Mike Gerdts mger...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
All that said, I'm still a little mystified as to why the normal
development builds are being held back.
Could it be because pkg image update is known to work pretty well
going forward (b134 - b134b)
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Mike Gerdts mger...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
All that said, I'm still a little mystified as to why the normal
development builds are being held back.
Could it be because
Mike Gerdts mger...@gmail.com writes:
Good starting points are:
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+indiana/building_on
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/downloads#HBuildingOpenSolaris
Thanks .. great clues.
I noticed at the first URL the author made the mistake often made,
Thanks Eric (and some of the others who replied.)
For RC work, the Bazaar method is much less useful (and,
can be detrimental to schedules), so it's better to keep the RC work
strictly inside the developer community, and exclude the user community
for the short period of time it takes to
Hi !
Le 30 mai 2010 à 01:59, bsd a écrit :
If there is active development of OpenSolaris, why does the dev repository
catalog have a last update of March 6, 2010?
I'm having trouble with building VirtualBox on FreeBSD, so I wanted to
install build 129, then update to the lastest dev
Greetings
If it is now nailed that next release is based on 134b what is a reason not
to publish 134a build to dev repo ?
Really been waiting next release to be reality.
Been run Solaris / Opensolaris +10 years and have to say patience is now
close to end. Information flow almost zero ,
On 31 May 2010, at 12:55, homerun wrote:
If it is now nailed that next release is based on 134b what is a reason not
to publish 134a build to dev repo ?
If there's a 134b, one might presume it's because 134a wasn't stable enough to
release. In which case, it's unlikely to be of much use to
Whatever happened to 'Release early and release often'?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s04.html
2010.?? will be full of preventable bugs because users will not have been
giving feedback to the developers.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 5/29/2010 11:58 PM, Paul Harper wrote:
Whatever happened to 'Release early and release often'?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s04.html
2010.?? will be full of preventable bugs because users will not have been
giving feedback to the developers.
On 5/29/2010 9:09 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
I don't know, otherwise I wouldn't have asked.
I know that build 134 was to be frozen and the next
release cut from that. Even though the release
hasn't been distributed, I didn't know that all
development has stopped and there aren't any
On 5/30/2010 1:14 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 5/29/2010 9:09 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
I don't know, otherwise I wouldn't have asked.
I know that build 134 was to be frozen and the next
release cut from that. Even though the release
hasn't been distributed, I didn't know that all
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
All that said, I'm still a little mystified as to why the normal
development builds are being held back.
Could it be because pkg image update is known to work pretty well
going forward (b134 - b134b) but is known not
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Mike Gerdts mger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
All that said, I'm still a little mystified as to why the normal
development builds are being held back.
Could it be because pkg image update
I know I'm off topic again but I'd still like to better understand. I just went
a round with pkg publisher 2009.06. I was trying for the release repo in my
e521 dell which the broadcom lan is not recognized. I did finally get it by
changing origins to http://localhost/ pkg publisher to
On 30 May 2010, at 07:58, Paul Harper wrote:
Whatever happened to 'Release early and release often'?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s04.html
2010.?? will be full of preventable bugs because users will not have been
giving feedback to the
On 30 May 2010, at 17:27, Calum Benson wrote:
Plenty of users have been giving feedback on b134 since March, so there's no
reason that any critical issues they reported (and probably some non-critical
ones too) shouldn't be fixed in 2010.??.
(Well, no reason other than a decision by the
Erik Trimble wrote:
Actually, on mature reflection, I'm guessing that the reason actual
built binary development releases aren't available right now is that all
equipment usually used for such a build is occupied with QA for the RC.
Nope - we have separate systems for build QA, and the
Mike Gerdts wrote:
Could it be because pkg image update is known to work pretty well
going forward (b134 - b134b) but is known not to work well or is
untested for going backward (b142 - b134b)?
pkg is known not to work at all for installing backwards, by design.
Going backwards is done by
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Paul Harper harper.pau...@gmail.com wrote:
Whatever happened to 'Release early and release often'?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s04.html
2010.?? will be full of preventable bugs because users will not have been
On 05/30/10 03:25 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
Could it be because pkg image update is known to work pretty well
going forward (b134 - b134b) but is known not to work well or is
untested for going backward (b142 - b134b)?
pkg is known not to work at all for installing
If there is active development of OpenSolaris, why does the dev repository
catalog have a last update of March 6, 2010?
I'm having trouble with building VirtualBox on FreeBSD, so I wanted to install
build 129, then update to the lastest dev build. However, if the latest dev
build is from
On 05/30/10 11:59 AM, bsd wrote:
If there is active development of OpenSolaris, why does the dev repository
catalog have a last update of March 6, 2010?
That's already been answered as I'm sure you know.
--
Ian.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
I don't know, otherwise I wouldn't have asked.
I know that build 134 was to be frozen and the next release cut from that.
Even though the release hasn't been distributed, I didn't know that all
development has stopped and there aren't any updates to dev.
So all you can get right now is build
On 5/29/2010 8:16 PM, bsd wrote:
I don't know, otherwise I wouldn't have asked.
I know that build 134 was to be frozen and the next release cut from that.
Even though the release hasn't been distributed, I didn't know that all
development has stopped and there aren't any updates to dev.
So
I don't know, otherwise I wouldn't have asked.
I know that build 134 was to be frozen and the next
release cut from that. Even though the release
hasn't been distributed, I didn't know that all
development has stopped and there aren't any updates
to dev.
So all you can get right now is
bsd wrote:
I know that build 134 was to be frozen and the next release cut from that.
Even though the release hasn't been distributed, I didn't know that all
development has stopped and there aren't any updates to dev.
Development hasn't stopped, just the updating of the /dev repo.
Source
26 matches
Mail list logo
