Title: OpenSSL (openssl-0.9.1c)
I have built libs for openssl with gcc 2.95. Build was sucessfull with minor warnings from GCC. I have built my own application with openssl libs, but I am having problem with SSL_CTX_new(). It fails in
ssl_create_cipher_list(ret->method, &ret->c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:03:32 +0200 (CEST), "Andy
Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> OpenSSL CVS Repository
appro> http://cvs.openssl.org/
appro>
_
for 0.9.8 after some further polishing
and cross-testing on a number platforms. A.
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Autom
inate" it for 0.9.8 after some further polishing and
> cross-testing on a number platforms. A.
It's looking much better on my system V platforms.
--
Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On 2007.10.26 at 14:06:37 +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> OpenSSL CVS Repository
> http://cvs.openssl.org/
>
> Modified files:
> openssl CHANGES
> openssl/apps s_client.c
> openssl/crypto/dsa dsa_pmeth.c
> opens
Hi,
a couple of days ago I've reported the bug:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1641
It looks like that Bodo's commit (see below) has fixed the reported
problem.
So the bug can be closed and set to fixed.
Best regards,
Christian
Bodo Moeller wrote:
OpenSSL CVS
From: Khan Alamgir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
akh> Please help!
Use a more modern OpenSSL. The current release is 0.9.6c.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 04:16:40PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> From: Khan Alamgir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> akh> Please help!
>
> Use a more modern OpenSSL. The current release is 0.9.6c.
And call SSL_library_init() :-)
-
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
>
Four horseman rode past asking where the pig party was...
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant.
Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk
______
ernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
___
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 13 Sep 2003 18:57:57 +0200 (CEST), "Ben Laurie"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ben> OpenSSL CVS Repository
ben> http://cvs.openssl.org/
ben>
ben&g
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 13 Sep 2003 18:57:57 +0200 (CEST), "Ben
> Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> ben> OpenSSL CVS Repository
&
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:18:02 +0200 (CEST), "Ben Laurie"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ben> OpenSSL CVS Repository
ben> http://cvs.openssl.org/
ben>
ben&g
You're not forgetting to apply this to HEAD, I hope...
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:58:20 +0100 (CET), "Andy
Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> OpenSSL CVS Repository
appro>
Richard Levitte wrote:
OpenSSL CVS Repository
http://cvs.openssl.org/
Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Richard Levitte
Root: /e/openssl/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module
lt, and that just expresses what software package it
comes from, nothing more (i.e. those are OpenSSL-specific files,
rather than SSL-specific).
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnl
probably be moved off, since it isn't SSL-specific
> either. After all, the whole installation tree lives under ssl/, at
> least by default, and that just expresses what software package it
> comes from, nothing more (i.e. those are OpenSSL-specific files,
> rather than SSL-specific).
sus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
___
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:09:12 +0100 (CET), "Andy
Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> Log:
appro> Please BSD make...
[...]
appro> Index:
appro> --- openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl 13 Dec 2004 17:28:42 -
1.144
appro> +++ openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl 25 Jan 2005 22:09:10 -
1.145
appro> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
appro> LIBRARIES="$(LIBSSL) $(LIBKRB5) $(LIBCRYPTO)" ; \
ap
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:27:50 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> > appro> --- openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl 13 Dec 2004 17:28:42 -
1.144
appro> > appro> +++ openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl 25 Jan 2005 22:09:10 -0
appro> > appro> --- openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl 13 Dec 2004 17:28:42 - 1.144
appro> > appro> +++ openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl 25 Jan 2005 22:09:10 - 1.145
appro> > appro> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
appro> > appro> LIBRARIES="$(LIBSSL) $(LIBKRB5)
ry grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Figured couple of clarification notes are due:-)
Added files: (Branch: OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable)
openssl/ms do_win64a.bat do_win64i.bat
Modified files: (Branch: OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable)
openssl Configure e_os.h
openssl/crypto
+ have to be made anyway).
+ [Richard Levitte]
+
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______
appro> me why. I'm not committing corresponding workaround into the HEAD as
appro> Makefile.shared reportedly needs even more work...
appro>
appro> Summary:
appro> RevisionChanges Path
appro> 1.154.2.41 +2 -1 openssl/Makefile.org
appro>
> Whoaa there, how does that change work when the compiler is *not* GNU?
It works *perfectly* with vendor compiler! Trust me:-) A.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing L
-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~l
. There is a whole bunch of compiler drivers that understand -Wl,
MIPSpro C does, Compaq C does, HP C does... In fact I can't think of one
that does *not*... A.
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.open
^^^ I meant "I can *not* tell for for version 3." A.
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ypto.a ...", while idea is
basically "ld ... -z allextract libcrypto.a -z defaultextract ..." Why,
oh why? A.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Ma
ROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee o
fernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
_____
/opt/SUNWspro/*/bin/ild,
where * stands for a version abbreviation, e.g. WS6 stands for WorkShop
6. A.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Levitte - VMS
> Whacker
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 11:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl Makefile.org
>
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 16 Dec
> 2002 19:54:08 +0100, Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTE
as you suggest. This might leave unresolved references to
libgcc. Now if it did, then attempt to cc ... -lssl would fail... A.
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
7
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is su
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See
dakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival f
chitect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
__
OpenSSL Project
ropriate.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
__
OpenSSL Project
any question, please ask.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenS
ions!
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: ht
e I can pull the tree down.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou need "a=b; c=$a; echo $c" to see "b." A.
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hose with empty values...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenS
PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL developm
assigned in the same statement that things don't work
> the same.
Right! The fact that only empty assignments are followed by ; is a pure
coincidence. It has nothing to do with the fact that assignments are
empty. A.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, C on VMS/Alpha knows very well what a long long is, and
knows how to make use of it. So let's stop pretending the Alpha
doesn't know long long...
And who said we were pretending? SIXTY_FOUR_BIT defines already BN_ULONG
as long long...
--- openssl/makevms.com
ppro> > doesn't know long long...
appro>
appro> And who said we were pretending? SIXTY_FOUR_BIT defines already
appro> BN_ULONG as long long...
True. Wrong wording.
appro> > --- openssl/makevms.com 11 Jul 2004 20:30:33 - 1.42
appro> > +++
It's interesting to see this happening. We have two parts of OpenSSL,
sha512 and pqueue, that solve the 64-bit integer problem in very
different manners.
Would it be a bad thing to have a header file in crypto/bn that
provides a guaranteed 64-bit number, possibly through BIGNUM, with
macr
It's interesting to see this happening. We have two parts of OpenSSL,
sha512 and pqueue, that solve the 64-bit integer problem in very
different manners.
:-)
Would it be a bad thing to have a header file in crypto/bn that
provides a guaranteed 64-bit number, possibly through BIGNUM,
grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ould
only be added to the 0.9.8 tree with lots of caution,
The proposed path fixes bugs too:-) BTW, does anybody see bug here:
bitmap <<= (a-b);
BTW, is there any test application? A.
______
OpenSSL Project
uot;When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
__
OpenSSL Project
software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the
traversing pqueue... But the list is not expected to
be very long, is it? But if it is, then one can cache the value in host
byte order upon insertion into list... BTW, is original contributor on
the list? A.
_
tforms that do need the specialized code will be minimal.
nagendra
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I am able to successfully build openssl-0.9.8j on Windows platform. Can i
know how to change the output file name of the build. Here i am getting
output file name as libeay32.lib, libeay32.dll, ssleay32.lib, ssleay32.dll.
I want to add a prefix to the output file names as follows
The OpenSSL project pleases me, but after having
surfed on all the www.openssl.org pages, I haven't
see a link, word or project about using OpenSSL
with Java... Docs and apps are all UNIX based...
Maybe if you want to be really Open, you should also
care about
- Java (world-wide used, alm
I have recently installed Openssl -0.9.1c on a linux intel box, running
2.0.36 red-hat ver5.2.
I have run the config, the dep, the clean, the make, the make test, the make
install with what appears to be success. When I try to compile any of the
demos, they give me errors, most like:
[dean@mail
Operating system: i586-whatever-linux2
Configuring for linux-elf
error:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/root/rpm/apache_php_compilekit-4.1/openssl-0.9.4/c
rypto/objects'
gcc -I.. -I../../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT
-DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-f
rame-pointer -m486 -Wall -DSHA
Does anyone know where to download openSSL for windows (if there is)
thanx,
audrey
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED
onnusamy.P
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello openssl-dev!
I've tried to compile OpenSSL openssl-0.9.6c under Microsoft Visual
C++ V7 (which comes with Visual Studio .NET). There everything was
OK except a warning in crypto/rsa/rsa_oaep.c, line 181. This warning
was treated as error and prevented from further compilation
Hello Bodo,
Bodo Moeller wrote:
Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Bodo Moeller
Root: /e/openssl/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openssl Date: 19-Mar-2003 19:58:56
Branch: OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable Handle
-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
___
Richard Levitte wrote:
> OpenSSL CVS Repository
> http://cvs.openssl.org/
>
>
> Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Richard Levitte
> Root: /e/openssl/cvs
Uhmmm, that's definitely not enough. Did you try to compile?
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:47:36 +0100 (CET), "Andy
Polyakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> OpenSSL CVS Repository
appro>
SWEDEN \
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kt
. What do you have? A.
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44
\ SWEDEN \
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTEC
because zero is
a valid length. This is theoretically true for the i2d_foo() ASN1 functions
though currently very few indicate an error condition, that may well change in
future.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
OpenSS
Yup, and it's quite possible to have them return (size_t)-1 in the
future as well :-). Or we could have them return ssize_t, like
write(2).
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnl
ike to take full advantage of size_t.
But in BN or PKI case on the other it would/should be considered as a
DoS attack. A.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Devel
I don't think everything has to be size_t-fied. In some situations it
Do you care about 16bit platforms?
Well, I was wondering this question myself. Do we? Does *anybody*
compile OpenSSL on 16-bit platforms nowadays? Is it still of interest?
What 16-bit platforms are out there? But in e
to change the macros
BLOCK_CIPHER_func_ofb, BLOCK_CIPHER_func_cbc and
BLOCK_CIPHER_func_cfb, because they're casting inl to long (I removed
the cast), meaning you need to change the EVP layer functions, and why
should one stop there and introduce some temporary casts? As soon as
the EVP layer is
s?
appro>
appro> Well, I was wondering this question myself. Do we? Does
appro> *anybody* compile OpenSSL on 16-bit platforms nowadays? Is it
appro> still of interest? What 16-bit platforms are out there? But in
appro> either case...
Hmm, DJGPP?
appro> > Perhaps use &qu
appro> >>I don't think everything has to be size_t-fied. In some situations it
appro> >
appro> >
appro> > Do you care about 16bit platforms?
appro>
appro> Well, I was wondering this question myself. Do we? Does
appro> *anybody* compile OpenSSL on 16-bit
pro> > appro> > Do you care about 16bit platforms?
appro> > appro>
appro> > appro> Well, I was wondering this question myself. Do we? Does
appro> > appro> *anybody* compile OpenSSL on 16-bit platforms nowadays? Is it
appro> > appro> still of interest?
y Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17/05/2004 04:58 PM
Please respond to openssl-dev
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/crypto/engine/
eng_openssl.c openssl/crypto/evp..
or pointer arithmetics
wider than 16-bit [per array of elements of basic type]. If there is,
then the next question is if there is a 16-bit OpenSSL application out
there, which is
- compiled in such environment;
- actively maintained;
- may not be executed on 32-bit capable hardware or can't
This patch seems to have introduced some code duplication:
It seems harmless, but still.
I tried to look line by line of the patch but I may have left something.
On 2004-12-05 02:04:45 +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> --- openssl/crypto/asn1/a_bitstr.c 12 Nov 2002 13:21:19 -0
S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant.
Funding needed! Details on homepage.
Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk
______
OpenSSL Project htt
e fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Scholars might like to note two bugs turned up by this change:
Index: openssl/crypto/asn1/a_set.c
$ cvs diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 a_set.c
--- openssl/crypto/asn1/a_set.c 5 Dec 2004 01:03:06 - 1.13
+++ openssl
Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Dr. Stephen Henson
Root: /e/openssl/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openssl Date: 27-Apr-2005 18:27:15
Branch
Heads up for Padlock users/developer[s]. I had opportunity to run tests
on C3, a.k.a Nehemiah, and found that CFB and OFB modes are broken [as
per http://cvs.openssl.org/getfile/openssl/test/test_padlock?v=1.1].
Double-check tomorrow snapshots as they become available
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 05:54:28 Richard Levitte wrote:
> OpenSSL CVS Repository
> http://cvs.openssl.org/
>
> __
>__
>
> Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Richard Levitte
He&
Oops, chalk up another victim to "reply-to" ... sorry for the noise (and
the follow-up noise of this apology).
Cheers,
Geoff
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 14:52:34 Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 05:54:28 Richard Levitte wrote:
> > OpenSSL CVS Re
In message <200812161452.34284.ge...@geoffthorpe.net> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008
14:52:34 -0500, Geoff Thorpe said:
geoff> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 05:54:28 Richard Levitte wrote:
geoff> > OpenSSL CVS Repository
geoff> > http://cvs.openssl.
rt of a similar problem in mod_ssl:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
is that something that can/should be fixed in OpenSSL too?
Regards, Joe
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> OpenSSL CVS Repository
> http://cvs.openssl.org/
>
>
> Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Dr. Stephen Henson
> Root: /v/openssl/cvs
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002, Richard Levitte wrote:
> Protect loading routines with a lock.
> PR: 373
>
> Summary:
> RevisionChanges Path
> 1.33.2.4+6 -1 open
;t need to lock at all.
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openssl.org/
______
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PRO
T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subjec
the possible race
> condition.
Ah, now I see it. Thanks for clarifying this point.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
comments inline:
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
OpenSSL CVS Repository
http://cvs.openssl.org/
Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Lutz Jaenicke
Root: /e/openssl/cvs Email: [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 1709 matches
Mail list logo
