On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> A more interesting question for this group, I think, is what
> requirements need to put onto the projects delivering into OpenSolaris
> consolidations so that those systems can work. Right now, I think we
> have a possi
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 02:03:23PM +0200, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
> when you invest your life, don't get paid, don't get recognition, then
> you have a right to criticize.
>
sigh.
at this point, what you call "criticizing" i call "whining".
you seem to feel like you've personally been wronged by
Martin Bochnig writes:
> Also: I'm not talking about getting "famous" like Madonna. It would be
> very nice already, if _certain_ folks would stop throwing fish at me.
> Or better: If the community would protect me from experiences like
> that.
I doubt that having others choose a different packagi
Glenn,
thanks for your comments, they are very appreciated :)
Only two points: I'm not talking about making or not making a fortune
here, and it is unlikely that I expected anything like that. In that
case I would probably have chosen a different job. What I am talking
about is pure survival. Wi
* Martin Bochnig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> p.s. OpenSolaris.com can continue to use IPS. It is their loss
> (truly). I would not benefit at all if they ever switched to conary
> (what they will never do, because they _cannot_ admit they made the
> smallest thing wrong). I'm not the author of c
Hello Pawel,
when you invest your life, don't get paid, don't get recognition, then
you have a right to criticize.
I don't understand how you can interpret this as "aggressive and
uncultured style of discuss".
Those who only talk and chat and never contribute can obviously always
be colorful, fan
Martin Bochnig pisze:
> You folks are talking, talking, talking.
> I work on real code, but nobody wants to help me (in whatever[!]) way.
> Rename it from "Developer community" to "chatting community".
Hello Martin,
Are you surprised? I'm not. I was watching that long and hot thread
and my comme
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:51:20 -0500 Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> First of all, with OpenSolaris 2008.x, I think you'll see far more
>> software packaged, and secondly, far more of it will be up-to-date.
>
> Yes, b
Building src inside conary, sample output:
# conary emerge --no-deps zlib:source
+ Methods called:
Zlib.setup
+ Building [EMAIL PROTECTED]:devel[]
warning: Could not find the following troves needed to cook this recipe:
bash:runtime
binutils:devellib
binutils:lib
binutils:runtime
bzip2:runtime
c
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, with OpenSolaris 2008.x, I think you'll see far more software
> packaged, and secondly, far more of it will be up-to-date.
That may be, but I have been hearing that for the better part of a
decade, so I'll no
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:51:20 -0500 Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, with OpenSolaris 2008.x, I think you'll see far more
> software packaged, and secondly, far more of it will be up-to-date.
Yes, but will it be packaged in usable form, or will it be configured
to work on a
Fredrich Maney wrote:
> I would submit that in the desktop realm, you would be correct.
> However, in my experience in the server realm, custom builds are
> pretty common. For example, until very recently (like the last 2
> years), I've rarely seen anyone run the Sun provided BIND, Sendmail or
> Ap
12 matches
Mail list logo
