Greetings:
Testing 148b I note that mouse wheeling over gnome switcher does not
change desktops. Until, I right click and go to preferences. At which
time it crashes and prompts for reload. After which switcher now
responds to mouse wheel scrolling. This is repeatable.
Thanks.
--
Ken
stros, none of which had working drivers available in their package
repositories. I'm not a developer/programmer but it would seem that
updating to the 270 stuff would be pretty low hanging fruit and help OI
make more favorable first impression on the desktop.
Thanks for your consideration.
-
been testing 148b as daily driver on the
workstation front. I've filed a couple bug reports on Redmine, but left
target version blank since I wasn't sure about the bug handling
workflow. Should I be setting target at 151 or would that fall under
auspices of triage person?
--
Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
le" rather than gamer type end user. I'd be willing put on
loan to US based driver developer if it would help polish up support for
Envy24 based cards. I also have another Envy24 based card (Chaintech).
--
Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing li
's scope, and OI dev effort much better
spent elsewhere and just including latest drivers from nVidia.
--
Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 15:18 -0400, Albert Lee wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> > Howdy:
> >
> > No audio here on 148b. I note a couple bugs filed in Redmine, but not
> > listed as show stoppers for 151. Shouldn't this be on the ra
eamer-properties, as gstreamer-properties from command line launches
same UI with same selections I've previously set. The "Test" button on
this tool produces sound via the onboard card. However, Gnome multimedia
apps such as Totem & Rhythmbox produce no audio playback.
--
Ken Gunde
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 23:20 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 06:16 +0400, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> > I have an envy24 driver nearly ready to integrate, but I have held off as I
> > don't have the hardware. If you want to send me the hardware, I can lo
e. The install
operation can't be performed."
Also, the "Read the release notes advisory points to Oracle:
<http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19963-01/>
Shouldn't we have it pointing to OI specific notes at openindiana.org??
--
Ken Gunderson
___
d.
Audio playback is still horrid to the point of unusable as referenced in
bug #933
<https://www.illumos.org/issues/933>
Sorry I don't code C and can't make more productive contribution but I
really hope this gets addressed before 151 is released.
--
Ken Gunderson
___
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 17:24 -0400, Tim Stewart wrote:
> Ken,
>
> On 05/23/11 11:55 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 23:20 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 06:16 +0400, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> >>> I have an envy2
a few other legacy cards that I may be
able to dig up. I think I have a wiki account now, so I'll update as
appropriate.
--
Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
does make sound, but it won't
make music. Bummer that my onboard fall back no longer works. I guess
I'm going to have to really dig though the legacy card pile and see if I
can round up an old SoundBlaster Live...
Thanks for the update on this.
--
Ken Gunderson
_
ve
rather than whinning about itches I'm expecting others to scratch for
me.
--
Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 08:24 +0400, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Switching to another less popular doc format doesn't seem like a great idea.
> I don't work with the documentation frequently, but I'd ask people that do.
>
> One thing is that some of these formats are like fads... they come and go. I
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 11:23 -0500, TJ Yang wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 08:24 +0400, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> >> Switching to another less popular doc format doesn't seem like a great
> >> idea.
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 15:11 +0100, Bayard Bell wrote:
> Tobias,
>
> I was just discussing this with Deano on IRC...
>
> My proposed litmus test is this: my girlfriend is willing to spend some time
> this summer helping out the project as a tech writer (she's got a background
> in speciality edi
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 18:37 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Now that 151 is almost out the door, we need to start looking beyond this to
> the next release. I'd like to kick this off looking at pkg5, since Userland
> would benefit from a newer pkg version.
>
> The pkg team integrat
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 20:49 +0200, Tobias Famulla wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I thought that Sphinx is better known in the Open-Source-Community, but
> because it's not known by the most of you, it might be easier for you,
> if I explain it shortly.
> Sphinx [1] was original written to write the Python-d
ment, but I guess
> installation comes first. I can cover one method of installation, say
> graphical install.
> Any other takers?
So you would have no problem with, for example, MS Word document?
I thought so...
So now you understand why this issue warrants discuss
excellent tool for making Latex accessible. My kid has been
using it since age 12 for writing. But on Solaris would need to have
working QT, etc.
--
Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 21:55 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> On 30 May 2011, at 19:04, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> > Not having time to follow your links, but on the subject of Oracle I
> > have been meaning to comment for sometime. I think it's long past
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 23:33 +0200, Damian Wojsław wrote:
> W dniu 2011-05-30 23:09, Ken Gunderson pisze:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 21:22 +0200, Damian Wojsław wrote:
> >> My personal take is: write the goddamn thing and the choice of the
> >> format goes to person t
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 23:25 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> After discussions online I wanted to flesh out proposals for the IPS repos
> and version numbers moving for the stable build and future dev builds.
>
> Repo wise:
>
> /release - for the stable releases
> /release-staging -
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 23:53 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> On 30 May 2011, at 22:32, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> > Your MUA doesn't wrap lines at any reasonable length, which makes
> > replying inline more challenging than it should be but a few thoughts
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 13:30 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> > Absolutely. Although I'm not so sure IPS is necessarily the way to go.
>
> How about using pkgadd?
>
> It supports installation over the net and there is not too much missing
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 20:26 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi Bayard,
>
> On 31 May 2011, at 09:56, Bayard Bell wrote:
> > So here's my quandry about this particular thread: I'm pretty supportive of
> > the need to be less dependent on Oracle for a number of things. As I see
> > it, Oracle's d
n writing code and we've got someone interested stepping up and
contributing in this much neglected capacity, barring any technical
reasons to the contrary, my vote would be to give Tobias the thumbs up.
--
Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Latex, then
aren't there lots of existing tools to export to various formats from
there, e.g. Docbook?
--
Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
ed some interest
> > in contributing to documentation: what would get you to become involved in
> > this capacity?
>
> While the question was directed at Ken Gunderson, I can answer for
> myself that it's a question of available time. So the best tools
> would be thos
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 16:19 +0100, Bayard Bell wrote:
> On 5 Jun 2011, at 15:05, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> Hello, Ken,
>
> > I'll let Tobias speak for himself but my read was that he has a
> > preference for Sphinx but willing to use other tools.
>
> That
easons for choosing git. As I think it's safe to assume that
decision was not undertaken lightly, and that Git likely scratched an
itch that Hg would/could not, such analysis could be quite illuminating
regarding Hg's shortcomings.
--
Regards-- Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
a look at the supporting documentation for
this, but perhaps it's nothing more than more penguinista kook-aide?
Indeed, as Garret points out, whenever I see this question come up the
ensuing discussion seems to typically be more along lines of personal
preference/familiarity and/or religious
gt; which stuff is put up for review in order to give interested
> parties enough time to look at changes.
>
> Any thoughts/opinions on this?
Seems reasonable to me. That this is not already happening is somewhat
of a strange release engineering model, no?
--
Regards-- Ken Gunderson
_
ested there. I have been away
traveling, missed the Tuesday meeting, and have yet the time to read
entire relevant verbiage from the logs, so will hold my comments a bit
until I have. Meanwhile, one hopes that such big change of the game
plans don't move forward too rapidly.
Thank you
t; http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Awesome! Be great to have LibreOffice on OI, if only to snub Oracle :-P
Last I poked around, the jury was still out on LibreOffice vs. Apache's
incarnation of OpenOffice as preferred office suite on OI. But I've
been being a fun hog and away
> Cheers,
>
> Alasdair
Rock On! If only because you're cool enough to be using Irssi :)
--
Regards-- Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
t;
> This is exactly what we have been after for some time now :-)
Nice work. Good job and a pat on the back for Alasdair :)
--
Regards-- Ken Gunderson
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
ration. In this
> part of the world, I seem to be very much alone. Thorough, linear,
> comprehensive documentation is my only hope for learning things the right way.
Ditto here.
I realize there are many developers who've contributed selflessly to OI
and my intent with the above is c
Hello Alasdair:
Thank you for all of your selfless efforts.
Warmest regards-- Ken
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
At Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:03:59 -0400,
Magnus Hedemark wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2012, at 6:44 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg
> Schilling) wrote:
>
> >
> > If we like OpenSolaris to survive, we need an OpenSolaris coordinator.
>
> OpenSolaris is long since dead. We are talking abo
At Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:13:07 -0500,
Nick Zivkovic wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > Jonathan Adams wrote:
> >
> >> On 3 September 2012 16:34, Joerg Schilling
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Correct, OpenSolaris is an umbrella and we need to find a way to
> >> > c
At Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:02:23 +0200,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> > > > Some people created the fork "Illumos" but failed to get the whole
> > > > community
> > > > behind them, so using the name Illumos does not wo
At Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:54:31 -0700,
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
>
> Any further thoughts on this, anyone?
[...]
Since you asked
While OI and Illumos should retain and nurture a collaborative
relationship, I also think OI should foster and maintain it's own
independence, as imho Illumos and Nexe
At Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:31:21 -0400,
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:27:02 -0600, Ken Gunderson
> wrote:
>
> > While OI and Illumos should retain and nurture a collaborative
> > relationship, I also think OI should foster and maintain it's own
&g
At Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:57:13 -0400,
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:54:02 -0600, Ken Gunderson
> wrote:
>
> > The foundation doesn't necessarily need to govern anything. Indeed,
> > my preference is that it would not. Rather it just needs to be a
&
At Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:32:41 -0400,
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:15:48 -0600, Ken Gunderson
> wrote:
>
> > Doesn't need to be a "C" corp. Keep it simple. Maybe an LLC or "S"
> > corp?
>
> Not if you want to
At Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:46:54 -0500,
Andrew M. Hettinger wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [1.1 ]
>
> [1.2 ]
[...]
>
> The Illumos Foundation has been vary generous to provide us with hosting,
> support,
> and not make any real demands on us in return. I think the best with regard
> to this
> is to continu
Thanks for your efforts. It would be great, however, if your MUA's
wrapped at 72 characters.
Thanks bunches-- Ken
At Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:22:06 +0100,
Andrew Stormont wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it would probably make sense to split your changes to userland-unpack
> into a separate changeset.
At Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:14:07 +0400,
Yuri Pankov wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:09:02 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your efforts. It would be great, however, if your MUA's
> > wrapped at 72 characters.
>
> And forbid top-posting...
Yep.
At Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:16:48 -0400,
Magnus wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2013, at 10:51 AM, G B wrote:
>
> > OI's last release was Oct 2012, so my question is when is the next release
> > (151a8) scheduled to be released?
>
> If you're coming from OpenBSD, this shouldn't be at all alarming.
This i
At Sun, 14 Apr 2013 07:51:37 -0700 (PDT),
G B wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [1.1 ]
>
> [1.2 ]
> Presently my commercial websites and mail servers run on OpenBSD, but I am in
> the
> process of moving them to either OpenIndiana, FreeBSD, or NetBSD. I have
> more than
> a decade using Solaris in the ente
you're
> criticizing before telling someone their opinion is lame, Ken.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 14, 2013, at 9:09 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> > At Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:16:48 -0400,
> > Magnus wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr
At Thu, 11 Jul 2013 01:12:50 +0200,
Adam Števko wrote:
>
> Hi Erol,
>
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Erol Zavidic wrote:
>
> Good evening folks,
>
> thanks for your feedbacks so far, here's the summary clustered in some
> way:
>
> 1.0 - Release Engineering:
> 1.1-
54 matches
Mail list logo
