On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 07:43:23PM -0700, AG wrote:
Anyone know why there's such a discrepancy? I think the RPM might be
stripping the binaries but I don't know if that would make such a big
difference... Doing a mutt -v on both the RPM and manual binaries
produces the same output:
Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I'm sure I got
this little code snippet from a mutt-related website...
I've got this in my .procmailrc file:
## Nuke duplicate messages
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages
:0 c
Vincent Danen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages
:0 c
backup
:0 ic
| cd $PMDIR rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e 1,100d`
But it doesn't seem to be working properly (the backup part). I've
got something like over 1000 messages in there now but
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:00:28PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages
:0 c
backup
:0 ic
| cd $PMDIR rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e 1,100d`
But it doesn't seem to be working properly (the backup part). I've
got something like
Well, after two frustrating days I got it all working! Colors work
now that I'm using ncurses (5.0 for those interested), and the
readonly inbox problem is also gone due to this small problem with
the RPM specfile:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
That's what was messing up the permissions on
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
## Nuke duplicate messages
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages
:0 c
backup
:0 ic
| cd $PMDIR rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e 1,100d`
That won't work, unless
Vincent Danen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
No, I'm using the mbox format. Does this mean I can't do this then?
Is there something similar to this for the mbox format?
Hack together something out of grep, awk and sed :) Or look for 'grepmail'
on freshmeat and pipe your procmail recipe to
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:56:38AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
## Nuke duplicate messages
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
## Create backup cache of 100 most recent messages
:0 c
backup
:0 ic
| cd $PMDIR rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e 1,100d`
That
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:29:43PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
No, I'm using the mbox format. Does this mean I can't do this then?
Is there something similar to this for the mbox format?
Hack together something out of grep, awk and sed :) Or look for 'grepmail'
on freshmeat and
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal. Do I understand
that a configuration like
aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would automatically readdress any email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
My
Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
My understanding was that *replying* to a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] would
address the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can find uses for this too. Some mailing lists around here can be
reached via multiple aliases -- [EMAIL
Hello Vincent!
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 03:27:43PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for
Vincent --
...and then Vincent Danen said...
% Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I'm sure I got
% this little code snippet from a mutt-related website...
%
% I've got this in my .procmailrc file:
%
% ## Nuke duplicate messages
...
% ## Create backup cache of 100 most recent
David T-G writes:
Hi again, folks --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% Mutt-1.2.2 is on its way to the FTP archive under
I pulled down the tarball, extracted, patched, configured, and made, but
was stopped because of the keymap_defs.h problem. Perhaps that should be
fixed before
Lars --
...and then Lars Hecking said...
% David T-G writes:
%
% I pulled down the tarball, extracted, patched, configured, and made, but
% was stopped because of the keymap_defs.h problem. Perhaps that should be
% fixed before 1.2.3 comes out...
%
% If you have automake and autoconf
Dave --
...and then Dave Pearson said...
% On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 04:03:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% grepmail keyword /tmp/mutt-11241
%
% and then loads /tmp/mutt-11241 or whatever as the current box.
...
%
% grepmail wrapper that does all this for you. I've got something
Someone at work has a requirement for a command line MUA to use with
S/MIME. He has to automate sending E-Mail to customers with X.509
certificates in their mail programs. He says "I think the RSA BSAFE
toolkit is what I need."
Does anyone know how easy it would be to hook this into mutt? Has
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:53:35AM +0200, clemensF [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
Mike Markowski:
Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
single slash, I get this:
how in the world did you find out? i would never have had the idea to try
to put two slashes in
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 12:18:43AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:48:29PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Is that a "Mutt" in ascii-art? :-) Where's it from..?
Yes, it's that. It is from me, and freshly done. In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Please use it with sig_dashes set.
I still use Mutt 1.0us (1999-10-22), and I don't know this variable. What is it
exactly ?
--
^ Those two dashes just before your .sig _are_ sigdashes.
-suresh
" ^^ Gauthier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 12:18:43AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:48:29PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Is that a "Mutt" in ascii-art? :-) Where's it from..?
Yes,
Gauthier --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 12:18:43AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:48:29PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
%Is that a "Mutt" in ascii-art? :-) Where's it from..?
%
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:24:35PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Hmmm... ok... backup was actually a mailbox file, so I deleted it
and made a directory named backup and changed $PMDIR to
$PMDIR/backup.
As long as the first and second recipe both have the same expression,
and it points
Dave --
...and then Dave Pearson said...
% On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:59:55AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% What a cool idea. Care to share it?
%
% My pleasure, on the understanding that installing and using glimpse is left
% as an exercise for the reader. g
No problem. All I have to do is
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:58:03AM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
different
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 06:16:07AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I'm sure I got
% this little code snippet from a mutt-related website...
%
% I've got this in my .procmailrc file:
%
% ## Nuke duplicate messages
...
% ## Create backup
--
^ Those two dashes just before your .sig _are_ sigdashes.
Not quite. The two dashes plus space are.
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
--
^ Those two dashes just before your .sig _are_ sigdashes.
Not quite. The two dashes plus space are.
yeah, right :)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable.
Suresh --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
%
% --
% ^ Those two dashes just before your .sig _are_ sigdashes.
% Not quite. The two dashes plus space are.
%
% yeah, right :)
Actually, that's very specific, and defined by RFC.
David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
%
% --
% ^ Those two dashes just before your .sig _are_ sigdashes.
% Not quite. The two dashes plus space are.
%
% yeah, right :)
Actually, that's
Hi there. I know this seems more like a tcsh question than a mutt
question, but I only see this behavior in mutt. Anyone know what
would make the screen clear after exiting mutt? I have it set up on
two difference Solaris servers, one running mutt 1.0 and the other
1.0.1, both the same
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Actually, that's very specific, and defined by RFC. Anything that
matches on sigdashes to automatically trim the signature should look for
dash-dash-space instead of just dash-dash ...
Yeah, I know that and have a fix in my procmailrc for it (scarfed
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 22 Jun 2000:
Yeah, I changed it to backup/. instead of just backup... I guess the
first uses maildir and the second uses mh folders. I prefer maildir.
=)
It's only a Maildir if (and only if) it's got the three subdirectories,
cur, new, tmp in
Telsa Gwynne proclaimed on mutt-users that:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 01:07:16PM +0530 or thereabouts, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 08:30:55AM +0100, Telsa Gwynne typed:
Give me a week or so - I'm a fairly new user to mutt (just a couple of
years, that's too short a
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Ken W wrote:
Hi there. I know this seems more like a tcsh question than a mutt
question, but I only see this behavior in mutt. Anyone know what
would make the screen clear after exiting mutt? I have it set up on
two difference Solaris servers, one running mutt 1.0 and
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:56:06AM -0400, Ken W wrote:
Hi there. I know this seems more like a tcsh question than a mutt
question, but I only see this behavior in mutt. Anyone know what
would make the screen clear after exiting mutt? I have
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:02:43PM -0400, Ken W wrote:
They are both set to vt100, if that is what you mean. Also what I
forgot to say is that mutt exits on the one machine like I said, but
vim exits still showing part of the editor. That is why I thought it
had to do with mutt.
vim
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:39:08AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
vim allows the user to override the system's termcap settings, [...]
P.S.
'less' also allows the user to override this restoring of the screen
with the '-X' option. See the less(1) man page or the less FAQ,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Gary Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:02:43PM -0400, Ken W wrote:
They are both set to vt100, if that is what you mean. Also what I
forgot to say is that mutt exits on the one machine like I said, but
vim exits still showing part of the editor. That is
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Gary Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 02:02:43PM -0400, Ken W wrote:
They are both set to vt100, if that is what you mean. Also what I
forgot to say is that mutt exits on the one machine like I said, but
Hello,
I tried to upgrade from mutt 1.3.2 to 1.3.4 by applying the diff
patches to the 1.3.2 source code. It worked well with
diff-1.3.2i-1.3.3i but failed with diff-1.3.3i-1.3.4i: I got many
rejects, almost all hunks failed and the sources didn't compile.
I used the command "patch -p1 --force
Hello! There,
After I upgraded my OS(FreeBSD 5.0-Current) and mutt-1.2, when I
read a mail, push the End key, an error message says,
"keys not bound. Press '?' for help."
Anybody knows the problem, please help!
Many Thanks!
Sam
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:31:12AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone at work has a requirement for a command line MUA to use with
S/MIME. He has to automate sending E-Mail to customers with X.509
certificates in their mail programs. He says "I think the RSA BSAFE
toolkit is what I
Hi everyone,
I use Mutt with Eterm's, and as such, have really cool backgrounds. I
was wondering if there was a way to have Mutt not colour the background
of its text.
Thanks for any help, and if you could cc any replies to my email
address, it would be most helpful.
Cheers
--
Jamie Love
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:49:09AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Hello Dennis,
It might be better to send your emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so that
other people have the chance to see them too, and reply to them. They
might have better answers than I do...
Sorry, I thought I had. This
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 22:36:49 +0200, Meinolf Sander wrote:
Hello,
I tried to upgrade from mutt 1.3.2 to 1.3.4 by applying the diff
patches to the 1.3.2 source code. It worked well with
diff-1.3.2i-1.3.3i but failed with diff-1.3.3i-1.3.4i: I got many
rejects, almost all hunks failed and
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 09:01:04AM +1200, Jamie Love wrote:
I use Mutt with Eterm's, and as such, have really cool backgrounds. I
was wondering if there was a way to have Mutt not colour the background
of its text.
Set the background color to be 'default'. That works just fine for me.
greg
Sam Xie:
read a mail, push the End key, an error message says,
"keys not bound. Press '?' for help."
this happened to me when switching over from command- line to x11 on a new
computer. try ^V End in the shell command- line, it tells you what key-
sequence gets emmitted. control-V is
Hello Byrial,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 12:22:53AM +0200, you wrote:
[...]
I have applied all patches from 1.2 - 1.3 - 1.3.1 - 1.3.2 -
1.3.3 - 1.3.4 without any problems with the program code. There
have however been some minor problems with the Changelog and some
.po files.
[...]
Yes, use
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:59:55AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Dave --
% grepmail wrapper that does all this for you. I've got something similar that
% I use with glimpse. It does the search and, if something was found, it fires
% up mutt with all the found messages in a folder. It ever writes
50 matches
Mail list logo
