On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 09:12:12PM -0400, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote:
c. Remove the use of the mbox entirely and just keep their mail on the IMAP server,
again negating most of the use of IMAP.
I would have though the idea of the IMAP server *is* that you
keep all your mail on the
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:13:19AM +0200, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000523 07:06]:
Also pgp doesnt work anymore very nicely.
For PGP file, check that file again, the entire PGP format has changed.
Which brinbgs me to my question.
im using mutt
im using mutt with pgp 2.6.something,
and I get the occasional message that I should upgrade to a newer version
of pgp ..
What version of PGP is recommened for use with mutt ?
gpg.
--
Åsmund Skjæveland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP signature
Cc'd to Felix in case he's not on the list and he thinks it's worth
adding to the FAQ.
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 11:38:26PM +0100 or thereabouts, Manuel Arriaga wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know this is offtopic, but following the advice of some list members I
created a new account for myself on
G.Embery proclaimed on mutt-users that:
The default binding for view-attachments is `v', which ...
snip
You can also reply to the current message from this menu, and
only the current attachment (or the attachments tagged) will
be quoted in your reply. ...
Put this in your
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:10:07AM +1000, CaT wrote:
well I just had my mailbox corrupted for the second time by mutt 8(
this happens when I try to quit, mutt finds there's not enough room
in /tmp and so doesn't let me. What winds up happening is that once
I do get a chance to quit properly
Jan Houtsma proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Mutt mail: Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 12:23:01 +0200
Unix mail: Date: 23 May 2000 10:22:28 -
Why are these different and what are the consequences for
the receiving party?
Mutt apparently uses your timezone settings, and unix mail uses GMT to
send
Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a long time.
Then when I open mutt again all my mail is duplicated (two copies of everything).
Dave
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Sorry to interfer
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a
long time. Then when I open mutt again all my mail is duplicated (two
copies of everything).
You are reading your mail off an IMAP server right? And you have it set
_not_
Actually I didn't see any option to expunge the messages from the imap server.
Dave
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a
long time. Then when I open
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Actually I didn't see any option to expunge the messages from the imap server.
try using fetchmail to pull your mails from the imap server.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
Green light in a.m. for new projects. Red
I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as
domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of
mail to *different* users at both my work domain (kbss.bt.co.uk) and
my home domain (isbd.demon.co.uk). It would be nice if I could set up
(two character?)
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as
domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of
mail to *different* users at both my work domain (kbss.bt.co.uk) and
Never tried this - but you could set up
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 06:47:16PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as
domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of
mail to *different* users at both my
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 06:47:16PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as
domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of
mail to
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Chris Green wrote:
I have mutt installed on three systems with S-Lang and colour working
OK. The fourth system that I have it installed doesn't have the
S-Lang libraries and I'd really prefer not to have to build them
myself (and use up quota there).
So, how do I get
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
It doesn't seem to work, I tried:-
setenv dmn "@isbd.demon.co.uk"
in csh (which we use at work here) and then ran mutt. Entering $dmn
as part of an address didn't get expanded.
You _can_ set unqualified addresses to be suffixed with a domain in
Raju Kurunkad Vasudevan proclaimed on mutt-users that:
or you can use abbreviations in ur editor
for eg. in vim you can set
inorea isbd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
inorea kbss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I pointed out in my prev post on this thread (which hasn't yet made it
to the list flaky sendmail $%$^%)
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 02:00:34PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
- I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as
- domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of
- mail to *different* users at both my work domain (kbss.bt.co.uk) and
- my home domain
Hi,
Thanks for your comments.
Things are working okay now as you can see with mutt upgraded.
However, pgp'ing not really.
In 1.0.1i i could encrypt messages the same way as now exept
When it asks for a key id for the adress to send to, i cant
just type the name of the key or push enter to
Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that:
But you must admit that the two Mail-(User/Admin)-HOWTOS are very poor: I actually
read them, but the Admin one only teaches you how to setup qmail (I went for postfix,
which has great- and thourough :-) - docs and works flawlessly for me) and the
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 14:00:34 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as
domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of
mail to *different* users at both my work domain (kbss.bt.co.uk) and
my home domain
Hi Suresh,
On a standalone linux box connected over a dialup this is trivial - not
when you are telneted into your mailbox which gives you just an 1 mb quota
...
got it? :)
Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me; now I understand what mbox is
for.:-)
Now I see, as I
David Ellement:
|On 000522, at 07:36:38, Randall Hopper wrote:
| Before I just remove these, I wanted to ask what "+language=mutt" is
| supposed to do. Is there a better fix I should be making?
|
|It is supposed to make PGP a little less verbose.
|
|The contrib directory in the
Gerhard den Hollander [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000523 07:06]:
Also pgp doesnt work anymore very nicely.
For PGP file, check that file again, the entire PGP format has changed.
Which brinbgs me to my question.
im using mutt with pgp 2.6.something,
Byrial Jensen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Environment variables are expanded in commands, like the macro
command below, but not in Mutt's line editor. But macros work!
macro editor \$dmn $dmn
Just what the doctor ordered. Thanks!!!
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
I
Hi
Tried installing mutt 1.3.1i on a sun 5.6 box and it built ok, but dumped
core on me.
Building, I gave it a ./configure --prefix=~/testbed to build it in my
home directory, and did a make install.
Then, I ran it. It read my mailbox ok, opened mails ok. When I tried to
send / reply to
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
Sorry to interfer in this tread too, but what is the purpose of mbox?
All read mails will be moved to this folder if you say set move=yes in
your muttrc (it will ask you politely first, of course) :)
Actually, to be
Manuel Arriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
mbox is there for people who use "real" *nix systems with many users and
therefore restrictions on the harddrive space they may use, which has
nothing to do with my case.
Well, not only for them... It's also for users like you who
On 2000-05-23 21:28:52 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Then, I ran it. It read my mailbox ok, opened mails
ok. When I tried to send / reply to mails, it says out
of temporary directory space / tmpdir invalid and dumps
core on me. Mutt 1.3i works like a charm in the same
setup.
While reading another thread here I playd a bit with this macro:
macro editor ,t test
Now I don't know how to get rid of it (short of restarting mutt).
There's no `unmacro' command. Section 3.6 of the manual says nothing
about undefining them.
Marius Gedminas
--
We have enough youth, how
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:53:10PM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 14:00:34 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
I want to be able to have macros that will expand to such things as
domain names which can be used anywhere. For example I send a lot of
mail to *different* users at
I'm using mutt version 1.2i on a Solaris 7 platform with Sendmail 8.9.3
and have the following two questions:
1: When I compose a new message or reply, the message header in my editor
has the following line:
From: Jeffery Small jeff@
Notice the missing domain portion of the
Hi all,
I use mutt 1.2i now. Everything is working just fine, as mutt
always does :)
Anyway, some things are different. Normally when i wish
to sign a message with pgp or completly encrypt a message
then it asks for the key id for that adress.
Normally, when i type a name its good enough, or
I was wondering how to get mutt to check mail properly with a regular unix
style mail spool
I have the following lines in my .muttrc file:
set check_new
set mail_check=5
Still, new mail won't appear until I type a command such as to compose a
message...etc.
Thanks,
Donald
Donald Zoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
I have the following lines in my .muttrc file:
set check_new
set mail_check=5
Still, new mail won't appear until I type a command such as to compose a
message...etc.
Check out the $timeout setting, which is how often Mutt will
I'm having a problem understanding why some messages are threaded as
they are. It seems incorrect to me, but it's probably some subtlety I
don't understand. I am using mutt-1.2i, but the appearance is the same
using mutt-1.0pre4us. Here's an example from the vim mailing list,
which I route to
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
I'm having a problem understanding why some messages are threaded as
they are. It seems incorrect to me, but it's probably some subtlety I
don't understand.
Right... Okay, I *think* I understand what is going on, let's see if I
can
(Hi, I just subscribed to mutt-users :)
I've been using mutt for a while as a nice elm replacement with good MIME
handling, and I just started looking at how to use it with mail filtered
into different folders for mailing lists and users by procmail.
So far, I have a procmailrc that dumps mail
I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate
what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as
an "alternative" or not the original. Thus, not the original which would
be referring to your
This is quite funny. You are explaining proper netiquette with a signature
that contains "Fuck you". I guess netiquette and etiquette are not
considered the same.:)
By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am
curious.
n Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:08:31AM +0200,
Hi Folks,
I asked you about the problem i got with pgp.
However, i forgot to add source = pgp5.rc etc.
Now its working great.
Bye,
Mipam
Jacob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
(Hi, I just subscribed to mutt-users :)
Hi, welcome! :-)
I've been using mutt for a while as a nice elm replacement with good MIME
handling, and I just started looking at how to use it with mail filtered
into different folders for
Mikko Hänninen:
PATH=C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\RUN;C:\WINDOWS\CRASH
you got your path all wrong. with windows it =must= look like this:
PATH=C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\CRASH;C:\WINDOWS\RUN
--
clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corey G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
It only states addresses as alternates.
The name is not accurate, and the description isn't either... I would
guess the name is some historical issue or something,
test
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/D75E0A36
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:20:36PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
G.Embery proclaimed on mutt-users that:
The default binding for view-attachments is `v', which ...
snip
You can also reply to the current message from this menu, and
only the current attachment (or
Mikko Hänninen:
Jacob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
I think I could accomplish this with a wrapper that monitors all my
mailboxes for new mail and display that on a menu, pushing me into
mutt on that mailbox when I select one, but I don't want to reinvent
the
Corey G.:
I would be more than happy to write a better explanation if someone
really wants me to for the documentation. I only want to make Mutt
better like everyone else.
sounds great! i vote ``yes'' both for the effort and the offer.
thanks Corey!
--
clemens
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:30:23PM -0500, Corey G. wrote:
By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am
curious.
The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFCs, this is
rather long, and some
Brian D. Winters proclaimed on mutt-users that:
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:30:23PM -0500, Corey G. wrote:
By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am
curious.
The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .)
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:23:30PM -0500, Corey G. wrote:
I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate
what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as
an "alternative" or not the
52 matches
Mail list logo
