useless lists at last cleanup.
Modification have been tested with millions of locks / thousands of keys.
May you post the code with a little comments cleanup ;-)
Regards.
On 3/9/07, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Bruno CROS wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Well, ou
Hi all,
Well, our team experiment some memory leaks using the LockManager in remote
mode, with the servlet and so, the LockManagerRemoteImpl.
It seems that, after a while, in the LockManagerInMemoryImpl (use by
LMRemoteImpl), some LockObject instances are stored in the static HashMap
keyLockMap
ment itself.
Cheers,
Charles.
> -Original Message-
> From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 December 2006 01:24
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: Re: Which class to modify to clock sql statements ?
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wel
JIRA is post.
On 12/15/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Bruno CROS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ye, we get rid of those dead locks.
Congratulation!
>
> Actually, OJB does not cause anything to have Oracle dead locks!!
Phew!
> Many
> applications
Hi,
Well, i just want to mesure the time a sql statement takes to be post (sql
commit too). I looked a bit in broker.accesslayer package and in
StatementForClassImpl.java. Is it the right place to do this ?
May be someone wrote an implementation?
Working with 1.0.4
Thanks for advices.
Re
to
figure in documentation.
Regards.
Thanks for help.
On 12/8/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruno CROS wrote:
> No. I don't known how to write such a test. But i have an idea where it
> occurs in the persistent graph.
>
> I use locks on OJB master object (at
Hi,
On 12/8/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Bruno CROS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing some troubles about deletePersistent usage when running
> ODMG transactions. The most of the issues is an Oracle dead lock.
> ORA-00060.
>
> I'
help.
On 12/8/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Just one question.
Using ODMG, if deletePersistent(o) is called from the Impl.getDatabase(),
how "SQL DELETE" query post can be done with the other "INSERT/UPDATE" in
the same SQL transaction without ref
Hi,
Just one question.
Using ODMG, if deletePersistent(o) is called from the Impl.getDatabase(),
how "SQL DELETE" query post can be done with the other "INSERT/UPDATE" in
the same SQL transaction without refering THE transaction? Why ODMG delete
object tutorial talk about deletePersitent way,
query.
On 12/7/06, Vasily Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I usually do criteria.addNotExists(subQuery) with
ReportQueryByCriteria subQuery and set subQuery.setAttributes(new
String[] { "1" }), it should be even faster than "anything ligth of
Group (key field by
ork.
Else, find out how to flush with PB API (post queries without commit).
Regards
On 6 Dec 2006 18:15:07 -, Virgo Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to do the same using Persistence Broker APIs ?
Thanks and Regards,
Gautam.
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 Bruno C
Well, try notExists criteria and a subquery on Group returning anything
ligth of Group (key field by example)
Bruno.
On 12/6/06, Josef Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello List,
I want to have all "Users", which are not in a "Group"
Here my repository:
How
The circular references have to be build in 2 steps :
First, create instances and link one relation.
Flush (write SQL insert and update)
Second, link with the second relation (in back side).
Commit.
Your example :
tx.begin();
d = new Drawer();
f = new Finish();
tx.lock(d);
tx.lock(f);
d.setFini
Hi,
I'm experiencing some troubles about deletePersistent usage when running
ODMG transactions. The most of the issues is an Oracle dead lock. ORA-00060.
I'm looking for what can be wrong, and don't find. Error occurs
on production server, never on developpement servers !!
To summarize, the tra
n.
Thanks again, and again...
Regards
Now, my need would be to getAllBroker from
On 11/13/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Bruno CROS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just about a little question.
>
> Does PersistenceBrokerFactory.releaseAllInstances() release all
Hi,
Just about a little question.
Does PersistenceBrokerFactory.releaseAllInstances() release all cached
objects?
I'm using PersistenceBrokerFactoryDefaultImpl and ObjetCacheDefaultImpl (and
OJB 1.0.4.)
The goal is to force server to reload all OJB mapped objects. Is there a
proper foreseen me
Well, do not care about last mail. Reflexive relation works fine if you
don't forget the flush or checkpoint absolutely necessary.
OJB is really a great tool.
Thanks.
On 10/30/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
At start of my project, I remember i did a wo
Hi,
At start of my project, I remember i did a workaround to translate the
mapping of reflexive relation, but i'm not sure why... so I did it again,
and obtained a PK_VIOLATED exception !
Even i don't known why this couldn't be possible ( i mean without
"simulated" indirection table, so refere
eone already do ?
Thanks
On 10/10/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here is my connector, Oracle9i yet...
May be i have to set the jdbc-level at 3.0 ?
Referring to this article, it seems that it is a hard to resolve trouble.
http://www.orafaq.com/node/758
Except look
.
The Oracle9i Platform should not make use of the local PreparedStatements
cache.
Furhtermore the 'Oracle9i' offers better performance and correct handling
for BLOBs > 4kB, for 9i or later Oracle versions.
Good luck
cheers
Danilo
Bruno CROS wrote:
Hi all,
Experiencing some MAX OPE
Hi all,
Experiencing some MAX OPEN CURSOR oracle errors (ORA -01000) , i'm looking
for the cursors leaks ( unclosed ResultSet it seems) in code.
I guess that broker queries well close the result set. So when report
queries results iteration are closed ? on HasNext()==false ?
Is it possible to
than a big one with InMemory. Depends on
application...yes. But what do you think about that ?
Best regards.
Bruno
On 9/28/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I updated from SVN LockManagerFactory and configure is well called now,
thanks.
the EOFException still remains
Hi Armin,
I think the classpath (jar) i give for servlet is wrong (server side).
Can you list the jars to be with LockManagerServlet?
Thanks
On 9/29/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the EOF is the cause on the client (RemoteImpl client)
the resulting exceptio
l.java:383)
at org.apache.ojb.broker.locking.LockManagerRemoteImpl.performRequest(
LockManagerRemoteImpl.java:335)
at org.apache.ojb.broker.locking.LockManagerRemoteImpl.releaseLock(
LockManagerRemoteImpl.java:193)
... 41 more
On 9/29/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruno CR
what is it really. I know what serialization is , i did it
(with file), but i can't see where something is wrong in
LockManagerRemoteImpl.
Thanks for any help.
OJB 1.0.4.
Sun JVM 1.4
On 9/28/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Once i'va modified constructor of Loc
Hi,
Once i'va modified constructor of LockManagerRemoteImpl to initialize
lockserver variable, i started to test LockManagerRemoteImpl and get into an
EOFException.
URL sun implementation , release 1.0.4
Thanks
Caused by: java.io.EOFException
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.re
Hello,
While waiting for the 1.0.5 release, which files should i get in CVS to
get LockManagerRemoteImpl work?
Thanks Armin
On 1/28/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
is fixed in SVN and will be included in upcoming 1.0.5 maintenance
release.
regards,
Armin
Armin Waibel w
Done
On 7/6/06, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/5/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that the "proxy" keyword can't accept "dynamic" value.
"dynamic"
> is an accepted value in repository file and see
Hi all,
I noticed that the "proxy" keyword can't accept "dynamic" value. "dynamic"
is an accepted value in repository file and seems to be different of "true".
On my setup, "dynamic" values works fine with CGLib proxies and,
proxy="true" seems to not...
Does someone can confirm this? if it
Oops, it's me.
Sorry
On 5/11/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep, i 'm affraid that _pool.size() is always > than -1 !! (the maxIdle),
so "shouldDestroy" is true, and no pool is added.
May be it's me . Someone can confirm this ?
priva
notifyAll(); // _numActive has changed
if(shouldDestroy) {
try {
_factory.destroyObject(obj);
} catch(Exception e) {
// ignored
}
}
}
On 5/11/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruno CROS wrote:
&
No idea. All is ok on paper!
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/pool/apidocs/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.html
On 5/11/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
when MaxIdle is set to 0, it works well, and the 5 maxActive are
sufficient. No freeze at all
good assumption, it looks like that, but if
code only reads, i don't known at all how to produce dead lock. I'm going to
look at common-pool settings, if maxIdle is common-pool setting.
regards
On 5/11/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruno CROS wrote:
> Hi Armin,
On 5/6/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Bruno CROS wrote:
> Hi Armin,
>
> In fact, i looked at the DB connections in the DB console. It was a bad
> idea, because connection disappear !! I looked with netstat -a , and i
saw
> sever
t for this. Check many methods without such a technique, is very
long... OJB developpements are shorter !!
Best regards,
Best regards.
Edson Richter
Bruno CROS escreveu:
> Hi Armin,
>
> Thanks for the idea to detect broker leak. It will show some bad coded
> methods, even they ha
Hi Armin,
Thanks for the idea to detect broker leak. It will show some bad coded
methods, even they have been checked : commit never reached, broker not
closed... no commit/abort !!! (find one, arghh )
Meanwhile, there was still some "open broker detected". When i look into
code, i found some
didn't find any documentation on that value.
What i known is that, when i put 0 (no limit), it seems there is no more
freeze.
Can you ligth up me about that.
Thanks.
Regards.
On 5/5/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Bruno CROS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have
Hi,
I have a strange behaviour about the second database i use. It seems that
using "broker = PersistenceBrokerFactory.createPersistenceBroker("rushDb");"
always return the same broker/connection.
My connection pool is setup as it have to keep 2 idle connections
available, and it never occu
be close by the method) whereas there is no open
transaction?
I do not have idea at all. I will have a lokk Tuesday.
Thanks for your help. Again.
On 4/28/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yep. I did something like... with an immediate catched exception!! it
> wo
if(brokerLeakDetection)
> {
> logger.error(msg + " Broker caller stack is: "
>+ SystemUtils.LINE_SEPARATOR + brokerStackTrace);
> }
> else
> {
> logger.warn(msg);
>
that will be so
great.
Imagine : broker xxx, time-out 120 s, borrowed by --- stacktrace ---
I will try it tomorrow, thanks a lot. Armin.
Regards
On 4/25/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > using proxies ?
> >
> > Oh, i see now.
r may
be someone else now ;-) )
Thanks again.
Bye.
On 4/25/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > Hi Armin,
> >
> > Here's is a schematic example :
> >
> > Consider a service method that returns
.. how does it close ?
return product;
}
return null;
}
I tried to wrap the code of first method with a tx.open() and tx.abort(), to
be sure that broker is released at the end with the abort().
thanks
regards.
On 4/25/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Brun
Hi,
It seems that read objects with a broker, can read related objects by
auto-retrieve set to "true" despite broker is closed.
I suppose that a getDefaultBroker is done, and the borrowed broker is never
closed (because no reference on it).
Note : This occurred because, application has been writt
Hi,
I experienced Two Level Cache Impl. Have a look to mail archives about
TwoLevelCacheImpl. Beware of checkpoints inside batch loops. Using
checkpoints make cached objects quantity growing until commit. If you have
to, replace checkpoints by commit/begin.
Did you try the ObjectCacheDefaultI
eption, ServletException {
>
>aChain.doFilter(aRequest, aResponse);
>
>/* Check for unclosed broker and log url path here!! */
> }
>
> Jon French
> Programmer
> ECOS Development Team
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 970-226-9290
>
> Fort Collins Science Center
&
Hi all,
I experienced brokers leaks. I checked all the open / close broker methods
and the leaks still remains. ODMG transaction have been checked too.
Those leaks result in PersistentBroker I/O Exception, freezing application.
I would be very happy to known which methods take my brokers
, Helder Gaspar Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i tinhk that i have understaood your point of view, but how can i
> compare A with B if they are diferents object types?
>
> Thank you
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > Take in consideration fields with null value. Test &l
Take in consideration fields with null value. Test <> ou = cannot be
correctly done with nulls.
In this case you have to write : A isNull OR A<>B
or A NotNULL AND A==B
Hope this may help you.
Regards.
On 4/13/06, Helder Gaspar Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone, i know th
Hi,
Take care about the loading behaviour with auto-retrieve=true on a reflexive
collection.
Without this consideration, then, querying with alias normally will help to
your error.
++
On 4/7/06, Daniel Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible for an object to have a reflexive colle
Hi,
Great .
thanks
On 4/5/06, Tino Schöllhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks. That would be great.
>
> Tino
>
> Armin Waibel wrote:
> > Hi Tino,
> >
> > Tino Schöllhorn wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> we are currently using OJB 1.0.1 and are thinking about updating to
> >> the lates
Hi,
Inserting a criteria as "rownum < 2" causes the ORDER BY #n DESC to be ORDER
BY #n . DESC has been lost !!
Anyone confirm ? Have a workaround ?
What's the best way to read only first resultset (or Object) without
iterating the whole collection ?
I suspect some broker-connections troubles on
Hello.
Does someone find a free alternative to P6SPY, ( or a fix to mixed
alias bug) ?
thank you
On 2/20/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I confirm.
>
> it's P6SPY. I have no idea why, at all.
>
> It's gonna be hard to debug queries w
Auto-reply :
SQL again.
On 3/27/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
> A new challenge : build a left and a right outer join. In fact, i think
> it's describe as a full outer join in a single reportquery.
>
> Does someone think it&#x
Hi,
A new challenge : build a left and a right outer join. In fact, i think
it's describe as a full outer join in a single reportquery.
Does someone think it's possible with OJB or do i go SQL again ?
Regards
Auto reply :
Final solution done with normal SQL query.
Solution includes sub queries attribute as well.
++
On 3/22/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi again,
>
> I 'm desesperatly searching how to produce ReportQuery with a reflexive
> virtual re
: p1, _LOOPBACK.p1
class : Table.class
criteria : p2=_LOOPBACK.p3
this would be traduced by :
select A0.p1, A1.p1 FROM table A0, table A1 where A0.p2 =A1.p3
Regards
On 3/21/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> first, thanks Armin for the patch, i t
Hi all,
first, thanks Armin for the patch, i think will wait 1.0.5 if it will
be released in the month, because i need CLOB changes too.
I'm asking me if it's possible to build an auto join ReportQuery such as :
select A0.id, A1.id FROM table1 A1, table1 A2 where A1.joinColumn1 =
A2.joincolu
rieve A1, retrieve B1 with A1.getB()
> > 2. instantiation and lock of A2
> 3. lock A1, B1 (depends on the configuration settings, implicit locking)
> > 4. A2.setB(B1)
> 5. B1.setA(null)
> > 6. delete A1 (markDelete)
> > 7. commit
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> Br
> > 2. instantiation and lock of A2
> 3. lock A1, B1 (depends on the configuration settings, implicit locking)
> > 4. A2.setB(B1)
> 5. B1.setA(null)
> > 6. delete A1 (markDelete)
> > 7. commit
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> >Hi
Hi Armin, Hi all.
Well, with a little confusion, we believed that our bug of complex update
was not one. But it remains.
I'm suspecting a bug of OJB concerning the transcription of the
"markDelete" in SQL operations.
If I have time, I will try to assemble a demonstrative case of test with
Oups, a type error at the end of my mail.
"I don't think i will test this deeper, because you warned me about doing
this (get object from other broker). "
That explains the strange behaviour we had.
Regards.
Sorry for mistake.
On 3/7/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
your help.
Regards.
On 3/6/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
>
> >>> Our first problem was, that, after commit, P1 was not referencing M in
>
> >>> database. I deduced that after a flush(), new locked
Thanks.
Response is in red.
I'm suspecting a bug.
Regards.
On 3/5/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> whew! Sounds really complex, I try my best...
>
> The first problem is the bidirectional reference between P1, P2. To
> establish the FK (e.g. in P1 from P2) the re
Hi all, hi Armin,
I believe i noted a strange behaviour behaviour of new 1.0.4 ODMG
ordering.
Consider JIRA OJB-18. Before 1.0.4 , we used the given workaround. This
means, that we put some flush() in "strategical" place to avoid all FK
constraints. It worked fine.
Now, with the OJB 1.0.
sing hard references (object cloning). But why would we clone this kind of
object, since this is not a primitive type.
Am i on the rigth way ?
Regards.
On 2/28/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> &g
Hi,
I need a little documentation on CLOB too.
To start, does someone can tell me which java type i have to use (to map)
with a jdbc-type CLOB ?
java.sql.Clob? as the OJB types mapping board shows it. but java.sql.Clob is
only an interface. What object to create so ? ( is there a Clob
implemen
OK. Fine.
I supposed that it was good.
It was just to be sure.
Thanks Thomas.
On 2/21/06, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/21/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Apparently, 1.0.4 does not support Oracle 10g platform (torque does bu
Hi all,
Apparently, 1.0.4 does not support Oracle 10g platform (torque does but not
the OJB runtime)
So, i go on with oracle 9i settings. Does anyone report experience (good or
bad) of that ?
Thanks.
> > SELECT A0.NUMBER,A1.NUMBER FROM PHONE_NUMBER A0 INNER JOIN CALLS A1 ON
> > A0.PHONE_NUMBER_ID=A1.PHONE_NUMBER_ID WHERE A1.NUMBER LIKE '%66%'
> >
> > but the data retrieved from the resultset is wrong:
> >
> > number and calls.numberCalled contain the same
Hi all,
It seems there is big problem on ReportQuery.
Consider 2 classes, Class_A with property_a and Class_B with property_b.
Consider that Class_A is 1:n related to Class_B.
Build a ReportQuery on Class_B, requesting "property_b" and "
classA.property_a". If database field names are the sa
Hi all,
I just experienced a strange behaviour of SequenceManagerNextValIpl (I
guess) following migration from OJB 1.0.1 to 1.0.4.
To build an object, i need the value of the id before writing it to the
database So i use
Identity oid = broker.serviceIdentity().getIdentity(objectNewInstanciat
CGLib,
convinced it's better, of course.
I answered to you below in blue.
On 2/11/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > Hi all, hi Armin,
> >
> > Using TwoLevelCacheObjectImpl, i experienced some big trouble
Hi all, hi Armin,
Using TwoLevelCacheObjectImpl, i experienced some big troubles with a
delete sequence containing some flush() to avoid FK constraints errors.
Assume 2 classes A and B, with 1:n relation.
We can resume sequence as this :
- open tx
- read object A
- read collection of object
ache.ojb.odmg.TransactionImpl.doWriteObjects(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.ojb.odmg.TransactionImpl.checkpoint(Unknown Source)
at
fr.gouv.finances.douane.dnsce.mathieu.application.tables.service.UnitesServ.
majUnites(UnitesServ.java:110)
On 2/9/06, Armin Waibel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Bruno C
something
disappear ? even if Customer is never locked, just loaded and
(re)referenced.
Thanks very very much for the answers.
I hope i will not request you anymore help.
Regards.
On 2/6/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
&g
set proxy="true" on the
reference-descriptor and proxy="dynamic" on referenced class.
- I didn't see significant loading chain breaks using CGLib, with
TwoLevelObjectCache. Tell me i'm wrong and that's the only fact of the cache
manager..
Regards
On 2/6
Discard my last mail !!
During a while, i was into the body of a "bad" user. (nightmare)
In fact, I did really change something, something in the setup of OJB even
!!
I was trying to install CGLib, without the jar (Idiot i am)
Sorry.
On 2/7/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROT
Help !
Can't get any broker today. Yesterday, it was all right. And i swear, i
didn't change anything !!
I don't understand anything cause all other developpers can connect to the
same instance/schema to work on.
What did i miss again ?
How can i tarce any jdbc connection troubles ? with log? w
About my precedent batch troubles:
In fact, a saw my model loaded from every where with all the actual
auto-retrieve="true", this means, every where !! This means too, that
"back" relations are read too, circling too much. This was the cause of my
OutOfMemoryError.
My model is a big one with a lo
tell me that i have
to check all my auto-retrieve !!
...
On 2/6/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Well, step by step, i hope that anything will be fine soon.
>
> DB Connections are well mounted, thank you very much again.
>
> So, I tested my ba
.
Best regards
On 2/4/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > i already have patch torque3.1.1.jar. thanks for advice. I've done since
> > start with the build.xml of ojb-blank.jar (so torque).
> >
> &
Note that my OJB_DMAP_ENTRIES has not been created !!
On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i already have patch torque3.1.1.jar. thanks for advice. I've done since
> start with the build.xml of ojb-blank.jar (so torque).
>
> I have the right database ge
On 2/3/06, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i 'm afraid i need to repatch distributed torque-gen-3.1.1.jar to have
> > TIMESTAMP jdbc type created for java.sql.Date and java.sql.times
ROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > Bang in the bull 's eye!!
> >
> > the embedded dtd was not 3_0_1 but 3_1. I just change the value and it
> find
> > the database.dtd file included en torque.jar
> >
> > Then i have to add
table needed ? why oracle does not want to cretae iot !!? It's
amazing.
Thanks for you help.
On 2/3/06, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > First you will find the ant trace of setup-db task, t
.lib.dir=lib
build.classes.dir=${build.dir}/classes/
build.resources.dir=${build.dir}/resources/
target.dir=target
=
=======
On 2/3/06, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS &l
EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Following the Armin's advice, i'm currently migrating from 1.0.1 to
> 1.0.4
> >
> > I started with the 1.0.4 ojb-blank.jar to replace all files. jar of
> course,
> >
plementation done in 1.0.2/3, changed auto-xxx
> settings for odmg, ...) it's listed in the release-notes and in the docs
> (Caching, Inheritance, ...).
> Strongly recommended:
> http://db.apache.org/ojb/docu/guides/odmg-guide.html
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
>
> Bruno
Hello,
I now have spent a lot of time debugging 2 batch processing.
First processing creates a simple 1-n couple of object (consider that class
UnityCar refers a class Unity with 1-n relation) . Creation is done like
this :
- tx.begin()
- Unity u = new Unity()
- tx.lock(u, Transaction.WRITE);
-
ossible to map to temporary tables in
> OJB.
>
> However, it might be possible to dynamically change the repository
> metadata
> to point to the temporary table...
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruno CROS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 June 2005
Help, please, did someone try to use temporary table ?
I'm asking me about a turn around, creating records in a ODMG transaction
and rollback them systematically . Risky, isn't it ? I don't known exactly
why, but i think there is a better way...
Thanks for any ideas
On 6/23
Hello,
I did not find any concrete discussings about dealing with temporary
tables with OJB.
My aim is to check some values against records in OJB tables. The
query is a complex join query, with multiple records entries.
Make a query for each check will be too heavy and too long. My first
idea
Waouh, was just an awful bad naming. I had forgotten than Windows is
not case sensitive !!! Unix is... argh
the xml "database" in my repository.xml was named
repository_database_rushDB instead of repository_database_rushDb.
So confuseD. So sorrY. Thanks again for your help.
++
On Fri, 18 Mar 2
is those who gave me Weblogic...
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:10:26 +0100, Martin Kalén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno CROS wrote:
> > I setup a repository.xml as ojb-blank project
> > description of my file is below. This file works very well on Tomcat
> > over windows,
Hello,
I setup a repository.xml as ojb-blank project
description of my file is below. This file works very well on Tomcat
over windows, but not at all on AIX !
AIX log tells me that "No repository is loaded", the parsing seems to
stop in a subfile !! (see below) so OJB starts with empty meta
Even if it has been already post, i just want to clarify the tip :
- according to Oracle 9i notes
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/htdocs/jdbc_faq.htm#08_01
it's important to note that mapping date attributes such as
java.sql.Time java.util.Date (with hours ...) and even
jav
97 matches
Mail list logo
