RE: Powershell Question

>The Select-Object cmdlet is probably what you want. It has -First, -Last, >-Skip, -Index, etc which you can use to step in to an array Cool, Is there any way to clean this up, I get an error when I consecutively pipe the $SnapOutput_Log and $GUID_Log lines together? $SnapOutput = start-job {

Re: Massachusetts law about encryption

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, David Lum wrote: > Can someone clarify who this applies to? The law applies to anyone who processes protected information of a MA resident. Protected information is basically Social Security, bank account, and/or credit card numbers. I'm told US Congress i

RE: Powershell Question

The Select-Object cmdlet is probably what you want. It has -First, -Last, -Skip, -Index, etc which you can use to step in to an array Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 > -Original Message- > From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] > Sent: F

RE: Powershell Question

>so if you search for "be35a053-2fee-4aa8-aa92-6bd1b2cf5e29" >you want to put $JobOutput = 787bdf7a-ccff-11dd-9866-806e6f6e6963 >or $JobOutput = D Neat function in previous email, but I am still not seeing how I do what I need. $JobOutput will contain many blocks all of that format, as an example

Re: Scripting Question - How to go backwards with tokens in for loop?

Much easier to do in VBScript with string manipulation. Try this: ' Set objShell = WScript.CreateObject("WScript.Shell") Set objScriptExec = objShell.Exec("cmd.exe /

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Thanks for the various perspectives, everyone. Have a great weekend.   -ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Verizon Smartphone -Original Message- From: Jon Harris Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:10:16 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Vo

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Well said.   -ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Verizon Smartphone -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:47:24 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data) Fully understand the bind you're in. Small compa

Re: Powershell Question

so if you search for "be35a053-2fee-4aa8-aa92-6bd1b2cf5e29" you want to put $JobOutput = 787bdf7a-ccff-11dd-9866-806e6f6e6963 or $JobOutput = D On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Hey Michael, > > > > Here is some of the output of two snapped drives (could be more): > > >

Re: Powershell Question

A nice example of use here: http://www.out-web.net/?p=757 On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Brian Desmond wrote: > I’ll go with “yes” too. ;) > > > > -ilike is the other operator I’d look at > > > > > > Thanks, > > Brian Desmond > > br...@briandesmond.com > > > > c – 312.731.3132 > > > > From: Mic

Re: Massachusetts law about encryption

That's basically the reason. We're running a SAN, all our data is on it, if they yank all the drives, they'd have to work very hard to reconstruct the data that's there. It's physically secure, more so than any desktop or notebook is. Locked closet, locked rack. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:15 PM, C

RE: Powershell Question

Hey Michael, Here is some of the output of two snapped drives (could be more): * SNAPSHOT ID = {be35a053-2fee-4aa8-aa92-6bd1b2cf5e29} ... - Shadow copy Set: {659a895d-1e31-4ef8-9909-ba8a21a143eb} - Original count of shadow copies = 2 - Original Volume name: \\?\Volume{787bdf7a-ccff-11dd-

RE: Powershell Question

I'll go with "yes" too. ;) -ilike is the other operator I'd look at Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Po

RE: Powershell Question

I'm going to say "yes", but I'm still not exactly sure what you are going for there. Look at "-match", "findstr", and "select". Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Friday, March 12,

Powershell Question

Hey guys, I am converting a shell script into a ps script and need to parse a variable that holds the output of an executed job. at the cli (using unix tools) I do this: grep -B 3 "some_string" |grep "another_string" |cut -f 5 -d " " So basically, the output has many repetitions that have vario

RE: Massachusetts law about encryption

Summarizing what you quoted, "any storage containing personal data of a Mass. resident which could be intercepted or lost must be encrypted. Presumably one wouldn't lose one's data center so data center storage is exempted. Carl _ From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Fr

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Agreed just document as you usually do that his preferred is not the best solution give him reasons similar to either mine or Erik Goldoff have stated and let it lie. At this point equipment is set and it is wiring that should be considered that is where this is caught. Jon On Fri, Mar 12, 2010

RE: SSL Certs... who do you use?

Actually, it's an Exchange MVP who is a reseller of the GoDaddy certificates (GoDaddy has a pretty nice reseller program). He helped popularize GoDaddy as a provider of UCC (SAN) certs early on in the Exchange 2007 startup era. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEss

RE: Watchguard appliances

I used both Enterprise and SoHo firewalls, and was frustrated with both. Now strictly use Sonicwalls. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confide

RE: Massachusetts law about encryption

Why not servers too? From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Massachusetts law about encryption We WDE everything except servers. A desktop is just a portable to a t

Re: Massachusetts law about encryption

We WDE everything except servers. A desktop is just a portable to a theif, and despite the apparent exception for desktops in the law our firm doesn't want to take the chance of having to litigate a breech involving an unencrypted [desktop] computer. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:20 PM, David Mazza

RE: SSL Certs... who do you use?

That's right - same prices and everything. I think it's more of a portal for non-GoDaddy customers. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged informat

Re: Massachusetts law about encryption

In any interpretation I have heard or read, at multiple sources as well as by (ahem, out-of-state) lawyers: Yes. -- Micheal Espinola Jr [image: Google] [image: Linkedin] -- ME2 On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at

RE: Massachusetts law about encryption

As for laptops, I would just assume whole drive encryption and be done w/ it. As for internal desktops... I dunno.. IPSEC?? From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Massach

RE: Watchguard appliances

+1 for Palo Alto My Pix515e's are going off support so I'm looking at different companies. I'll consider the ASA but I've heard some good tings about Palo's f/w. I talked with a tech at PA last week and it's sounds promising. Subject: RE: Watchguard appliances Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:23:58 -06

Re: Massachusetts law about encryption

Yes, this has been a major issue for CPA firms dealing with MA clients. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, David Mazzaccaro < david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com> wrote: > That's what I interrupt it as. > Just had a webinar on this last week. > > > -- > *From:* David Lum

RE: windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

Same concepts. BartPE is putting a layer in between the OS and The VMWare install. There's something in the unattended parameters that is not playing well with virtualization. Take the unattended install out of the mix and see what happens, or use the converter on a physical machine. Your problem s

RE: Massachusetts law about encryption

That's what I interrupt it as. Just had a webinar on this last week. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Massachusetts law about encryption Can someone clarify who this applies

Re: Massachusetts law about encryption

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:59, David Lum wrote: > Can someone clarify who this applies to? > > “persons who own or license personal information about a resident of the > Commonwealth of Massachusetts” defined as: > > Owns or licenses, receives, stores, maintains, processes, or otherwise has > acce

Massachusetts law about encryption

Can someone clarify who this applies to? "persons who own or license personal information about a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts" defined as: Owns or licenses, receives, stores, maintains, processes, or otherwise has access to personal information in connection with the provisi

Re: No Disclaimers in VIPER (caused by use of email digital certificates)

+1 It would alter the message and invalidate the certification - if happening post-certification (very likely). As I understand it, most disclaimer products apply the disclaimer as a last step during the outbound SMTP transport event. I'm sure Michael Smith can add much more detail to this. --

RE: SSL Certs... who do you use?

IIRC CertificatesForExchange is just reselling GoDaddy Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 > -Original Message- > From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:41 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: SSL Certs... who do

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Fully understand the bind you're in. Small companies tend to wing it, and don't often understand the tradeoffs in the good/fast/cheap choice, or at least have a strong preference for the latter two, without caring what benefits the first two bring. Kurt On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:19, Andrew S. Ba

Re: SSL Certs... who do you use?

If you're doing a great deal of eCommerce then the Verisign/Thawte certs offer the value of name recognition. For general SSL coniderations, GoDaddy or CertificatesForExchange work just as well. Die dulci fruere! Roger Wright ___ On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Scot Parsons wrote: > I use

Acronis remote backups d2d

Any done any regular off site (remote) backups with acronis? I have a client that wishes to do >From branch that has bussiness fios to small coporate office that also has >fios bussiness(50 down 20 up) and connect to each other via ipsec. Any ideas (acronis backups, remote)? Thanks Sent via Blac

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Those are good questions, for which I will have to look for the answers. In any event, the decision maker in question is not concerned with how hard it is for me to manage the environment. In his mind, that is a theoretical problem that does not offset his cost savings. So, these well-intentione

RE: Scripting Question - How to go backwards with tokens in for loop?

Never mind, I got it. Thanks to anyone working on it. Basically I just called tokens 1-x with a delim and then just piped them out in reverse order and then using the newly created reverse order list pulled the first 2(which when reversed is the .com and the domain) and re-reverse them in output.

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

And that's what I was getting at - Andrew is looking for pros and cons, and these kinds of questions need to be answered in each environment, because each one is unique, especially WRT policies and procedures, and equipment already in hand. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:05, Phil Brutsche wrote: > Al

RE: Hijack : RE: VIPRE 4 - bad updated installer (4275)

Yes, we are looking into that - a Vista PE type thing. We totally agree! From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: Curt Larson Subject: RE: Hijack : RE: VIPRE 4 - bad updated installer (4275) Forwarded to Product M

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

All IP phones I've ever seen are switches. That doesn't mean there aren't any that are hubs aka bridges, of course... I was thinking in terms of PC management ;) For the things you're talking about... it's just like any other switch. You will see at a minimum 2 MACs per port - one for the PC, one

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Who knows or cares about "all"? A little reading on your chosen manufacture's web site should provide that answer? -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networ

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

I don't know how all IP Phones work, but the Shortel line basically has an internal switch inside the phone. The switch inside the Shoretel phones are automatically designed to prioritize VoIP traffic to the phone, potentially overriding data going to a device placed on the other port on the pho

RE: windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

Yeah, a lot of the same recommendations still apply here... Might be as easy as flipping the disk controller setting in the BIOS to go from AHCI down to the good ol' ATA. From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:28

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Are all IP phones switches, or are some of them bridges? The last question isn't yes/no - in particular, there are questions of how it affects your security stance on the network switches WRT port security and limiting MAC addresses per port. Kurt On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:39, Phil Brutsche wr

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Haven't heard anything about Avaya being mentioned, but then again, I'm not on the Network/Telecoms team. The first we'll know is if we land in some morning and the phones have been changed. On a similar lack of information point, we've just found out that the IT testing team is being outsource

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

We're using Cisco 7960 phones. And we have insufficient staff (a desktop/server support person and a single consultant who has network experience). -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Glen Johnson wrote: > Cisco has several. > 7941G-GE, 7971G-GE, 7945G and I'

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

That's only a useful argument if the person to whom it is delivered has zero experience with a converged network (including reading about it) or primarily bad experiences with it. In this case, he has what he believes are good to great experiences with the current two floors that are done that way

RE: Hijack : RE: VIPRE 4 - bad updated installer (4275)

Forwarded to Product Manager ! Warm regards, Stu Sjouwerman Co-Founder, Publisher, Sunbelt Media P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218 F: +1-727-562-5199 s...@sunbelt-software.com From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re:

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

No to all 3 questions: the phone's switch is exactly that - a 2 port switch. Kurt Buff wrote: > Questions, for which I don't have answers: > > If putting the phone between the PC and the network, does that mask > the MAC address for the PC? > > Does it kill your ability to do WoL? > > How else

Re: Watchguard appliances

I used old WG Firebox III units for years - only had one issue, with their SMTP proxy. Switched to a packet filter and had no problems. It is, of course, completely irrelevant that my brother works for them as a trainer, because when the time came, we switched to Sidewinders (which were then unfor

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Questions, for which I don't have answers: If putting the phone between the PC and the network, does that mask the MAC address for the PC? Does it kill your ability to do WoL? How else might it interfere with your network management? Kurt On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:25, Andrew S. Baker wrote:

RE: windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

I understand what you’re talking about here. Never done it myself, but had several experiences with that error on physical machines and it normally comes down to a driver or hardware issue. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.es] Sent: Friday, Mar

Re: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates)

So is it a programmed feature? If so, it's the first disclaimer product I'm aware of that does it right out of the box. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Alex Eckelberry wrote: > Kevin is right, and I'll make sure the techs know. > > > > Changing a signed document goes directly against what a s

RE: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates)

Great! We can conclude.with a *much* better understanding of this issue and a workaround. Thank you Kevin. Alex. IMHO your tech(s) should be made aware (Ticket on this case was #137504). As For the record, despite his lack of understanding with certificates, he did a stand-up job (so I'm to

RE: Watchguard appliances

Seems every Watchguard owner is a "Beta" tester. Their support is frustrating to say the least, and I have never had "them" actually figure out a problem, I've done it myself. My next look will be a Palo Alto - I'm done with UTM - Packet filtering - Bastardized Proxied firewalls. Application awaren

Re: Watchguard appliances

oh, yeah, rolling the upgrades off the firewalls was never suggested by their support team. they were always 100% sure that wasn't the problem, even after the 2nd or 3rd time. Like we were the only people who ever had that problem. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jeff Brown <2jbr...@gmail.com>

RE: windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

I might have expressed myself wrong. When I talked about unattend installation I meant a Bart PE live CD which installs a fresh Windows XP unattended. I'm not talking about any virtualization of a physical machine here.Miguel--- El vie, 12/3/10, John Aldrich escribió:De: John Aldrich Asunto: RE: w

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Aw man, that stinks. From the little bit of experience I had in working with the Nortel hardware, they seemed to make a really solid product - granted I only worked with their TDM systems, but still... Too bad the company didn't survive on its own. How have you been impacted by he Avaya takeover

RE: SSL Certs... who do you use?

I use http://certificatesforexchange.com/. -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SSL Certs... who do you use? Well, I've been asked to check out the costs of an SSL cert. There

RE: SSL Certs... who do you use?

Comodo Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SSL Certs... who do you use? Well, I've been asked to check out the costs of an SSL cert. There are a lot of vendo

RE: SSL Certs... who do you use?

+1 for GoDaddy From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SSL Certs... who do you use? Been using GoDaddy certs for several years now, no issues we are aware of... On Fri, Mar 12,

RE: oh my aching DC...

Given that error I would dcpromo the box down and re-promote it. Also figure out what's wrong with the i/o subsystem. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 > -Original Message- > From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010

RE: SSL Certs... who do you use?

DigiCert is awesome and who I send all my customers to. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 > -Original Message- > From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:08 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: SSL Certs.

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

We're a Nortel shop here, with IP Phone 2004's on all the desks apart from a handful of IP Phone 1140e's. They can't be upgraded. Regards Tony Patton Desktop Operations Cavan Ext 8078 Direct Dial 049 435 2878 email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com From: "Raper, Jonathan - Eagle" To: "NT Syst

Re: SSL Certs... who do you use?

Been using GoDaddy certs for several years now, no issues we are aware of... On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Matthew W. Ross wrote: > Well, I've been asked to check out the costs of an SSL cert. There are a > lot of vendors out there. Prices range wildly, and I'm curious what the > lists recomm

RE: SSL Certs... who do you use?

Yes there are a lot of them. My .02 I've used directnic for years. No problems here. dave -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SSL Certs... who do you use? Well, I've been as

Re: Watchguard appliances

6+ years since we went through our "mess" with Watchguard, I'm still not completely over it, so I'll be happy to share. We had 5 units, 2 mid to large size firewalls and 3 SOHO devices. We never had any issues with the larger boxes, but every time we applied any kind of upgrade(CALS or VPN licens

SSL Certs... who do you use?

Well, I've been asked to check out the costs of an SSL cert. There are a lot of vendors out there. Prices range wildly, and I'm curious what the lists recommends. VeriSign and other big-name guys are always an option, but GoDaddy.com has an awesome price as well. Any reason _not_ to go with GoD

RE: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates)

Kevin is right, and I'll make sure the techs know. Changing a signed document goes directly against what a signed document is supposed to be... Alex From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: VIPER: NO Disclaimers

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Make sure the backplan of the switches can handle a lot of traffic with QOS running if not push hard for new switches. I have seen less powerful Cisco switches with good backplan for data get drugged when a lot of voice traffic gets thrown on to them even with QOS. Jon On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Ah ha. Missed that. Knowing Cisco, I doubt they have such and upgrade for any of their phones. -Original Message- From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Vo

Watchguard appliances

Curious to hear of experiences with their appliances and support, as well as comparisons with competing products. I am ready to throw this thing off the roof, along with Pavel Checkov from the support department. Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561) 747-6107 TH

Re: oh my aching DC...

The second DC stores its logs on an E drive that is a logical drive on the same physical hard drive as C. Phil Brutsche wrote: > Whoever did the initial configuration put the directory service database > (the DIT) on C: but put the transaction logs on F:. > > That doesn't explain why BOTH DCs wen

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Yes, however those are full-fledged handsets. I was leaning in the direction of a Gigabit switch module (designed specifically to work with the phone) that would upgrade an older non GigE phone without having to replace the handset. Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE Technology Coordinator Eagle

Re: Technet promo code?

I don't think they have that verson any longer. I seem to remember reading that they were discontinuing it. Jon On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Jim Slattery wrote: > Figured it out… that code is for the Direct version… I want one for the > w/Disks version. > > > > Thanks again, > > *Jim Slat

RE: windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

IRQL Not Less Than Or Equal usually points to a driver or hardware issue. I had a user's desktop which had a wireless card in it and after I pulled all the add-on cards out the blue screen issue went away and I started adding the cards one by one until it blue-screened again. Guess which card it cr

RE: windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

Exactly what I was thinking... Another option: You might need to tweak your sysprep if you do want to keep using the same image. -Original Message- From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: window

RE: windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

I remember when I did this a while back that I had to modify something in the .vmx file. Can't remember what it was exactly, but it may have had something to do with a scsi line. Regards Tony Patton Desktop Operations Cavan Ext 8078 Direct Dial 049 435 2878 email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.co

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Cisco has several. 7941G-GE, 7971G-GE, 7945G and I'd guess others. -Original Message- From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data) Well, that depen

Re: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates)

Yes, all certificate vendors would present this problem to ANY disclaimer system. It's not limited to Viper. If you think about what a digital signature is doing - alerting to any change to a message, this makes sense. A disclaimer is a change. So if Viper were to add a disclaimer, the recipien

Re: Changing AV from Symantec to Mcaffee - Good or Bad?

The previous version of Forefront requires a full copy of SQL to function like the SAV, etc consoles do. It did work but I have not worked with the current version. It was a smaller footprint than either of your current choices and I personally think it would catch more than either of them. The

RE: windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

Was the unattended install built from a physical machine installation? You might have a hardware detection issue. Does a "normal" install work? The different types of disks (scsi vs ide) in VMWare can cause issues if the unattended install is one type and the VM is another. Probably better to use

Re: oh my aching DC...

yes, it is a GC. Phil Brutsche wrote: Another thought: is the second DC a global catalog? Bill Humphries wrote: My other huge issue is why did my secondary DC not start authenticating. I couldn't even log onto it during the down time and it has AD and DNS running on it. There are no err

Re: Hijack : RE: VIPRE 4 - bad updated installer (4275)

I would like to add to this when will the consultants version that works off of a self booting USB drive ever come out? On several occasions where the Vipre Rescue was run it did indeed find and remove a lot of stuff but it sure would be nice to have a self booting version that does not rely on th

windows xp on vmware IRL less than not equal

Hi,  I have run an unattended installation of Windows XP on VMware server (the latest version). When it boots I get a blue screen of death IRQ lesss than not equal.  Anyone had this issue? I can't find any entry on google that points me in the right direction...  Thanks,  Miguel ~

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Well, that depends on the phones you're using. Mitel has a GigE option for their phones without having to replace the phone itself: http://www.mitel.com/DocController?documentId=19404 We've been running converged for 4 years without issue, and I have some imaging apps that are very network int

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

There's your argument right there. Putting a phone between your workstations and the network is a capital mistake. More precisely, letting your phones limit the speed at which your workstations can operate is a guaranteed failure. Kurt On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:40, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > And

Re: oh my aching DC...

Another thought: is the second DC a global catalog? Bill Humphries wrote: > My other huge issue is why did my secondary DC not start > authenticating. I couldn't even log onto it during the down time and it > has AD and DNS running on it. There are no errors in the DS log viewer > on this ser

Disable MailEssentials except the dislaimer piece

We are looking at the Disclaimer piece only. How do I install the MailEssentials and disable everything right off the bat?? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~

Re: oh my aching DC...

Whoever did the initial configuration put the directory service database (the DIT) on C: but put the transaction logs on F:. That doesn't explain why BOTH DCs went down though... unless there was a bigger problem with the FC SAN and both DCs are configured the same way. Bill Humphries wrote: > (s

RE: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates)

Yes. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates) That would

Re: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates)

That would require AD integrated certificates, no? On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > You should do it with transport rules so a message can be re-signed. In > my opinion. > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael B. Smith > > Consultant and Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentia

oh my aching DC...

(sorry about the long winded email) Hi all, I'm hoping for a little insight here so I can avoid another evening like last night. Client has main office with PDC and a second DC. One satellite office with one DC. The PDC and the backup both have DNS installed. At 6pm authentication to anyt

Scripting Question - How to go backwards with tokens in for loop?

I writing a quick script to show what domains are currently in a users dns cache. I only want the root domain itself, not anything past that. So if I run this: for /F "tokens=*" %%X in ('ipconfig /displaydns') DO echo %%X | find "CNAME Record" >> list.txt for /F "tokens=8" %%X in ('type list.txt

RE: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

Flexibility??? Simple. and another switch, connect to network, wait three more years. Hopefully by then you will be out of there and it will be your replacements problem. ;-) From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Su

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

*>>It's amazing how many companies go with the cheaper option at the start only to spend x times the cost to do it right in the future.* Yes, how well I know that. :) And a subset of those even try to blame you for their future lack of flexibility... -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker On Fri,

Re: Vipre - how is this possible?

Not really, but I would certainly take a look at GPO, there are so many things that you can set like that. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:24 AM, David Mazzaccaro < david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com> wrote: > True. > Do you know of a GPO setting (or 3rd party app) that ONLY allows secure > wi-fi connect

RE: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates)

You should do it with transport rules so a message can be re-signed. In my opinion. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jeff S. Gottlieb [mailto:jeff.s.gottl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Su

RE: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates)

Kevin, I reworded and reposted this thread (minutes ago) hoping to stimulate more discussion.and before knowing you replied. Thank you. Interesting enough Sunbelt support, "never saw anyone using a email digital certificate".thus could not offer a remedy. We do not represent the defense de

Re: Pros & Cons of Converged Networks (Voice / Data)

It would be as simple as replacing the phones, but it's nowhere near as cheap as running a second cable. It's amazing how many companies go with the cheaper option at the start only to spend x times the cost to do it right in the future. Regards Tony Patton Desktop Operations Cavan Ext 8078 Di

RE: Vipre - how is this possible?

True. Do you know of a GPO setting (or 3rd party app) that ONLY allows secure wi-fi connections? From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Vipre - how is this possible?

  1   2   >