Setting pgp_good_sign should help against this. Basically, you
don't know from the outside whether or not something is just
signed+encrypted. So unless it's entirely sure, mutt will claim it
couldn't verify a signature.
On 2001-07-11 21:06:18 -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>Date: Wed, 11 Jul
Please upgrade to a recent development version. These are stable,
and have this problem fixed.
On 2001-07-12 07:29:01 +0300, Alper Ersoy wrote:
>Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 07:29:01 +0300
>From: Alper Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Strange behavior against uppercase Conte
It is the second day that I am trying to fix mutt somehow not to show
questionmarks insed of some national letters. I get a lot of mail
form some hungarian MS Windows users who are using their national
letters, but instead of these characters I only see "?". I tried to
fix it somehow with locale,
Viraj Alankar [mutt-users] <11/07/01 17:08 -0400>:
> 1. Sometimes I CC quite a few people and before mailing the message mutt shows
> only one line for CC and chops off any addresses that don't fit. Is there any
> way to expand this to more than 1 line?
Don't wrap the lines and that won't happe
Viraj Alankar [mutt-users] <11/07/01 17:08 -0400>:
> set editor="vi -u ~/.muttvimrc"
Try
set editor="/usr/bin/vim +':set textwidth=77' +':set wrap' +\`awk '/^$/ {print i+2;
exit} {i++}' %s\` %s"
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Carte
Hello,
Whenever I try to read a mail that has the Content-Type header in
uppercases, mutt complains about unsupported mime-type and forces me to
press v and select the part from the list.
I investigated further and found that this only happens when the mime-type
has "I" in it. My locale (specifi
Hi,
Just started using PGP (in this case, GnuPG) with Mutt and I notice a
problem. When a message is just signed, the message shows that it was
successfully verified (if I have the key) and this is seen on the
"status bar" at the bottom as well. However, when it's both signed and
encrypted, the
* Drew Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> * Ailbhe Leamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > My only real problem with this is that I want it to display only those
> > mailboxes which actually contain new mail.
>
> You're allowed to press it more than once.
My apologies to the list. I see what you mean no
Hello,
I just downloaded and compiled from source the latest version of
abook, to give it a try. The problem I have is really stupid, but, as
embarassing as it is, I can't figure it out, and there is nothing I
can see about it in the man page or the builtin documentation.
(Which might just mean t
Depends on what kind of heuristic bash applies.
On 2001-07-11 21:29:23 +0100, Luke Ross wrote:
>Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:29:23 +0100
>From: Luke Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Mutt User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
>
>Hi
* Ailbhe Leamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Utilize the magical key.
>
> My only real problem with this is that I want it to display only those
> mailboxes which actually contain new mail.
You're allowed to press it more than once.
--
Drew
Hello,
This may be a very dumb question but for the life of me I cannot
figure it out. I am trying to do text formatting when sending mails via mutt
via vim. For some reason, 'gqap' does not do anything for me. I can only do
'{gq}'. I call VIM from mutt with:
set editor="vi -u ~/.muttv
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 04:09:56PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> > ii=`echo $RANDOM`; echo ${ii#${ii%[0-9]}}
>
> Why not use bash to compute the remainder? For instance, if you have
> 13 signature files, compute 0-12 (pseudo-)randomly with:
> $((RANDOM%13))
Yes, I forgot that Bash can do mod
Hi
> > Might be helpful with some naive new-mail checking programs, but of
> > course breaks mechanisms which really look for mailbox updates.
> I vote for removing the code. (c:
> Anyone objects?
Will it affect bash telling me I have new mail? (As in, it'll say I do
every time I quit mutt?)
On (11/07/01 09:17), Drew Raines wrote:
> * Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I would like to limit the list of mailboxes in the folder browser to
> > those that have new mail. Is this possible? If so, how?
>
> Utilize the magical key.
My only real problem with this is that I want it to di
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0500, Drew Raines wrote:
> * "Carl B . Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > How can I tell mutt to mark email as read.
>
>
r works but n doesn't toggle the new flag for me.
Chris
--
The only joy in the world is to begin. -Cesare Pavese
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:51:05PM -0400, William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or, you can play around with RANDOM environment variable (bash), perhaps
> taking only the last digit which will give you 10 choices, ie.
> ii=`echo $RANDOM`; echo ${ii#${ii%[0-9]}}
Why not use bash to com
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:02:13PM -0400, William Park wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:36:52AM -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> > * William Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > 6.3.180. signature
> >
> > Yes, I'm aware of that, but I'm not sure how to turn that into a
> > random sig
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:15:13AM -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> Is there anyway in mutt to randomize the signature? I might like to use
> a different sig for different replies which is easy enough to do using
> mutt/vim combo (del sig :r ~newsig) but how would I randomize between 4
> or 5
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 02:25:28PM +, Nelson D. Guerrero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I tried putting:
>set attribution:"* %n%d wrote on %L:"
>And all it did when replying was put:
>Wed Jul 11, Michael Elkins wrote on Michael Elkins:
Do you have the list address defined in
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:36:52AM -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> * William Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 6.3.180. signature
>
> Yes, I'm aware of that, but I'm not sure how to turn that into a
> random sig. My shell scripting is quite weak I'm afraid ;-(
You may be able to twea
On (11/07/01 12:30), David Champion wrote:
> On 2001.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Ailbhe Leamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > simple ESC+q. However, I found par, and now I need to know how to make
> > elvis use it. Oh, and make it use a ~/.exrc file, so I can have pretty
> > colours w
I use this:
macro index .c "T.\n;WN^T.\n" "Mark all messages as read"
No tabs, special chars, etc. Just copy and paste.
Hitting .c in a folder or mailbox causes all messages to be marked as
read. Much like the 'Catch up' function in mail readers.
HTH
L
On 07/11/01 11:34 AM, Carl B . Constan
"Carl B . Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there anyway in mutt to randomize the signature? I might like to use
> a different sig for different replies which is easy enough to do using
> mutt/vim combo (del sig :r ~newsig) but how would I randomize between 4
> or 5 sig fileis, or randomize
* "Carl B . Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> How can I tell mutt to mark email as read.
This unsets the "new" flag. You could also tag multiple messages and
<;>
--
Drew
* William Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 6.3.180. signature
>
> Type: path
> Default: "~/.signature"
>
> Specifies the filename of your signature, which is appended to all
> outgoing messages. If the filename ends with a pipe (``|''), it is
> assumed that filename i
How can I tell mutt to mark email as read. I use t to tagg the email,
and I just want to mark it as read so mutt doesn't always put me on an
email that I don't want to read just because it's N or O. An I don't
really want to just hit the spacebar to toggle the read flag for every
single message.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:15:13AM -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> Is there anyway in mutt to randomize the signature?
This is what I use:
#!/bin/sh
SIGFILES=`ls ~/.sigs/sig.* |wc -l`
RANDOM=$$
cat ~/.sigs/sig.`expr $RANDOM % $SIGFILES`
I put this in a script called randsig.sh, and
set si
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:15:13AM -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> Is there anyway in mutt to randomize the signature? I might like to use
> a different sig for different replies which is easy enough to do using
> mutt/vim combo (del sig :r ~newsig) but how would I randomize between 4
> or 5
* On Wed Jul 11, Michael Elkins wrote:
-> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:21:49AM +, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
-> > This is prolly a stupid question, but I'm gonna throw it
-> > anyways. How do I, when replying to an email put the mailing list or
-> > mbox on the attribution?
->
-> If you fi
Is there anyway in mutt to randomize the signature? I might like to use
a different sig for different replies which is easy enough to do using
mutt/vim combo (del sig :r ~newsig) but how would I randomize between 4
or 5 sig fileis, or randomize between sigs/quotes from one large file?
Has anyone
On 07/11/01 07:32 PM, Marco Fioretti sat at the `puter and typed:
> Lou,
>
> I am happily repling to your message in the mutt editor, with properly
> colored quotes and all, after replacing the mutt_vim_rc file with the
> one you sent yesterday.
>
> Thanks again!,
>
> Marc
Hello,
I know how to format my mutt message indexes with commands like this:
set index_format = "%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-18.18F %s"
and I know how to color some lines differently, i.e. assuming that I
want to spot easily all the messages that *I* sent, with something
like:
color index default red '
Lou,
I am happily repling to your message in the mutt editor, with properly
colored quotes and all, after replacing the mutt_vim_rc file with the
one you sent yesterday.
Thanks again!,
Marco
On 2001/07/10 20:18:20 -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> I thought that file looked
> In order to remove this behaviour, you'd just have to comment out
> lines 960-965 in mbox.c.
Ah, great. Hm, but what will I break doing that? :-)
> Thinking about it, the code in question makes sure that an mbox
> folder's mtime is always the point of time at which the last message
> was _a
On 2001.07.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ailbhe Leamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> simple ESC+q. However, I found par, and now I need to know how to make
> elvis use it. Oh, and make it use a ~/.exrc file, so I can have pretty
> colours while editing.
"" Par lines from my .exrc. Note l
Hi people
OK, I'm really stupid, I should be able to work this out myself.
However.
I have been using emacs -nw as my editor for as long as I've used
mutt, simply because I can reformat most normal and quoted text with a
simple ESC+q. However, I found par, and now I need to know how to make
elv
I'm having trouble figuring out the date format for my
attribution line. I want it to show as or
something a lot shorter than the default. Can someone provide
this for me?
thanks,
jc
--
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:21:49AM +, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
> This is prolly a stupid question, but I'm gonna throw it
> anyways. How do I, when replying to an email put the mailing list or
> mbox on the attribution?
If you filter the mail for a particular mailing list into its own
J-C Hendrickx [11/07/01 18:44 +0200]:
> Hello,
> I saw a screenshot of Mutt in a Xwindow with a menu :
> File view message Folder Search
> How can I do that ?
Install Eterm (if you mean the screenshots at mutt.org)
-suresh
Hello,
I saw a screenshot of Mutt in a Xwindow with a menu :
File view message Folder Search
How can I do that ?
A little advice please.
Thank you.
Mutt 1.3.18i
J-C H.
--
Jean-Claude Hendrickx
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001, Dan Boger wrote:
> Just a wild guess that the vi gurus here could help me out... When I
> reply to a message, I try to quote only the relevant parts. But once
> I'm done, especially if the message is part of a long and over quoted
> thread, I have to delete 10s, or even 100
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 12:17:05PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
> any easy way of doing "Delete until ^--"?
Well, d} will delete everything until the next blank line, which
should work, since mutt puts in a blank line before the signature
separator. Alternatively you could just, as you suggest, do
d/
Just a wild guess that the vi gurus here could help me out... When I
reply to a message, I try to quote only the relevant parts. But once
I'm done, especially if the message is part of a long and over quoted
thread, I have to delete 10s, or even 100s of lines before I get to my
sig... any easy
On (11/07/01 10:30), Ken Weingold wrote: This brings up a question of
> mine, since we are on the topic. This comes up more in USENET than
> email, though. You have a thread going on for a while, and want to
> quote it, but it is MANY lines. That is where I wonder what to do,
> since you could
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:40:13AM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:27:06AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > On 2001-07-11 08:22:09 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
> >
> > >I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I
> > >find is that all question now goes (
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:11:19AM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Ok, now I feel like an ass. =)
You shouldn't, an ass would not have asked the question in the first place,
he would have just struggled on grumbling to himself about &^%$&*ing lame
mail clients...
> Just a suggestion, you may want
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach »John Arundel« am 2001-07-11 um 15:55:48 +0100 :
> > Remember that in most cases people reading your followup will have just
> > read the preceding message. They don't need to see it again.
>
> Exactly.
Usually yes, but there really are ca
So sprach »John Arundel« am 2001-07-11 um 15:55:48 +0100 :
> Remember that in most cases people reading your followup will have just
> read the preceding message. They don't need to see it again.
Exactly.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (engl
* Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just a suggestion, you may want to make it so that the
> capitalization is always uppercase in the manual, since
> in some places it's TAB and some it's tab. I saw it
> referenced as "tab", so that's what I grepped for.
grep -i "[ <]tab[ >]"
--
Drew
John Arundel [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Mutt manual, section 3.11: "Defining mailboxes which receive mail."
>
> "Pressing TAB in the directory browser will bring up a menu showing the
> files specified by the mailboxes command, and indicate which contain
> new messages. Mutt will automatically
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 10:50:25AM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> I didn't see anything in the manual about the views and
> how to order them.
Mutt manual, section 3.11: "Defining mailboxes which receive mail."
"Pressing TAB in the directory browser will bring up a menu showing the
files specifie
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 10:30:49AM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
> You have a thread going
> on for a while, and want to quote it, but it is MANY lines. That is
> where I wonder what to do, since you could have more than a page-worth
> of just quoting, and it is all relevent.
Unlikely. The only rea
Drew Raines [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I would like to limit the list of mailboxes in the folder
> > browser to those that have new mail. Is this possible?
> > If so, how?
>
> Utilize the magical key.
On this subject, is there any way to make this the default
folder view, so I don't have t
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Exactly - and that's (one of) the reasons, why TOFU (german, meaning: text
> above, full quote below) is *BAD*. It wastes bandwith and makes it harder to
> follow to what *EXACTLY* you're relying. It's simply neither necessary nor
> wanted nor is
Hi,
my problem is, that I have an internal e-mail address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
where csoliver is my user-name, and an external name
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now the mail I have send off (and got back by bcc)
is not recognized as my outgoing mail, but as mail from
From: Oliver Kullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTE
* Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I would like to limit the list of mailboxes in the folder browser to those that
> have new mail. Is this possible? If so, how?
Utilize the magical key.
--
Drew
:D You guys are gonna make me have to go reread the diff manpages,
aren't you?
I can't promise I'll remember to do it all the time but if you quit
picking on me, I'll try :)
L
On 07/11/01 04:25 AM, Thomas Dickey sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 09:37:21PM -0400, Louis LeB
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 02:21:52PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> Insert
>
> send-hook . 'unmy_hdr X-BOFH-Excuse:'
>
> before the one below. See section 4.4 Using Hooks in TFM.
Um, yeah. That works. Thanks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mathie.cx/~graeme/
> The header stays the same for the entire mutt session. I thought to
> myself that perhaps the my_hdr was only being evaluated once, so I tried
> the following instead:
Insert
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr X-BOFH-Excuse:'
before the one below. See section 4.4 Using Hooks in TFM.
> send-hook . "
Hello everyone,
This is prolly a stupid question, but I'm gonna throw it
anyways. How do I, when replying to an email put the mailing list or
mbox on the attribution?
---
..
| Nelson D. Guerrero
As far as I can tell, anything in backticks inside .muttrc is evaluated
when .muttrc is first read. I was wondering if it is possible to have
'lazy evaluation' instead -- ie the shell command is evaluated when the
variable is referenced.
The reason for this is that I've an extra header as follow
Hi !
Please help me ...
One more time: Why can't I see in mutt the 8bit chars.
All outgoing message produced by mutt is right.
charset is iso-8859-2
Viewing mailboxes with an external program I can see the 8bit chars,
in mutt there are ??? instead of e', a'...
Thanks
--
-
Hi everyone,
Apologies for sending this again.. I didn't have a subject first time.. so I have
added this time.
I'm just starting with Mutt and have used a config taken from a web site to get things
started.. the person's taste in colors is just right.
What I want to know is when using vi (vi
Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
> if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
> email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons original
> email when replying.
>
> I have my si
Hi !
I can't see 8bit chars in mutt, but produce right output.
Only mutt eat the chars.I see ??? instead of e', a'...
--
-
Attila | >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<< | Szabo
-
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:16:25PM +1000, Anthony Green wrote:
>
> Most, if not all email programs these days have you reply to a message
> *above* the email text that you have been sent and quote it in some
> form .. the >'s etc.
>
> So ... if the signature was appended at the top of the email
Anthony Green [mutt-users] <11/07/01 21:05 +1000>:
> Hello all ..
> I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
> if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
> email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons original
> email when
Hi everyone,
I'm just starting with Mutt and have used a config taken from a web site to get things
started.. the person's taste in colors is just right.
What I want to know is when using vi (vim) on my linux box, what syntax is it using?
I tried searching the archive but didn't have much luc
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:16:25PM +1000, Anthony Green wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Take for example my reply to your email now . I type at the
> top and reply to your email ... but my signature is *below* you email.
>
> Most, if not all email programs these days have you reply to a message
> *above* t
I wish to know whether Mutt supports shell variables. (My
problem is that my attachments are frequently in very deeply nested
folders for which i have already created shell variables.)
However i havent been able to use them. e.g. when attaching a file, i
tried:
attach file: $MYCLASS/x.java
attach
Hi,
Take for example my reply to your email now . I type at the
top and reply to your email ... but my signature is *below* you email.
Most, if not all email programs these days have you reply to a message
*above* the email text that you have been sent and quote it in some
form .. the >'s et
Hello all ..
I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons original
email when replying.
I have my signature set in my .muttrc as :
set sig
Hi,
I would like to limit the list of mailboxes in the folder browser to those that
have new mail. Is this possible? If so, how?
-- Biju
--
-
Biju Chacko| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Exocore Consulting | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (play)
On 11.07.2001 03:37:21 Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> Yes, more readable, but also three times longer - which on smaller
How about -u then? Just ~2 times longer and still more readable than "plain"
diff.
I have observed that while sending mails with a pdf attachment, the size of
the pdf attachment changes when it reaches
the destination.Sometimes(randomly).i am not able to open the pdf
attachment...gives an error like "error reading the document".
The attachment behaves differently if the de
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 09:37:21PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 07/10/01 05:37 PM, Ryan Cook sat at the `puter and typed:
> > read. The '-c' flag on a diff provides much more readable content.
> Yes, more readable, but also three times longer - which on smaller
> displays or shorter xterms, h
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:27:06AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2001-07-11 08:22:09 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
>
> >I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I
> >find is that all question now goes ([yes] / no) and if i type 'n'
> >it interprets as a YES, and I keep for
On 2001-07-11 08:22:09 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
>I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I
>find is that all question now goes ([yes] / no) and if i type 'n'
>it interprets as a YES, and I keep forgetting pressing 'N'
This shouldn't happen. What locale are you using?
-
On 2001-07-10 19:08:27 -0500, Andy Spiegl wrote:
>> >> hamster:~>l testmailbox
>> >> -rw---1 spiegl users 26537 Feb 20 20:57 testmailbox
>[...]
>> >> hamster:~>l testmailbox
>> >> -rw---1 spiegl users 26579 Feb 20 20:57 testmailbox
>[...]
>> >> hamster:~>l testmail
On 2001-07-10 19:08:27 -0500, Andy Spiegl wrote:
>By the way you are also wrong about the proof of the 60 seconds.
>:-) I had done this test not 5 months ago, but very recently.
>Only the timestamp of the file is from February!
Thinking about it, the code in question makes sure that an mbox
f
I was going to ask for what your alias was, but I went and
tried it myself. ls -l shows the same effect!
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:08:27PM -0500, Andy Spiegl wrote:
> By the way you are also wrong about the proof of the 60 seconds. :-)
> I had done this test not 5 months ago, but very recently.
83 matches
Mail list logo
