John Brewer wrote:
This Project Proposal: Wireless USB Support should also include wireless support for
SDIO (newer Wireless newer type i.e: Spectech 802.11g and of course SDIO devices 802.11b the N /
Nimo standerds as well), and as well as the legacy PCMCIA PC Card slots this could be
also
Rich Teer wrote:
Hi all,
Given that GNOME is Sun's forward direction for windowing environments, I
have been trying to use it more often (the photo previewer in Nautilus
makes this easier to do!). The trouble is, as a long-term CDE user, there
are several major road blocks to my doing this.
Agreed (as a lapsed sysadmin). It makes a lot of sense that the program do the
right thing in the context of the menu presented to the user. That just means
keypad 8 2 are up and down, keypad 1 and 2 are the entries. Belenix have
managed it after all, so the code must be knocking around.
Agreed (as a lapsed sysadmin). It makes a lot of sense that the program do
the right thing in the context of the menu presented to the user. That just
means keypad 8 2 are up and down, keypad 1 and 2 are the entries. Belenix
have managed it after all, so the code must be knocking around.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Agreed (as a lapsed sysadmin). It makes a lot of sense that the program do
the right thing in the context of the menu presented to the user. That just
means keypad 8 2 are up and down, keypad 1 and 2 are the entries. Belenix
have managed it after all, so the code must be
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Agreed (as a lapsed sysadmin). It makes a lot of sense that the program do
the right thing in the context of the menu presented to the user. That
just
means keypad 8 2 are up and down, keypad 1 and 2 are the entries.
Belenix
have managed it after all, so the code must be
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Agreed (as a lapsed sysadmin). It makes a lot of sense that the program do
the right thing in the context of the menu presented to the user. That
just
means keypad 8 2 are up and down, keypad 1 and 2 are the entries.
Belenix
have managed it
If the code is not yet open then how did the Belenix people get this
going?
As far as I can see Grub background graphic (XPM) is a feature that
is already
I meant the keyboard mapping during the locale selection.
Oh I misunderstood. I am just using GNU dialog linked with libncurses
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Agreed (as a lapsed sysadmin). It makes a lot of sense that the program do
the right thing in the context of the menu presented to the user. That just
means keypad 8 2 are up and down, keypad 1 and 2 are the entries. Belenix
have managed it after all, so the code must be
Dennis Clarke wrote:
If the code is not yet open then how did the Belenix people get this
going?
As far as I can see Grub background graphic (XPM) is a feature that
is already
I meant the keyboard mapping during the locale selection.
Oh I misunderstood. I am just using GNU dialog
Rich Teer wrote:
Or, failing that, is there a way to cajule gnome-terminal to use the same
font as dtterm? I'm currently using Lucida Sans Typewriter at 9 points,
but I find the interline gap too wide. I'm pretty sure that getting
gnome-terminal to use the same font as dtterm will fix this,
Ghee Teo writes:
It seems that this is already covered bby the Visual
Panels project;
I do not believe we should have two competing
projects except in cases
where there are very compelling reasons.
These may have been replied before in a similar vein, but it seems to be th
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
Given that GNOME is Sun's forward direction for windowing environments, I
have been trying to use it more often
Well done (:
It's an uphill battle. GNOME certainly does NOT make it easy for
users coming from CDE--something I think ought to
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Why not migrate to gnome-terminal then. I uses the same multi threaded
Maybe one day, when gnome-terminal supports all I want (including
the ability to have terminals open 132 columns wide without having
to manually resixe them, and to be able to use
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Even if you got them to use the exact same font, the software they use for
drawing text is so different it will still not look the same. If it's a
bitmap font it will be closer, but TrueType fonts won't even have the same
appearance, much less
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Why not migrate to gnome-terminal then. I uses the same multi threaded
Maybe one day, when gnome-terminal supports all I want (including
the ability to have terminals open 132 columns wide without having
to manually resixe them,
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Stephen Lau wrote:
gnome-terminal --geometry=132x40
Good to know...
I prefer the shift behaviour since it lets me use apps that map PgUp/PgDn
properly
Also good to know. Methinks that this is one of those things that
ought to be configurable...
--
Rich Teer, SCNA,
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 10:01 -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
Given that GNOME is Sun's forward direction for windowing environments, I
have been trying to use it more often
Well done (:
It's an uphill battle. GNOME certainly does NOT make it
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 10:25 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
I prefer the shift behaviour since it lets me use apps that map
PgUp/PgDn properly
Indeed, that's precisely why they were chosen (ditto all the other
Shifted shortcuts in gnome-terminal). In fact, in JDS we changed it
back for a while,
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Calum Benson wrote:
FWIW, we've started CDE user transition/migration projects at least
twice in the six years we've been shipping GNOME, and they've been
dropped due to perceived lack of demand :/
Hmm. Perhaps those determining the demand were asking the wrong
people...
Rich Teer wrote:
Does the latter point about Bitstream fonts also apply to the
xorg X server?
Yes - we've replaced the freetype-based code used in the Xorg
open source release with Bitstream code in the Solaris Xorg.
(This is in the libbitstream.so which is currently the only
piece of our
Thanx. I am posting this test reply from the 0.44 LiveCD, will try to do a HD
install this weekend.
BTW, will I be able to install BeleniX in an extended partition?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Thanx. I am posting this test reply from the 0.44 LiveCD, will try to do a HD
install this weekend.
BTW, will I be able to install BeleniX in an extended partition?
Not yet. Extended partition support in OpenSolaris is being worked on
currently.
Regards,
Moinak.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
If the code is not yet open then how did the Belenix people get this
going?
As far as I can see Grub background graphic (XPM) is a feature that
is already
I meant the keyboard mapping during the locale selection.
Oh I misunderstood. I am
Hi, and thanks for your excitement. :)
The project is being set up as we speak and should be available very soon.
Once we are set up we will do some project management, see how many interested
contributors there are, set up some discussions and post up some stuff that
needs to get done, then
John Brewer wrote:
Support for Jumpstart to include the ZFS Boot options would be needed as well!
Yes, this will be part of the Install support.
Lori Alt
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Why not migrate to gnome-terminal then. I uses the same multi threaded
Maybe one day, when gnome-terminal supports all I want (including
the ability to have terminals open 132 columns wide without having
to manually resixe them,
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Why not migrate to gnome-terminal then. I uses the same multi threaded
Maybe one day, when gnome-terminal supports all I want (including
the ability to have terminals open 132 columns wide without having
to manually resixe
Ian Collins wrote:
Ah, so you prefer the IE way of opening windows to Firefox :)
I've been using tabs in a browser for years. I actually use a
combination of windows and tabs for my browser.
I get tabs for browsing but not for terminal windows - I can't really
justify to myself why but
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Ian Collins wrote:
Ah, so you prefer the IE way of opening windows to Firefox :)
Them's fightin' words, mister! :-)
Seriously, gnome-terminal has improved significantly in the latest JDS,
so if (like me) you were disappointed with its performance in earlier
releases,
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 18:51, Calum Benson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 10:25 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
I prefer the shift behaviour since it lets me use apps that map
PgUp/PgDn properly
Indeed, that's precisely why they were chosen (ditto all the other
Shifted shortcuts in
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:32:52PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
Indeed, that's precisely why they were chosen (ditto all the other
Shifted shortcuts in gnome-terminal). In fact, in JDS we changed it
back for a while, but that patch seems to regressed (or removed, I don't
know which), and
Will this end up in b43 or b44?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
looking forward to that.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Moinak,
what else is you planned to make Belenix as a complete distribution?.
is there any TO DO list available in belenix web site?
just curious to know that
and i will see,if any is possible for me to contribute,
i will approach you accordingly
thanks
Ashok
On 7/12/06, John Brewer
Hi all,
I've configured a DHCP server on Solaris 10 u1 x86 and it works fine when
tested with another Solaris box as a client. dhcp start / renew / whatever.
However, when trying to use it for jumpstart, it doesn't seem to pick up an IP.
It just tells me no boot filename received. the packet
36 matches
Mail list logo
