Subject: Re: [newbie] Speed differences between OSs
Randy Kramer wrote:
The other machine I had tried it on some months ago is a much faster one
and
at the time had 256 meg. of RAM and a much bigger harddrive partition on
which I was dual booting between Linux and Win 2000Pro.
I like
Es Dissabte 08 Juny 2002 16:09, en Jon Doe va escriure:
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 08:39:28 -0500
Dan W. Dooley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the full featured aspect of KDE and though I haven't examined
Gnome that closely, it looks interesting. I would not want to go to
something severely
Es Dissabte 08 Juny 2002 18:49, en shane va escriure:
seriously, to windows, cpu rules. to linux it is RAM.
That's right. My laptop's battery life is always longer with linux than any
windows -98, 2000, XP-...
--
Joan Tur. Eivissa-Balears
AOL quini2k ICQ 11407395
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 June 2002 09:21 pm, Femme wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 16:36:04 +0200 (CEST)
Ralph Slooten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Dan W. Dooley wrote:
snip
I have been using Fluxbox for the last 5 months now or so, and
Can someone explain to me why Linux under KDE or Gnome would run so much
slower than Windows on the same machine?
An older HP Vectra with a 200 MHz Pent.; 80 meg RAM; two harddrives;
integrated video. This machine has had Windows 2000 Server, NT Server 4,
Linux 8.2, and currently NT and 8.2 on
Dan W. Dooley wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Linux under KDE or Gnome would run so much
slower than Windows on the same machine?
An older HP Vectra with a 200 MHz Pent.; 80 meg RAM; two harddrives;
integrated video. This machine has had Windows 2000 Server, NT Server 4,
Linux 8.2,
and CPU.. and decide if you need it.
regards
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan W. Dooley
Sent: Saturday, 8 June 2002 8:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Speed differences between OSs
Can someone explain to me why Linux
]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Speed differences between OSs
Dan W. Dooley wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Linux under KDE or Gnome would run so much
slower than Windows on the same machine?
Ideas?
I won't try to explain -- that would be a major
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 08:39:28 -0500
Dan W. Dooley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the full featured aspect of KDE and though I haven't examined
Gnome that closely, it looks interesting. I would not want to go to
something severely stripped down. Not if I'm ever going to think in
terms of a
Dan W. Dooley wrote:
I understand. It is disappointing, and to me (my humble opinion) counters
the claims of Linux being a good choice on more modest hardware. At least
that was always the impression I had.
Yeah, I feel the same way -- as a nondiscriminating listener, I heard
Linux was more
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Dan W. Dooley wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Linux under KDE or Gnome would run so much
slower than Windows on the same machine?
There you have it... Gnome or KDE. To be honest I haven't had any
experience with KDE the last year or so, but I do know that Gnome is
alle
- Original Message -
From: Jon Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Speed differences between OSs
I am sure I'll get flamed for this, but I don't think Linux is a
replacement for Windows. Linux is a robust *nix
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:13:05 -0500
Dan W. Dooley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something doesn't have to be just like something else to work the
same way. What I mean by work the same way is, to be an environment
within which I can run the applications I need to run to fulfill my
reasons for
Jon Doe wrote:
I'm with you, I know what its like not liking MS. But the point I'm
trying to make is,
1. If you don't like the speed of linux use something else.
Or change Linux.
This is not a personal attack, so please don't take it that way.
I just get tired of hearing people bashing
Randy Kramer wrote:
The other machine I had tried it on some months ago is a much faster one and
at the time had 256 meg. of RAM and a much bigger harddrive partition on
which I was dual booting between Linux and Win 2000Pro.
I like the full featured aspect of KDE and though I haven't examined
robin wrote:
Randy Kramer wrote:
Just for the record, I didn't write what you attributed to me. I think
Dan W. Dooley wrote it, but I'm not absolutely sure.
So is it a case of comparing apples and pears (i.e. recent versions of
KDE with old versions of Windows)?
Perhaps. I've made
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 June 2002 06:39 am, Dan W. Dooley did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
I understand. It is disappointing, and to me (my humble opinion)
counters the claims of Linux being a good choice on more modest hardware.
At least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 June 2002 08:54 am, robin did speak unto the huddled masses,
saying:
I'd be interested to see
performance compared between XP and Mandrake 8.2/KDE, with both boxes
running the same kinds of services with the same level of security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 June 2002 07:36 am, Ralph Slooten did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
Sorry if I offend anyone, this is not ment to raise anyone's hair, but
Nautilus is more usefull as an egg-timer.. damn it's so slow. Yes it
looks good,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 June 2002 3:36 pm, Ralph Slooten wrote:
There you have it... Gnome or KDE. To be honest I haven't had any
experience with KDE the last year or so, but I do know that Gnome is
really becomming dissapointing in terms of speed. I
PROTECTED]
Web address: http://www.qsl.net/wb9tka
May Goddes love blest ye alle
- Original Message -
From: Jon Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Speed differences between OSs
I am sure I'll get flamed
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 07:19:13 -0500
Dan W. Dooley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Linux under KDE or Gnome would run so
much slower than Windows on the same machine?
An older HP Vectra with a 200 MHz Pent.; 80 meg RAM; two harddrives;
integrated video. This machine
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 07:19:13 -0500, Dan W. Dooley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Linux under KDE or Gnome would run so much
slower than Windows on the same machine?
An older HP Vectra with a 200 MHz Pent.; 80 meg RAM; two harddrives;
integrated video. This machine
and still
be 5 or 6 different types of server.
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dennis Myers
Sent: Sunday, 9 June 2002 2:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Speed differences between OSs
On Saturday 08 June 2002
- Original Message -
From: Bill Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Speed differences between OSs
If you said Windoze98, I could understand this. But not 2000 server. I
have a 300MHz PII machine with 160MB of ram
On Saturday 08 June 2002 08:19 am, you wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Linux under KDE or Gnome would run so much
slower than Windows on the same machine?
An older HP Vectra with a 200 MHz Pent.; 80 meg RAM; two harddrives;
integrated video. This machine has had Windows 2000 Server, NT
I can testify...That's has always been my problem!
Lee
On Saturday 08 June 2002 03:37 pm, you wrote:
On Saturday 08 June 2002 08:19 am, you wrote:
Can someone explain to me why Linux under KDE or Gnome would run so much
slower than Windows on the same machine?
An older HP Vectra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
do i hear an amen brother? :)
On Saturday 08 June 2002 07:05 pm, Lee did speak unto the huddled masses,
saying:
I can testify...That's has always been my problem!
Lee
error between seat and keyboard during each and every linux install...
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 12:08 pm, Dave Kufta wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 June 2002 09:21 pm, Femme wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 16:36:04 +0200 (CEST)
Ralph Slooten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Dan W. Dooley wrote:
snip
I have
I am finally making the switch I had planned for a long time. Went
from KDE to WinoowMaker. And I have one word about the speed
differences - WOW!!
It's especially noticeable in Star Office. It no longer takes minutes
to start, or open folders. Wish I had taken the time earlier!!
Just
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Josh McCaffrey wrote:
I like KDE, but I tried switching to XFce (maybe pick up some speed),
and it's pretty damn confusing being that I havn't been using Linux
for more than a few weeks, and KDE is a little more like the windoze
I'm so used to. Any XFce users on the
31 matches
Mail list logo
