Hello Pawel, when you invest your life, don't get paid, don't get recognition, then you have a right to criticize. I don't understand how you can interpret this as "aggressive and uncultured style of discuss".
Those who only talk and chat and never contribute can obviously always be colorful, fancy and funny , they think they are cool. Simply because they don't lose anything, as they did not invest very much. They just hang around. Regards, Martin p.s. OpenSolaris.com can continue to use IPS. It is their loss (truly). I would not benefit at all if they ever switched to conary (what they will never do, because they _cannot_ admit they made the smallest thing wrong). I'm not the author of conary, nor hold any license. We ported it exclusively because we realized its powerfulness. But the OpenSolaris user base does not seem to value it, when somebody external really starts to scratch on his head, how it could significantly be improved. Instead they kick you. Or at least ignore you. On 10/24/08, Paweł Tęcza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Bochnig pisze: > >> You folks are talking, talking, talking. >> I work on real code, but nobody wants to help me (in whatever[!]) way. >> Rename it from "Developer community" to "chatting community". > > Hello Martin, > > Are you surprised? I'm not. I was watching that long and hot thread > and my comment is following: I can agree with your arguments and even > believe you that Conary is great package system for OpenSolaris, > but unfortunately your aggressive and uncultured style of discuss can be > discouraging for many people here. Do you talk with people in real world > in the same way? I doubt about it. So, if you really want Conary > success, then you should be its better advocate... > > Have a nice day, > > Pawel > > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
