I was wondering if any Samba experts could help me out on this one
Troy McKee (airshipjones) replied to your LiveJournal comment in which you
[meaning Sir Robin] said:
I've never used W2K and don't know what an Active Directory, but I
reckon your best bet is to set up a Samba server on
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:09, Robin Turner wrote:
I was wondering if any Samba experts could help me out on this one
One of the best bets for this is to setup the system using SWAT and
Webmin - this gives the linux administrator the ability to actually
setup the linux box as not only a
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:09, Robin Turner wrote:
I was wondering if any Samba experts could help me out on this one
One of the best bets for this is to setup the system using SWAT and
Webmin - this gives the linux administrator the ability to actually
setup the linux
My question deals with a current setup of two MDK 9.0 clients and one MDK 9.0
server running DHCP and Samba with winbind. The network is a mixture of
Windows clients (presently Win 98 SE and Win 2K) and MDK 9 clients, all DHCP
clients. The server is setup to be Master as well as Local Browser
Well, I finally was able to connect to my Linux computer but I still have
one question. When I connect this is what I see:
NameComments
ericMithrilhall's Linux Server
homes Mithrilhall's Linux Server
Printers and Faxes Show installed printers and
Gidday Mithrilhall
Sorry, I could have given more detail. Samba can have it's own password and user list
as
well
Webmin is a https web browser based administration program which you can use from a
win pc
To use it point a web browser at https://your_server_ip_address:1
If it's not installed
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba Question
On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 17:29, Mithrilhall2000 wrote:
When at my Windows XP computer I do a search using the IP of the linux
computer and it shows this:
Name Folder Comment
192.168.1.3
I'm setting up Samba and I think I have just about everything perfect. I
have a user on the linux computer (Ex. login name: bob password: test) and I
have the same user on my Windows XP computer with the same login name and
password.
When at my Windows XP computer I do a search using the IP of
Gidday Mithrilhall
I know nothing of XP, but I am using Samba (via webmin).
Do you have a samba user of the same name and password?
In webmin it's easy, you tell it to convert all linux users to samba users.
rgds
max
I'm setting up Samba and I think I have just about everything perfect. I
have
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba Question
Gidday Mithrilhall
I know nothing of XP, but I am using Samba (via webmin).
Do you have a samba user of the same name and password?
In webmin it's easy, you tell it to convert all linux users to samba users.
rgds
max
I'm setting up Samba
On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 17:29, Mithrilhall2000 wrote:
When at my Windows XP computer I do a search using the IP of the linux
computer and it shows this:
Name Folder Comment
192.168.1.3 unknown
If I double-click the IP address shown above I get a login prompt and I type
in
- Normally NETBIOS name to IP resolution is done by the DNS, but you
probably don't have one.
NETBIOS name to IP resolutin is (or can be) done by a WINS server (which
SAMBA will emulate, if you tell it to), or - optionally - from an
LMHOSTS files (not LMHOSTS.SAM - that's a SAMple file).
-
, network logon scripts, roving
profiles, etc.
-JMS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Frank McKenna
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 1:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
Hi Michael
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 06:56:50 -0500
Jose M. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
Non domain windows machine authenticate every time they open a share.
Domain controlled machines basically log in once, then have access to
the resources allocated on a per user
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 00:11:14 -0500
Jose M. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
Password Encryption?
as in is encryption turned on? as far as i know it is. is this a bad thing?
--
daRcmaTTeR
Registered Linux User 182496
Mandrake 8.1
Hi Jose,
Thank you for your reply and sorry for the long post everyone.
1) Are the user accounts valid.
smbclient -L Sambabox -U Windowsuser
Have done this for all three users and there does not appear to be any error
messages
is the Windows Login name (that you used on the Windows
Heh, then the much simpler share level authentication is all you need.
-JMS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Weaver
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 8:49 AM
To: newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
then you have your cake and
icing...
A thought.
-JMS
-Original Message-
From: Jose M. Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 8:48 PM
To: 'Julian Opificius'
Subject: RE: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
Want to buy your Pack
are you trying to connect with?
-JMS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Weaver
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 8:54 AM
To: newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 00:11:14 -0500
Jose M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Frank McKenna
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
Hi Jose,
Thank you for your reply and sorry for the long post
- SEEING THE LIGHT with Samba -
-- Snip ---
I thought of it as a duh, an obvious feature, and that I was
overlooking
the obvious, but apparently not. The more I think about it, it
demonstrates
the philosophical difference between Microsoft (the KISS principle) and
Unix (the long rope - you
Um, thanks for the rant ...
1) I'm not badmouthing Linux, Samba, or anyone, Mr Sanchez. My comparison
of KISS vs the rope was a recognition of the power of Linux, while
acknowledging that it requires skill. The last letter of KISS stands for
Stupid. The point is, as you eloquently pointed
Thanks very much for taking the trouble to write, Dave.
Yes, I understand what [homes] does, and I am using it for private
directory structures.
The problems with [homes] are that :-
1) It defines a directory mapping (and browse visibility) on a user basis,
not a group basis, and gives the
and it doesn't like that one. i've even tried the Linux box's root passwd
and _that_ doens't work either.
the weird thing that got me going this direction was I opened the config
file and commented out ALL of the global settings cause i wanted to see how
things would react, then attempted
Password Encryption?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Weaver
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:21 PM
To: newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
well, I found the file LMHOSTS.SAM on my windows
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
Thanks very much for taking the trouble to write, Dave.
Yes, I understand what [homes] does, and I am using it for private
directory structures.
The problems with [homes] are that :-
1) It defines a directory mapping
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Weaver
Sent: Sunday, 16 December 2001 10:10 AM
To: newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 19:44:45 -0600
Julian Opificius [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to
ponder:
I'm
On Saturday 15 December 2001 21:10, you wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 19:44:45 -0600
Julian Opificius [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to
ponder:
I'm a little worried, as I said before, about the users mdw1982 and the
alexhome in the valid users list in the above definition.
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Frank McKenna
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 10:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
I have a similar problem where I can see all three users of my Mandrake
8.0 box
Hi Michael,
To make things easier, you can set up your Linux box as a domain
controller
and therefore will only have to deal with username / passwords on the
Linux
side. If you want to pursue that, let me know.
Could you please let me know how to do this and why it would be beneficial
TIA
With dexterous use of chmod and the smbpasswd file I can control access to
various shares, but how do I prevent shares from even appearing for logins
who are not permitted to access them? I'd rather those shares not even
appear, so as to provide a simplified interface to some users (i.e. my
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 22:14, Julian Opificius wrote:
With dexterous use of chmod and the smbpasswd file I can control access to
various shares, but how do I prevent shares from even appearing for logins
who are not permitted to access them? I'd rather those shares not even
appear, so as to
Hello:
Have you tried the veto files command? I have not used it, but the book I
have has a description for it, which you might find helpful:
veto files: Contains a list of file and directory names that are marked
by Samba as not visible and cannot be accessed by users. Entires in the
list
Thanks for the response Dexter.
No, what I'm looking for is to have shares simply not show up in the
network directory listing if the current user is not authorized to access them.
I thought of it as a duh, an obvious feature, and that I was overlooking
the obvious, but apparently not. The
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:44:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
Thanks for the response Dexter.
No, what I'm looking for is to have shares simply not show up in the
network directory listing if the current user is not authorized to access them
PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:44:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
Thanks for the response Dexter.
No, what I'm looking for is to have shares simply not show up in the
network directory listing if the current user is not authorized to access
them.
I thought
around to it.
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Opificius
Sent: Saturday, 15 December 2001 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
Just like browseable = no, right
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 20:55:41 -0600
Julian Opificius [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
Hi there,
i've got a question about something. I've been following this thread and gleening some
info from it. I've got the samba server running on my Linux machine and i'm trying to
.)
-Original Message-
From: Julian Opificius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:44:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [newbie] Samba question - making shares invisible
Thanks for the response Dexter.
No, what I'm looking for is to have shares simply not show up
Mark,
The first thing is that you say that you're trying to get the Windows box
to see the Linux box. The next thing is you talk about running smbclient,
which is used for accessing the Windows box from the Linux box, so I'm a
little confused.
The smbclient log message? I'm guessing it's
don't know the answer to ur question, but u may want to try:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
At 04:32 01/11/20 +1100, you wrote:
Hello all,
I have samba running ok (logon, file and print sharing)and when I run
the 11 tests in diagnosis.txt, everthin works fine except..
1. I can ping
I have a Linux box(at school) on a peer-to-peer network with Win98 machines.
How can I set up Samba to share files with them and also be able to see
their shared drives? Thanks y'all!
The Moose
Hi,
I´m using Mandrake 7.2 and the incredible nice KDE2 with Konqueror.
It´s all very good but I can´t manage to see other computers in my windows
workgroup
(I´m a stand alone linux user on my work, blá!!!).
Does anyone knows how SAMBA works with konqueror?
DATA:
Workgroup: FADO
My
okay, i got samba all set up and running. i can see my linux box from
windows. when i try to connect to it, it prompts for a password. however,
i have not set a password for it. i've tried every password for my system,
and even tried nothing. but it always tells me that it's an invalid
I think your Windows network username (and password) has to be the same as
a user name in Linux.
At 01:17 AM 6/22/2000 +, you wrote:
okay, i got samba all set up and running. i can see my linux box from
windows. when i try to connect to it, it prompts for a
password. however, i have
--
|From: J D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 9:17 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [newbie] samba question
|
|
|okay, i got samba all set up and running. i can see my linux box from
|windows. when i try to connect to it, it prompts for a password.
|however,
|i have not s
ot; lines too. Often these are overlooked.
Enjoy!
-JMS
|-Original Message-
|From: J D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 9:17 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [newbie] samba question
|
|
|okay, i got samba all set up and running. i can see my linux box from
|win
47 matches
Mail list logo
