On 07/24/10 11:09 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
2010/7/24 C. Bergströmcodest...@osunix.org:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
C. Bergströmcodest...@osunix.org wrote:
Did you pull the libc work from Garrett and drop that on there?
No, I just created a halfway clean base for
This is not an IPS issue; this is a distribution issue. Remember that
all of the bits on pkg.opensolaris.org have been redistributable for a
long time. That means that if someone wanted a mirror in say, Finland,
they could have set one up. For that matter, one could have been setup
on genunix.org
On 07/24/10 08:23 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 04:17 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 07/25/10 10:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 06:37 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
...
To stir the pot here, since we are discussing a Community Distro
as opposed to a SUN/Oracle distro, IPS when used
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Stefan Parvu wrote:
IPS tries to be a network pkg management system. It needs to be simple
... list of good ideas ...
These are all things that could easily be addressed, and aren't per-se
reasons to abandon IPS. If it was important, these things could be
On 07/17/10 01:38 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
On 17 Jul 2010, at 16:35, Paul Gress wrote:
On 07/17/10 09:07 AM, Ken Mays wrote:
Ken, what you say make a lot of sense. But when I look at those
community distributions I don't see what I'm exactly looking for. So
I guess I going to try to
True. Im not reffering here as a drop of IPS but rather as a understanding point
for future and how this compares against SVR4. Anyway for future community
distro
, if any, would be good if we can keep one pkg management system and be
compatible
between distros.
IPS should have fixed all these
Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
True. Im not reffering here as a drop of IPS but rather as a understanding
point
for future and how this compares against SVR4. Anyway for future community
distro
, if any, would be good if we can keep one pkg management system and be
today, I put SchilliX-0.7.0 out.
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix/SchilliX-0.7.0.iso.bz2
Joerg, I'm going to recommend xz instead of (or in addition to) bzip2. It's
much faster and compresses better. My experience is 2x faster and 2x better
Star-1.5.1 is also available from Blastwave.
The star on SchilliX has one new feature:
1) create a meta data only archive with star -c -dump -meta . arch
2) extraxt the archive uwing star -xp -xmeta -force-hole arch
in order to create all plain files as 100% empty holes
New is the
It may even be seek times are the main problem...
True. Too much concurrency on spinning platters can
cause seek time bottlenecks. Possibly an iostat log
during boot can provide some clues. If true then the
situation will be better with SSDs.
We have DTrace and we might
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in transport
performance when used with a properly configured web and/or depot server.
Do you know how frustrating it is when
Thanks everyone...
I opted to use the SJT packages and got things working. Since I'm only going
to use this for transcoding I wasn't too concerned that it isn't the latest
version. Mixing g++ and Sun Studio compiled library dependencies was very
problematic in getting things working. I
To: Hernán Saltiel Community User Groups
The community needs resources to maintain the components updated by the various
teams. For the upcoming Hackathon and user meetings, users interested
in building a 'community distro' or providing support for it should know where
to look for help.
The
On 07/24/10 07:51 PM, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in
transport performance when used with a properly configured web and/or
depot
Hi, Ken!
This *really* help us!
Thanks a lot, I'll start contacting the referred POC's.
Best regards,
HeCSa.
On 07/25/10 01:44 PM, Ken Mays wrote:
To: Hernán Saltiel Community User Groups
The community needs resources to maintain the components updated by the various
teams. For the upcoming
Those are good points. I'm not opposed to going with Oracle VM but keeping Xvm
in Solaris would have allowed so many more consolidation opportunities.
We were looking to replace a pair of clustered V880s with 12 shared D2 arrays
stuffed with 72GB disks and other various servers (clustered for
On 07/20/10 02:18 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
Well i guess the MySQL guys fears are now put to rest.
I do hope Opensolaris community also gets a welcome mat at OpenWorld. crossing
my fingers!
extract:
Oracle is rolling out the welcome mat for the MySQL community as part of Oracle
OpenWorld.
And you determined this how? Can you show any dtrace output, or similar?
Determined by stopping one zone and testing connectivity from global+remaining
zone. Starting zone again and repeat.
I think you might be confusing simpler with familiar.
I tnking your'e making an assumption without
On 07/24/10 11:55 PM, HeCSa wrote:
...
On 07/24/10 08:23 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
...
The source is there, and you can build it you know ;)
Alternatively, you could use the bits someone made available on
genunix.org for b142:
http://genunix.org/dist/richlowe/README.txt
On 07/24/10 03:51 PM, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in transport
performance when used with a properly configured web and/or depot server.
Do
On 07/25/10 06:27 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 11:55 PM, HeCSa wrote:
...
On 07/24/10 08:23 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
...
The source is there, and you can build it you know ;)
Alternatively, you could use the bits someone made available on
genunix.org for b142:
Hi Matthias!
Looking at the fact, that OVM is free, and has a way better graphical
management system, and also comes with already predefined Images, I don't
see that many problems.
Well, I don't care much about GUI management systems, I care about scripts.
Who would really be using ZFS in
On 07/20/10 02:18 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
Well i guess the MySQL guys fears are now put to
rest.
I do hope Opensolaris community also gets a welcome
mat at OpenWorld. crossing my fingers!
extract:
Oracle is rolling out the welcome mat for the MySQL
community as part of Oracle
Suppose you want to use solaris/opensolaris as a VM host, and Windows Server
as a guest. What would be the preferred hypervisor to use? Sun Virtualbox?
It is desired to start the guest when the host boots up. And vice-versa for
shutdown.
I see that sol10/osol are not supported host OSes for
I am wondering ... SchilliX is being built, using the same procedures and
source as opensolaris, right? What differences are there / will there be,
between opensolaris and schillix? I am speaking technical differences.
Obviously there will also be cultural differences, and that's not the
Hi, Edward!
On 07/25/10 11:22 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Suppose you want to use solaris/opensolaris as a VM host, and Windows
Server as a guest. What would be the preferred hypervisor to use?
Sun Virtualbox? It is desired to start the guest when the host boots
up. And vice-versa for
We've run XEN here on b134 very successfully, and it came with opensolaris (or
at least, you can just go 'pkg install $module'.
We ran b134 as the dom0, and we tested:
osol_119
osol_134
Sol 10u8
centos_5.3
Windows 7
FreeBSD 7.2
Win2k3_srv
ubuntu 9.10
as domU.
The production test
Stefan Parvu wrote:
How IPS handles the process of applying patched ? AFAIK OSOL does not really
have the concept
of a patch, right ? Or ?
Right - IPS simply has new versions of packages, in which the packaging system
determines which files are different from what you've already installed
HeCSa wrote:
On 07/24/10 07:51 PM, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in
transport performance when used with a properly configured web
Hi,
Are you planning to do some for celebrating softwarefreedomday 2010?
if any plans,please reply on this osol mailing lists.
http://softwarefreedomday.org/
thanks,
-masafumi
Lead of Tokyo OpenSolaris User Group.
Core Contributer for OpenSolaris.
(2010/07/26 11:40), Jorgen Lundman wrote:
We've run XEN here on b134 very successfully, and it came with opensolaris (or
at least, you can just go 'pkg install $module'.
We ran b134 as the dom0, and we tested:
osol_119
osol_134
Sol 10u8
centos_5.3
Windows 7
FreeBSD 7.2
Win2k3_srv
ubuntu 9.10
Don't know about that. Dtrace is certainly useful to
detect bottlenecks in VM
setup and configuration. Now that there are rumours
that Bryan Cantrill has
left Oracle, the future development of dtrace is not
clear, anyway.
This particular rumour is very much true:
On 07/26/10 12:35 AM, Masafumi Ohta wrote:
Hi,
Are you planning to do some for celebrating softwarefreedomday 2010?
if any plans,please reply on this osol mailing lists.
Hi, my friend!
Yes, we do. Today AOSUG and CaFeLUG (Capital Federal GNU/Linux Users
Group) had a meeting about
33 matches
Mail list logo
