Can you please go into a
little bit detail as to how I could go about implementing what you suggested?
Thanks for your help.
-Shabana
From: Rod Ayers
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu 4/27/2006 5:20 PMTo:
Ahmed, Shabana; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net;
Troy Laurin wrote:
On 9/20/05, Gary Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but on the other hand there are some
things that make can do easily, but which are tricky or more work to do
in NAnt - such as adding a project-wide pre or post compile step.
That actually sounds like a good idea...
On 9/20/05, Gary Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but on the other hand there are some
things that make can do easily, but which are tricky or more work to do
in NAnt - such as adding a project-wide pre or post compile step.
That actually sounds like a good idea... do you think there would be
Hello,
mine 2 cents to this:
- first I liked those pipe idea proposed
- but Gary is mostly right - there is alot stuff possible via output/append
- only missing is input redirection?
exec program=cmd1 output=${filename} /
exec program=cmd2 output=${filename} append=True /
exec
Troy Laurin wrote:
I have no issues with making the shell configurable, that's definitely
a Good Idea, although the actual nature of how to configure it would
probably need discussion. Would it be a normal (magical) property, or
a special parameter like the logger? Presumably it could be
As an interim measure, it would probably be easier if the exec could
detect the use of redirection (|) and prepend the command with
either cmd /c or sh, depending on environment... that way, people
could use commands they are familiar with and get the full power of
redirection using NAnt, and
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] RE: [ nant-Bugs-1210046 ] Fileset
fails when nested in an if block. - 0.85 RC2
Martin,
Can you also create unit tests for this change (covering both
success and failure scenario's) ?
Thanks !
Gert
-Original Message-
From
It seems I cannot add attachment on SF tracker. Silly.
Regards,
Martin
Category: Core
Group: 0.85
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hinrichs (thinrichs)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Fileset fails when nested in an if block. - 0.85 RC2
Initial
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [nant-dev] RE: [ nant-Bugs-1210046 ] Fileset fails
when nested in an if block. - 0.85 RC2
It seems I cannot add attachment on SF tracker. Silly.
Regards,
Martin
Category: Core
Group: 0.85
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hinrichs
I had similar issues trying to set this up. In IIS, I needed to
configure the site (or virtual directory) running the ASP.NET page to a
new Application Pool. I set the credentials of that App Pool to a user
that could successfully execute the nant script on the IIS machine (in
my case, the local
Ray,
Can you submit a bug report for this and attach a repro
?
You can submit bug report here :
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=31650atid=402868
Thanks !
Gert
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray
JohnsonSent: donderdag 24 maart 2005
Gert Driesen wrote:
Hi Conor,
I understand that this is a breaking change for anyone implementing their
own compiler tasks (that derive from CompilerBase) like you.
But in this case, the change from bool to DebugOutput enum was necessary to
support the different debug modes (off, full, pdbonly)
Gert Driesen wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/nant/nant/src/NAnt.DotNet/Tasks
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv5120/src/NAnt.DotNet/Tasks
This change is not backward compatible at the source code level. Using a
recent build, our Clover.NET tasks break trying to access the Debug
to hide it from build
authors.
Is this a blocking issue for you ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:16 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [nant-commits] CVS
Hi,
The code written will give you an output like this. Can you please
tell me what exactly is your issue is?
NAnt 0.85 (Build
0.85.1795.0; nightly; 11/30/2004)
Copyright (C) 2001-2004
Gerry Shaw
http://nant.sourceforge.net
Buildfile:
file:///D:/NAnt/testing.build
Title: RE: NAnt internal error (floridariz)
Hi,
I meant to attach the solution and build files in case that helps. Not real proud of the .build file cuz Im just getting started
Thanks
Dave
DaveNonVSS.sln std_template.build _
From: Risler,
Of
Risler, DaveSent: dinsdag 14 december 2004 19:34To:
Risler, Dave; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[nant-dev] RE: NAnt internal error (floridariz)
Hi,
I meant
to attach the solution and build files in case that helps. Not real
proud of the .build file cuz
Im just getting
started
Thanks for the compliments. The tool wouldn't be where it is today
without the contributions of everybody that has worked on the project.
I'm forwarding this to the nant-dev list as they deserve the thanks
more than I do. As you know yourself by working on an open source
project, a project
into this.
--Edwin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Castro, Edwin Gabriel (Firing Systems Engr.)
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 5:16 PM
To: Scott Hernandez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [nant-dev] RE: [Nant-users] NantContrib [loadtasks]
Bringing
Bringing this over to the developers list:
I see what you mean about appdomain issues. I'll look into the code as I
expect the implementation might be somewhat easy. I'll also try to write
some good tests!
Would it be feasible to create a second appdomain, load the assembly
into that appdomain,
I did some digging using Filemon and discovered that it wants the
nunit.framework.dll right next to the test case dll.
Anyone can tell me why?
In addition, I cant get the tests
to execute, I get the following message:
[nunit2] Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Not
run: 0, Time: 0 seconds
- Original Message -
From: Ayende Rahien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 6:44 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] RE: NAnt Nunit 2
I did some digging using Filemon and discovered that it wants the
nunit.framework.dll right next to the test case dll.
Anyone
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) A project can have an attribute of language=csharp (and this is
needed to generate lib path).
wouldn't we need a more generic platform or something like this.
Would the lib path treatment of a J# or Nemerle or whatever .NET
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See this article Avoid DevPath for info on why you should avoid
DEVPATH
http://blogs.msdn.com/suzcook/archive/2003/08/15/57238.aspx
Thanks again.
,
| It's not good for the dev. env., either - it makes it unnecessarily
|
I've been following this dicussion from the sidelines, and one idea that has
occurred to me that may help, and should probably be addressed anyway, is
having Gump produce its own public/private key pair for signing strong names
for the assemblies. By using a separate key, you reduce the GAC
Hi,
back from vacation so I'm sorry for the delay.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) Run a script to build NAnt (kinda like the bootstrap-ant.sh
script)
2) Use the newly built NAnt to build the rest of Nant-dom (i.e. OSS
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen wrote:
What exactly will Apache be using NAnt for ?
Building open source .NET projects, for example Log4NET on a nightly
basis.
Do you (yourself or Apache) have any issues with our current license
(GPL) ?
Only speaking about the Gump scenario, I don't think
-
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 2:18 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: NAnt
Hi,
back from vacation so I'm sorry for the delay.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that you cannot avoid GAC with .NET because of the order in
which the assebmlies are located:
http://www.awprofessional.com/articles/article.asp?p=30601seqNum=6
Thank you for that URL.
In Gump's case we probably can
. This can be done with a simple
shell script that uses gacutil to remove unwanted assemblies.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: NAnt
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004
repository or should it sit in the project
(i.e. NAnt) repository?
Cheers,
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 9/6/2004 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Re: [nant-dev] Re: NAnt
Stefan
06, 2004 9:34 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Re: NAnt
Hi Adam,
I managed to get a first cut at the bootstrap together. I have only
produced the Windows batch file and just want you to take a look and make
sure it is something you can use before I work on the ?nix script.
There is a batch file
I was talking with Adam the other day and he suggested that a batch/ shell
script that built NAnt from source might be a little better than relying
on the mini-NAnt.exe. I believe ant uses
something similar to bootstrap itself so my understanding is that this
fits in better with the gump
-
From: Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jaroslaw Kowalski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: NAnt
I was talking with Adam the other day and he suggested that a batch
Hi,
back from vacation so I'm sorry for the delay. I wonder whether my
apache.org address will make it through to the nant list, if not I'll
repost there using the other address I've already use to subscribe
there.
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adam R. B.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Gert Driesen wrote:
What exactly will Apache be using NAnt for ?
Building open source .NET projects, for example Log4NET on a nightly
basis.
Do you (yourself or Apache) have any issues with our current license
(GPL) ?
Only speaking about the Gump scenario, I don't think
1) Run a script to build NAnt (kinda like the bootstrap-ant.sh script)
For now I just require that NANt is installed, we can focus on building it
(from source) sometime soon, but it can wait.
What we'd like to do is teach Python Gump how to launch NAnt (as it
does
Ant today) with an
Adam,
I'm at work right now, so I don't have time to work through your questions
right now, but we'll definitely look into them later ...
I've copied your message to the NAnt Developer mailing list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), which is the mailing list I'd
suggest you to subscribe to.
Regards,
Gert
I like it. I think it makes good sense. And while you're at it, why not
go ahead and extend that params idea to targets too?
Gary McCullough
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian MacLean
Sent: Friday,
Gert Driesen wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 4:42 AM
Subject: [Nant-users] Params vs properties redux was: Nant .85 not
working with Draco.Net
This seems
Hi Gary,
Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the description of this breaking
change as follows :
In previous versions of NAnt, the arg element (used by, for example, the
exec task) would automatically add quotes for both file and value
attributes in the command line generated by the task.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gert Driesen
Sent: Tuesday, 3 August 2004 9:46 PM
To: Gary Feldman; Nant-Developers (E-Mail)
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] NAnt 0.85 release notes + to-do's
Hi Gary,
Thanks
Title: Re: [nant-commits] CVS: nant/src/NAnt.Core/Filters ReplaceString.cs,NONE,1.1 ExpandProperties.cs,1.2,1.3 ReplaceTokens.cs,1.2,1.3 TabsToSpaces.cs,1.2,1.3
That sounds like a good idea and it will make things more consistent. I'll take care of it.
Roger
From: Gert DriesenSent: Wed
Roger,
I guess for now we should hold off on the culture stuff ... We'll discuss it
post 0.85.
Something else : should replacetokens also be able to use a
case-insensitive searchreplace ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Dahlman, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL
I guess I wasn't specific enough in the original post.
I create the Build.Bat file in the nantcontrib directory and use it to
build nantcontrib and copy the build assemblies to the correct location
in the nant directory. It may need to be modified for your specific
situation and directory
The reason for my previous post was to show the steps to build both the
nant and nantcontrib projects. I set up a batch file in the nantcontrib
directory to do the build and then copy the assemblies to the
appropriate nant directory.
I have no background as to the reasons behind the current
- Original Message -
From: Dahlman, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 3:18 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-commits] CVS: nant/src/NAnt.Core/Filters
ReplaceString.cs,NONE,1.1
ExpandProperties.cs,1.2,1.3 ReplaceTokens.cs,1.2,1.3
forgot to ask :
Should we remove replacecharacter from cvs, now that we have
replacestring ?
Shouldn't replacestring support removing a string from a file (replacing
with empty string) ?
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dahlman, Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Malcolm MacLucas wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a machine just for (currently) NAnt testing,
so I'll see what I can do, but I'm more interested in using my time to support
a August 4 release, or at least candidate release for Nant 0.85
Currently I'm trying to get a copy of the 7-23 NAnt
Malcolm MacLucas wrote:
Ok
first, I a mistake in my original post, there is no 7-23 build of nant, there
is a 7-22 build, that's the one I used.
I used the 7-23 build of NAnt Contrib.
I installed it into the previously mentioned program files\nant directory
and the I ran the NantContrib.build
nant
Malcolm or anyone else having questions about building,
I hope this helps. I do the following:
1) Install the NAnt zip into directory ( C:\Projects\NAnt-0.85-20040722 )
2) Install the NAntContrib zip into directory (
C:\Projects\NAntContrib-0.85-20040723 )
3) Build the NAnt by going to its
From a user point of view, I love it.
I'm not currently doing anything with NAnt that would require this much power,
but it would be nice to have.
Malcolm
--- Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys!
I'd like to propose the introduction of typed properties to NAnt. Currently
- Original Message -
From: Dan Pupek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Numit2 and .Nunit files
We may be willing to add this support ourselves. What is the protocol for
submitting changes?
The NAnt
Gary,
This should be fixed in cvs now.
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Gary Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 5:27 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Cl.exe /I for additional include
directories
From
Gert Driesen wrote:
Matthew,
The .NET 1.1 lc.exe indeed has a command line switch for specifying assembly
references, but it doesn't work. That's why we don't use it.
Actually, it does and I have proof. :) The only thing is that you
can't specify assemblies that exist in the GAC (it gives
You're right - it is braindead.
It works if you only specify a single component to license, otherwise it
fails. :(
What I didn't realize is that it will try over and over to re-populate
its hashtable, failing. This causes the assembly resolution to fail.
Unfortunately, there isn't any way to
Title: [Nant-users] Cl.exe /I for additional include directories
Thank
you Melissa
the , delimiter is still in CVS (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/nant/nant/src/NAnt.VSNet/VcProject.cs?rev=1.16view=auto)
to nant commiters
: could anyone fix this in the nightly build ? it
- Original Message -
From: Baldree Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dahlman Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] nant 0.85
Gert,
Roger has finished implementing the filter chain. Are you guys still
interested in it?
Matt,
Better send it to Ian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Scott
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Jarek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and myself.
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Baldree Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Gert Driesen' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dahlman Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: NAnt Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev][Nant-users] deprecation of built-in properties
Yep,
I would agree
Yep,
I would agree that functions are a more powerful way to express these
properties. We have talked about this for a while. But I would like to
depreciate these over a few builds before actually remove them completely.
This will cause some serious problems with peoples' build files (and
- Original Message -
From: Dahlman Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Gert Driesen' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 12:54 AM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] nant 0.85
Gert,
The filter chain is functioning properly except for the issue of ordering
elements properly.
Roger,
I don't think we should change AttributeConfigurator here, as this is for a
very specific case. I don't think its feasible to do processing like this
for other elements, writing this is a generic way is not that simple and
performance will not be good, as you'd have to scan all properties
Gert Driesen wrote:
You mean an attribute that didn't exist ? Properties that don't exist cause
a build error already ...
Yep - that's what I was thinking.
But I agree that we should indeed have this mode (or just always run NAnt in
this mode, what do you propose) ...
In what cases should NAnt
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:57, Matthew Mastracci wrote:
Gert Driesen wrote:
You mean an attribute that didn't exist ? Properties that don't exist cause
a build error already ...
Yep - that's what I was thinking.
But I agree that we should indeed have this mode (or just always run NAnt
PROTECTED]
Cc: ! nant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force csc recompilation
You mean the same task used for cleaning? Why?
csc output=... buildmode=clean
/csc
Jarek
I don't mind, but we should perhaps consider having
You mean the same task used for cleaning? Why?
csc output=... buildmode=clean
/csc
Jarek
I don't mind, but we should perhaps consider having a buildmode or
something, which can be set to Build (default), Rebuild, Clean,
Gert
---
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force csc recompilation
You mean the same task used for cleaning? Why?
csc output=... buildmode=clean
/csc
Jarek
I don't mind, but we should perhaps consider having a buildmode or
something, which
, if I may say so :)
/Nicke
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 13 januari 2004 15:58
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski
Cc: ! nant
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Force csc recompilation
because tasks know how to clean their output, so instead
-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Problem installing nant v82
Hmm - it looks like the release packaged up an older version of the
source code. If I compare whats in the zip to whats in cvs on the 0.84
branch they are not the same ie those fixes are missing from the zip.
There might have been a mix up
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nant-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Problem installing nant v82
This may be a problem with SF.NET mirroring, some mirrors are more
up-to-date than others. Sometimes I get 404 when accessing some new
file
from mirrors and have to retry using
This issue could be due to a known issue in rc1, can you please try rc2 and
get back to us asap ?
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Abhishek Kant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 3:46 PM
Subject: [Nant-users] Problem
: Thursday, December 25, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Abhishek Kant; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Problem installing nant v82
This issue could be due to a known issue in rc1, can you please try
rc2
and
get back to us asap ?
Thanks,
Gert
- Original
: Thursday, December 25, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Abhishek Kant; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Problem installing nant v82
This issue could be due to a known issue in rc1, can you please try
rc2
and
get back to us asap ?
Thanks,
Gert
- Original
Thanks Sean, in the future send these types of email to the nant-dev
list.
On 18-Dec-03, at 11:43 AM, Foy, Sean wrote:
I recently found that NAnt could not build one of my solutions using
the
solution task and, finding nothing in the bugs database, decided to do
something about it.
My project
I already had this issue fixed on my local system, but I'm testing some
other changes before committing the fix ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Dmitriy Bezugliy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:50 PM
Subject:
I don't use the solution task, but I'm guessing that the problem is that you
are missing the following at the top of your solution file:
?xml version=1.0 ?
- Ants
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
| Kent Boogaart
| Sent:
use the version task and the asminfo task !
split your assemblyinfo.cs in two
- one is maintained manually and contains everything but the assembly version
attribute
- the other one will be auto-generated by the asminfo task and will contain the
version number from the version task.
- if not defined :
* if it is a project reference then CopyLocal is true
* if anything else (file present in gac or not) then CopyLocal is false
Just to clarify a point. You can *never* reference an assembly in the
GAC. You can reference an assembly somewhere on the filesystem
You can use my trick:
The technique consists of:
1. A plain text file that holds nothing but a version number
AA.BB.CC.DD (version.txt)
2. A small C# utility that increments one of the components in
the file (NewBuild.exe)
3.A small C# utility that replaces AssemblyVersion(...)
in all
Title: Message
In ReplaceVersion.cs, I wonder
if DirectoryInfo.GetFiles(string) to see if the AssemblyInfo.cs file
exists.
-
Ants
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaroslaw
KowalskiSent: Tuesday, 16 September, 2003
' ; 'Daniel Nguyen' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:00
PM
Subject: [nant-dev] RE: [Nant-users] How
do one update the AssemblyVersion build number?
But does your AssemblyInfo.cs
file compile with a value greater than 255 in one of the build
Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:02
PM
Subject: [nant-dev] RE: [Nant-users] How
do one update the AssemblyVersion build number?
I like this suggestion. It's
very clean and streamline.
I do have a general question
to though: I shot down for suggesting using awk or sed to update
Nguyen';
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [nant-dev] RE:
[Nant-users] How do one update the AssemblyVersion build
number?
Yes, it seems to be legal: a snapshot of
my ILDASM dump:
.assembly extern Sooda{
.publickeytoken = (36 D3 1D A5 0D 00 DE DD
)
// 6
: RE: [nant-dev] RE: [Nant-users]
How do one update the AssemblyVersion build number?
Oops, sorry, my bad. I think
that65535 is the upper limit for build number parts which less than
Int32.Max.
-
Ants
-Original Message-From: Jaroslaw
Kowalski [mailto
Message-From: Jaroslaw
Kowalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 16 September, 2003
11:52To: Anthony LoveFrancisco; 'Daniel Nguyen';
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [nant-dev] RE:
[Nant-users] How do one update the AssemblyVersion build
number?
Yes, but who
Ian MacLean wrote:
I'm still fleshing out the details but basically infer the locale based
on the resx file name ( or allow it to be specified ) and then use
... or infer it if not specified?
assemblylinker to build the satellite assemblies.
So you plan a comfort feature of implicitly
forgot the link again:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=31650
Ian
0.8.3 final has been released. No major changes from rc3 except that
its now the official version. rc3 was downloaded 943 times with no
major bugs reported ( except the various solutiontask fixes of couse ).
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Is there any updated roadmap to 1.0 ? I've checked the
http://nant.sourceforge.net/todo.html
and looks like we've silently got a lot of features planned for
0.8, 0.9, 1.0 and 1.1 into the current version.
yeah - thats well out of date. Now is definately a good
Hi,
* Ian MacLean wrote on 07.09.2003 (16:04):
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Maybe it's time to have version 1.0 released ? I believe NAnt is stable
enough now to handle even large projects like mono both on windows and
linux and having production version 1.0 would only make more people
Gert Driesen wrote:
and for the solution task)
- datatype documentation
Have you made any progress on the type docs ?
nope. Got the 0.83 release out first. Its on the list for this week.
Ian
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 9:04 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] 0.8.3 final
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Is there any updated roadmap
Gert Driesen wrote:
In my opinion, high on the list of things to do are :
- support for building locazized applications (for both the compiler tasks
and for the solution task)
- datatype documentation
- packaging (one distribution for all supported frameworks, or separate
distributions)
Note:
Brar Piening wrote:
what you plan to do in case of
building locazized applications?
I'm still fleshing out the details but basically infer the locale based
on the resx file name ( or allow it to be specified ) and then use
assemblylinker to build the satellite assemblies.
I'm asking because
Sascha Andres wrote:
* a version system task for cvs - a SourceSafe one would be
nice too, cause I know many using this.
both of these tasks exist right now. Sourcesafe tasks are in
NAntcontrib. And I've started on perforce tasks.
* ensure documentation ist complete, the way it's now is
oh, and just because it might need re-repeating,
i too am very grateful to this community. it's a great tool, i'm
heavily invested in it, and want to continue to help grow it.
/jean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Foley, Cash
Try compiling NAnt from CVS (it's very easy, just type nant release and
fresh nant will be built to build/nant-0.8.4 directory).
Solution task has been recently fixed in CVS, maybe this will fix your
problem.
Using nant from CVS I'm able to build a quite complex (8 interdependent
projects)
post a diff to the list.
diff -u file1 file2
should be fine.
Ian
I've made the appropriate changes. I've named the attribute changecase,
possible values are None, Upper, and Lower. None is the default value.
I.e. you can write
sysinfo changecase=Upper /
Unfortunately, our firewall doesn't
I've made the appropriate changes. I've named the attribute changecase,
possible values are None, Upper, and Lower. None is the default value.
I.e. you can write
sysinfo changecase=Upper /
Unfortunately, our firewall doesn't allow access to external CVS. How can I
contribute my changes?
Ok, diff is attached.
Will some build master add this to the CVS?
Regards,
Thomas
-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 13. August 2003 15:08
To: Freudenberg, Thomas
Cc: NAnt Developers
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] RE: [nant-dev] Feature
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
