Hi Ishai,
We don't have load balancing set up in our environment.
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Ishai Sagi
Sent: Sunday, 3 November 2013 10:59 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: SPS2010 SP2 - assembly name invalid
It is server-based? Are you load
)
Subject: SPS2010 SP2 - assembly name invalid
Hi all,
We've got a console application that uses the _vti_bin\copy.asmx web service to
upload files to a document library. The issue is that it works sometimes, and
at other times it fails - for example it'll work fine for 6 hours, then just
Hi all,
We've got a console application that uses the _vti_bin\copy.asmx web service to
upload files to a document library. The issue is that it works sometimes, and
at other times it fails - for example it'll work fine for 6 hours, then just
randomly stop working for a few hours, and then
Thanks for the info and tips guys - the DBA's and Tech Services are looking in
to it.
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Turner
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2010 10:15 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: SP2 and backups
Agreed :)
Regards,
Paul Turner
Hey all
One of our DBA's just came to see me with a puzzling situation. Ever since
installing SP2 in mid Jan, our daily backups have been grown to approximately
30Gb a day - from around 600Mb.
We're using Snap Manager, and my understanding is that it's the differential
backups that are so big
Hertz
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2010 8:21 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: SP2 and backups
Hey all
One of our DBA's just came to see me with a puzzling situation. Ever since
installing SP2 in mid Jan, our daily backups have been grown to approximately
30Gb a day - from around 600Mb.
We're using Snap Manager
Of
Paul Turner
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2010 9:24 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: SP2 and backups
How big are your databases? It depends on a few things, DB Size, Recovery
Model, number of Transactions, type of backup...
Regards,
Paul Turner
Senior Solutions Specialist
M: 0412 748 168 P: 08 8238
...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Nigel Hertz
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2010 9:29 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: SP2 and backups
At the risk of being called an idiot... it's 178Gb *runs away and hides in
shame*
There's very few transactions that happen every day (that we know
not necessarily be that
of DWS Pty Ltd.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Tom Bizannes
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2010 9:40 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: SP2 and backups
Do they do log backups?
90
Hi All
I upgraded to MOSS SP2 over the weekend, and for some reason I ended up with a
trial version though I downloaded the more recent version.
I know there was a bug in the SP2 and it was fixed, but why did I get when I
downloaded the files well after it was fixed?
That was easily fixed
Do you have Alternat4 Access Mappings setting up for http://intranet ?
Cheers,
DB
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Marko Salonen
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2010 8:47 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Errors after SP2 upgrade
Hi All
I upgraded to MOSS SP2
February 2010 8:19 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: Errors after SP2 upgrade
Do you have Alternat4 Access Mappings setting up for http://intranet ?
Cheers,
DB
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Marko Salonen
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2010 8:47 AM
To: ozMOSS
Excellent!! Thanks for that!
Worked like a charm. Not sure why it worked all ok before SP2 upgrade, but at
least it now works with the AAM.
Cheers!
Regards,
Marko
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Daniel W. Brown
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2010 8
I found that user controls worked fine before SP2 with the permissions we had,
but after SP2 installation we needed to specifically add user groups to the
user control directories. It was rather interesting.
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf
Hi All
After completing an SP2 upgrade on the weekend for MOSS 2007 Enterprise, I've
had a few problems. First with MOSS becoming a trial version, then with a
missing AAM setting.
Now I am getting errors when users try to submit forms.
Type: DataAdapterException, Exception Message: The form
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2010 1:06 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: From one problem to another (SP2 upgrade)
Hi All
After completing an SP2 upgrade on the weekend for MOSS 2007 Enterprise, I've
had a few problems. First with MOSS becoming a trial version, then with a
missing AAM setting.
Now I am getting
Of Marko Salonen
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2010 12:39
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: From one problem to another (SP2 upgrade)
Removing and adding user permissions took care of that one...
I juusst lve Sharepoint error messages!
(There is a problem with the Web server. Make sure the Web
While I do always recommend upgrading to the latest patch, The first step after
the SP2 upgrade should be ensuring that everything is in order again before
attempting such a update.
By all means upgrade, but don upgrade a partially broken/error prone server at
all costs (sometimes you just
Hi all
This issue has fortunately been resolved now. It turns out it was the
permissions on the user controls folder (which we have situated on a separate
data drive)
I'm curious as to how (a) the permissions on the folder changed or; (b)
differences in SP2 to SP1 in accessing the files
Is this only happening locally on the server or remotely also?
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Nigel Hertz
Sent: Friday, 29 January 2010 12:39 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Issues since SP2 instalaltion
Hey all
After trialling SP2 in our test
] On Behalf Of
Daniel W. Brown
Sent: Friday, 29 January 2010 1:25 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: Issues since SP2 instalaltion
Is this only happening locally on the server or remotely also?
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Nigel Hertz
Sent: Friday, 29
I would detach/attach the content DB, so SharePoint upgraded it automatically
From: Marko Salonen
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 4:42 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: I get this error when upgrading to SP2
Now I am getting these during the forced update:
[SPManager] [ERROR] [8/10/2009 10:46
Thanks Daniel
Was just about to do a fresh SP1 install, now DL'n SP2...
Cheers
Daniel W. Brown dan...@danielbrown.id.au 21/12/2009 11:19 am
FYI, Microsoft have updated the installation packages of both WSS MOSS to
include service pack 2.
WSS with SP2
* x64:
http://www.microsoft.com
...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Daniel W. Brown
Sent: Monday, 21 December 2009 12:05 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: I get this error when upgrading to SP2
When I've come across this error I've had great success with first running:
STSADM.EXE -o upgrade -inplace -forceupgrade -url http://site (need to do
.
Connections to this database from this server have been blocked to avoid data
loss. Upgrade the web front end or the content database to ensure that these
versions match.
My plan is to install WSS 3.0 SP2 and MOSS SP2 over the weekend to attempt to
fix the problem.
I hope this will fix the problem
Did somebody try to create SP2 slipstream from existing SharePoint SP1
slipstream?!
I copied all SP2 files to \Updates folder and I deleted all SP1 duplicates
that differs by SP1/SP2 suffix only.
But there are few unique files, that have *sp1 suffix, and dated back 2008
...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Nemtsev
Sent: Thursday, 8 October 2009 8:25 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: SP2 slipstream and *sp1* files
Did somebody try to create SP2 slipstream from existing SharePoint SP1
slipstream?!
I copied all SP2 files to \Updates folder
To: 'ozMOSS'
Subject: RE: SP2 slipstream and *sp1* files
Tried with these SP1 files and without them (removed everything from \Updates
folder) - no differences. Everything is installed correctly and Sharepoint
shows the same version.
It looks like these files are either ignored, or not used
From: ozmoss
SP2 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Thanks that is the way I am going to approach it as well.
Didn't know you had to do the wizard on every box.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Noja, Fadi
fadi.n...@fahcsia.gov.aumailto:fadi.n...@fahcsia.gov.au wrote:
The way I've done it in the past was
Install SP2
will install SP2 and that will take care of it. However in
the dev machines I get errors
and something like this:
ERROR MOSS_Search cannot update because this is a pre release verision
yada yad yada
And
User, group, or role 'WSS_Content_Application_Pools' already exists in the
current
Hi guys,
I have an installation of SP2 coming for a client and would really like to
have verification on how to proceed with installing on a multiple server
environment.
*Environment*: 2 x WFE
*Approach:*
1. Install WSS 3.0 on WFE01 when the wizard prompts click Next
The way I've done it in the past was
Install SP2 on the first box, run the wizard, when it prompts you to
tell you to make sure all the other servers on the farm on in this
screen (after you click next a few times) go to the second box and do
the same thing. Get all the boxes to have
Thanks that is the way I am going to approach it as well.
Didn't know you had to do the wizard on every box.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Noja, Fadi fadi.n...@fahcsia.gov.auwrote:
The way I’ve done it in the past was
Install SP2 on the first box, run the wizard, when it prompts you
Hi Guys:
I wonder if anyone experiences this problem. We have a custom timer job which
run on daily 2AM which works fine for the last 3 months. But after we applied
SP2, the job runs randomly, sometime 4PM, sometime 11 AM.
Anyone has idea?
Cheers
Ken
@ozmoss.com
Subject: Re: Interesting metadata issue with Office 2003 SP2 and MOSS 2007 SP2
PS. Further info about the metadata issue we have discovered:
* The metadata issue appears only on a document content type - any choice
column metadata either disappears or resets to the default choice option
, the issue remains. Try any
other document library on the site, and it is all fine. SP2 was installed 3
weeks ago and that seems to be around when users first noticed the issue.
This is a pretty stock site who have been running happily for a year now. No
naughty customisations, happy logs, good
What type are the columns in question?
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Culmsee
Sent: Friday, 14 August 2009 10:35 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: Interesting metadata issue with Office 2003 SP2 and MOSS 2007 SP2
Hiya
I have a site where one user reported
and not when edited in Word 2007
- Original Message -
From: Judy Price
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Interesting metadata issue with Office 2003 SP2 and MOSS 2007 SP2
Yes I have seen this and have a call logged with Microsoft
It's risky... If this is mission critical stuff, I would be installing a
SharePoint farm on a VM, patching up to the infrastructure updates, doing the
restore there, and then upgrading to SP2. That way you can take another backup
of the content at the SP2 level to restore into your production
|
+6177702
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ajay
Sent: Tuesday, 4 August 2009 9:19 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: Restoring pre SP1 backup on SP2
Hi All,
I have a stsadm -backup from Sharepoint Server which has infrastructure updates
installed.. no SP2 stuff
Hehehehe, it actually fixes some of the issues SP2 causes.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Noone
Sent: Monday, 20 July 2009 11:22 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: SP2
No...please no. Surely a cumulative update
...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Noja, Fadi
[fadi.n...@fahcsia.gov.au]
Sent: Monday, 20 July 2009 10:54 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hehehehe, it actually fixes some of the issues SP2 causes.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm
As per the release schedule the cumulative updates are due every two months. We
recommend you install them.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone
Sent: Monday, 20 July 2009 11:22 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: SP2
No...please no. Surely a cumulative
[ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown
[daniel.br...@internode.on.net]
Sent: Monday, 20 July 2009 11:01 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
As well as August :)
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner
Sent: Monday, 20 July 2009 10
Yep.. have added that as part of SP2 install .
Cheers
Ajay
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Aaron Saikovski
aaron.saikov...@microsoft.com wrote:
As per the release schedule the cumulative updates are due every two
months. We recommend you install them.
*From:* ozmoss@ozmoss.com
@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Brown
Sent: Thursday, 21 May 2009 3:28 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: MOSS SP2..license bug
In Central Admin, go to Operations, click on Convert license type under
the Upgrade and Migration heading
If it is set to a trial
I've heard about it but not yet experienced it. At least not that we've noticed.
What's the easiest way to check?
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Tommy Segoro
Sent: Thursday, 21 May 2009 3:51 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: MOSS SP2..license bug
Interesting
Though Central Admin
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Noone
Sent: Thursday, 21 May 2009 3:17 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: MOSS SP2..license bug
I've heard about it but not yet experienced it. At least not that we've
noticed.
What's
Ack, that was just meant for Paul, Sorry fumble fingers today.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Brown
Sent: Thursday, 21 May 2009 3:22 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: MOSS SP2..license bug
Though Central Admin
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
I mean, how would it appear? As a great big animated banner? ;)
What screen? All I can see is version number on any setting screens.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown
Sent: Thursday, 21 May 2009 3:52 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: MOSS SP2
SP2..license bug
Interesting thing...
I found that my license is going back to Trial after installation of SP2.
Did you guys experience the same thing?
Tommy Segoro
Microsoft Business Management Solutions Specialist (MBMSS)
Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist (MCTS
Technet is suggesting it now...
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc263187.aspx
Latin1_General_CI_AS_KS_WS when the default in sql 2008 is
Latin1_General_CI_AS.
Haven't had an issue with Latin1_General_CI_AS until sp2 as the
database collation can be different from the server one
I know, but it's still their product and they've been aware of the issue
for 3 months now.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Nemtsev
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 3:55 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2
LOL
if (IsFree)
DoNothing();
else
MoveToSupportWaitingList();
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Nemtsev
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 3:55 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED
I've just tried installing SP2 and am getting this error
[SPDatabaseGbwSequence] [ERROR] [4/30/2009 10:43:38 AM]: Upgrade object
too new (build version = 12.0.0.6341, schema version = 2.0.0.0). Current
server (build version = 12.0.0.4518, schema version = 3.0.1.0).
Now the build version
What I'd try to do is
1) run prescan tool to check if there is something wrong with DB
2) detach and attach sharepoint database in Centra Admin. To make sure that
your db schema is correct\
and after that tried to install SP2 again
Michael Nemtsev
Readify | Microsoft MVP
http://msmvps.org/blogs
SQL 2005 v9.0.4035, SP3
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Nemtsev
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 11:33 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
What's your SQL Version is and installed SP
...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Nemtsev
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 11:33 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
What's your SQL Version is and installed SP?!
Michael Nemtsev
Readify | Microsoft MVP
http://msmvps.org/blogs/laflour
T: 0424 184 978 | E
The actual installation is doing few things. Wizard apply majority of changes.
Referring to your SQL version is look like that you have right version, not
outdated.
Your current issue is not caused by SP2 specifically. It's common issue, which
are about leaving sites in inconsistet state (did
into it, the current schema is saying it's version 3.0.1.0 and
it's trying to upgrade it to v 2.0.0.0. So I think we've installed a
hotfix at one point that has upgraded the schema and in SP2 they've put
the old schema in it.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm
Did I mention how happy I was to have you as my crash test dummy for this? ;)
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Noja, Fadi
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 12:11 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I don't have that error message
I saw this error before, you have to make sure every web front has run the
upgrade before the configuration
Ken
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
[mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Noja, Fadi
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 12:11 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2 [SEC
I did. They were all at the same stage.
SP2 upgrades the schema to version 2.0.0.0 and some hotfix had upgraded
it to 3.0.1.0
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of ken
zheng
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 12:29 PM
To: ozmoss
[ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Noja, Fadi
[fadi.n...@fahcsia.gov.au]
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 2:09 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I did. They were all at the same stage.
SP2 upgrades the schema to version 2.0.0.0 and some hotfix had upgraded
@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Do you have GroupBoard installed?!
They say it can cause this error. Check that technet article
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ensl=deu=http://technet.micro
soft.com/de-de/library/cc288269.aspxei=6zD5SZqxOqjhtgfl9o2uDwsa=Xoi=t
Here's the English version of it
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288269.aspx
it was released in January, so I wonder why they didn't have it fixed
for SP2.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Nemtsev
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Noja, Fadi
[fadi.n...@fahcsia.gov.au]
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 3:33 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Error with SP2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
That’s what’s causing it. Im surprised Microsoft haven’t tested it since
For those who don't know, MOSS SP2 is scheduled to be released on the
28th of April.
Fadi
Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support
List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr
[mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Noja, Fadi
Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 10:43 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: SP2 release date [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
For those who don't know, MOSS SP2 is scheduled to be released on the 28th
of April.
Fadi
_
Support procedure: https
69 matches
Mail list logo
