Hi
while testing an upgrade from 3.23.58 to 4.1.22 on an FC3 test box
SELECT * FROM Contacts WHERE Categories=Services and BusinessCodes REGEXP
^R and gold_id=2 ORDER BY Company ASC
on mysql server3.23.58 i get company result in ASC order.
on mysql server4.1.22 i get non ASC order for
BY Company ASC
-Original Message-
From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 9:29 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: ORDER BY problem
Hi
while testing an upgrade from 3.23.58 to 4.1.22 on an FC3 test box
SELECT * FROM Contacts WHERE Categories=Services
- Original Message -
Subject: RE: ORDER BY problem
Try your query with either back quotes around Company
SELECT * FROM Contacts WHERE Categories=Services and BusinessCodes
REGEXP
^R and gold_id=2 ORDER BY `Company` ASC
Or no quotes around Company
SELECT * FROM Contacts WHERE
the order comes out of sequence showing 10.11.12.13 etc before the number 2---
Can anyone help me out
?php
//get user tips
$query = @mysql_query(SELECT * FROM tips WHERE user_id = $user_id AND comp_id
= $comp_id ORDER by round DESC);
while ($result = @mysql_fetch_array($query)) {
?
Hi,
the order comes out of sequence showing 10.11.12.13 etc before the number 2---
Can anyone help me out
That's because you are sorting the result on a string
(char/varchar) column. Try using CAST to convert it to
int or something similar: ORDER BY cast(column as unsigned)
Best
At 20:27 +0800 9/7/06, M B Neretlis wrote:
the order comes out of sequence showing 10.11.12.13 etc before the number 2---
Can anyone help me out
?php
//get user tips
$query = @mysql_query(SELECT * FROM tips WHERE user_id = $user_id
AND comp_id = $comp_id ORDER by round DESC);
while
I need to order a few names by the number following
the main name. For example swap2, swap3, swap10 in the
order of swap2, swap3, swap10, not in swap10, swap2,
swap3 as it will happen when I do an order by.
So I came up with the following query:
mysql select distinct secname, date from optresult
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 2:48 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: strange order by problem
I need to order a few names by the number following
the main name. For example swap2, swap3, swap10 in the
order of swap2, swap3, swap10, not in swap10, swap2,
swap3
Claire Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/27/2005 03:48:11 PM:
I need to order a few names by the number following
the main name. For example swap2, swap3, swap10 in the
order of swap2, swap3, swap10, not in swap10, swap2,
swap3 as it will happen when I do an order by.
So I came up with the
Claire Lee wrote:
I need to order a few names by the number following
the main name. For example swap2, swap3, swap10 in the
order of swap2, swap3, swap10, not in swap10, swap2,
swap3 as it will happen when I do an order by.
... ORDER BY ABS(SUBSTRING(secname,5)) ...
will insure that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claire Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/27/2005 03:48:11 PM:
I need to order a few names by the number following
the main name. For example swap2, swap3, swap10 in the
order of swap2, swap3, swap10, not in swap10, swap2,
swap3 as it will happen when I do an order
Claire Lee wrote:
This simplified my second expression in the if
statement. Thank you. But the query still doesn't sort
by the numbers, here's the result:
mysql select distinct secname, date from optresult
where secname like 'swap%' a
nd date like '2005-09-2%' order by if (secname like
I've got a SELECT statement that is returning the data I want, but not
in the right order (and I don't know why...). Let's say there are two
tables, People and History. Some records in People have corresponding
records in History, but not all--so I need a LEFT JOIN TO connect
history.people_id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 10 September 2004 18:00, Ren Fournier wrote:
I've got a SELECT statement that is returning the data I want, but not
in the right order (and I don't know why...). Let's say there are two
tables, People and History. Some records in People
At 17:00 -0600 9/10/04, René Fournier wrote:
I've got a SELECT statement that is returning
the data I want, but not in the right order (and
I don't know why...). Let's say there are two
tables, People and History. Some records in
People have corresponding records in History,
but not all--so I
Hi there,
I recently learned about LIMIT so that I can page through records on a web page I am
creating. However, when coupled with ORDER BY, the sorting does not work anymore.
Can someone look at my
below query and point out what I am doing wrong? Thanks. This is my first time
posting
On Sunday 04 July 2004 02:52 am, Gary Mack wrote:
Hi there,
I recently learned about LIMIT so that I can page
through records on a web page I am creating.
However, when coupled with ORDER BY, the sorting
does not work anymore. Can someone look at my below
query and point out what I am
.
Andy
-Mensagem original-
De: andy thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 8 de junho de 2004 08:51
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: ORDER BY problem
In a table called 'advisers' I have a column called 'surname' which
contains the surnames of a number of people
: andy thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2004 13:51
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: ORDER BY problem
In a table called 'advisers' I have a column called 'surname' which contains the
surnames of a number of people. Using a query like: 'select * from advisers order
: Mysql List
Subject: RE: RE - Order By Problem
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Andy Eastham wrote:
Look at using the Reverse() function, then take the substring up to the
first space, then reverse the result.
Well, 'select substring_index(surname,' ',-1) from advisers' does the
trick as far
- Order By Problem
I have never done anything like this but after looking at the spec's I
have a possible direction for you
In String functions there is LOCATE(substr,str,pos)
The first syntax returns the position of the first occurrence of substring
substr in string str. The second syntax
andy thomas wrote:
snip
Well, this was fixed in the end by this query:
select substring_index(surname,' ',-1) as r from advisers order by r
which produced the desired result. But we have since had complaints from
individuals wanting their surnames sorted differently! People from Germany
with
In a table called 'advisers' I have a column called 'surname' which
contains the surnames of a number of people. Using a query like:
'select * from advisers order by surname' lists the people in the
correct order but some people have surnames like 'du Sautoy' and
'van den Berg' and these are
junho de 2004 08:51
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: ORDER BY problem
In a table called 'advisers' I have a column called 'surname' which
contains the surnames of a number of people. Using a query like:
'select * from advisers order by surname' lists the people in the
correct order but some people
, which means 'von Hohenzollern'
is correctly ordered among the the v's and not the h's.
prosit
Klaus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: andy thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2004 13:51
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: ORDER BY problem
In a table called
I have never done anything like this but after looking at the spec's I have
a possible direction for you
In String functions there is
LOCATE(substr,str,pos)
The first syntax returns the position of the first occurrence of substring
substr in string str. The second syntax returns the position
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Paul McNeil wrote:
I have never done anything like this but after looking at the spec's I have
a possible direction for you
In String functions there is
LOCATE(substr,str,pos)
The first syntax returns the position of the first occurrence of substring
substr in
If surname is a field, then use it without the single quotes ('),
otherwise it is treated as a literal string and 0 is the correct result:
select locate(' ',surname,1) from advisers
andy thomas wrote:
Yes, this is the approach I was thinking of using but:
select locate('
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Vadim P. wrote:
If surname is a field, then use it without the single quotes ('),
otherwise it is treated as a literal string and 0 is the correct result:
select locate(' ',surname,1) from advisers
Thanks a lot, this is working. I now need to figure out how to use
Look at using the Reverse() function, then take the substring up to the
first space, then reverse the result.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Paul McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 June 2004 14:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE - Order By Problem
I have never done
PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 June 2004 14:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE - Order By Problem
I have never done anything like this but after looking at the spec's I
have
a possible direction for you
In String functions there is
LOCATE(substr,str,pos)
The first syntax returns
Andy,
Just:
select substring_index(surname,' ',-1) as r from advisers order by r;
works.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: andy thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 June 2004 15:57
To: Andy Eastham
Cc: Mysql List
Subject: RE: RE - Order By Problem
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Andy
work?
Thanks for your help,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Paul McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 June 2004 14:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE - Order By Problem
I have never done anything like this but after looking at the spec's I
have a possible direction for you
In String
Hi all,
I am trying to get a bunch of results, group them by category, and then
order each group of categories. My query is thus:
SELECT
l.CatalogNumber,
l.MP3Name,
l.PDFLink,
l.PDFName,
l.Title,
p.PublisherName,
c.ComposerLname,
Hi all,
I have an ID field in my database...it reads like this
ASS1
ASS23
ASS4
ASS10
ASS6
.
.
.
when i'm retrieving the data by taking ORDER BY clause it is sorting like this
ASS1
ASS10
ASS23
ASS4
ASS6
means its only sorting by the 4 the character. i want the sorting to be done like the
Hi,
==
I have an ID field in my database...it reads like this
ASS1
ASS23
ASS4
ASS10
ASS6
when i'm retrieving the data by taking ORDER BY clause it is sorting like
this
ASS1
ASS10
ASS23
ASS4
ASS6
means its only sorting by the 4 the character. i want the sorting to be done
like the following
==
Martijn Tonies wrote:
Hi,
==
I have an ID field in my database...it reads like this
ASS1
ASS23
ASS4
ASS10
ASS6
when i'm retrieving the data by taking ORDER BY clause it is sorting like
this
ASS1
ASS10
ASS23
ASS4
ASS6
means its only sorting by the 4 the character. i want the sorting to be done
Sagar C Nannapaneni wrote:
ASS1
ASS23
ASS4
ASS10
ASS6
.
.
when i'm retrieving the data by taking ORDER BY clause it is sorting like this
ASS1
ASS10
ASS23
ASS4
ASS6
means its only sorting by the 4 the character.
No, it's not sorted by the first four characters but it's sorted
lexicographically
At 06:49 AM 1/23/2004, Sagar C Nannapaneni wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ID field in my database...it reads like this
ASS1
ASS23
ASS4
ASS10
ASS6
.
.
.
when i'm retrieving the data by taking ORDER BY clause it is sorting like this
ASS1
ASS10
ASS23
ASS4
ASS6
means its only sorting by the 4 the
The following might help, but will certainly be quite slow:
SELECT ... ORDER BY ABS(SUBSTRING(field, 4));
A better (and faster) solution will probably be indexing the records with
a numeric field, as usual.
Fred,
Doesn't MySQL always physically sort the rows and not use the
index to
The SQL specification does allow aggregates in the
ORDER BY. Does mySQL have any plans to add such
functionality (or at least add it to its list of
things it doesn't do)? The problem with the solution
of ordering by an alias is that I may not necessarily
want the thing I'm ordering by to be in
At 5:52 -0700 10/3/03, Ed Smith wrote:
Why doesn't the following work:
mysql CREATE TABLE dog(id integer, breed char(20),
age integer, weight integer)
;
mysql SELECT breed, MIN(age)
- FROM dog
- GROUP BY breed
- ORDER BY MIN(age);
ERROR : Invalid use of group function
I don't
Why doesn't the following work:
mysql CREATE TABLE dog(id integer, breed char(20),
age integer, weight integer)
;
mysql SELECT breed, MIN(age)
- FROM dog
- GROUP BY breed
- ORDER BY MIN(age);
ERROR : Invalid use of group function
but this does
mysql SELECT breed, MIN(age) AS
Hallo everyone !
I already sent this, but I think some people think is
not clear enough ;-)
Im using Mysql 4.0.12 on RedHat 7.3 x86
I know it's not the last binary but I cannot upgrade
now. (And i saw nothing about this in the changelog
for 4.013 and 4.0.14)
I found the following :
I have two
Hi,
well, I'm not totally sure about your question. Which order is reversed ? The
order you get the entries with a select after the insert ? If it is this,
then I think it's not a problem with the insert. The order is then given by
the select, and if no order by is in the select, it is
Hi Stephan,
Let's see the case :
I use ORDER BY, because I want that order in PTemp
table, so I do not have to order them later (because
they are retrieved several times later).
1. Inserting with mysql c.l.i. :
I get the records well sorted : first by a, secondly
by b and finally by c
Hi Alejondro
I use ORDER BY, because I want that order in PTemp
table, so I do not have to order them later (because
they are retrieved several times later).
If I understand correct ,,,
U can never trust the order ur records get return from DB
(it is indepented of the order u insert records
Hi,
I think you can't do this. There is no order in the table, so there is no
point in using order by with insert. You always have to do this when
retrieving the records (the order you get with select without order by is
accidential).
HTH
Stefan
Am Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:49 schrieb
02, 2003 6:57 AM
Subject: Re: insert ... select .. order by, problem
Hi,
I think you can't do this. There is no order in the table, so there is no
point in using order by with insert. You always have to do this when
retrieving the records (the order you get with select without order
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 6:57 AM
Subject: Re: insert ... select .. order by, problem
Hi,
I think you can't do this. There is no order in the table, so there is no
point in using order by with insert. You always have to do this when
retrieving
* Albert
Stefan,
I'm Roger, but I reply anyway. :)
Do you imply that tables cannot be sorted desc or asc based on one of the
columns e.g. a last name? or am I misunderstanding you.
In relational database theory the order of rows within the table is
undefined, i.e. it is up to the server, and
02, 2003 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: insert ... select .. order by, problem
Hi Albert,
you are not misunderstanding me :-) Tables can indeed not be sorted, it's
output which gets sorted. The difference is not academic, but important:
It's
not the table which gets an order, but the output. Take
Roger,
Thanks for the additional clarification
Albert
Atlanta
- Original Message -
From: Roger Baklund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: insert ... select .. order by, problem
* Albert
The following query works with mysql 3.23:
SELECT * FROM answer ORDER BY concat( n_sort, -, id_answer )
It does not with mysql 3.22.27. Neither does any query with a function call
in the order by clause. Is this documented somewhere? Am I missing something?
Is there a workaround other
At 20:43 +0100 2/16/03, sascha mantscheff wrote:
The following query works with mysql 3.23:
SELECT * FROM answer ORDER BY concat( n_sort, -, id_answer )
It does not with mysql 3.22.27. Neither does any query with a function call
in the order by clause. Is this documented somewhere? Am I missing
Am Sonntag, 16. Februar 2003 21:15 schrieb Paul DuBois:
At 20:43 +0100 2/16/03, sascha mantscheff wrote:
The following query works with mysql 3.23:
SELECT * FROM answer ORDER BY concat( n_sort, -, id_answer )
It does not with mysql 3.22.27. Neither does any query with a function
call in
Hi,
How can I fix an order by using numbers and letters ?
Id Town
56 Paris 1
60 Paris 10
7 Paris 11
262 Paris 12
8 Paris 13
16 Paris 14
22 Paris 15
6 Paris 3
57 Paris 4
51 Paris 6
5 Paris 7
61 Paris 8
59 Paris 9
I'd like to get :
56 Paris 1
6 Paris 3
57 Paris 4
51 Paris 6
5 Paris 7
61 Paris 8
assuming you have a table with two columns id and town
then here's one solution:
Create temporary table address (ad varchar(30));
Insert into address select concat(id, ' ', town)
from your_original_table_name;
select * from address order by ad;
--- Nicolas JOURDEN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi,
We noticed that a select statement using an order by that should
return 0 rows fails on large table (~11 million rows), due to the
following error:
Out of sort memory.
Increase daemon sort buffer size (becomes 3, Database error.)
We searched the lists and found the following reference to
[snip]
I'm having trouble with ordering. I've got data in a varchar field that
currently gets ordered like this when I use 'order by myfield asc':
aristo 1001
aristo 156
aristo 222
I'd like it to order like this:
aristo 156
aristo 222
aristo 1001
How can I do this in MySQL? Is there a way
On 11 Jul 2002, at 16:06, Dan Lamb wrote:
I'd like it to order like this:
aristo 156
aristo 222
aristo 1001
How can I do this in MySQL? Is there a way to take the numbers into
account when using order by?
There are various ways to break up your strings and convert part to a
number
Hello All,
I'm having trouble with ordering. I've got data in a varchar field that
currently gets ordered like this when I use 'order by myfield asc':
aristo 1001
aristo 156
aristo 222
I'd like it to order like this:
aristo 156
aristo 222
aristo 1001
How can I do this in MySQL? Is there a
Hi,
I have problem with join and order clause. I have 2 table join with
amount condition and sort by order clause. The result of this join
generate unwanted row to me.
example
table1
No. Amount Count
1 1000 2
Hello,
I just installed the newest MySQL (3.23.32) with PHP 4.0.4pl1 (shared
module) on an Apache 1.3.12 (Linux).
Some SQL syntaxes that worked before don't anymore.
E.g.:
$query = "SELECT * FROM $userstable ORDER BY when DESC LIMIT 0, 3";
doesn't work:
Warning: Supplied argument is not a
* J.M. Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28.01.01 02:05:
I just installed the newest MySQL (3.23.32) with PHP 4.0.4pl1 (shared
module) on an Apache 1.3.12 (Linux).
...
$query = "SELECT * FROM $userstable ORDER BY when DESC LIMIT 0, 3";
doesn't work:
From your query I think you upgraded from a
"J.M. Roth" wrote:
Hello,
I just installed the newest MySQL (3.23.32) with PHP 4.0.4pl1 (shared
module) on an Apache 1.3.12 (Linux).
Some SQL syntaxes that worked before don't anymore.
E.g.:
$query = "SELECT * FROM $userstable ORDER BY when DESC LIMIT 0, 3";
doesn't work:
66 matches
Mail list logo