Jason,
Means you must roll your newer builds of autoconf and gettext and point your
configure options to that.
You can deinstall the old builds for easier detection in some cases.
~ Ken Mays
From: Jason Lawrence
To: ken mays
Cc: "opensolaris-di
Firefox3 Cookie, HTTPS, Message Digest, Metalink,
XML-RPC
Hash Algorithms: sha-1, sha-224, sha-256, sha-384, sha-512, md5
Report bugs to t-tujik...@users.sourceforge.net
Visit http://aria2.sourceforge.net/
Hope that helps you,
Ken Mays
From: Jason Lawrenc
Hi Dave,
Make a symbolic link between firefox/depend/lib and firefox/libssl3.so.
It'll grab the lib dependencies of libssl3.so as well.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, david bone wrote:
From: david bone
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle Solaris Online Forum Event :: April 14
presentation.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, david bone wrote:
From: david bone
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle Solaris Online Forum Event :: April 14th at
9am PT
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 8:56 AM
My email to Glynn yesterday regarding my Sun
is will support xHCI and 5 Gb/s transfers.
You can buy USB 3.0 hardware today though which will default to USB 1.0/2.0
transfer speeds (approx. 480 Mb/s) by design under the Solaris/OpenSolaris OS
by default. The SIIG DP SuperSpeed USB 2-Port PCIe (JU-P20412-S2) PCIe card
works well as an
cs support is
forthcoming but depends on other features/updates to drivers and the libraries.
But for basic computability, you can run with a Sandy Bridge motherboard today
with OI_148a/Sol-11x and super compute till your heart's content today! NO
updates required.
~ Ken Mays
__
Actually, take note that heavy calculations are offloaded to GPUs
or specialized hardware nowadays.
Many ways to skin something
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 2/24/11, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> From: Orvar Korvar
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Another [OT] Hardware Post
> To: opensolari
playback. Worked pretty well within the
chip's limitations and I tested on a 1280x1024 display monitor. Most Compiz/3D
features worked.
As for official SandyBridge GPU driver support, best use a Nvidia GPU card as a
workaround.
Hope that helped a bit,
Ken Mays
--- On Wed, 2/23/11,
), but
if you get it then best make sure your hardware is using it properly and
supports it if this is your more serious work/SOHO NAS unit.
Good luck!
~ Ken Mays
--- On Wed, 2/23/11, Harry Putnam wrote:
> From: Harry Putnam
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Another [OT] Hardware Post
&
You can spend less with a dedicated predesigned commercial unit...
~ Ken Mays
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Harry Putnam wrote:
> From: Harry Putnam
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Another [OT] Hardware Post
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 3:29
Sandybridge chipset in i965 DRI driver.
Src: ftp://freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/7.10/MesaLib-7.10.tar.bz2
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
driver updates.
Thanks Alan for your work and support as well,
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 1/6/11, Guido Berhoerster
wrote:
> From: Guido Berhoerster
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support
> To: "Alan Coopersmith"
> Cc: "ken mays" , opensolaris-dis
.sun.com/osol/x/downloads/Xorg-1.9/build-2010-11-18/Xorg-1.9.2-20101118-i386.tar.bz2
I'm reviewing the intel 2.13.903/2.14.x 2D driver/Xserver 1.9.2 package
integration for testing.
Mesa 7.10 is proposed for release tomorrow.
Tests ran on: Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale & Clarkdale) IGPs.
ince you want "a ZFS solution on my home server to share vols/directories
using iSCSI and/or NFS services between two ESXi hosts", both products will
meet your needs with NexentaStor being more specialized in storage solutions
for you.
For home/personal use, I'd choose NexentaStor C
consolidations.
All great distros serving various desktop, embedded, and server needs.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
r the LGPL, Oracle chooses the other license."
This is from the Solaris 11 Express distribution. Explain GPL/LGPL licensing
dealing with source code availability for included FOSS-related binaries.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opens
cle is 134 as
> "OpenSolaris
> development build 134", while ON source is available up to
> 147 and
> other distributions are based on the newer source.
>
> -Albert
Solaris 11 (SNV_151) is the new official public release with its updated IPS
repo images. The 153 c
-ds-155370.pdf
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 9/30/10, Octave Orgeron wrote:
>
> Contrary to popular believe there are still some major
> differences between
> OpenOffice and the StarOffice code base. StarOffice has
> closed source bits
> around MS Office translation and print
FMRI: pkg:/developer/sunstudio1...@12.1.1,5.11-0.111:20100306T002245Z"
So, the idea is to get official wording from Oracle that they have tested
building a recent 64-bit binary build of ON_147-150 with Sun Studio 12.1.x/12.2
without the need for the older Sun Studio 12.
~ Ken
Recently patched versions of Sun Studio 12.1.x (Fall 2010) won't compile ON_147
and higher?!? Nor Sun Studio 12.2?
Guess updating those docs would help...
~ Ken M.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opens
HI Ashih,
Good suggestion and that is already underway in the OpenIndiana project
for 'all' compatible distros. SFW_147 is already incorporated in the OI IPS
repo. SPEC-FILES-EXTRA packaging from the pkgbuild project is already
in the works as well.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 9/16/
;rock solid' solution and a great evolution
from the Opensolaris project.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Sat, 9/11/10, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> From: Orvar Korvar
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] OpenIndiana - a new OpenSolaris Distribution!
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Saturd
ars ago and the discussion forum just lingered on afterwards. Much of the
discussion there really is best suited for other forums. Archival was better
suited for the old indiana-discuss forum.
OpenIndiana is another project with its own discussion forums.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
not at the level of AIX. You may think AIX does not have a bright
future - but wasn't that also said about Linux in the data center?!?
Is not a diamond just a shiny crystal rock???
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
openso
-based distro providing
numbers 2 and 3 at this moment.
You can use and install the Oracle Solaris Studio Express 6/10 Software or pkg
install sunstudio12u1 if you have IPS capability (or do it manually).
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss
ing in Freetype 2.4.2.
Congrats on the PUBLIC release of Shillix 0.7.1!!!
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1. Some source consolidations are still being updated.
2. Much of ON_147/148 is in the open.
Oracle mentioned they are providing a supported Solaris Express in place of the
OSOL binaries of the past. The kernel sources are very recent to gain a 'like
Solaris 11' experience today.
~ Ken
--- On
s cards to work. I suggest the Nvidia GPU-based graphic cards since the
commercial video driver is maintained by Oracle/Nvidia.
Much of this info I've posted in the HCL and validated with Sun (Oracle).
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 8/26/10, Dusan Kysel wrote:
> From: Dusan Kysel
> S
ome very basic steps.
This is only based on my migrations from Solaris Legacy OSes to
OpenSolaris-based OS installs.
Protect and backup important data at all costs!
~ Ken Mays
--- On Wed, 8/18/10, Stephan Ferraro wrote:
> From: Stephan Ferraro
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] @Oracle
chalkboard points noted:
1. Dropping AMD servers for Intel-based servers.
2. Upscaling SPARC server roadmap to 128 cores and 64TB of memory by Y2015.
3. Solaris 11 will ship next year - Y2011.
4. Merge of Sun's Ops Center system management software and Oracle's Enterprise
Manag
mercial
OSes (boosting sales and usage numbers) does not mean the Unix-based desktop
market has gone the way of the dinosaurs...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
Based on the demo presentation, there is hope of a successful public core
binary with the recent ON and Xorg updates.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hard drive storage devices.
You "can" get things working somewhat... but you are better off utilizing
the Solaris/OpenSolaris 64-bit kernel + userland in the long run.
Better safe than sorry!
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-dis
munity distros where resources and funding
are always constrained.
The Illumos founders are a very capable group. I imagine visionary leaders like
Mark Shuttleworth or Garrett D' Amore leading the pack.
As they say in the movies, godspeed
~ Ken Mays
P.S. Possible Illumos trailer?
SQL and other developers needing test servers and places to develop
their code - many user groups and engineers can assist in those regards.
Best to support the people building and supporting 'OpenSolaris-based distros'
over in distribution-discuss and/or wait for Solaris 10u9.
If Oracle does provide another OpenSolaris distro update later this year then
it will be better 'to wait for the cake to rise' than opening the oven door to
early.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ndors are backing Oracle as it was menioned long
ago that Oracle was going to have their major product lines all run
on the Solaris 10 OS...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ers.
Blastwave/OpenCSW for advanced Solaris-based package management and FOSS
porting support.
So you have a lot of community people that can help as well as many user groups.
~ Ken Mays
Atlanta, Georgia (USA)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
--- On Sat, 7/24/10, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Ken Mays wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > I'm taking a stab at this but I heard Joerg mentioned
> an issue with moving beyond ON snv_130. Then, you brought up
> some things about not being able to build ON 135+, X b143
cense terms.
Assembled 24 July 2010
Pre-tested: X.Org X Server 1.7.3 for integration and Nvidia 256.35.
Review: Pre-tested: X.Org X Server 1.8.2 for integration and Nvidia 256.35.
Main C/C++ compilers to use: Sun Studio 12.1/GCC 4.3.4 (BW)
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from open
Can Oracle Engineering provide someone like Joerg what he needs to update his
external SchilliX distro to implement ON snv_145/IPS 134?
~ Ken Mays
P.S. 'To infinity and beyond...' - Toy Story
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
open
This is an idea, but SchilliX (or a fork of it) could remain a pure
server-oriented core distro (without X or desktop cruft). The desktop stuff
could come by way of IPS integration and/or CSW/SFW/other packages...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
Congratulations, Joerg!!! I almost thought you did a snv_145 refresh
but this is amazing as well.
You're back on the map.
Good job,
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
of the newer Boomer audio backend in OSOL Dev snv_134.
Most of us have tested the packages with 1080p streams and the Nvidia 256.35
driver.
Some old links: http://wyang0.blogspot.com/2009/08/vlc-on-solaris-10.html
~ Ken Mays
P.S. Blu-Ray players are going for about $50-$75 USD now...
--
This
tachments/78086473/OSOLRELNOTES.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1268857930181
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
n" if it is officially adopted by Oracle for Solaris Next. Also, a few
other Solaris contributers are starting to use it. Larger ISV adoption of IPS
will tell the tale for us.
By the way, a few of us looked at Conary as well as many other solutions.
Well, what programming language i
w your audio backend hw-acc capabilities as well (i.e. the ol'
sunaudio won't do you justice). ;o0
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
is is very possible within a 72-hour period based on building the
FOSS packages separately beforehand with GCC 4.x.
Will try to post some screenshots this weekend (depends!).
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ommunity members?
Also, I did remember a note about using GCC 4.x to build ON and the X
consolidation as well in the future. Is this tested by anyone at Oracle
Engineering?
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
distro to OSOL 2010.03-b134 at this time. You can get a copy of it at
Genunix.org to review.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
f the popular server-based applications.
Otherwise, Oracle is providing us with the kernel and core environment updates
and we still have OSOL 2009.06, OSOL 2010.03-b134, and Sol10u8 available.
Whether you have VMWare, Xen, Virtuozzo/vzServer,VBox or something else it just
boils down to hav
me research on the hardware setup and motherboard.
Ask in the storage-discuss group as they can research this for you.
Default root password is usually 'opensolaris'.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
y to update a bunch of consolidations
and packages just yet.
Sometimes, just getting a chance to stand on home plate to swing a baseball bat
and striking out is better than just sitting only on the benches...
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
---Ken Mays wrote:
> > If I was a betting man...I'd think someone from the
> OGB staff attending these two meetings would be very helpful
> to the OGB and to those attending
--- On Tue, 7/13/10, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
> If Oracle is willing to arrange the fligh
etting man...I'd think someone from the OGB staff attending these
two meetings would be very helpful to the OGB and to those attending
The asylum is now open...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
update can be done to b142 and higher. Some
people are running snv_138-144 kernels. Mileages may vary.
As for NWAN, there are some notes on the NWAN GUI install and other update
info. You can also contact the nwan-dev team for more info.
~ Ken Mays
_
ix-32169-12593-24902
More info than what I posted, but something to compare with FreeBSD 9.0-current
and FreeBSD 8.1-RC2.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.06
5.62 - FBSD 8.1-RC2 (*)
6.24 - Ubuntu 10.10
Tandem XML v1.0 (sec)
54.52 - OSOL 2009.06
29.01 - FBSD 8.1-RC2 (*)
30.89 - Ubuntu 10.10
Use for pure entertainment value only!
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Sat, 7/10/10, Ian Collins wrote:
> From: Ian Collins
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Benchmarking OpenSolaris and Solaris 10?
> To: "Ken Mays"
> Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Saturday, July 10, 2010, 8:17 PM
> On 07/11/10 12:06 PM, Ken Mays
rypt
GnuPG
GraphicsMagick
Gzip compression
Himeno
John The Ripper
LAME MP3 encoding
LZMA compression
MAFFT
PostMark
POV-Ray
Sudokut
Threaded I/O Tester
A few tests need implementing. ZFS works for now (awaiting official word).
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opens
... but some things may be still
valid. I'll let you speculate and read up on that note!! (smile)
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ed said:
"I continually say that solaris & opensolaris are designed to be servers, not
desktops. I'd like to go into the reasons why, and see what other opinions
people have about this."
--->
Well, the basicness of what you said is true -as 'Solaris' primarily is a
server-oriented product from
- in relation to Solaris Next Dev.
As for OpenSolaris updated binary distros, there was some
commentary awhile ago that energies are focused on Solaris 10u9 (a bigger
concern in the 'real' production world) as well as Solaris Next Dev in
parallel. Also, the OTN por
ld get a
cautionary sticker.
If you use FreeBSD 9.0 amd64/ZFS with the Nvidia driver, you'll get a much
different performance especially if you use the right FreeBSD 'tweaks' as
Phoronix testing is usually done 'out-of-the-box' for automation reasons.
I think we
Ken Gunderson wrote: 'Could we please have links to these third party tests?'
Phoronix has a test report to debate between OSOL-DEV-b127 and FreeBSD 8.0:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=10
The newer article was January 25, 2010 based on FreeBSD 8.0 and
ait till after Solaris 10u9 is released and the OTN/BigAdmin portal is fully
operational.
My crystal ball is currently on lock-down via iPhone 4.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, betchou betchou wrote:
I really don't care about delay. It has still existed, will exist...
To say : "There will be a release every 6 month." is not that much precise. I
don't really care if we have one two or three month to wait. But I really care
about letting people with
kage rolling' work being done?
That's for another thread at another time...
Oracle is working on the next production release of 'Solaris'. Either we wait
for it, use what we got, or look for other options - especially for those
people not willing to pay for it or the work invol
ew apples - but at least you'll get some applesauce in the
end rather than an empty bowl and dust mites.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
moreso hobbyists that are
not willing to be a bit proactive and contact an Oracle account manager.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Alex Sims wrote:
> From: Alex Sims
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] So who is ready to be let down?
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: T
under 256 MB. Still enough for today's
embedded Y2K purposes. I think the engineering quote was 384 MB RAM minimum
(512MB roughly).
~ Ken Mays
--- On Fri, 6/25/10, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> From: Dennis Clarke
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Milax 0.5 boot fails : login services can n
date other areas as you see fit.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Mon, 6/21/10, Bruno Sousa wrote:
From: Bruno Sousa
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SNV_142 Test DVD & Blastwave's AMP stack
To: "Hernan Saltiel"
Cc: "Ken Mays" , opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Mon
NetBeans
6.8 support.
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
--- On Mon, 6/21/10, Tim Scanlon wrote:
> From: Tim Scanlon
> Subject: [osol-discuss] Studio Express 6/10?
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Monday, June 21, 2010, 7:09 AM
> "Oracle Solaris Studio Express 6/10
&g
her resources but hope to make everything available soon.
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Working on packages for compatible OSOL 2010.DEV-based distros.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
9
Squid 2.7.Stable9
Many of the test packages mentioned are already available through the
Blastwave.org repository mirrors to support other OSOL distro providers for
both SPARC and x86/x64 platforms.
Special thanks to Initworks BV and some work by Richard Lowe.
Thanks
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
--
not even worry about what
clothes they have on for a given day (i.e. Why? They can pay other people for
that).
Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer... but I never said let the
sharks swim in your bathtub.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
ble Oracle
engineers willing to chat and help - or grab yourself an Oracle Account Manager
with an Etch-A-Sketch.
Shake often,
~ Ken Mays
--- On Thu, 6/10/10, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
> From: Giovanni Tirloni
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Sun Software Product Map- opensolaris not included
&
Well, you have to also consider:
1. Oracle is still making patch updates to OpenSolaris 2009.06. See support
contract.
2. OSOL DEV 134 is available, otherwise OSOL 2009.06.
3. Some engineers have updated to the ON snv_142 kernel release.
4. ZFS a little buggy (data loss >=b134 possible under cert
- but those that can
find bugs and willing to report those bugs to others.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Mon, 6/7/10, Peter Jones wrote:
> From: Peter Jones
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Where is OpenSolaris 2010 release?
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Monday, June 7, 2010, 5:3
Steve,
Oracle's account managers handle this sort of thing. The other solution
is talk to someone like Nexenta.
Now ensure you understand is that somone like Oracle may look at 'best tool for
the job' so what is 'under the hood' may or may not be what you expect.
~ Ken
tributions (i.e. OpenSolaris
2010.05) will probably come in the near future from Dell.
I'll let Oracle or Dell correct me otherwise.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ave a long time ago. The Solaris 8/9 x86/x64
Containers add-on packages on Solaris 10 x86/x64 platforms never made it to the
general public (AFAIK). The resources and customer demand for Solaris 8/9 x86
container development and support was not there (i.e. pre-Y
opensolaris-announce for the OpenSolaris 2010.05
release and the update on the Genunix.org website.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
10, the larger SXCE (now defunct), or
OSOL-DEV_b134. I'd think for many people that is good enough for many projects.
As for speculating on Oracle Solaris 11, a few things can be put on Oracle
Solaris 10 until that big release day happens. Just wait and be patient.
Maybe we'll be on GNOME 3.0 for the next release by then...who knows?
Just enjoy the ride and stop kicking the tires
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Thu, 4/29/10, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> From: Alan Coopersmith
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Opera drops browser support for Solaris
> To: "ken mays"
> Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org, "Anon Y Mous"
>
> Date: Thursday, April 29, 2010,
for only a certain platform and version of Oracle Solaris (i.e. Solaris 10
SPARC).
This is where the community and Oracle's support for the smaller ISVs and
organizations that port **ANY** software to Oracle Solaris/OpenSolaris become
important to help sustain and grow the community.
~ Ken Ma
hat it doesn't matter what hardware vendor you have or chose in
this particular subject. The goal is that the Solaris OS has some level of
professional maintenance and support warranty for consumers - **mainly**
provided by Oracle (i.e. if all else fails).
~ Ken Mays
--- On Tue,
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> From: Alan Coopersmith
> ken mays wrote:
> > Some of us are running OSOL 2010.03 snv_137 now.
>
> That's impossible if you're outside of
> Oracle. You may be running
> snv_134 with individual consolidati
HI Edward,
Not official, but most likely you'll see snv_138 for the Live CD as well
b134(x) for OSOL 2010.03 FINAL on GENUNIX.
Some of us are running OSOL 2010.03 snv_137 now.
Also, the Nexenta Core Edition v3.0b3 (snv_b134c) CD is available.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, E
tream recording.
I had a wireless setup which worked well
but many of the wireless HDTV hardware was just coming down in price. You
should be able to get it very cheap today.
You can reference MythDora and Mythbuntu for some proof of concepts.
Most of the codecs are ported to OpenSolaris.
~ Ken
is only a small piece of the larger solutions at hand.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ronment and go from there for your own certification testing.
Talk to Oracle about partner programs for ISVs. There is also this website:
http://www.oracleisv.com
Hope that helps,
Ken Mays - Atlanta, GA
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
y are based on the ON kernel
and core environment at some engineering snapshot level. Some projects are
based on entirely different default package management systems and repositories.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Solaris 10u8)
Hope that helps,
Ken Mays - Atlanta, GA
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
Something is brewing:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b138/
~ Ken
--- On Fri, 4/16/10, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
From: Giovanni Tirloni
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] b137 based on tonic or otherwise
To: "Dennis Clarke"
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Friday, April 16,
b134) if possible.
We mostly discuss this over at desktop-discuss...
~ Ken Mays
--- On Wed, 4/14/10, bsd wrote:
> From: bsd
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Firefox 3.5.5 with SXCE can't load page
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 4:34 AM
g ANY major issues with a prior OpenSolaris release, just give
OSOL 2010.03 until April 16th or await the snv_138 kernel release.
You'll be 'very' glad you did.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-
of Solaris 10 10/09 ASAP if you don't already have
it and pay for whatever >=90 day warranty or technical support you need.
Otherwise, you have other options to utilize for your work or hobbist
environment.
May our cups run over,
Ken Mays
--- On Tue, 3/30/10, Mike DeMarco wrot
that
conversation. You are dealing with engineering snapshots and BETA releases of
'something to come'. Treat it as such - and you'll be much happier in the end.
As for Oracle Solaris 10, it is as free as it was yesterday. Kindly get off
Hi Jussi,
The 3G modems are 'supported' but you may have to configure them and modify
the drivers (IDs) to your modem. A few walkthroughs are available.
Ask for detailed help at wwan-discuss and give them the output from "mdb -k
::prtusb -i e -v"
~ Ken Mays
--- On
1 - 100 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
