Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Hi, This is to address that lag time issue that I have been seeing on my Linux boxes. Attached is a diff that gets around the issue while I dig further. THIS IS NO MEANS A FINAL SOLUTION. It's only a band-aid until I can properly create a proper fix. One of my problems that I am having with th

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Hi, On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dominik Guder wrote: > Am 06.03.2010 22:38, schrieb Ryan Boggs: >> Hey Gert, >> >> Question regarding the NAnt.build file,  in particular the userdoc >> target.  Could you help me understand why the "self-userdoc" target is >> being called via the exec program

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Am 06.03.2010 22:38, schrieb Ryan Boggs: > Hey Gert, > > Question regarding the NAnt.build file, in particular the userdoc > target. Could you help me understand why the "self-userdoc" target is > being called via the exec program task rather than calling it > internally? I know there must be a

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

ginal Message- > From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com] > Sent: zaterdag 6 maart 2010 2:09 > To: Gert Driesen > Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; cchan...@users.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release > > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 4,

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

gmail.com] > Sent: zaterdag 6 maart 2010 2:09 > To: Gert Driesen > Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; cchan...@users.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release > > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Gert Driesen > wrote: >>

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

; cchan...@users.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release Hi, On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Gert Driesen wrote: > Hi Charles, > > The docs clearly state that the dependent targets are always executed > (first): > > "Note: the dependencies

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Thanks, Ryan. Charles P.S. I will be reviewing your patches this weekend. :) > Ok, if no one minds, I would like to look into this > further. __ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.c

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

gt; Ok, if no one minds, I would like to look into this further. > Regards, > > Gert > > -Original Message- > From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net] > Sent: vrijdag 5 maart 2010 4:26 > To: Ryan Boggs > Cc: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourc

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

me time (find the problem, fix it, and then wait for the fix to be included in a release). Regards, Gert -Original Message- From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: vrijdag 5 maart 2010 4:26 To: Ryan Boggs Cc: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sub

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

it now. That being said, a simple remedy to this situation would be to make install-windows depend only on build and then call userdoc within that target. It's not the best patch, more of a band-aid. What do you think? > Regards, > Charles > > --- On Fri, 3/5/10, Ryan Boggs wr

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

t; From: Ryan Boggs > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release > To: "cchan...@users.sourceforge.net" > Cc: "Gert Driesen" , > "nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net" > > Received: Friday, March 5, 2010, 1:35 AM > Hi, > >

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Hello Gert, >> >> Thanks for the heads up. Let me try this, and if I can pinpoint the source >> of the issue. Perhaps I will post to Mono dev team as well and see if they >> can provide any guidance. >> >> Regards, >> Charles >> >> --- On Thu, 3/4

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

dev team as well > and see if they can provide any guidance. > > Regards, > Charles > > --- On Thu, 3/4/10, Gert Driesen wrote: > >> From: Gert Driesen >> Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release >> To: cchan...@users.sourceforge.net, "'

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Hello Gert, Thanks for the heads up. Let me try this, and if I can pinpoint the source of the issue. Perhaps I will post to Mono dev team as well and see if they can provide any guidance. Regards, Charles --- On Thu, 3/4/10, Gert Driesen wrote: > From: Gert Driesen > Subject: RE: [na

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

gs Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release Hello Ryan, I don't know, but something doesn't sound right. Thanks for pointing it out. I have provided Dominik with access to TC, and I believe he is going to try setup the Windows build.

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

parallel. This needs to be looked at for 0.87 release anyways. Regards, Charles --- On Thu, 3/4/10, Ryan Boggs wrote: > From: Ryan Boggs > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release > To: cchan...@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Rec

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

at 8:51 PM, Charles Chan wrote: > Yes! > > At least I know my setup is working correctly (Windows + NMake + Mono 2.4.3). > I will close the issue as well. > > Thanks for helping out. > Charles > > --- On Thu, 3/4/10, Ryan Boggs wrote: > >> From: Ryan Boggs >

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Yes! At least I know my setup is working correctly (Windows + NMake + Mono 2.4.3). I will close the issue as well. Thanks for helping out. Charles --- On Thu, 3/4/10, Ryan Boggs wrote: > From: Ryan Boggs > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release >

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

It's currently stuck on the userdoc portion of the build on my Debian Test box but the rest of the build went without a hitch. Looks like you squashed this bug. Good job. Thanks, Ryan On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Ryan Boggs wrote: > Sure, give me 10 minutes to give it a go... > > On Wed, Ma

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Sure, give me 10 minutes to give it a go... On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Charles Chan wrote: > Hello Ryan, > >> The good news is that after I install Mono, I am now able >> to reproduce it. So the fix should not be far behind. :) > > I have checked the fix into the CVS HEAD, and tested it on m

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Hello Ryan, > The good news is that after I install Mono, I am now able > to reproduce it. So the fix should not be far behind. :) I have checked the fix into the CVS HEAD, and tested it on my machine. Would you mind giving it a try at your convenience? Thanks, Charles _

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Hi, On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Charles Chan wrote: > Hello Ryan, > > --- On Wed, 3/3/10, Ryan Boggs wrote: >> If you are referring to the actual process of building >> NAnt, the main >> problem I have been running into is during the test >> NAnt.Core build on >> the Mono platform.  Specific

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Hello Ryan, --- On Wed, 3/3/10, Ryan Boggs wrote: > If you are referring to the actual process of building > NAnt, the main > problem I have been running into is during the test > NAnt.Core build on > the Mono platform.  Specifically, with the > XmlPokeTest.cs file, it > complains that variables

Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release

Hi, On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Charles Chan wrote: > >From what I have seen so far on the mailing list, it looks like most people > >are happy with the roadmap at this time. Let's stay focus for the short > >term, and we can revise the roadmap as we go along. :) > > -- > > So w

Re: [nant-dev] task verbosity

Hello, as far as I know, it was not :( The only way to control it is global NAnt switch (verbose/normal/quiet) but no control on task level. Ing. Martin Aliger GORDIC spol. s r.o. GORDIC spol.

Re: [nant-dev] task decorators/listeners, was Re: [Nant-users] Build target from command line without dependencies

On 9/22/05, Gary Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Troy Laurin wrote: > > >On 9/20/05, Gary Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>but on the other hand there are some > >>things that make can do easily, but which are tricky or more work to do > >>in NAnt - such as adding a project-wide pre

RE: [nant-dev] task

Ian, > sounds like a good idea. Why don't you log a bug for it ? Done. j3d. > > > > > >-- DISCLAIMER > >-- > >This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be > >privileged. If you have received it by mistake ple

Re: [nant-dev] task

Greco Giuseppe wrote: Hi all, Why doesn't the task support the NDoc argument "xmldoc" (see http://ndoc.sourceforge.net/usersguide.html)? NAnt assumes that XML files generated by the C# compiler are always located in the same directory as the compiled assemblies. Don't you think that we should add

Re: [nant-dev] task question

Gert Driesen wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Steve Jansen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [nant-dev] task question

Hi Ian, First off, I really appreciate the responsiveness from both you and Gert with my questions. I know that pre-1.0 releases are not expected to be backwards compatibile, but, I still think it's good to try for it. So, I humbly vote for option A, to leave the get-NNN() functions as is and

Re: [nant-dev] task question

- Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Steve Jansen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wed

Re: [nant-dev] task question

Ian MacLean wrote: Gert Driesen wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Jansen Sent: vrijdag 3 december 2004 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] task question Hi again, I have a question about the task and the project

Re: [nant-dev] task question

Gert Driesen wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Jansen Sent: vrijdag 3 december 2004 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] task question Hi again, I have a question about the task and the project::get-buildfile-p

RE: [nant-dev] task question

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Steve Jansen > Sent: vrijdag 3 december 2004 17:19 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [nant-dev] task question > > Hi again, > > I have a question about the task and the > project::get-buildfi

Re: [nant-dev] task

Done, j3d. > Hi Giuseppe, > > Can you submit a bug report for this ? > > Thanks ! > > Gert > > - Original Message - > From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:42 AM > Subject: [nant-dev] task > > >> Hi all, >> >> it seems t

Re: [nant-dev] task

Hi Giuseppe, Can you submit a bug report for this ? Thanks ! Gert - Original Message - From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:42 AM Subject: [nant-dev] task > Hi all, > > it seems there is a problem with the task: >

Re: [nant-dev] task...

Gert, Thanks, using is OK... j3d. On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 13:24, Gert Driesen wrote: > Giuseppe, > > The task was recently changed to use a instead of a > regular element. > > The allows you to set a prefix (directory) for the files in the > fileset. > > So, you should actually use for

Re: [nant-dev] task...

Giuseppe, The task was recently changed to use a instead of a regular element. The allows you to set a prefix (directory) for the files in the fileset. So, you should actually use for the global data type. The error message that was output was wrong. It should have been "Attempting to use

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

ED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 17:04, Gert Driesen wrote: - Original Message - From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "NA

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 17:04, Gert Driesen wrote: - Original Message - Fr

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

L PROTECTED]> Cc: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 17:04, Gert Driesen wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAI

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 17:04, Gert Driesen wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

- Original Message - From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 4:58 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux &g

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

Gert, the following does work: al /t:lib /embed:myApp.en-US.resources /c:en-US /out:myApp.resources.dll j3d. On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 16:50, Gert Driesen wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednes

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

- Original Message - From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 4:31 PM Subject: [nant-dev] task on Linux > Hi all, > > the task on Linux does not generate satellite > assemblies at all... here below is the debug i

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 20:39, Giuseppe Greco wrote: > On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 20:33, Gert Driesen wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 8:25 PM > > Subject: [nant-dev] ta

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 20:33, Gert Driesen wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 8:25 PM > Subject: [nant-dev] task on Linux > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm trying to create a s

Re: [nant-dev] task on Linux

- Original Message - From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "NAnt Developers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 8:25 PM Subject: [nant-dev] task on Linux > Hi all, > > I'm trying to create a satellite assembly with a task > like this: > >target="lib"

Re: [nant-dev] task for NAnt :)

On Mon, 05 Apr 2004, Matthew Mastracci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's unfortunately not under a GPL-compatible license (preventing > direct linking), but the command-line interface would work just fine > for most purposes, I believe.

Re: [nant-dev] task in Ant

On 27 Nov 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just polished up a little sandbox project I've built over in > Ant land, a task library to help a little in a .NET world. The docs are now online at and can be downloaded as

Re: [nant-dev] task behavior and nant.onfailure

Damir, These issues are now fixed in cvs. Thanks for taking the time to get to the bottom of this, and providing the repros ! Gert - Original Message - From: "Damir Simunic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 8:58 PM Subject: [nant-dev] task

RE: [nant-dev] task behavior and nant.onfailure

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damir Simunic Sent: 29. studeni 2003 20:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] task behavior and nant.onfailure ... In addition, in all three scenarios any message after the task is never printed ou

RE: [nant-dev] task w/non-existant files

+1 for that idea. -Original Message- From: Matthew Mastracci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:15 PM To: Nant-Developers (E-mail) Subject: [nant-dev] task w/non-existant files Should the touch task create a non-existant file? The documentation says that it

RE: [nant-dev] task bug in nested build

Ok tested with the latest nightly builds, it works. Thanks!! -Original Message- From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2003 5:29 PM To: Eddie Tse; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] task bug in nested build What version of NAnt are you using

Re: [nant-dev] task bug in nested build

What version of NAnt are you using ? This should actually already be fixed in the 0.8.4 nightly builds, but not by that patch you supplied ... Earlier versions of the solution task did not resolve the solution filename to a full path in SolutionTask.cs, this was fixed since ... Can you try one of

RE: [nant-dev] task fixes

WebMap map = _webMaps[project]; -Original Message- From: Matthew Mastracci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 23 August 2003 1:11 AM To: Eddie Tse Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] task fixes Eddie - ignoring non-csproj and non-vbproj files loo

Re: [nant-dev] task fixes

Hi Eddie, I've committed your patches to cvs. Thanks ! Gert - Original Message - From: "Eddie Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 3:58 PM Subject: [nant-dev] task fixes > Hi All, > > I've been experimenting with the task from CVS and had

Re: [nant-dev] task fixes

Eddie - ignoring non-csproj and non-vbproj files looks good. We shouldn't do this without at least warning the user that we are ignoring their projects, however. Can you add a log message to this test? Eddie Tse wrote: Hi All, I've been experimenting with the task from CVS and had made a fe

RE: [nant-dev] task change

> So people send in your votes on these topics: > 1. or property-group > 2. separator attribute or no separator attribute no separator --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here fo

RE: [nant-dev] task change

> So people send in your votes on these topics: > 1. or propertygroup > 2. separator attribute or no separator attribute no separator --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE

Re: [nant-dev] task change

Shaw, Gerry wrote: >>I think its a good idea. Howver the outer tag should probably be >> >> > or somthing like that. I think the . seperator is fine. > >Do others feel strongly about this? I have it working with prefix="">. I like it being all in one task so that when the user reads >

RE: [nant-dev] task change

> I think its a good idea. Howver the outer tag should probably be or somthing like that. I think the . seperator is fine. Do others feel strongly about this? I have it working with . I like it being all in one task so that when the user reads the docs for they understand everything about i

Re: [nant-dev] task change

Shaw, Gerry wrote: >What do people think of the following syntax for the task: > > > > > > > >To produce the following properties: > >win-vc7.cc >win-vc7.lib >win-vc7.link > >The idea is to reduce duplicate values of the build value. > > This is almost the same as the namespace iss

RE: [nant-dev] task: 36894 sql

Seems like Tomas Restrepo is working on the sql task. His posts are on nantcontrib. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.

RE: [nant-dev] task: 36894 sql

AFIK nobody is working on the SQL task. I think ADO.NET should be considered cross platfrom. I believe I've heard that Mono is providing an implementation of that API. -Original Message- From: Adrian-Bogdan Andreias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 2:42 AM To: [

RE: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading

cott Hernandez > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading > > > Scott Hernandez wrote: > > > > >I was imagining that we would probably scan both "." and > "./Tasks". It > >would not seem crazy to me to h

Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading

Scott Hernandez wrote: >> > >I was thinking that the config file would spell out the explicit (but >not absolute) paths for loading task Assemblies. And there you would add >more entries if you wished. The default behavior would disappear and the >new "default" would be to use the config file. I

RE: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading

> -Original Message- > From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:27 AM > To: Scott Hernandez > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading > > Scott Hernandez wrote: > > >I don't c

Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading

Scott Hernandez wrote: >I don't consider this overly negative, but I am curious what the build >patterns are. > What do you mean by build patterns ?? > > >Anyway, I really don't care one way or another, I just think that at >this point, without more user feedback, and comments, I don't see one >

RE: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading

ED]] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:13 AM > To: Scott Hernandez > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading [snip] > I'm still not convinced that its a good idea to put those Tasks in the > build directory. If someone really needs to do it they c

Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading

Scott Hernandez wrote: > >I was imagining that we would probably scan both "." and "./Tasks". It >would not seem crazy to me to have build specific tasks in the build >file directory. > >Take for example this directory structure: > >myproject > myproject.build > tasks (custom) > src >src.b

RE: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading

> -Original Message- > From: Ian MacLean > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:30 AM > To: Scott Hernandez > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading > Scott Hernandez wrote: > > I want to bring this up as a topic of its own. We

Re: [nant-dev] Task Assembly Loading

Scott Hernandez wrote: > I want to bring this up as a topic of its own. We have discussed what > the behavior of loading assemblies and custom tasks before, but I > wanted to make sure there was consensus, and a clear understanding of > how things work. > > > > Let me start by stating how it