gt;> bill.mccarthy.li...@live.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Although there’s lots of c ‘style’ languages, the devil is always in the
>>> details/differences. I find it hard to switch between c# and js and not
>>> forget/mess up. With vb.net a
latest bits pushing out only new stuff, you can do that with the internet and
your spare time 😏
Btw: reporting services custom code... just sating😉
From: David Burstin
Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2015 2:19 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: vb.net
I think the real message here is - forget the
October 2015 at 13:53, Bill McCarthy <
>> bill.mccarthy.li...@live.com.au
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Although there’s lots of c ‘style’ languages, the devil is always in the
>>> details/differences. I find it hard to switch between c# an
problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> The same use to be said for vb and vbscript in days of asp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *David Burstin
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, 13 October 2015 1:41 PM
>> *To: *ozDotNet
>> *Subject: *Re: vb.ne
and vbscript in days of asp
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *David Burstin
> *Sent: *Tuesday, 13 October 2015 1:41 PM
> *To: *ozDotNet
> *Subject: *Re: vb.net
>
>
>
>
>
> I started my .net journey with vb.net, but these days I code C# unless I
> have to use
differences. I find it hard to switch between c# and js and not
> forget/mess up. With vb.net and js not so much a problem.
>
>
>
> The same use to be said for vb and vbscript in days of asp
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *David Burstin
> *Sent: *T
: Tuesday, 13 October 2015 1:41 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: vb.net
I started my .net journey with vb.net, but these days I code C# unless I have
to use vb for working with a legacy system.
I agree with Bill - there really isn't much difference between using the
languages in .net. In
that was my
> experience
>
>
> On Tuesday, 13 October 2015, Bill McCarthy <
> bill.mccarthy.li...@live.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Really ? What ‘legacy’ things are you referring to ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Tom said ‘vb.net’.
From: Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2015 1:35 PM
To: Bill McCarthy
Cc: Nelson;ozDotNet
Subject: Re: vb.net
things that are old enough to still be running vb?
and i have a feeling people who still stick to vb are fairly stubborn.
i know im stereotyping here sorry if
I started my .net journey with vb.net, but these days I code C# unless I
have to use vb for working with a legacy system.
I agree with Bill - there really isn't much difference between using the
languages in .net. In fact, knowing my way around the .net framework (from
having used it with vb) made
are you referring to ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Nelson
> *Sent: *Tuesday, 13 October 2015 12:52 PM
> *To: *ozDotNet
> *Subject: *Re: vb.net
>
>
>
>
>
> Personally i would turn down such offer - actually wouldnt even be
> applying in t
This usually a great rant starter for a Friday conversation. Realistically
though Vb.net is much a muchness with c# on .net. Definitely the best language
if doing integrated xml. With late binding stuff it has some advantages with
better conversions, but also disadvantages such as wider scope.
Didn’t he die at Trafalgar?
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Bill McCarthy
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 1:29 PM
To: Nelson; ozDotNet
Subject: RE: vb.net
Really ? What ‘legacy’ things are you referring to ?
From
Really ? What ‘legacy’ things are you referring to ?
From: Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2015 12:52 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: vb.net
Personally i would turn down such offer - actually wouldnt even be applying in
the first place.
pretty good market out there with JS and C# .NET, try
Personally i would turn down such offer - actually wouldnt even be applying
in the first place.
pretty good market out there with JS and C# .NET, try looking else where if
you can
if you just recently graduated, your modern mindset would have a hard time
dealing with VB and the legacy system.
rd
> Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2014 4:59 PM
> To: ozDotNet
> Subject: Re: VB.NET (was Re: VS2013 Windows Phone project)
>
> Yes, there are still VB.NET programmers around. My workplace is using C#
> for many new projects but we have lots of VB.NET (and some VB6) legacy
> stu
10 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913
> fax
> SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
> On Behalf Of Mark Hurd
> Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2014 4:59 PM
> To: ozDotNet
>
t.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Mark Hurd
Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2014 4:59 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: VB.NET (was Re: VS2013 Windows Phone project)
Yes, there are still VB.NET programmers around. My workplace is using C# for
many new projects but we have lots of VB.NET
It's Thursday, we can have it tomorrow.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:37 PM, DotNet Dude wrote:
> Did someone mention vb.net? Finally! Now I can sleep well knowing I'm not
> completely a dinosaur...yet. :p
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Greg Keogh wrote:
>
>> C# is showing up in more and mo
Yes, there are still VB.NET programmers around. My workplace is using
C# for many new projects but we have lots of VB.NET (and some VB6)
legacy stuff that won't go away.
--
Regards,
Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.)(Hons.)
On 20 November 2014 16:07, DotNet Dude wrote:
> Did someone mention vb.net? Finally!
ender
immediately.
-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Bill McCarthy
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 5:07 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: vb.net question
It should be in the language documentation: look for End Statem
n the named recipient(s) is
prohibited. If you are not a named recipient please notify the sender
immediately.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of djones...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 5:04 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: vb.net que
It should be in the language documentation: look for End Statement.
For windows.forms it calls on Environment.Exit
|-Original Message-
|From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
|boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Peter Maddin
|Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 7:59 PM
|To: 'oz
End is very bad, replace it with application.exit.
End will leave threads / resources active/open.
Davy
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: "Peter Maddin"
Sender: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:59:13
To: 'ozDotNet'
Reply-To: ozD
That worked a treat! thanks
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Bill McCarthy
Sent: Wednesday, 10 November 2010 1:09 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: vb.net xml help
Try this function instead :
Function GetPoNo(ByVal
I had the same problem with a data feed I had to process. The namespace
thing had stumped and any docs/examples I found were no help.
I found and used the trial version of 'Liquid XML Studio'
(http://www.liquid-technologies.com/). It generates a code snippet to
start parsing xml.
Dim nsMgr A
Try this function instead :
Function GetPoNo(ByVal island As String) As String
Return
XElement.Parse(island)...@pon
o
End Function
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Anthony
Sent: Wednesday, 10 November 2010 12:50 PM
Cheers guys, very helpful.
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Aha! Here’s the statement that sums it all up with legal clarity:
>
>
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7825002w(v=VS.80).aspx
>
> *This means that variables in a standard module are effectively global
> va
Aha! Here's the statement that sums it all up with legal clarity:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7825002w(v=VS.80).aspx
This means that variables in a standard module are effectively global
variables because they are visible from anywhere in your project, and they
exist for the life o
Chaps, I think we've answered Tom's question in a way, eventually, I hope.
He was suspicious of using Modules, and you've confirmed my suspicions that
Modules are aliases for static classes that don't need to be qualified. No
other .NET compliant language I know of hides what's going on underneath
toria Park, Western Australia
-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Bill McCarthy
Sent: Sunday, 6 June 2010 5:14 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Vb.net Modules or classes
Hi Greg, Ian, all
As Ian says
e
importantly for extension methods.
|-Original Message-
|From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
|boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Ian Thomas
|Sent: Sunday, 6 June 2010 6:53 PM
|To: 'ozDotNet'
|Subject: RE: Vb.net Modules or classes
|
|Greg
|
|Over the years, there have been
people to transition to VB.NET.
_
Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia
_
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Sunday, 6 June 2010 3:19 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Vb.net Modules or classes
Hi Tom, is it quiet in here or is my email on the fritz?
"Modules" were weird and unclear abstractions in the old VB days that
irritated and confused me. They still do, so whenever I make a new VB
project I delete the Module and I create classes. I'm probably biased here
because I come from a C
> Gday dotnetters,
>
> Ever since I switched to vb.net i find im using Modules more and more,
> rarely creating classes, particularly at the entry point into a few utility
> console apps im working on. This definitely feels wrong, is it just bad
> design? Should i be learning OO design again?
>
> A
Thanks Bill, That was it.
-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Bill McCarthy
Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2010 10:47 AM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: vb.net switching between debug and release in VS2008
Hi Kirsten,
--> Projects and Solutions tab.
|-Original Message-
|From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
|boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Kirsten Greed
|Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2010 10:24 AM
|To: 'ozDotNet'
|Subject: RE: vb.net switching between debug and release in VS2008
|
boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2010 9:48 AM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: vb.net switching between debug and release in VS2008
Kirsten, in a VB.NET project in VS2008 I can see the Configuration combo at
the top of the Compile sheet in project properties (Deb
Kirsten, in a VB.NET project in VS2008 I can see the Configuration combo at
the top of the Compile sheet in project properties (Debug|Release). I also
have a Build > Configuration Manager menu. I can also right-click the
solution node and get the Configuration Manager menu. From what I recall,
none
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/wx0123s5.aspx
On 6 March 2010 07:02, Kirsten Greed wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I can’t figure out how to do this, can anyone give me the steps, I am
> wondering if there is a bug in my install.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kirsten
>
>
>
>
>
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
