Already done,
The jira issue is WW-425.
Just to clarify, my intention was not replace or duplicate the velocity
based templates in webwork. With the changes however, users could developo
their own template based tags using the technology of their own choice.
I think there's a point in separating
Guys,
I've updated Webwork 1.4 to use a new Pell multipart library for uploading.
However, this is slightly not backward compatible. Where previously
the library would thow an error if the filesize was too large, now it
just returns a null file.
This is preferable IMHO as it means that you c
Are you using Resin? Resin caches tag values. This could be a bug in
the action tag.
Jonas Eriksson wrote:
If I use two action tags on same page and the action-name and namespace
are equal on the two separate tags, the second invocation is not
creating a new Action object. This is not the su
This is a well tested encoding filter. You will need to edit things to
remove the Atlassian imports & word curly quotes.
It works on all application servers.
Cheers,
Scott
remigijus wrote:
Hi.
How can I change encoding for all incoming pages to utf-8?
--
ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.co
So what is the outcome of this discussion? :P
Also, I think I'm going to add a helper object to the AC like so:
"#p.foo" - causes action.getFoo() to be called, and if the return value
is null (or default) then it will call request.getParameter("foo"). That
would solve Mike's 'abc' example if all
Les,
Did you get anywhere with this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] A little HELP pleasea very odd error
Let me preface this by sa
Ouch -- great catch! Please file a jira issue and I think we'll need to
update the CompoundRootAccessor to only execute methods after the action
has been processed and we're in "view mode". I'll probably put in a few
other checks, like disallowing some of the super critical method calls
like System
It's in no form, it was just some placeholder directories and files.
On Dec 16, 2003, at 10:52 PM, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Oh, and also keep in mind that there is Dreamweaver "support" (not sure
in what form) for WW 1.x
---
This SF.net email
Oh, and also keep in mind that there is Dreamweaver "support" (not sure
in what form) for WW 1.x
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter White
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork/2
Yeah, I've decided to nix a "Struts Studio" type solution based on the
feedback I've received so far. However, I've been looking for an excuse to
do a Dreamweaver extension since I plan on reusing the experience I'll gain
on a future project. At the moment, I'm about half way there - I've already
f
Title: Message
Please make sure a jira issue exists for
this just in case. I’d hate to forget to do this before releasing 2.0
final
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Carreira
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003
7:55 AM
To:
[EMAI
Fredrik, please get these on to jira if you haven't already.
I read this whole thread, and basically, WebWork's UI tags will continue
to depend on velocity (we don't want to get in to the game of
maintaining different templates for various languages). That said, the
fixes you've done could be used
Sounds like a bug... please file a jira issue (and provide a patch if
you can!)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonas Eriksson
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Reusing Action object when s
I think that the tag might be helpful for what you're
doing... check it out :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Patrick Holzmann
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: [OS-webwork] Obtaining Xwork action
Keep in mind that there IS a GUI editor for XWork that is included with
XWork.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter White
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork/2 Tool Support...
G
Of course we'd like to see this also in WebWork 2.0, so please be sure
to set the fix-for version to both branches :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hani Suleiman
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
All these proposals sound good to me, but changing the clear()
behaviour is slightly non-backward compatible, so I'd like to hear from
people who strongly object to this modification because it'd make their
lives unbearable etc etc.
On Dec 16, 2003, at 6:32 PM, Robert Dawson wrote:
After runni
After running into some pain with SessionMap on a project a while ago, I
have been looking into trying to get it into shape.
I have been focussing on the 1.x codebase, because it is what I get the most
benefit. I'm looking to get some feedback on some of the changes I am
looking at before cutting
Good enough for me, I'm looking into it. :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason Carreira
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork/2 Tool Support...
>
> Dreamweaver
You should turn off the html escaping that the property tag uses by default:
Cheers,
Dick Zetterberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Leonidas Papadakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:14 AM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Displaying
If you're seeing blanks, then the taglib is being recognised, but
somethign else is going wrong. Did you poke around the logfiles to see
if it's logged anywhere? If the taglib is not recognised, then you'll
see an error page, rather than the page without any of the taglibs.
What tags are you tr
It certainly does. I've tried to figure out why, but haven't found any
critical differences. The example app references the taglib in exactly the
same way as the skeleton app. The only differences I can see are that the
webwork.properties file for the example app defines an XML action file. The
ske
Try the example app and see if that behaves any better?
Larsson, Jonas wrote:
Hi all,
I'm out of options right now and I'm getting really frustrated with a
problem which is probably a "stupid user error" but I still need some
pointers...
I've downloaded WW1.4 and tomcat 4.1.29. I've installed th
Hi all,
I'm out of options right now and I'm getting really frustrated with a
problem which is probably a "stupid user error" but I still need some
pointers...
I've downloaded WW1.4 and tomcat 4.1.29. I've installed the skeleton app
that comes with WW and read through all available configuration
works fine - thanks!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
Joseph Ottinger
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2003 12:06
An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betreff: RE: [OS-webwork] Obtaining Xwork action name in JSP
I'd like to propose that a shortcut
Dreamweaver support would be excellent.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork/2 Tool Support...
>
>
> Yeah, I hear you guys - WebWork's simplicity was wh
If I use two action tags on same page and the action-name and namespace
are equal on the two separate tags, the second invocation is not
creating a new Action object. This is not the supposed behaviour, or is it?
In my case I was setting some tag params and they were set in the second
invocatio
I'd like to propose that a shortcut method for this should be added to the
ActionContext. :)
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
> <%=ActionContext.getContext().getActionInvocation().getProxy().getActionName
> ()%>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Holzmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Title: RE: [OS-webwork] Obtaining Xwork action name in JSP
<%=ActionContext.getContext().getActionInvocation().getProxy().getActionName()%>
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Holzmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 16 december 2003 11:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: [OS-web
Hi,
is there a way to obtain the action name used in xwork.xml in the corresponding JSP?
I am trying to implement some action-based menu structure/handling.
Thanks + cheers
Patrick
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program
Greetings,
i have an action in webwork1 that has a message property. The below :
message="\"";
will be parsed to " at the html page, whereas i want to remain as "
Can anybody tell how do i do that ?
Thanks in advance
L
---
This
I like the idea about the tool for Dreamweaver, it would be nice to be
able to switch between templates while in DW, and also even some
sitemesh decoration functionality too
Peter White wrote:
Yeah, I hear you guys - WebWork's simplicity was what attracted me to it at
first. That's why I wanted
Hi.
How can I change encoding for all incoming pages to
utf-8?
33 matches
Mail list logo
