Re: [newbie] IBM Hard Drives?

2002-07-10 Thread Julian Opificius
I've been on a Western Digital trip for several years now and have no reason to change. I've used several professionally over the past decade, and own three of them personally (bought within the last three years) at last count. They are running 24/7, and I've never had so much as a squeak

Re: [newbie] IBM Hard Drives?

2002-07-10 Thread Julian Opificius
At 06:20 AM 7/10/02, you wrote: Western Digital drives are by far the worst you can get. Officially, the company only supports Windows and Solaris, so if you choose any other OS (like GNU/Linux) you're on your own. WD drives lack some vital CRC circuitry, and they don't comply fully with the

Re: [newbie] what to use for hostname

2002-01-07 Thread Julian Opificius
MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after me ... Julian Opificius. ICQ 3268206. Want to buy your Pack

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
Gerald, At 07:40 AM 1/4/02 -0500, you wrote: So what you're saying is that the hosts file is used only by the local machine, right? Correct! And is NOT used by bind, right? Correct! Oh dear ... Usually the resolv.conf on Linux would have a line order hosts bind. Which means look at hosts

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
Michael, At 09:38 AM 1/4/02 -0600, you wrote: Who fulfills DNS requests for local machines if not anoka? I've been told that bind doesn't look at /etc/hosts, which brought my world crashing down. Now what? :-) Thanks for your patience with me, I'm sure we're nearly at the bottom of this.

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
Gerald, At 10:53 AM 1/4/02 -0500, you wrote: There's no point in a local machine going up to my ISP's nameserver to find name/address mappings for another machine on my computer is there? DNS for the local LAN has to be handled by a NS that has authority for my LAN. Who else could that

Re: [newbie] spamed by Desired Design?

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
Yes, it's their autoresponder. When they come back from lunch and check their mail they'll have egg on face ... ;-) j. At 06:50 PM 1/4/02 +0100, you wrote: As an answer to my shoutcast question I got a response from Desired Design saying thank you for contacting Desired Design.

Re: [newbie] Question - school related -- Have we been conned????

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
? :) Remember. You aren't paranoid if the world really is out to get you. Grant Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after me ... Julian Opificius. ICQ 3268206

Re: [newbie] spamed by Desired Design?

2002-01-04 Thread Julian Opificius
from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after me ... Julian Opificius

Re: [newbie] Question - school related so ignore if you want.

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Here's another ... 1. 10 2. 46 3. M 4. ADSL 640/256 5. 5 As an aside, I'm truly impressed that people happily helped this lad out by replying, rather than telling him to take it elsewhere. Just goes to show what a great community is built around Linux and FSF. Yeah, I know, what a kiss-@$$

Re: [newbie] Question - school related so ignore if you want.

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
At 11:17 PM 1/3/02 +0200, you wrote: As an aside, I'm truly impressed that people happily helped this lad out by replying, I'm sure others, like myself, replied by private mail. But what surprised me was how *old* we are on average! Nothing like the teenage linux geek stereotype. Yes,

[newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Is there some willing chap who can help me configure named.conf? julian. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Hi Ed, This is what I sent to Ric Tibbets privately. He bravely offered to help. As I said to to him, I have configured a DNS server before - bind, on NT, but it was long enough ago that although I undertand the concepts of DNS well enough, I've forgotten some of the basic terms, and the linux

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Ed, I understand the /etc/hosts file. But I thought named was the guy that shared the info in /etc/hosts with client machines making dns requests. Do i have it wrong? Second, what is resolv.conf all about? I noticed with surprise that I have one with the correct ISP DNS servers already in

Re: [newbie] OT - Delays

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
I'm getting blazing speeds - almost conversational , but I'm in the US. Where are you, the Philippines? Most likely a problem with your ISP. julian. === At 09:31 AM 1/4/02 -0500, you wrote: hi, am i the only one experiencing delay? i began noticing yesterday

Re: [newbie] named configuration

2002-01-03 Thread Julian Opificius
Ed, At 11:28 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote: On Thursday 03 January 2002 10:51 pm, Julian Opificius wrote: Ed, I understand the /etc/hosts file. But I thought named was the guy that shared the info in /etc/hosts with client machines making dns requests. Do i have it wrong? YES Sorry

Re: [newbie] no permission to mount cdrom

2002-01-02 Thread Julian Opificius
-0500, you wrote: On Tuesday 01 January 2002 01:34 pm, Julian Opificius wrote: If I understand that what you're asking for is for multiple users to be able to mount and unmount CD-ROMS, then you must change user to users in fstab. See man mount. using users will allow any user

Re: [newbie] AOL CDROM help!

2002-01-01 Thread Julian Opificius
How did you install Linux in the first place if not by CD ROM? julian. = At 02:10 PM 1/1/02 -0800, you wrote: Pls help! I mounted my cdrom using mount /mnt/cdrom then i went to the directory using cd /mnt/cdrom when i command ls no directories or files found

Re: [newbie] AOL CDROM help!

2002-01-01 Thread Julian Opificius
/1/02 -0800, you wrote: ok i install Linux by CD i know that im just asking that I cannot mount the cdrom when im inside the Linux Systems already (KDE and Gnome) I dont want to reinstall again so what will I do so i will not re-Install again Thanks Respectfully AOL www.aolsystems.com Julian

Re: [newbie] no permission to mount cdrom

2002-01-01 Thread Julian Opificius
If I understand that what you're asking for is for multiple users to be able to mount and unmount CD-ROMS, then you must change user to users in fstab. See man mount. julian. At 01:30 PM 1/1/02 -0500, you wrote: On Tuesday 01 January 2002 11:49 am, chris huston wrote: Hello, I can't seem

Re: [newbie] Motions Fowarded :-)

2001-12-23 Thread Julian Opificius
Hear hear !!! Enthusiastically seconded! j. = At 05:37 PM 12/22/01 -0500, you wrote: As long as we're sending salutations..in this case to Civilme for all of his time and efforts spent on this list, I think Sridhar should be honored as well. No question for me this

Re: [newbie] cordless mouse

2001-12-23 Thread Julian Opificius
I have the non-optical Logitech cordless wheel mouse running, and I suspect there's little difference in the PS2 interface side of things. The set-up screen in the installer was real squirrelly, but it works without a problem. j. At 11:00 AM 12/23/01 -0500, you wrote:

Re: [newbie] mandrake come from red hat

2001-12-22 Thread Julian Opificius
Cheers Brian. I did reboot Win98, and my Redhat shares came back. I rebooted to Mandrake, rebooted Win98, but no luck. I suspect I may have a network configuration error. When I run smbclient on the Mandrake box thus:- smbclient //anoka/distro -U julian I get can't determine network mask for

[newbie] swap memory guidelines

2001-12-22 Thread Julian Opificius
Hi guys I'm stacking my new LM server with 512Meg of RAM (not to mention 80Gigs of HD). How much swap space should I set up? I think I heard somewhere that beyond about 128Meg or so of RAM, matching swap to RAM results in reduced performance. Thanks, julian. Want to buy your Pack

Re: [newbie] swap memory guidelines

2001-12-22 Thread Julian Opificius
The machine will be combined workstation (nothing really intenstive) and Samba server for three Win98/2000 stations - low usage. Should I match swap space to RAM, then? j. === At 05:15 PM 12/23/01 +1100, you wrote: On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 23:30:12 -0600, Julian Opificius [EMAIL

Re: [newbie] mandrake come from red hat

2001-12-21 Thread Julian Opificius
be a bear. There has been a lot of mail about it lately, check the archives as well. Ric PS: Glad to hear you got it installed running! Ya just gotta watch those prompts options. If ya miss the wrong one, pfft! yer toast. :) Julian Opificius wrote: Hi Ric, PS: Julian; You're good sport

Re: [newbie] places to put stuff

2001-12-21 Thread Julian Opificius
it /dev/hdb. Is this reasonable thinking? j. At 04:28 PM 12/21/01 -0900, you wrote: On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 13:42, Julian Opificius wrote: Can anyone tell me the standard places to put files? Specifically :- On a multi-user workstation I would obvious use /home/accountname

Re: [newbie] places to put stuff

2001-12-21 Thread Julian Opificius
Now you did it ... answered a question, and set up another ;-) What is /usr/local used for? j. At 05:07 PM 12/21/01 -0900, you wrote: On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 16:37, Julian Opificius wrote: Thanks for the input, Civileme. Where would I put the public access directory

Re: [newbie] places to put stuff

2001-12-21 Thread Julian Opificius
The links provided exactly the information I was looking for. Thanks. j. == At 07:45 PM 12/21/01 -0900, you wrote: On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 17:18, Julian Opificius wrote: Now you did it ... answered a question, and set up another ;-) What is /usr/local used for? /usr

Re: [newbie] places to put stuff

2001-12-21 Thread Julian Opificius
, you wrote: On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 16:37, Julian Opificius wrote: Thanks for the input, Civileme. Where would I put the public access directory? Under /home, say /home/public, or is there some other traditional place? If I do this, presumably I could put /home on a separate /dev/hda'n

Re: [newbie] mandrake come from red hat

2001-12-20 Thread Julian Opificius
Hi Ric, PS: Julian; You're good sport. You'll do OK with this stuff! :) Cheers Ric - you too :-) b.t.w. In the past hour or so I went back and reinstalled Mandrake 8.1. I was a lot more studious of options, and managed to get the installer accept the partitions I'd created in System

Re: [newbie] mandrake come from red hat

2001-12-19 Thread Julian Opificius
Redmond. If you don't have any patience for us NEWBIES, then don't waste your precious time writing arrogant and spiteful retorts to those of us on this NEWBIE list who have, if not more knowledge and experience, then certainly a lot more humility and civility than you appear to have. Julian

Re: [newbie] mandrake come from red hat

2001-12-19 Thread Julian Opificius
Dang it, why do I rise to the bait this ol' curmudgeon keeps tossing? ;-) At 06:46 PM 12/19/01 -0500, you wrote: On Wednesday 19 December 2001 18:07, you wrote: Well let's not get too flamin' high and mighty and make judgements about each others' intelligence, shall we? OK I agree, but why

Re: [newbie] mandrake come from red hat

2001-12-19 Thread Julian Opificius
Jeez, what's with all this heavy artillery. I didn't say it was junk. I offered the installer wasn't well written. You came at me with guns a'blazin, Ric! I've been in this business a long time, and I don't appreciate judgemental crap about lame options, not R'ing TFM, etc. I actually do have

Re: [newbie] I've got a strange one

2001-12-19 Thread Julian Opificius
At 02:43 PM 12/20/01 +1100, Sridhar wrote: Sridhar Dhanapalan In short, Microsoft is no more able to build secure products than England's cricket team is able to withstand the bowling of Australia's bowlers. -- John Leyden, MS firewall is holier than the

[newbie] Install - CD-ROM not reading CD's 2 or 3

2001-12-19 Thread Julian Opificius
Trying to reinstall Mandrake 8.1. For some reason the CD ROM doesn't identify CDs 2 or 3. They are readable on my other computers under MS Windows. Any clues, anyone, please? Julian. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: Fwd: Re: [newbie] Mandrake come from RedHat?

2001-12-17 Thread Julian Opificius
machine off.) hope this helps, Randy Kramer Julian Opificius wrote: Just to offer a contrasting and virtually worthless opinion here ... I'm not sure about the slicker install or souped up. I lost Windows installs on two of my machines (Win98 and Win2000) because Mandrake 8.1's installer

RE: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible

2001-12-15 Thread Julian Opificius
stress that the above is fictitious, but I think it exemplifies what I want. My actual requirement is simply to make various directories VISIBLE to my wife and I, but INVISIBLE to our kids, while NOT having to put it all into user directory trees. Thank you for your help. Julian Opificius

RE: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible

2001-12-15 Thread Julian Opificius
Thanks very much for taking the trouble to write, Dave. Yes, I understand what [homes] does, and I am using it for private directory structures. The problems with [homes] are that :- 1) It defines a directory mapping (and browse visibility) on a user basis, not a group basis, and gives the

[newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible

2001-12-14 Thread Julian Opificius
kids). Thanks in advance. Julian Opificius. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible

2001-12-14 Thread Julian Opificius
/*.bat/. If the case-sensitive parameter is false, Samba will veto files regard to case. Hopefully, this command can help you solve your problem. Good luck... Dexter On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Julian Opificius wrote: I've pored over man on the Samba web-site, and yes, you remember correctly

Re: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible

2001-12-14 Thread Julian Opificius
: This probabally isn't what you want, but if you end a SMB share name with a '$' it will not show up in browse lists but will still be accessable (assuming you have rights to the share and the underlying files of course.) -Original Message- From: Julian Opificius [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible

2001-12-14 Thread Julian Opificius
, Dexter On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Julian Opificius wrote: Just like browseable = no, right? No, I want the share to show up or not show up as a function of it's accessibility by the current login - i.e. login-dependant, rather than definition-dependant. Thanks all the same. Julian

Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible

2001-12-14 Thread Julian Opificius
box or the Windows box, and which way are you trying to connect? Julian. At 11:05 PM 12/14/01 -0500, you wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 20:55:41 -0600 Julian Opificius [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder: Hi there, i've got a question about something

Re: [newbie] Dual boot with Windows 95 LM 8.1

2001-12-06 Thread Julian Opificius
I too am a System Commander fan, (have been for years) and tried to use it to boot Mandrake 8.1 along with Win98 and Win2000. I had the MS OSs loaded first, however, and tried to load Mandrake afterwards. The results were disastrous: I lost both MS installations as Mandrakes's installer