Hi,
I just installed the new NDoc 1.2 beta, and wow am I impressed .. I think
the speed increase for the MSDN documenter is at least x5.
You can now choose whether you want links to .NET SDK 1.0, 1.1 and MSDN
Online, and the MSDN documenter now allows you to generate online (web) docs
...
We
- Original Message -
From: John Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Gert Driesen' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 7:48 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Nant.VisualCpp.Tasks build failures
Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 17:51, Ramasamy, Dinesh wrote:
Hi
I get the following error,
SourceForge.NAnt.BuildException: H:\work\build.xml(10,3):
Unknown task vssget
at SourceForge.NAnt.TaskFactory.CreateTask(XmlNode taskNode, Project proj)
at
- Original Message -
From: John Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 6:54 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] Nant.VisualCpp.Tasks build failures
I'm still getting build failures for the *entire* Nant.VisualCpp test
suite
on the 1.1
If no one else volunteers, I'll look into it.
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 21:07, Geurts, James wrote:
Hey everyone. I'm sorry that I have not been able to get this working. I have been
too busy lately and do not see myself having the time to get it working properly any
time soon. If someone
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Miller, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 4:10 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to
latest Nant
Looks pretty much ok, some minor comments/questions inline ...
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:56 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Namespaces and NAnt.Cnntrib tasks
Gert Driesen wrote
Hi Giuseppe,
I looked at the code of the resgen task, and apparently it's not being
executed on the mono runtime right now.
The following comment is in the UsesRuntimeEngine property :
// TO-DO : uncomment this when monoresgen no longer crashes when run with
the mono runtime.
I think that
How do you propose to deal with the NAntContrib sources ?
will they be moved into /src/NAnt.Optional and /tests/NAnt.Optional or
will they be integrated into the current namespace structure ?
I would still like to get rid of needing a COM interop assembly for
SourceSafe (and if possible also for
Hi Ian,
Sorry to bring this up again but if we decide to remove the defaultframework
attribute from the NAnt configuration file, and have NAnt automatically
select the first valid framework as default framework, then shouldn't we add
an attribute on the project level that allows you to set a
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] default framework
Gert Driesen wrote:
Hi Ian,
Sorry to bring this up again but if we decide to remove the
defaultframework
John,
We should .. euhm .. could ... (never say should, if there's a slight chance
that Ian is gonna read the mail .. LOL) also move to a fixed version number
for releases, now that all assemblies are built using a common
assemblyinfo.cs file.
I'll set a fixed version in
I John,
I never had any issues with these tests, can you possible debug the tests to
see what's actually happening ?
I would still like to get a few things in the 0.8.3 release : upgrade to a
new version of #cvslib, perhaps upgrade to a yet-to-be-released version of
log4net (which now uses the
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 5:28 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib
Gert Driesen wrote:
Great job, Clayton
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib
of course but we're not talking every
-
From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gert Driesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 7:42 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib
Hi,
I think that a nant task should live in nant. It gives the nant
Great job, Clayton ...
I only have two minor concerns :
- should we have a more general name for the namespace for scm related tasks
(and have a subnamespace for cvs ?), so we can add more scm tasks later on
(eg. for sourcesafe, pvcs, ...) ?
- Can't these tasks actually be part of #cvslib itself
Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] COM visibility
It works both ways. If you feel that there is no demand for using NAnt
from COM
may be a little
verbose
in places, but we can clean those up. Right now I would say it is better
to
have too much info, than not enough. This is will need to be addressed
before the final (1.0) release.
- Original Message -
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Hernandez
Hi,
When an ApplicationException (like BuildException)
occurs in the ConsoleDriver.Main method, the cause of the exception (the
innerexception) is not shown to the user.
This means, for example, that when you specify a
buildfile containing invalid xml, you'll only get the message
"Error
Hi,
I want to create a hierarchy of included
configuration files, where each level of the hierarchy adds
information.
eg. I want to have the following directory
structure :
examples
mono
1.0
Tutorials
WebApp
in each directory I would want to have both a build
file and a
. I have not yet managed to build a MonoBasic
application using nant because it expects the commandline options to be
specified using -- instead of /
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March
to be
specified using -- instead of /
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] multiple framework support for vbc task
Gert Driesen wrote
Title: Message
Or perhaps we can start porting http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/to
.NET :-)
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff McManus
To: Nant-Developers
(E-mail)
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 6:55
PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Formatting,
#Regions, and CVS Keywords
Hi,
I'm having problems building nant using the build
file.
Apparently the excludes are no longer functioning,
because the 'GetTaskTest.cs', the 'MailTaskTest.cs' andthe
'TouchTaskTest.cs' are being excluded in the buildfile, but they still get
passed to the compiler anyway. I've
Hi,
Can the folowing patches please be committed
:
- added support for checking a specified framework
is available to the available task
eg. available type="Framework"
resource="mono-0.21" property="mono-0.21.framework.present" /
- updated the xml docs for the available task + use
I agree with the way it's working right now, I didn't know that it was
possible to use an ANd operation using the if task, my mistake sorry.
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Philip Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:55 PM
Subject:
Hi,
I created a patch that will make NAnt.Core
CLSCompliant and that will no longer mae NAnt visible to COM clients (which I
don't think is necessary anyway).
I'm not saying it should be committed, but I think
we should be moving in this direction.
So I hope itwill at least get the
Hi,
This patch exposes the version of the
CurrentFramework and the DefaultFramework as properties.
Can this please be committed ?
Thanks,
Gert
Project.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I forgot to add a few patches, so here's the
complete list of patches.
Thanks,
Gert
FileSet.diff
Description: Binary data
IfTask.diff
Description: Binary data
Log.diff
Description: Binary data
Target.diff
Description: Binary data
TaskContainer.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi Ian,
Does that mean that you'll commit the patch (with the exception of setting
the ComVisible attribute) ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:37 AM
Subject: Re: [nant
Hi Ian,
Thanks for implementing support for multiple runtimes, but I had still have
issues if I want to use it for building assemblies for the .NET Compact
Framework. The following is an example of what a configuration section for
the .NET Compact Framework could look like :
Hi,
Would it be possible to set the names of frameworks
to all lower-case letters (or make the lookup case-insensitive) ?
eg. net-1.0 instead of NET-1.0
This will improve consistency (mono is all
lowercase)and will prevent me from having to changethe runtime
identifiersin all my build
Hi,
I included a patch that adds support for the
checked and unsafe options to the csc task.
Can this please be committed ?
Thanks,
Gert
CscTask.diff
Description: Binary data
to the Free Software
// Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
// Gert Driesen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Globalization;
using NUnit.Framework;
using SourceForge.NAnt.Tasks;
//using SourceForge.NAnt.Attributes;
namespace
Hi,
I'm trying to build a assemby using Mono 0.20 on
Windows, but apparently the Mcs task calls the mcs.exe, this will cause Mono to
compile an assembly using the .NET runtime instead of the Mono
runtime.
The task should instead call "mono mcs.exe
[options]" where mcs.exe should be
responses inline ...
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Compiling for Mono
Gert Driesen wrote:
I'm trying to build a assemby using Mono 0.20
Hi,
Is it ok if I submit a patch to the SysInfo task
that allows you to retrieve the location of the Program Files directory
?
Thanks,
Gert
Hi,
Can anyone submit this patch for the following bug
in the Copy task :
when you try to copy a file that doesn't exsit,
only an informative message is displayed in the log. In my opinion, this
should definitely throw a BuildException (which, in turn, will cause the build
to fail when
Hi Scott,
Can you submit this (very simple) patch
?
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From:
Scott Hernandez
To: Gert Driesen ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 6:47
PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Add property for
retrieving program files
Hi,
Would it be possible to remove the path length must
be 10 limit from the Delete task ?
The following code in the DeleteTask.cs file causes
this limit :
// TODO: remove this once this task is
fully tested and NAnt is at 1.0
if (path.Length =
10) {
throw new
Hi,
I'm sorry for crossposting to both the users and
developers list, but I think this is something that needs everyone's
attention.
In my opinion we urgently need to come up with a
strategy for implementing support for multiple runtimes, and for making tasks
runtime-aware. The release of
Hi,
Would it be possible to change the
NAnt.console.exe.config (in src/NAnt.Console), to allow it to run on the .NET
Framework 1.1 runtime when both .NET Framework 1.0 and 1.1 are available on a
system ?
To accomplish this, the following should be added
the config file :
configuration
.
Then again, this is just my opinion :)
--
Tomas Restrepo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] .NET Framework 1.1 version
Hi,
Currently the Copy task does not cause the build to
fail when you try to copy a file that doesn't exist.
If people want the build to failwhen you want
to delete a file that doesn't exist then I'm pretty sure they want a build to
fail (when failonerror = true) when you want to copy a
Hi IAn,
I've removed the quiet attribute and made sure that a message wil be logged
(in verbose mode) if you try to delete a file or directory that doesn't
exist.
Can you commit this patch (I updated the NUNit test for the Delete task
too) ?
Thanks,
Gert
(See attached file:
Hi,
I agree that we should perhaps decide not to commit this patch at all ...
But if the Delete task should continue to throw exceptions when you try to
delete a non-existing file or directory, then indeed a new mechanism should
be provided that allows you to check if a file or direftory
Hi Ian,
If you want to delete a directory or file that doesn't exist, then this
should just be considered a successful execution of the task, shouldn't
it
be ?
yep. And it will work that way for filesets I think.
Ok, I'll update the Delete task to do the same.
Certainly if
Hi Gerry,
responses inline
- Original Message -
From: Gerry Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Delete task behaviour
What happens if you have directory foo that you want
Hi,
In my opinion the current behaviour of the delete task is not valid.
It current throws an exception (which causes the build to fail if
failonerror=true) when the file or directory that you want to delete doesn't
exist.
If you want to delete a directory or file that doesn't exist, then this
these
misunderstandings. I would be glad to help you out on this, and other
things ...
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] serious BUGS
assemblies).
Will support for building assemblies for multiple
platforms be incorporated in nant ?
Thanks,
Gert Driesen
Would it be possible to include support for building .NET Compact Framework
assemblies in the release ?
You should also be able to choose which .NET runtime you want to compile
against. Is this currently possible ?
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Cort Schaefer [EMAIL
701 - 753 of 753 matches
Mail list logo
