Hi,
I sometimes receive messages with an embedded photo and I wonder how
do display it easily from within mutt. On the console the photo can
be viewed using
gpg --edit-key showphoto quit
1) Has someone maybe already written a macro that does exactly this?
2) If not, how do I extract the keyID
> > I presume mutt needs multipart/signed.
>
> Sounds like a reasonable guess. I don't suppose you could send in a
> message that has been mangled this way? It would make it easier to
> test.
I'm attaching a tgz archive with both versions, most of the headers stripped
that are not relevant to
mixed
> structure, presumably done by the list server for the purpose of adding
> a (text, 7-bit) footer. Exchange flattens the struture into a multipart/
> mixed with a qp text part, a application/pgp-signature part in base64,
> and another base64 text part.
>
> I presume mutt ne
, 7-bit) footer. Exchange flattens the struture into a multipart/
mixed with a qp text part, a application/pgp-signature part in base64,
and another base64 text part.
I presume mutt needs multipart/signed.
There was a thread on this mailing list back in March,
http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=130016436305546&w=2
List: mutt-users
Subject:application/pgp-signature is unsupported
From: Joseph < xxx () gmail ! com>
Date: 2011-03-15 4:44:57
which doesn'
On 03/15/11 16:21, Derek Martin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:09:15AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I tried all combinations:
set crypt_verify_sig=ask-no
set crypt_verify_sig=ask-yes
set crypt_verify_sig=yes
Makes no difference, I always get [-- application/pgp-signature is
unsupported (use '
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:09:15AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I tried all combinations:
> set crypt_verify_sig=ask-no
> set crypt_verify_sig=ask-yes
> set crypt_verify_sig=yes
>
> Makes no difference, I always get [-- application/pgp-signature is
> unsupported (use 'v'
always get
[-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
--
Joseph
* On 15 Mar 2011, Joseph wrote:
> The addition in mailcap I just added in, but it makes no difference.
> I know before it used to ask me if I want to view the signature but some how
> it doesn't any more.
What is the value of $pgp_verify_sig? What you describe sounds like
it used to be ask-yes
On 03/15/11 00:23, David Champion wrote:
* On 14 Mar 2011, Joseph wrote:
I'm missing a setting I think.
When I open gpg signed message I get:
application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view ...
mutt pgp setting:
# automatically verify the sign of a message
* On 14 Mar 2011, Joseph wrote:
> I'm missing a setting I think.
> When I open gpg signed message I get:
>
> application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view ...
>
> mutt pgp setting:
> # automatically verify the sign of a message when opened
>
I'm missing a setting I think.
When I open gpg signed message I get:
application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view ...
mutt pgp setting:
# automatically verify the sign of a message when opened
set crypt_verify_sig=yes
mailcap
application/pgp-signature; gpg %s
Wh
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:05:40AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
> There is a parameter to turn off the auto-verifying, isn't there?
>
> #unset pgp_verify_sig # automatically verify message signatures
> (yes)
>
> Just uncomment this line (if not, add it).
>
That sounds like a sensible
There is a parameter to turn off the auto-verifying, isn't there?
#unset pgp_verify_sig # automatically verify message signatures
(yes)
Just uncomment this line (if not, add it).
best regards,
charlie
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 08:50:15PM +, Chris G wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 201
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:35:20PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 19:56:13 +, Chris G wrote:
> > Sitting for tens of seconds while mutt retrieves a key from a web site
> > is just silly.
> >
> > Is there a way to turn this off while still allowing me to send (
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 19:56:13 +, Chris G wrote:
> Sitting for tens of seconds while mutt retrieves a key from a web site
> is just silly.
>
> Is there a way to turn this off while still allowing me to send (using
> 'p') signed messages?
I haven't paid a lot of attention to the Mutt side of
Now that I have implemented PGP (for one correspondent who wants it) I'm
realising why I didn't do so before.
It takes *ages* for mutt to show any message from a new correspondent
who has a PGP signature.
Seriously this is a big issue for me, I *really* don't care who wrote
most
* Buzzer <4625...@gmail.com> 09.10.2009
> 8-Oct-2009 числа в 14:16 часов, ты написал(а) следующее:
>
> > > For application/pgp-signature type not found record in mailcap file.
> > >
> > > set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap"
> > >
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 07:34:05PM -0700, Buzzer wrote:
> For application/pgp-signature type not found record in mailcap file.
>
> set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap"
> $ cat ~/.mailcap
> application/pgp-signature; gpg %s
Try removing the quotes:
set mailcap_path=~/.mailcap
8-Oct-2009 числа в 14:16 часов, ты написал(а) следующее:
> > For application/pgp-signature type not found record in mailcap file.
> >
> > set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap"
> > $ cat ~/.mailcap
> > application/pgp-signature; gpg %s
>
> I have my g
* Buzzer <4625...@gmail.com> 08.10.2009
> For application/pgp-signature type not found record in mailcap file.
>
> set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap"
> $ cat ~/.mailcap
> application/pgp-signature; gpg %s
Hello Buzzer,
I have my gpg stuff in my muttrc. Here it is fro
For application/pgp-signature type not found record in mailcap file.
set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap"
$ cat ~/.mailcap
application/pgp-signature; gpg %s
--
/Buzzer () кампания ascii ribbon - против писем в html формате
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - против про
Looks like mutt developers are already taking care of this :)
http://bugs.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3067
Thanks.
--
---
http://stupidityandmalice.blogspot.com/ Ignacio Mondino
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:36:33PM +0200, Angel Olivera wrote:
> Maybe your distribution sets $pgp_autoinline by default? Try unsetting
> it.
Doesn't work either, Im using Mutt 1.5.18 (2008-05-17) in Debian Lenny
and testing against a gmail account.
Thanks.
>¬
--
--
On Wed 09.Jul.08 15:47, Ignacio Mondino wrote:
Seems like some web mail services (gmail, yahoo and some others)
append the content of my signature file to the mail body resulting in
somting like:
[...]
Is there a way to configure mutt to do the same as the other MUA's?
Maybe your distribut
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 03:07:09PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> set pgp_clearsign_command=
>
>
> 3.185. pgp_clearsign_command
>
>Type: string
>Default: ""
>
>This format is used to create a old-style "clearsigned" PGP
>message.
>Note that the use of this format is
sig
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIc/ZbuPfkTSOyAeERAqjmAJ9qSNLfqvo1A2PlZDHMZ8uOKYQdowCfQqP4
> VOqwWdgkAPdks2lzAWU47HA=
> =bwF1
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
>
> However, this happends only wh
Hi,
Seems like some web mail services (gmail, yahoo and some others) append
the content of my signature file to the mail body resulting in somting
like:
message
-
sig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIc
riable is only used if ``$$mime_forward'' is \fIset\fP and
** ``$$mime_forward_decode'' is \fIunset\fP.
*/
+ { "pgp_bottom_sig", DT_BOOL, R_NONE, OPTPGPBOTTOMSIG, 0},
+ /*
+ ** .pp
+ ** When set, the PGP signature report will be at the end of the signed
+ ** message part.
x27;s idea of a secret is not to tell who told her.
msg31887/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
index \Cv "set
pgp_verify_sig=yesset pgp_verify_sig=no"
"Verify PGP signature"
macro pager \Cv "iset
pgp_verify_sig=yesset pgp_verify_sig=no"
"Verify PGP signature"
Many thanks to René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Champion
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
7;ve never encountered a downed key server at
> the site I'm using)
Oh, so you *are* a newbie! ;-) Pardon my svenning, but key servers just
don't seem to stay up for very long.
> If I always verify, then I don't have to remember the verify command.
Put this in your .
;ve never encountered a downed key server at
the site I'm using) signed by this person. If I always verify,
then I don't have to remember the verify command. On occasions
when I want to verify I don't need to care how it's done because
I've already done it.
It might all go back to my mother not allowing me to purchase
the secret decoder ring on the back of the rice crispies box.
Ever since then I've always thought things related to encryption
were cool.
JPK
msg31865/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The burning question on the mind of every dyslexic existentialist:
"Is there a dog?"
msg31864/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
again, all my life I've wanted things I can't have.
JPK
msg31861/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
reasts.
One is not enough and three are too many.
msg31860/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[I know it might have bad security consequences, but I really don't
like to see most of my screen eaten by the outout of GPG checking PGP
signatures.]
Is there a way to display the message "Good signature from..." *after*
the message, not between the headers and the messages? Or to hide it
unless
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 08:20 -0500]:
> AFAIK you're out of luck. It's my understanding that mutt feeds to gpg
> the entire body, including MIME headers, for signing and then attaches
> the signature after that -- which means that just saving the body off is
> insufficient.
A
pg-users list or maybe mutt-dev to get a hint as to what exactly
mutt has gpg sign.
--
Peter Abplanalp
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: pgp.mit.edu
msg29255/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg29254/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-25 18:01]:
> People have sent me some PGP signed emails in PGP/MIME format
> (with signature as a separate attachment). I would like to turn
> these into standalone files with just the contents and the
> signatures. Does anyone here know how I'd go abo
People have sent me some PGP signed emails in PGP/MIME format (with
signature as a separate attachment). I would like to turn these into
standalone files with just the contents and the signatures. Does
anyone here know how I'd go about doing this?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / DNRC / UMBC-LUG: http:/
Hello Aaron,
On Sunday, April 14, 2002 at 5:38:20 PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
[quoted-unreadable encoding]
>> some dots *not* beginning a line were rejected at beginning of next
>> one, because of QP soft cutting long lines... And Mutt didn't notice
>> it should have encoded it.
> Yeah, I
rg/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27859/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mutt to say "PGP signature could NOT be verified" and the
% index "s" to remain lowercase. Zero *and* a match are necessary for Mutt
% to announce successfull verification and uppercase the "S".
Thanks to Alain's dedicated digging, we've also figured out the pr
n't
need mutt to do double check that.
If anybody ever finds out what the problem in this special
case is, I'd like to get a note...
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27836/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gave, but you have
another half...
> According to the manual, gpg has to return an exit value of non zero
> making mutt reporting a bad signature allthough it's good.
Exactly: Non zero GPG exit code *or* $pgp_good_sign not matching GPG
output, lead Mutt to say "PGP signature coul
* Rahul Rekapalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-22 19:59]:
> I enabled PGP signing in mutt, when i view the mail, mutt shows the
> PGP signature inline, but a couple of friends of mine who use Pine,
> asked me why my PGP signature was attached rather than being inline.
> Is ther
ignature from" (or your real
> localized GnuPG output string)
That seems to work. According to the manual, gpg has to return an
exit value of non zero making mutt reporting a bad signature allthough
it's good.
So, this is not really a solution.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27566/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Rocco,
On Monday, April 22, 2002 at 9:47:28 PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> When I look at mails which verify okay with gpg, mutt sometimes says
> the signature could not be verified.
-1) set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from" (or your real
localized GnuPG output string)
-2) If
p, I could not verify this one!
gpg: BAD signature from "David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
And in Mutt's status line:
PGP signature could NOT be verified.
It's of course because of my found but still unsolved local delivery
problem. Once the superfluous dots
essed patch, is all, I think...
--
Dan Boger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg27543/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is is what I have so far:
My mutt has problems with traditional pgp signatures created
by the sender. Adjusting the content/type doesn't help, too.
I'm interested in what others get to find out wether it's a
general problem or something is wrong with my modified version
of mutt.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27541/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
& HAND
:-D
- --
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
-BEGIN
Rahul --
...and then Rahul Rekapalli said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
% I enabled PGP signing in mutt, when i view the mail, mutt shows the
% PGP signature inline, but a couple of friends of mine who use Pine,
Of course. mutt sucks less than anything else!
% asked me why my PGP signature was
begin Rahul Rekapalli quotation:
> I enabled PGP signing in mutt, when i view the mail, mutt shows the
> PGP signature inline, but a couple of friends of mine who use Pine,
> asked me why my PGP signature was attached rather than being inline.
> Is there something that I have conf
Hi,
I enabled PGP signing in mutt, when i view the mail, mutt shows the
PGP signature inline, but a couple of friends of mine who use Pine,
asked me why my PGP signature was attached rather than being inline.
Is there something that I have configured wrong? Please advise.
Rgds
Rahul
just ignore
mutt's messages and only rely on gpg.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27535/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27529/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;ll remove those rules and see what happens.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27528/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Rocco and ALL,
On Saturday, April 20, 2002 at 2:37:21 PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> I spent some time on testing. In my case, all signatures GPG can
> sucessfully verify while mutt saying it can't have rewritten
> content-type headers by formail.
This could be that something was mod
ication, I think it shouldn't stop working.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27484/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
his seems quite old ;)
--
Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com
2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375
If the brain was so simple that we could understand it, we would
be so simple that we could not understand it (Lyall Watson)
msg27268/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27266/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> % David I know you use several keyrings. If I uncomment all keyring lines
> % in my options file I can verify any mail just fine.
> % Without those lines the gpg output shows that the sigs are verified, but
> % mutt says they can not be verified.
> Intere
o live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27248/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27246/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ng
msg27245/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
't verify anything.
David I know you use several keyrings. If I uncomment all keyring lines
in my options file I can verify any mail just fine.
Without those lines the gpg output shows that the sigs are verified, but
mutt says they can not be verfied.
HTH,
Michael
--
"Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX."
(By Stephan Zielinski)
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
msg27244/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27242/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ichts ist schwerer und erfordert mehr Charakter, als sich in offenem
Gegensatz zu seiner Zeit zu befinden und zu sagen: Nein!
- Kurt Tucholsky
msg27241/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hrough gpg and see what happens. If it still doesn't verify,
it's not Mutt.
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
http://www.eiv.com | 1) There's more than one way to do it
AIM: spmcmahonfedex, smcmahoneiv | 2) Somebody thinks your way is wrong
msg27240/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
your way is wrong
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27239/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ht be a good idea.
Thorsten
--
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
- Voltaire
msg27238/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
mcmahoneiv | 2) Somebody thinks your way is wrong
msg27234/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27232/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27231/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
o.
msg27209/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
o operate a computer
means that evolution has made a general fuckup and our race is doomed.
msg27206/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
r way is wrong
msg27205/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, smcmahoneiv | 2) Somebody thinks your way is wrong
msg27204/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Rocco,
On Monday, April 15, 2002 at 1:15:41 AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey, that's one of mine and guess what... It verifies okay here.
Yes, okay here too now I've corrected effect of my broken deliver.
And It should be also verified by anybody else without
Thorsten Haude wrote:
> * Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 20:19]:
> >I cannot verify the first
> And I cannot verify this one.
perhaps it's time (past time???) to take this discussion off list?
--
Will Yardley
input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 20:19]:
>I cannot verify the first
And I cannot verify this one.
Thorsten
--
Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind unverletzlich.
- Grundgesetz, Artikel 10, Abs. 1
msg27201/pgp0.pgp
Descrip
D: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<20020413110926.A2737@Verdi> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1
ave --quiet and have --output but am otherwise the same, too.
--output and -o are equal.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27187/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
dn't
been modified, but "good signature" with "could not be verified" seems to
contradict that...
HTH & TIA & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27186/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
27;s principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27185/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
7;s taking to get to you, perhaps there's a broken MTA involved.
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
http://www.eiv.com | 1) There's more than one way to do it
AIM: spmcmahonfedex, smcmahoneiv | 2) Somebody thinks your way is wrong
msg27173/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
deliverable
without any modifications.
> Once these dots removed with editor, the 4 messages verify OK.
I'll take some time tomorrow to try that with all messages
which don't verify correctly.
But what is really weird that mails which cannot be verified
differ from person to person.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27170/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t richtig, auch das Gegenteil.
> - Kurt Tucholsky
Maybe use signatures in English in an English list?
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27169/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 00:38]:
Add this one to the list I just can't verify. I cannot find any
suspicious dots here.
Thorsten
--
Death to all fanatics!
msg27167/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-15 00:41]:
>I cannot verify (April only):
With neither 1.5.0 nor 1.3.27 (except for S/MIME of course).
Thorsten
--
Alles ist richtig, auch das Gegenteil.
- Kurt Tucholsky
msg27166/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
IL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
because the last line of GPG's output is empty. GPG oks these, Mutt
doesn't.
Thorsten
--
Die Zensur ist das lebendige Geständnis der Großen, daß sie nur
verdummte Sklaven aber keine freien Völker regieren können.
- Johann Nepomuk Nestroy
msg27165/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
trfcpy (line, "=2E", sizeof (line));
+ linelen = 3;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ line[0] = savechar;
+ linelen = 1;
+ }
}
}
msg27164/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Thorsten,
On Sunday, April 14, 2002 at 1:12:18 PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> I cannot verify the following IDs (only checked April):
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Strange: I can verify OK those 2 mails, but can't verify 4 others
(gpg:
-01-22)
Strange, I may have overlooked something which I noticed when
checking with an 'old' 1.3.28. So I went through my private
archives with 1.3.28 and 1.5.0 (04/2002 only).
I can't verify with 1.3.28 _and_ 1.5.0:
+ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-14 23:06]:
I cannot verify this one. I can still verify my other mails.
Thorsten
--
I've been accused of vulgarity. I say that's bullshit.
- Mel Brooks
msg27158/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Still, a *lot* got broken when I switched to 1.5.0.
Thorsten
--
Wasn't the storming of the Bastille an act of terrorism?
Probably. Now it's a holiday.
- umarsyed
msg27155/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;s the reason?
Do you still have an older version of mutt you can view the
affected mails with? Didn't David mention he can't verify his
own, too?
I don't think that switching to 1.5.0 is the reason since it
works (with mbox) here.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27154/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
