* jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-12-06 16:52]:
this is _not_ nice. it makes it impossible to join the
author of the mail
depends
I use mutt and lbdb. If a person has sent mail to a list where I'm
subscribed and I have received it, I can lookup that person's name and
get his email addr.
16:59
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdd wrote:
Henne Vogelsang a écrit :
* Its possible on this list to ask to have the adress masked (in the
archives only)
... all email addresses are already obfuscated in our archive by
stripping the domain part (replacing it by xx).
Hi,
On Friday, August 11, 2006 at 15:18:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
William Gallafent [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11-08-2006 16:10
On Friday 11 August 2006 13:53, houghi wrote:
Just noticed that the Reply-to is now pointed to the
sender. Could this be adjusted so it is send to the list
as
On 2006-08-11 15:57, Stefan Bogner wrote:
Am Freitag, 11. August 2006 15:54 schrieb Kevin Ivory:
thunderbird doesn't
http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
been there, done that.
I have mail redirect 0.7.4 installed. That tool is for bouncing
mails, not for reply to list. I use it regularly.
Kevin
* Kevin Ivory [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-11-06 09:55]:
thunderbird doesn't
hummm, broken client. Adjust or change!
OR, advise thunderbird developers *they* need to change.
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org@
On 06/08/11 15:52 (GMT+0200) Henne Vogelsang apparently typed:
Which mailer does not support it?
kmail does
evolution does
mutt does
pine does
The more popular cross-platform ones mostly don't:
Mozilla
SeaMonkey
Thunderbird (extension available to alter this)
AFAIK, the most common ones
Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
* Kevin Ivory [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-11-06 09:55]:
thunderbird doesn't
hummm, broken client. Adjust or change!
OR, advise thunderbird developers *they* need to change.
may I say that:
* this setup is the one of suse-linux-e for years now, and
that of most
On 06/08/11 10:39 (GMT-0400) Patrick Shanahan apparently typed:
* Kevin Ivory [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-11-06 09:55]:
thunderbird doesn't
hummm, broken client. Adjust or change!
OR, advise thunderbird developers *they* need to change.
They recent provided the back end that allows an
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:15:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
* this setup is the one of suse-linux-e for years now, and
that of most linux related lists
And that means it should forever be that way? I think it is a very bad way
to do it. The fact that everybody else is doing something does not mean it
on the affected lists.
as there will be a new openSUSE list for users, we can
expect a slow decreasing flow in these. However the merging
with openSUSE lists should not happen, there is traffic
enough for two lists :-)
Enough traffic for two lists? Maybe.
But having two lists per language about
the language between the topic.
(I consider the topic to be opensuse-project, not just project. What
project? ;-)
take account of the fact that the name of the main list if
opensuse-lang, so this part should stay fixed, and new
things added after. all french langage lists should be
opensuse-fr-xxx
Hi,
now that the rename of SUSE Linux into openSUSE is taking place with
the release of alpha 3 I think it is time to also adjust our mailing
list layout. I would like to propose the following changes:
1. Generic user support + catch-all list
opensuse@opensuse.org (changed list description
Hi,
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 at 15:47:55, Sonja Krause-Harder wrote:
1. Generic user support + catch-all list
opensuse@opensuse.org (changed list description)
I assume we're all tired of these discussions. I think we can use the
natural tendency of new users to subscribe to this list
Torsdag 10 august 2006 15:47 skrev Sonja Krause-Harder:
Of these I think #opensuse-devel is unnecessary and should be merged
with #opensuse-factory, but I might have overlooked something. Could
those active on #opensuse-devel please speak up? ;-)
#opensuse-devel already forwards people to
Torsdag 10 august 2006 15:47 skrev Sonja Krause-Harder:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new)
I tried to subscribe to this sending an empty mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Got the error below.
This is the Postfix program at host Relay1.suse.de.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be
Hi,
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 at 16:46:38, Martin Schlander wrote:
Torsdag 10 august 2006 15:47 skrev Sonja Krause-Harder:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new)
I tried to subscribe to this sending an empty mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Got the error below.
Because Sonjas mail is a proposal and no
Torsdag 10 august 2006 17:02 skrev Henne Vogelsang:
Because Sonjas mail is a proposal and no announcement.
Once again I was too fast on the trigger. Sorry.
Let me be the first to say that I'm fully in favour of this proposal, with the
following small additions/clarifications.
1) I think it
-existing, active communities, this step
will not happen without a discussion on the affected lists.
as there will be a new openSUSE list for users, we can
expect a slow decreasing flow in these. However the merging
with openSUSE lists should not happen, there is traffic
enough for two lists :-)
jdd
it must be the right list to ask questions about it :-)
The off-topic post are very low on the specific list like
opensuse-wiki and opensuse-factory.
Agree.
So my vote is that if we want a list to only discuss community lets
create [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then delete
opensuse@opensuse.org
answer.
HTH
...
Although I would like the Opensuse-list to be merged with suse-linux-e
and be about technical questions. Since it's more logical for newbies.
Opensuse-ideology, opensuse-discussion or
opensuse-beyond-the-thunderdome should replace this one. As Community
doesn't say to much, about
Peter Flodin wrote:
So my vote is that if we want a list to only discuss community lets
create [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then delete
opensuse@opensuse.org
anyway it can do no harm, try it :-)
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:38:25AM +0200, houghi wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:02:32AM +0200, Jerry Westrick wrote:
Maybe we can cross post the users message for them?
with a note like that is a lot shorter? Something like:
I would like that. I think however it is not possible to do it
answer.
HTH
...
Although I would like the Opensuse-list to be merged with suse-linux-e
and be about technical questions. Since it's more logical for newbies.
Opensuse-ideology, opensuse-discussion or
opensuse-beyond-the-thunderdome should replace this one. As Community
doesn't say to much, about
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:53:05PM -0700, Renegade Penguin wrote:
Please do not toppost.
I think this is a better solution that JDD has proposed.
Houghi gets all upset when valid constructive criticism is made,
insisting he is right, makes demands that all correspondence be directly
on
When I've been in similar situation on other lists, I've tried an approach
along the lines of:
I think the answer to your question may be X, but the appropriate list for
that kind of discussion is ___. You'll have more luck if you follow up
there.
That points the person in the right
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 04:48:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
It's a middle ground that I've seen work well both to keep lists on topic and
to make people feel welcome.
Unfortunatly I have see it fail on lists. People just kept posting more
and more, because their questions where answerd
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 02:14:55PM -0700, Renegade Penguin wrote:
snip
plonk
houghi
--
This openSUSE mailinglist is about the community. All discussion about
the community is welcome.If you have a techical question
just subscribe via this email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Renegade Penguin wrote:
Scott is right. Houghi, quit trying to defend yourself here. Just try
it his way for a while.
That is MY experience - I side with Scott.
You obviously haven't been on this list for a long time. Houghi's way
is the only way that has worked here and I'm thankful he
On Saturday 03 June 2006 23:14, Renegade Penguin wrote:
Scott is right. Houghi, quit trying to defend yourself here. Just try
it his way for a while.
That is MY experience - I side with Scott.
RP
houghi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 04:48:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
It's a
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:02:32AM +0200, Jerry Westrick wrote:
Maybe we can cross post the users message for them?
with a note like that is a lot shorter? Something like:
I would like that. I think however it is not possible to do it like in
Newsgroup where you do a crosspost and then set the
Linux will be discussed on
suselinux mailing list, opensuse on opensuse mailing list. Everyone
takes that openSUSE is some different kind of SUSE linux, like Fedora
Core is different kind of Redhat.
What I found on opensuse.org I have to talk about in opensuse (mailing
list, forum, news), not suse
questions about it :-)
The off-topic post are very low on the specific list like
opensuse-wiki and opensuse-factory.
So my vote is that if we want a list to only discuss community lets
create [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then delete
opensuse@opensuse.org
Peter 'Pflodo' Flodin
distrowatch.com does exactly that.
On 4/13/06, jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
question about the content of the distro are very frequent.
The answer as to look at the index file is acurate but not
handy.
so we need a tool to show the list of available packages,
the version, this for any
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
distrowatch.com does exactly that.
thanks, I didn't know that :-)
but are there only 174 packages in SUSE?
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:03:47PM +0200, jdd wrote:
but are there only 174 packages in SUSE?
Yes, what makes you think there are more. :-D
Off to the pub. makeSUSEdvd seems to work. I need a drink. RC1 look great
BTW.
houghi
--
Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es
bugmail (I think it's plugin to bugzilla) that sends a message
to cooker mailing list (sort of opensuse-factory list) for every
little change on every little ticket.
I think it's quite neat to have this kind of feature, since people
interested in tracking any bugs could have an easy way
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 05:36:24PM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
We discussed this somewhen in the past, but as of now didn't implement
something to get this functionality. It's definitely something nice to
have(tm), but I'd suggest to postpone this to the post CODE10 time (i.e.
when SUSE
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, houghi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 05:36:24PM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
We discussed this somewhen in the past, but as of now didn't implement
something to get this functionality. It's definitely something nice to
have(tm), but I'd suggest to postpone this to
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 07:26:34PM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
If there isn't any so far, this might be the best way to keep this on the
radar ;)
Bug 160835 Submitted
houghi
--
Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es
ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, houghi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 07:26:34PM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
If there isn't any so far, this might be the best way to keep this on the
radar ;)
Bug 160835 Submitted
Thanks, houghi!
Regards
Christoph
mailing list (sort of opensuse-factory list) for every
little change on every little ticket.
I think it's quite neat to have this kind of feature, since people
interested in tracking any bugs could have an easy way for doing it
instead of having to run complex queries on the web site. Since
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 08:56:33PM -0300, Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) wrote:
Hi!
I don't know if it has been asked before, but sorry if it has.
I would love to have a mailing list where we could track bugzilla
tickets.
snip
That would be nice. It could be a read-only mailinglist.
houghi
hi
Aside the new mailing List layout it might be of use to have some related
information for new list members
MHonArc
For some of the users it might be of interest to have a sdb/howto article how
to set up a local MHonArc at home.
It has several advantages using MHonArc (or others) for home
On 2006-02-12 22:25:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
otrs, Ticket request system
For a few power posters it also might be interesting to have a sdb/howto how
to set up and use otrs (open ticket request system) for the opensuse mailing
lists.
This is an idea I'm thinking of as a more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
otrs, Ticket request system
For a few power posters it also might be interesting to have a sdb/howto how
to set up and use otrs (open ticket request system) for the opensuse mailing
lists.
This is an idea I'm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
Aside the new mailing List layout it might be of use to have some related
information for new list members
true
MHonArc
For some of the users it might be of interest to have a sdb/howto article how
to set up a local MHonArc at home.
you seem a perfect
Hello,
I have been running the upgrade process for almost 24 hours. Every
time the installer upgrades a fonts package, fc-list runs for almost
an hour. I have 1Gig of RAM and a huge swap partition, so I can
hibernate to disk.
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I have been running the upgrade process for almost 24 hours. Every
time the installer upgrades a fonts package, fc-list runs for almost
an hour. I have 1Gig of RAM and a huge swap partition, so I can
hibernate to disk.
procs
the reference to the opensuse-factory list?
I wrote the mesage here to check that my understanding is right.
The purpose of the edit was to direct general SUSE Linux questions to
suse-linux-e and keep opensuse@ focused on development, ideas for future
versions etc.
Right, openSUSE@ is meant
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 19:38, Silviu Marin-Caea wrote:
Please tell me if you find them inaccurate.
please go to suse-linux-e or opensuse-factory instead.
Why remove the reference to the opensuse-factory list?
Bye,
Steve
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 12:42, Stephan Binner wrote:
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 19:38, Silviu Marin-Caea wrote:
Please tell me if you find them inaccurate.
please go to suse-linux-e or opensuse-factory instead.
Why remove the reference to the opensuse-factory list?
I wrote the mesage
I'm thinking of making the following edits. Please tell me if you find them
inaccurate.
http://www.opensuse.org/Communicate#openSUSE_Project_Mailing_Lists
opensuse for general discussions about the openSUSE project. This list is NOT
for issues around SUSE Linux, please go to suse-linux-e
Andreas Girardet wrote:
Well I think this is really not good as it certainly will impact my own
emails to this list. Often it is only possible to convey the whole
message of who you are. Usually i put it in there as a reference once
per thread. Whatever your habit it is not fair to choose 4
Andreas Girardet wrote:
Well I think this is really not good as it certainly will impact my
own emails to this list. Often it is only possible to convey the whole
message of who you are. Usually i put it in there as a reference once
per thread. Whatever your habit it is not fair to choose 4
Hi,
I remember reading complaints that the opensuse@opensuse.org mailing
list is not as usable and enjoyable as it could be. (Do we have a
similar problem on the other lists? I'm not aware of any, but please say
so if I'm wrong.)
I'd like to propose creating a FAQ to clarify the usual questions
Sonja Krause-Harder wrote:
I'd like to propose creating a FAQ to clarify the usual questions, like:
Given that there can be a _opensuse-help_ list which talks about issues on
the current opensuse, but probably this is done in high volume mailing list
suse-linux-e
- Purpose of the list
Sonja Krause-Harder wrote:
Hi,
I remember reading complaints that the opensuse@opensuse.org mailing
list is not as usable and enjoyable as it could be. (Do we have a
similar problem on the other lists? I'm not aware of any, but please say
so if I'm wrong.)
I'd like to propose creating a FAQ
Hello,
Am Montag, 14. November 2005 15:05 schrieb Sonja Krause-Harder:
I'd like to propose creating a FAQ to clarify the usual questions,
like:
- Purpose of the list
- Good topics
- Bad topics (and where to discuss them instead)
Good idea ;-)
- Preferred conduct
- Preferred email and
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 8:35 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian Boltz wrote:
Also a good idea - but there's something about this in the wiki
already:
http://www.opensuse.org/Opensuse_mailing_list_netiquette
I began this one and forgot about it :- )
It wasn't clear for me that this list was dedicated to development. And
looking at the large majority
of the mails posted here I'm not the only one to be confused about that.
Is it stated somewhere ?
http://www.opensuse.org/Communicate says:
opensuse (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) for general
Damian,
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 22:57, Damian Mihai Liviu wrote:
Hello,
Is possible to make an offtopic mailing-list, where we can talk about
anything not related to opensuse? ...
The great thing about off-topic-ness is that it's universal, so you only
need one such list, and it already
Hello,
Is possible to make an offtopic mailing-list, where we can talk about anything
not related to opensuse? Will be a better place to talk things like Posting
on OpenSUSE because as you all can see there was a lot of unnecessary
traffic generated by that thread. Also, it will be nice to
Martin Mewes escribió:
Hello,
Mark Hellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenSuSE mailing-list are managed by ezmlm. This is a strange choice
considering:
1. There is no ezmlm RPM package in OpenSuSE. It is a bit odd that a
distribution uses a software on its servers that it does
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:38:02PM -0300, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
No Mailman please.. ¡¡¡ :) No passwords for a mail list ¡¡
It is much easier in use for the end user. It's ease of use is something I
prefer. Going on a holiday? Just fill that out on the website and I am
done. No idea how I
Hi,
houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is much easier in use for the end user. It's ease of use is something
I prefer. Going on a holiday? Just fill that out on the website and I am
done. No idea how I should do that now.
You could create a procmail-rule to send eMails from the list
to
On 2005-10-13 21:44:55 +0200, houghi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:38:02PM -0300, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
No Mailman please.. ¡¡¡ :) No passwords for a mail list ¡¡
It is much easier in use for the end user. It's ease of use is something I
prefer. Going on a holiday? Just fill that
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Martin Mewes wrote:
houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is much easier in use for the end user. It's ease of use is something
I prefer. Going on a holiday? Just fill that out on the website and I am
done. No idea how I should do that now.
You
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:55:10PM +0200, Martin Mewes took 45 lines to write:
Hello,
Mark Hellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenSuSE mailing-list are managed by ezmlm. This is a strange choice
considering:
1. There is no ezmlm RPM package in OpenSuSE. It is a bit odd
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:38:34PM -0400, Marc Collin wrote:
hi
for some new user to linux, that could be fine to be able to run some windows
application
something that work without problem with wine... but often it's not true...
with crossover, it's easier then wine...
CrossOver
hi
for some new user to linux, that could be fine to be able to run some windows
application
something that work without problem with wine... but often it's not true...
with crossover, it's easier then wine...
CrossOver Office source code is available
maybe someone can create a package
On Sun, Sep 4, 2005 at 12:50 am, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Where's the wish list at for openSUSE? I'd like to suggest Jakarta
velocity and velocity- tools.
http://www.opensuse.org/index.php/Package_Wishlist
201 - 271 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
