Subject: Re: dns issue with browser (OS X)
Doublecheck the browser/OS proxy settings.
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy Tran
[mailto:jt...@teachtci.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Fri, 17 Feb 2012
...@teachtci.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 4:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
I will find out tomorrow morning if she has issues. I highly doubt its
malware but I cannot confirm. Not sure if there is even a malware scan for
Snow Leopard. The proxy
will just wipe and reinstall.
-Original Message-
From: James Hill [mailto:falc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 5:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
This sounds like the most likely cause.
Or even some type of Malware.
*gasp... did
This sounds like the most likely cause.
Or even some type of Malware.
*gasp... did he just say that!?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Saturday, 18 February 2012 3:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: dns issue with browser (OS X
Has he restarted the computer?
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Jimmy Tran [jt...@teachtci.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 10:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 12:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
Has he restarted the computer?
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http
DHCP or static IP addressing?
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jimmy Tran jt...@teachtci.com wrote:
Hi All,
** **
I have one specific user using a Mac who cannot resolve DNS properly in
Firefox or Safari on OS X 10.6.8. They can ping by hostnames just fine.
They can get to any
, February 17, 2012 9:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
Has he restarted the computer?
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com http://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Jimmy Tran
Doublecheck the browser/OS proxy settings.
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy Tran
[mailto:jt...@teachtci.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Fri, 17 Feb 2012
08:52:56 -0800
Subject: dns issue with
DHCP. When it wasn't working, I changed to static info and still
nothing. The reboot does fix it temporarily but it just seems to come
back in 24 hours.
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: dns issue
but what could it
be?
** **
*From:* Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2012 9:00 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
** **
Has he restarted the computer?
Carl Webster
Consultant
No proxy settings in Firefox or Safari.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: dns issue with browser (OS X)
Doublecheck the browser/OS proxy settings.
--Matt Ross
again and it
worked. Seems like there is something going on at night but what could it
be?
** **
*From:* Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2012 9:00 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
** **
Has he
Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: dns issue with browser (OS X)
** **
DHCP or static IP addressing?
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jimmy Tran jt...@teachtci.com wrote:**
**
Hi All,
I have one specific user using a Mac who cannot resolve DNS properly in
Firefox or Safari
Is there a way to flush the DNS cache on a Mac?
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:jt...@teachtci.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
No proxy settings in Firefox or Safari.
-Original Message
17, 2012 9:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: dns issue with browser (OS X)
Can you resolve any external hosts from a terminal window using nslookup? When
you said that you could ping by hostname, were you pinging internal hosts with
the same DNS suffix? (I think Macs call
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
Is there a way to flush the DNS cache on a Mac?
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:jt...@teachtci.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dns issue with browser (OS X
Check cache settings in the browsers
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:jt...@teachtci.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 12:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dns issue with browser (OS X)
I was pinging external hosts, not internal. Google resolved fine from terminal
but cannot resolve
: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: dns issue with browser (OS X)
Can you resolve any external hosts from a terminal window using nslookup? When
you said that you could ping by hostname, were you pinging internal hosts with
the same DNS suffix? (I think Macs call this search
Given that you have name resolution, and that you can ping the webserver on the
172.16.x.x subnet from the 172.17.x.x subnet, I don't believe this is a DNS
issue at all.
Also, since pings (and likely trace routes) are successful, routing is
correctly set up.
That leads to the conclusion that
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com wrote:
I'd like users on the 172.17.x.x end to access a webserver on the 172.16.x.x
end but it doesn't work and I'm not sure why.
Explain doesn't work. Error message, timeout, what? What are you
entering as the URL -- name
What does doesn't work mean?
What errors?
*ASB *(Find me online via About.Me http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio)
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...
*
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com wrote:
I have two locations connected via VPN. The
.
Oregon, WI 53575
Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215
Fax: (608) 835-7399
e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
_
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:35:12 -0500
Subject: Re: DNS Issue
On Tue, Mar 15
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com wrote:
I've tried entering both the name and IP address of the webserver and get
connection fail in Internet Explorer. In FireFox, the error is Unable to
determine IP address from host name.
The Firefox error indicates a
--
*From:* Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
*To:* NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
]
*Sent:* Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:35:12 -0500
*Subject:* Re: DNS Issue
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com
wrote:
I'd like users
: (608) 835-7399
e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
_
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:56:02 -0500
Subject: Re: DNS Issue
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Bob Hartung bhart
) 835-3106 x215
Fax: (608) 835-7399
e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
--
*From:* Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
*To:* NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
]
*Sent:* Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:56:02 -0500
*Subject:* Re: DNS Issue
Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
]
*Sent:* Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:56:02 -0500
*Subject:* Re: DNS Issue
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com
wrote:
I've tried entering both the name and IP address of the webserver and get
connection fail
, 2011 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DNS Issue
Telnet fails with both name and ip address.
NSLOOKUP resolves the name correctly.
FireFox gets The requested URL could not be retrieved when the ip address is
entered.
--
Bob Hartung
Wisco Industries, Inc.
736
-0500
Subject: Re: DNS Issue
I'd be sure to verify what ports are being allowed through your VPN. What is
your VPN?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com wrote:
I've tried entering both the name and IP address of the webserver and get
connection fail
What info are you getting back for the reverse zones?
Can you provide examples (appropriately sanitized, of course)?
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
2010/10/18 Wilhelm, Scott swilh...@mcs.k12.ny.us
Hello Everyone:
With the current DNS poisoning, trojans, and other malicious activity
ISP's are only allowing certain DNS servers to resolve. Check with
Comcast and make sure that you have the right Comcast DNS server for your area.
At 04:38 PM 9/24/2009, you wrote:
Good morning folks,
Recently, at a new
Is this an AD environment or peer to peer?
You didn't mention local DNS servers so I'm assuming it's peer to peer.
Anyway, what I found was that ipconfig/all showed that it had an
appropriate IP address, SNM, DG and DNS servers listed Comcast DNS servers
listed as DNS pri/sec on the LAN clients?
Thanks! I'll try all these before I rebuild it. Probably get around to
that task middle of next week. It's a residential box and they are moving
their data and picture files to another drive in preparation for the
rebuild. I'd kinda like to see if I can fix it before I decide to rebuild.
They
Quote: Comcast DNS servers listed as DNS pri/sec on the LAN clients?
Really? Why not a local DNS server on the LAN for resolution?
This is a residential PC. There is only the single box on the cable modem
and before I got there, there wasn't a firewall/router in the system. That
was why the
This is a long shot, but is there a chance that the IE settings went into Work
Offline under tools\ when the computer couldn't connect to anything, and now
that you have a valid ip config, maybe it's only IE having issues - that is as
long as the only thing that isn't working is IE and surfing.
Do a google search for Winsock XP Fix. Use that tool and see if it
helps at all. I've used it in similar scenarios, typically when a virus
or malware has damaged network settings, and it seems to help.
Jay
From: Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24,
netsh ip reset has proved most helpful for me in the past.
How to reset Internet Protocol (TCP/IP)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299357
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299357
How to reset Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) in Windows Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317518
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Len Hammond lenhammo...@gmail.com wrote:
My conclusion is that something is wrong with the IP installation.
Obviously. :)
But I am curious as to where to go to just refresh the IP
stack, never having done just that.
I am of the belief that once Windows
With XP you can't uninstall TCP/IP, however you can reset the XP TCP/IP
stack with the following command:
netsh int ip reset c:\logfile.txt
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
_
From: Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com]
Sent:
-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS issue
It's been a good while, but I've fixed certain lookup
problems in the past by disabling edns on 2k3 DNS servers
behind older
, April 29, 2009 7:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DNS issue
If a domain name has no MX records, but does have A
records, then SMTP MTAs are supposed to treat the domain as
if it had specified the hosts at those A records as the mail
exchangers. This is per the relevant RFC
Also consider testing with someone else's DNS or your forwarders. OpenDNS
perhaps.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS issue
The domains in question do
Here's an article about changing the negative caching:
http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/48528/controlling-positive-and-negative-caching.html
Jeff
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Charlie Kaiser
charl...@golden-eagle.orgwrote:
I'm running into a problem at one of our clients. W2K3 AD,
***
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DNS issue
Here's an article about changing the negative caching:
http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/48528/controlling-po
30, 2009 7:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS issue
Yeah; I saw that one, but it's a client-side setting only. I set that on
the
Exchange server, but it doesn't affect the DNS server's caching of
outside
lookups... And that's where the issue lies...
***
Charlie
Kingman, AZ
***
-Original Message-
From: Bill Songstad (WCUL) [mailto:administra...@waleague.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS issue
Charlie, I developed a similar problem yesterday when I
replaced
It's been a good while, but I've fixed certain lookup problems in the
past by disabling edns on 2k3 DNS servers behind older pixes.
dnscmd /config /enableednsprobes 0
Just a thought.
Have you enabled detailed packet logging on your DNS servers to look
into exactly what replies you're getting?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Charlie Kaiser
charl...@golden-eagle.org wrote:
Bottom line is that DNS lookups are failing, and mail is going to the A
record for the remote domain instead of the MX record. Apparently this is by
design with E2K3/W2K3 when a negative reply comes back.
If a
How do you mean? Should we just set up an options on a splash screen
where visitors can choose Flash or HTML versions of the site?
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
You are only invisable if you do not also supply standard content.
You dont need to trash the Flash to
, December 03, 2008 9:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DNS issue?
How do you mean? Should we just set up an options on a splash screen
where visitors can choose Flash or HTML versions of the site?
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
You are only invisable if you do
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Eric Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you mean? Should we just set up an options on a splash screen where
visitors can choose Flash or HTML versions of the site?
You can do it that way, but I think the better way to do it is to
build your web site using
some steps to index Flash better.
- Andy O.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Rector [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 8:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS issue?
Exactly...that should be your home page - you can seed it with keywords
+1
keep the flash in a specific area, wrapped by content/html
Personally I would change the site so each topic had its own page,
non-flash navigation (coupled with flash navigation if you wish), and
use flash to highlight media aspects of a page, not be the page.
Each page should have an
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Andy Ognenoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SEO argument against all flash sites has changed recently.
Yah, I've seen that news before. I'm not in a position to have a
representative sample, but I can provide an ancedote: On the public
web site for a
I don't know know how or why. Maybe not all Flash files index
equally well. Maybe it was luck. Whatever. We're happy for the
increased business. We're willing to sacrifice having lots of Flash
if it means we make more money.
Agreed. When I'm tackling a web site I go from the angle that
I am only addressing the specific question below, I did not have much luck
trying to hit your site. You already are doing that through DNS, both point to
the same IP address.
So now make sure the web server is set to answer to the requests for that
header.
Don't know if that is your problem,
DNS on the outside resolves the same for both www.forespost.com and
forestpost.com
Can you post the code that loads the xml?
Klint
It may not be
Eric Brouwer wrote:
Good afternoon,
I've run into an issue at work related to our web site that I can't
figure out. Our site was developed in
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Eric Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... using Flash ...
There's your problem. (Ha Ha Only Serious.)
FYI: A website which consists of nothing but Flash -- like yours --
is essentially invisible to search engines (like Google). So you're
hurting your search
We don't host the site internally.
When I contact them, what do I tell them I need done? That I need the
header requests for the two domains answered the same?
On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Kennedy, Jim wrote:
I am only addressing the specific question below, I did not have
much luck
It's a simple line of Actionscript in the Flash file:
xml.load(editorialicons.xml);
On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Klint Price - ArizonaITPro wrote:
DNS on the outside resolves the same for both www.forespost.com and
forestpost.com
Can you post the code that loads the xml?
Klint
It may
That should do it.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 2:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DNS issue?
We don't host the site internally.
When I contact them, what do I tell them I need done? That I need
can you change that line of code so it loads from
www.yoursite.com/editorialicons.xml ?
Eric Brouwer wrote:
It's a simple line of Actionscript in the Flash file:
xml.load(editorialicons.xml);
On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Klint Price - ArizonaITPro wrote:
DNS on the outside resolves the
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 2:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DNS issue?
We don't host the site internally.
When I contact them, what do I tell them I need done? That I need the
header requests for the two domains answered the same
On 2 Dec 2008 at 13:06, Eric Brouwer wrote:
Good afternoon,
I've run into an issue at work related to our web site that I can't
figure out. Our site was developed in house using Flash by another
[gag]. I'm on DSL and it takes a L-O-N-G T-I-M-E to load the home page and
move between
Believe me, I hear you on the anti-flash stuff. That was the first
thing I told them when I started. We are invisible to search
engines. With our work, form always trumps function. Our designers
need to have total control over how things look down to specifying
exactly what font the
Tried that, but it still doesn't work. I think Jim or Ben was right.
Seems like a cross domain security issue.
On Dec 2, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Klint Price - ArizonaITPro wrote:
can you change that line of code so it loads from www.yoursite.com/editorialicons.xml
?
Eric Brouwer wrote:
You are only invisable if you do not also supply standard content.
You dont need to trash the Flash to accomplish that.
--
ME2
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Eric Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Believe me, I hear you on the anti-flash stuff. That was the first thing I
told them when I
68 matches
Mail list logo
