Hello,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:57:48:PM -0700 Steve Talley wrote:
The pipe command doesn't save the output of the command as a new
version of the message. It also doesn't mark the original message as
deleted.
Right. But why not write a macro which:
1) pipes the message to a command
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:11:22:PM -0700 Steve Talley wrote:
Rocco Rutte wrote:
Right. But why not write a macro which:
1) pipes the message to a command (this command may be a shell
script using another instance of Mutt to send the *changed* mail
to yourself),
What
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:48:00:AM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote:
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 01:01]:
Should even fit on a line in your config
as works by pressing just *one* key.
I guess, this won't end up quickly and I'm running out of coffee... ;-)
well, you can put
Steve --
...and then Steve Talley said...
%
% If mutt has the ability to allow the user to edit a message, and then
% automatically save it to the mail folder, and delete the orignal, why
% shouldn't it be able to do the same with an arbitrary shell script?
It can -- just as you've defined it
Mike, et al --
...and then Mike Schiraldi said...
%
% Someone posted a patch a few months ago which has mutt change the file's
% timestamp to one second ago before calling the editor, so that you
% wouldn't need that pause.
That's Byrial's ed_mtime patch. It was needed up through 1.2 but the
Steve --
This is my only other response on the subject, I promise :-)
...and then Steve Talley said...
%
% It looks like modifying the $editor variable and resetting it later is
% the easiest solution. It's a shame mutt can't do this more elegantly.
I can't imagine a more elegant way, since
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:11:22:PM -0700 Steve Talley wrote:
%
% There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
% own commands. Something like:
%
% define my-command-1
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:52:42PM +0100:
%
% Can I convince mutt to ignore the In-Reply-To
% header if there is a References header?
...
%
% I guess he could use procmail to remove the In-Reply-To header
Nat, et al --
...and then Nathaniel Irons said...
%
% On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:55:43AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
% On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:39:23PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% You could either turn off $save_name, but have to remember to turn it
% back on, but have to figure out
begin quoting what David T-G said on Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:28:07AM -0500:
See the original mail; he already begged to not go that route because of
all of his old mail that would need reprocessing.
man perl
:-)
msg25859/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Florian Schintke wrote:
It would be great if mutt would wrap the fields dispayed in the
compose window over several lines if necessary.
If I mail to many people, like a bunch of students I can only see
two or three of the names in the 'To:' field, because the list is too
long. It would be
Perhaps something as simple as renaming the edit-message function to
tweak-message, telling it to use $tweak_prog which defaults to $editor
if $t_p is undefined, and explaining in the manual why tweak-message is
bound to 'e' would do it.
How about just adding a command called edit-with? It
Here's the patch. I wrote it, i'll let you test it.
Don't forget to sleep 1 or else mutt will assume your script didn't do
anything.
--
Mike Schiraldi
VeriSign Applied Research
Index: OPS
===
RCS file:
set from = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not working
--
Pankaj Jangid
National Centre for Software Technology
msg25863/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* On 2002.03.20, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
own commands. Something like:
define my-command-1 'mutt-command-1mutt-command-2enter'
define my-command-2
Quoting David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 21, 2002 13:15]:
* On 2002.03.20, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to
define my own commands. Something like:
define my-command-1
Mike Schiraldi wrote:
Perhaps something as simple as renaming the edit-message function to
tweak-message, telling it to use $tweak_prog which defaults to $editor
if $t_p is undefined, and explaining in the manual why tweak-message is
bound to 'e' would do it.
How about just adding a
David T-G wrote:
Steve --
...and then Steve Talley said...
If mutt has the ability to allow the user to edit a message, and
then automatically save it to the mail folder, and delete the
orignal, why shouldn't it be able to do the same with an arbitrary
shell script?
It can -- just
David T-G wrote:
Can I convince mutt to ignore the In-Reply-To header if there
is a References header? ...
I guess he could use procmail to remove the In-Reply-To header if
there is a References header. Or rewrite it to say the same
thing.
See the original mail; he already
Try,
my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (My Name)
Sam
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
set from = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not working
--
Pankaj Jangid
National Centre for Software Technology
--
Satyajit Grover
http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~satyajit/
Thanks to those of you who came back with useful suggestions.
David Ellement suggested this little concoction, and that's what I'm using
now:
macro index M :my_hdr Importance: high\nmail
Thanks again
Dan.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 08:08:09PM +, Daniel Bye wrote:
Hi all,
Wonder if
Dan --
...and then Daniel Bye said...
%
% Thanks to those of you who came back with useful suggestions.
HTH
%
% David Ellement suggested this little concoction, and that's what I'm using
% now:
%
% macro index M :my_hdr Importance: high\nmail
From the manual
3.12. User defined
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:53:53AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% $save_name refers to copies of outgoing messages, correct? (Otherwise
% the documentation is wrong).
It has been verified to me off-list that $save_name will not only
determine the target for your fcc but also for where a
Nat --
...and then Nathaniel Irons said...
%
% On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:53:53AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% % $save_name refers to copies of outgoing messages, correct? (Otherwise
% % the documentation is wrong).
%
% It has been verified to me off-list that $save_name will not only
...
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:40:09PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
it appears to me that you'll want a default send-hook that will undo this
for you UNLESS YOU INTEND TO COMMUNICATE ONLY WITH AOL USERS FROM NOW ON ;-)
Yeah, I simply defined this macro:
macro index m :unmy_hdr Importance\nmail
This is cool! Thanks Mike!
One suggestion I could see for improvement would be to prompt for a
filter program (instead of an alternate editor) and then replace the
message with the STDOUT of the filter. That way simple things like:
sed 's/\re:/Re:/i'
or
grep -v '^X-Priority'
would
* Daniel Bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 20:07]:
%
% Thanks again
HTH HAND
%
% Dan.
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL
* Daniel Bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 20:07]:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:40:09PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
it appears to me that you'll want a default send-hook
that will undo this for you UNLESS YOU INTEND TO
COMMUNICATE ONLY WITH AOL USERS FROM NOW ON ;-)
Yeah, I simply defined this
21-Mar-02 at 22:32, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
however, you will thereby lose 'm' for the mail
command. maybe you have no use for this, but...
Not if you have remapped another key to the mail command, such as if you were
an ex PINE junkie who keeps hitting c and ends up changing
* Steve Talley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 20:35]:
One suggestion I could see for improvement would be to
prompt for a filter program (instead of an alternate editor)
and then replace the message with the STDOUT of the filter.
jeez - what else does mutt have to get for this?
if you want
Right, let's see how many faux pas I can commit _this_ time...
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:32:39PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
Yeah, I simply defined this macro:
macro index m :unmy_hdr Importance\nmail
which clears the my_hdr: thing.
however, you will thereby lose 'm' for the mail
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
LISP.
There - I've said it.
or grep -v '^X-Priority' would work.
.. which you can use via a subshell.
I don't know. It would be nice to press the key bound to filter and type,
like,
perl -pe 's/.*?//g'
to remove all HTML tags from a message.
Or
tr A-Za-z N-ZA-Mn-za-m
to rot13 a message. Of course, that'd mess up
Sven Guckes wrote:
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 16:49]:
Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
LISP.
* Daniel Bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-21 22:09]:
macro index m :unmy_hdr Importance\nmail
which clears the my_hdr: thing.
however, you will thereby lose 'm' for the mail command.
Well, no - the new definition of m turns off the header, then
invokes mutt's internal mail command... It
Mike Schiraldi wrote:
or grep -v '^X-Priority' would work.
.. which you can use via a subshell.
I don't know. It would be nice to press the key bound to filter and type,
like,
perl -pe 's/.*?//g'
to remove all HTML tags from a message.
Or
tr A-Za-z N-ZA-Mn-za-m
to rot13 a
Why do you need to *replace* the message with its filtered version?
At 5:18 PM EST on March 21 Mike Schiraldi sent off:
I don't know. It would be nice to press the key bound to filter and type,
like,
perl -pe 's/.*?//g'
to remove all HTML tags from a message.
It's practically a necessity
At 6:50 PM EST on March 21 Steve Talley sent off:
One more example:
formail -i 'References: ...'
to force a message into a thread (and overcome poorly-behaved mailers
that leave out the References: and In-Reply-To: headers).
I like patch-1.3.25.cd.edit_threads.9.1 for that.
--
It
begin quoting what Michael Elkins said on Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:25:46PM -0800:
This converstion comes up every once in a while and devolves into my
programming language is better than yours ultimately.
Just put an INTERCAL interpreter in there.
Or, better yet, befunge. Then you can say
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:10:40PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
Why do you need to *replace* the message with its filtered version?
At 5:18 PM EST on March 21 Mike Schiraldi sent off:
I don't know. It would be nice to press the key bound to filter and type,
like,
perl -pe 's/.*?//g'
to
On 11:44 21 Mar 2002, Steve Talley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| David T-G wrote:
| ...and then Steve Talley said...
| If mutt has the ability to allow the user to edit a message, and
| then automatically save it to the mail folder, and delete the
| orignal, why shouldn't it be able to do the
At 7:33 PM EST on March 21 Gary Johnson sent off:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:10:40PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
# Despite the name, stripmime.pl is really for deHTMLization.
macro index H |/home/reid/bin/stripmime.pl /var/spool/mail/reid
i.e. it makes a copy that goes in my inbox, and
Is there a way to pass the location of the current folder to the shell?
This is being discussed in the filtering thread, but I also want to use it in
my thread killfiler. There are some threads (including in my inbox) that I
don't want being counted as new mail, so I filter them out with a
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote:
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
% own commands. Something like:
%
% define my-command-1 'mutt-command-1mutt-command-2enter'
% define
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:56:43:AM -0600 Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Yepp.
Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
It would be
Hi,
As the subject says, I recently switched from Netscape to mutt,
a couple of weeks ago. I wanted to do it for a long time, for
several reasons, but you know how lazy one can be when it comes
to changing ones habits... :o)
I spent some time on the configuration, and it's _almost_
perfect
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:58:16PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
At 7:33 PM EST on March 21 Gary Johnson sent off:
You're going to too much work, and I would imagine that the results
don't look very good. To fix HTML e-mail, just put this in your mailcap
file:
text/html; w3m -dump %s;
Flavien wrote:
*) I filter my fetchmailed-mails through procmail and send the mails
to the appropriate folders (especially mailing lists). Mutt does not
show N in front of the dirs.
just to check, do you have them listed in your muttrc as 'mailboxes' ?
*) Aliases : Do I really have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Jerry Van Brimmer on Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 08:19:40PM -0800:
I'm new to Mutt. I have been able to get Mutt set up so that I can POP
download my email and read it, but I can't get mail to reach it's
destination. When I press y to send, I can
Yes, I am using sendmail, but I have no clue as to where sendmail's log file is.
Do you know?
Thanks
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:20:35 -0500
Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Jerry Van Brimmer on Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 08:19:40PM -0800:
Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
Yes, I am using sendmail, but I have no clue as to where sendmail's
log file is. Do you know?
this depends on your operating system. sounds from your original
message like you're using linux; most likely your logs will be in
/var/log - the mail stuff will possibly
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:33:47:PM -0800 Gary Johnson wrote:
You're going to too much work, and I would imagine that the results
don't look very good. To fix HTML e-mail, just put this in your mailcap
file:
text/html; w3m -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput
and this in
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:10:52:AM +0100 Flavien wrote:
*) When reading a list, I often press 'd'. I would like mutt
to display the next _unread_ message, and not the next message
in the list (I have the messages sorted by thread, thus it
often displays messages I already read).
Just
53 matches
Mail list logo
