

2000-05-23 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000: > I'm having a problem understanding why some messages are threaded as > they are. It seems incorrect to me, but it's probably some subtlety I > don't understand. Right... Okay, I *think* I understand what is going on, let's see if I c

threading problem

2000-05-23 Thread Gary Johnson
I'm having a problem understanding why some messages are threaded as they are. It seems incorrect to me, but it's probably some subtlety I don't understand. I am using mutt-1.2i, but the appearance is the same using mutt-1.0pre4us. Here's an example from the vim mailing list, which I route to a

Re: Can't get mail checking to work

2000-05-23 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Donald Zoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000: > I have the following lines in my .muttrc file: > > set check_new > set mail_check=5 > > Still, new mail won't appear until I type a command such as to compose a > message...etc. Check out the $timeout setting, which is how often Mutt

Can't get mail checking to work

2000-05-23 Thread Donald Zoch
I was wondering how to get mutt to check mail properly with a regular unix style mail spool I have the following lines in my .muttrc file: set check_new set mail_check=5 Still, new mail won't appear until I type a command such as to compose a message...etc. Thanks, Donald

pgp/gpg unclearness here :)

2000-05-23 Thread Mipam
Hi all, I use mutt 1.2i now. Everything is working just fine, as mutt always does :) Anyway, some things are different. Normally when i wish to sign a message with pgp or completly encrypt a message then it asks for the key id for that adress. Normally, when i type a name its good enough, or just

Two questions

2000-05-23 Thread Jeffery Small
I'm using mutt version 1.2i on a Solaris 7 platform with Sendmail 8.9.3 and have the following two questions: 1: When I compose a new message or reply, the message header in my editor has the following line: From: Jeffery Small Notice the missing domain portion of the address.

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:53:10PM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 14:00:34 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as > > domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of > > mail to *different* user

Clearing macros

2000-05-23 Thread Marius Gedminas
While reading another thread here I playd a bit with this macro: macro editor ,t test Now I don't know how to get rid of it (short of restarting mutt). There's no `unmacro' command. Section 3.6 of the manual says nothing about undefining them. Marius Gedminas -- We have enough youth, how ab

Re: Mutt 1.3.1 dumps core on me

2000-05-23 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-05-23 21:28:52 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Then, I ran it. It read my mailbox ok, opened mails > ok. When I tried to send / reply to mails, it says out > of temporary directory space / tmpdir invalid and dumps > core on me. Mutt 1.3i works like a charm in the same > setup.

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Manuel Arriaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000: > mbox is there for people who use "real" *nix systems with many users and > therefore restrictions on the harddrive space they may use, which has > nothing to do with my case. Well, not only for them... It's also for users like you wh

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Mikko Hänninen proclaimed on mutt-users that: >I personally prefer to set just move=no and as a result deal with the >700 mail inbox with all sorts of old junk in it possibly from year(s?) >back. :-) I prefer to use procmail and over 50 folders to refile my mails :) If there are too many mails

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000: > >Sorry to interfer in this tread too, but what is the purpose of mbox? > > All read mails will be moved to this folder if you say set move=yes in > your muttrc (it will ask you politely first, of course) :) Actually, to be

Mutt 1.3.1 dumps core on me

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Hi Tried installing mutt 1.3.1i on a sun 5.6 box and it built ok, but dumped core on me. Building, I gave it a ./configure --prefix=~/testbed to build it in my home directory, and did a make install. Then, I ran it. It read my mailbox ok, opened mails ok. When I tried to send / reply to mails

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Byrial Jensen proclaimed on mutt-users that: >Environment variables are expanded in commands, like the macro >command below, but not in Mutt's line editor. But macros work! > >macro editor \$dmn $dmn Just what the doctor ordered. Thanks!!! -- Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.co

Re: mutt 1.2 changements

2000-05-23 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Gerhard den Hollander [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000523 07:06]: > >> Also pgp doesnt work anymore very nicely. > > For PGP file, check that file again, the entire PGP format has changed. > > Which brinbgs me to my question. > > im using mutt with pgp 2.6.s

Re: PGP: No translations available for language "mutt"

2000-05-23 Thread Randall Hopper
David Ellement: |On 000522, at 07:36:38, Randall Hopper wrote: |> Before I just remove these, I wanted to ask what "+language=mutt" is |> supposed to do. Is there a better fix I should be making? | |It is supposed to make PGP a little less verbose. | |The contrib directory in the distribut

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Manuel Arriaga
Hi Suresh, > On a standalone linux box connected over a dialup this is trivial - not > when you are telneted into your mailbox which gives you just an 1 mb quota > ... > > got it? :) Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me; now I understand what mbox is for.:-) Now I see, as I

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Manuel Arriaga
Suresh, But you must admit that the two Mail-(User/Admin)-HOWTOS are very poor: I actually read them, but the Admin one only teaches you how to setup qmail (I went for postfix, which has great- and thourough :-) - docs and works flawlessly for me) and the User-HOWTO only teaches you basic nagi

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 14:22:41 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 06:47:16PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > > > Never tried this - but you could set up aliases in .cshrc / .bashrc or > > whatever ($idcu for isbd.demon.co.uk) and use them. It _may_ work, that > > is.

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 14:00:34 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as > domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of > mail to *different* users at both my work domain (kbss.bt.co.uk) and > my home domain (isbd.dem

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that: >But you must admit that the two Mail-(User/Admin)-HOWTOS are very poor: I actually >read them, but the Admin one only teaches you how to setup qmail (I went for postfix, >which has great- and thourough :-) - docs and works flawlessly for me) and t

Re: mutt 1.2 changements

2000-05-23 Thread Mipam
Hi, Thanks for your comments. Things are working okay now as you can see with mutt upgraded. However, pgp'ing not really. In 1.0.1i i could encrypt messages the same way as now exept When it asks for a key id for the adress to send to, i cant just type the name of the key or push enter to see

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 02:00:34PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: -> I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as -> domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of -> mail to *different* users at both my work domain (kbss.bt.co.uk) and -> my home domain (is

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Raju Kurunkad Vasudevan proclaimed on mutt-users that: >or you can use abbreviations in ur editor >for eg. in vim you can set >inorea isbd [EMAIL PROTECTED] >inorea kbss [EMAIL PROTECTED] As I pointed out in my prev post on this thread (which hasn't yet made it to the list ) you have to set edi

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that: >It doesn't seem to work, I tried:- > >setenv dmn "@isbd.demon.co.uk" > >in csh (which we use at work here) and then ran mutt. Entering $dmn >as part of an address didn't get expanded. You _can_ set unqualified addresses to be suffixed with a doma

Re: Colour with ncurses

2000-05-23 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Chris Green wrote: > I have mutt installed on three systems with S-Lang and colour working > OK. The fourth system that I have it installed doesn't have the > S-Lang libraries and I'd really prefer not to have to build them > myself (and use up quota there). > > So, how do

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Raju Kurunkad Vasudevan
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 06:47:16PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as > >domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of > >mail to *

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 06:47:16PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as > >domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of > >mail to *different* users at b

Re: I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that: >I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as >domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of >mail to *different* users at both my work domain (kbss.bt.co.uk) and Never tried this - but you could set up al

I want a different sort of macro

2000-05-23 Thread Chris Green
I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of mail to *different* users at both my work domain (kbss.bt.co.uk) and my home domain (isbd.demon.co.uk). It would be nice if I could set up (two character?) mac

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that: >Actually I didn't see any option to expunge the messages from the imap server. try using fetchmail to pull your mails from the imap server. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com Green light in a.m. for new projects. Red ligh

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Dave \(Grizz\) Glaser
Actually I didn't see any option to expunge the messages from the imap server. Dave On Tue, 23 May 2000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a > >long time. Then when I op

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that: >Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a >long time. Then when I open mutt again all my mail is duplicated (two >copies of everything). You are reading your mail off an IMAP server right? And you have it set _no

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Dave \(Grizz\) Glaser
Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a long time. Then when I open mutt again all my mail is duplicated (two copies of everything). Dave On Tue, 23 May 2000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > > > >Sorry to inter

Colour with ncurses

2000-05-23 Thread Chris Green
I have mutt installed on three systems with S-Lang and colour working OK. The fourth system that I have it installed doesn't have the S-Lang libraries and I'd really prefer not to have to build them myself (and use up quota there). So, how do I get mutt to work in colour under ncurses? I telnet

Re: metoo not removing my address

2000-05-23 Thread David T-G
Corey -- ...and then Corey G. said... % Adding: set alternates = [EMAIL PROTECTED] worked! Yay :-) % % However, I feel that it's not an intuitive option and should probably be % made more clear with another variable or regular expression. Especially % since this is not really an alternate but

Re: Mailheader Date: ??

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Jan Houtsma proclaimed on mutt-users that: >Mutt mail: Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 12:23:01 +0200 >Unix mail: Date: 23 May 2000 10:22:28 - > >Why are these different and what are the consequences for >the receiving party? Mutt apparently uses your timezone settings, and unix mail uses GMT to sen

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Dave \(Grizz\) Glaser
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Chris Green wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 09:12:12PM -0400, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote: > > > > c. Remove the use of the mbox entirely and just keep their mail on the IMAP >server, again negating most of the use of IMAP. > > > I would have though the idea of the I

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-05-23 Thread CaT
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:10:07AM +1000, CaT wrote: > well I just had my mailbox corrupted for the second time by mutt 8( > > this happens when I try to quit, mutt finds there's not enough room > in /tmp and so doesn't let me. What winds up happening is that once > I do get a chance to quit prop

Mailheader Date: ??

2000-05-23 Thread Jan Houtsma
Hi, I noticed that if i use mutt i get a different timestamp on the outgoing emails as with normal unix mail. The difference is the timezone and summer time i am in. Mutt mail: Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 12:23:01 +0200 Unix mail: Date: 23 May 2000 10:22:28 - Why are these different and what are

Re: forwarding including all attachments

2000-05-23 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
G.Embery proclaimed on mutt-users that: >The default binding for view-attachments is `v', which ... > >You can also reply to the current message from this menu, and >only the current attachment (or the attachments tagged) will >be quoted in your reply. ... Put this in your

forwarding including all attachments

2000-05-23 Thread G.Embery
Dear gentle-mutt'rs, I have been trying valiantly to forward/reply-to a message that includes attachments and shunt _all_ the attachments on. Yet i haven't been able to do any more than forward attachment #1 and the others go nowhere. (... mutter, mutter, mutter ...) I have followed the instru

Re: (OT) mailbox for new user?

2000-05-23 Thread Telsa Gwynne
Cc'd to Felix in case he's not on the list and he thinks it's worth adding to the FAQ. On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 11:38:26PM +0100 or thereabouts, Manuel Arriaga wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I know this is offtopic, but following the advice of some list members I > created a new account for myself o

Re: mutt 1.2 changements

2000-05-23 Thread Åsmund Skjæveland
> im using mutt with pgp 2.6.something, > and I get the occasional message that I should upgrade to a newer version > of pgp .. > > What version of PGP is recommened for use with mutt ? gpg. -- Åsmund Skjæveland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) PGP signature

Re: mutt 1.2 changements

2000-05-23 Thread Antoine Martin
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:13:19AM +0200, Gerhard den Hollander wrote: > * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000523 07:06]: > > >> Also pgp doesnt work anymore very nicely. > > For PGP file, check that file again, the entire PGP format has changed. > > Which brinbgs me to my question. > > im

Re: mbox (Mutt and IMAP)

2000-05-23 Thread Chris Green
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 09:12:12PM -0400, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote: > > c. Remove the use of the mbox entirely and just keep their mail on the IMAP server, >again negating most of the use of IMAP. > I would have though the idea of the IMAP server *is* that you keep all your mail on the

Re: mutt 1.2 changements

2000-05-23 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000523 07:06]: >> Also pgp doesnt work anymore very nicely. > For PGP file, check that file again, the entire PGP format has changed. Which brinbgs me to my question. im using mutt with pgp 2.6.something, and I get the occasional message that I should upgra

Re: Location of signature in replies

2000-05-23 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000523 02:06]: > Sounds fair enough. According to proper netiquette - your reply should FOLLOW the text you're replying to putting the reply before the text is a M$ mailer induced braindeadism l) - the signature belongs at the end of an email. That's what signa