On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Arnold Stark wrote:
> > The PUG has made its mark by being inclusive. Let's not start something we don't
>want to continue.
>
> How can the PUG be inclusive if it excludes exclusiveness?
*LOL* Probably the best comment in this thread so far. :)
chris
-
This message is
An artistic drawing (or engraving). Maybe you don't
have this in the US, but if a guy asks you to look at
his etchings, he is really trying to get you into the
sack. Of course, I am not speaking from experience.
Jody.
> Yes please - BTW what is an etching?
>
> Peter
> > That's an interesting t
Admin wrote:
>We must do something to mark the end of an age...
>Perhaps some kind of ceremony at the PDML Grandfather Mountain weekend?
Maybe we could invite Tanya and get her to ceremonially throw
one off a cliff?
mike
(who is as sad as anyone else.)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Disc
At 16:46 27/04/01 +1000, you wrote:
>haha, i bought a number of bottles of this and quite like it :) Havent tried
>the Cape Mentelle's Zinfandel.
You could do a lot worse. At about 16% alcohol it isn't for the faint
hearted. A lovely drop, none the less. Enjoy the Penfolds!
Cheers
Jon
"Who a
Jan van Wijk writes:
> The new Nikon for medium format will probably hadle it.
> I am not sure it has the 35mm masks for this but it covers enough area I would say.
>
> The cost is way too high probably (I guess arround US $ 4000).
That is _way_ over my budget :(
You'd think someone else wou
Bojidar Dimitrov writes:
> FA 100/2.8 Macro
This one has both a clamp and a focus limiter.
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
"Why is it that if an adult behaves like a child they lock him up,
while children are allowed to run free
Jostein Oksne writes:
> I suggest you also evaluate the Epson su1640 PHOTO. To me it looks like more
> bang for the bucks than the Agfa. Not exactly 4000dpi, but closer than the
> Agfa, anyway.
I'd like to avoid flatbed/adaptor combinations if I can, but this little scanner
doesn't look too ba
Dan Scott writes:
> You might want to look and see if
> there is a plastic hex socket clamped around one of your tripod legs, this
> is Manfrotto's tool for tightening those nuts.
I broke mine the first time I tried to use it.
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ht
mike wilson writes:
> Maybe we could invite Tanya and get her to ceremonially throw
> one off a cliff?
Let me know if you do so I can be waiting at the bottom with some baseball
gloves.
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
"Why is it
Gerald Lewis writes:
> Another possible solution is to scan the panoramic neg twice, once on each
> end of the neg and then use software to knit the two together.
I know this is an option but I would like to avoid the hassle.
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http
Jon Hope writes:
> I picked up a new to me Manfrotto 055CD tripod today, complete with 029
> head. All for the measly sum of $150 AUD (erm approx $3.24 USD).
Well done. That's not a bad price, either. I have the same combination and
it's rock solid even for medium format (except at full ext
Hi PDML listers,
I waited a long time before I send this e-mail, just to be sure I could'nt
answer by myself...
As a non-english speaking person I cannot interprete correctly of the
abreviations I see on the list.
I would appreciate someone explains the meaning of the following :
LOL
BTW
IMO
IIR
I played an afternoon with the HP equivalent, so I can't comment on
image quality ( wasn't too interested either as 2 MB is too low for me
anyway).
I liked the ergonomics in good Pentax tradition. Actually, before
this Pentax I never cared too much for digitals - all were missing the
optical
Hi Cyril,
LOL = laughing out loud
BTW = by the way
IMO = in my opinion
IIRC = if I remember correctly
HAR = ?
KEH = www.keh.com
HTH = hope this helps
The ones that I use:
TIA = thanks in advance
KMP = K-mount page
KLD = KMP lens discussion
Cheers,
Boz
-
This message is f
If it was one of my brothers, they would probably
double the price :)
BTW I am adding an "OT" which you seem to have all
forgotten.
Jody.
> Yes: If he doesn't like the "best offer," the seller
> can refuse to sell.
> That's precisely my point, Chris: It's a hollow
> promise. Heck, if he
> doesn'
look there:
http://www.tfkp.physik.uni-erlangen.de/~ralf/photo/PDML/FAQ-3.html
> "Cyril" == Cyril MARION <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Cyril> Hi PDML listers,
Cyril> I waited a long time before I send this e-mail, just to be sure I could'nt
Cyril> answer by myself...
Cyril> As
Well, it means the 5th January to me.
> Anyway, if anyone is still confused I believe 5/01
> don't mean May the first but May 2001 release.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
Th
> All of these shots were done with an Olympus C-3030
> digicam (!)
Wash your mouth out!!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Heyy, think it's time to change the subject. When
I say no, I always mean no (I'm a hard woman).
> Paul S-y wrote:
> >But then, we also assume that when a girl said No,
> she means No.
>
> I n e v e r assume a girl means No, no matter what
> she says...
>
> Lasse
___
No way. That is really sick. They might as well show
pics of him in the morgue afterwards. That is the kind
of sick people they are.
> Am I the only one that thinks there is something
> really sick
> about that auction?
> William Robb
__
Do You Ya
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Excluded from this offer are: Chris Brogden,
> Aaron Reynolds (who know why they're excluded) and César Metamoros,
> who, if he doesn't already know why he's excluded, will shortly.
And a doozy of a surprise it was! Trust me, gentlemen and ladies, it's
worth it.
Oh,
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
> I had to work late today, so I am just now sipping some good Scotch
> Whiskey with my LX. (I won't let the LX have any; no need to test the
> efficacy of its seals.) But from among the dozens of cameras I've owned
> over several dozen years, the LX is by far my favorite.
I am starting a process of consolidating my lens collection. (Translation: I
am selling some of my lenses to pay for buying some other lenses.)
First up for sale is this F version 100mm Macro. Superb lens.
As recently discussed in response to Boz's data call, this version has the
Focus Range Lim
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 07:19:12 -0500 (EST), Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
> > I don't know what means, [...]
>
> son-of-a-b*tch?
I think in this case it's more of a sound effect ... the sound of
someone sobbing. Though S.O.B. certainly _does_ mean son-of-a-b*tch in
many contexts. :-)
TTYL, DougF
-
T
At 09:04 PM 4/26/01 -0400, you wrote:
>An exclusive gallery, whether or not it displaces a regularly scheduled
gallery, violates the welcome spirit of the PUG.
>
>Doug
>
My 2 Cents: As a non-LX owner, its OK. The LX is a truely 'cult-status'
camera, and just as they made recent GOLD versions of
Ernest wrote:
> Maybe one of our Japanese member can answer this, but how is the LX selling
> in Japan? I have a feeling that if Pentax had not stopped marketing the LX
> outside of Japan a few years ago, it's production could have continued, ad
> infinitum. Or at least a few more years, g
Treena wrote:
>.crank lab in his car.
I can't make any sense of this. Care to enlighten me and,
possibly, others?
Ta muchly,
mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
What depth of field? Where? Why do you want DOF in
macro shots anyway? I like my subject to stand out
from the out-of-focus background.
You certainly haven't convinced me. I'm going to stick
with my analogue cameras for a very long time.
Jody.
> I'm not much of a fan of the current digital came
The ALR only works when you are using power zoom. Both Power zoom and ALR
are POWER wasters designed to sell more batteries.
Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh
- Original Message -
From: "Bojidar Dimitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, A
At 06:12 AM 4/27/01 -0700, you wrote:
>I was playing around with this lens yesterday at a local shop and am
seriously considering purchasing it. Can anyone relate their expeience with
it? I could save a whole bunch of money and go with the Sigma or Phoenix
but haven't ever used third party lense
What was this surprise? my curiosity has peaked. As if you`re going to tell
me. Who ya rootin for in the playoffs? My Kings are making a good
showing, eh?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: T
Several years ago I was lucky enough to be able to tour the old Dallas Dhu
distillery. They were no longer producing for commercial purposes, but it
was educational and fun anyway, especially inasmuch as couple of drams of
"sample" were handed out at tour's close. Made the rest of the afternoon a
I'm surprised the words "emergency" and "gray market" haven't
popped up...
Regards,
Stephen Moore
__
"You got a Zarg in here? Are you *nuts*???
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow th
Hi, Brent.
the M-100/2.8 has a very high ranking with me too. Second only to the
FA*400/5.6.
Highly recommended.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:56 AM
Subject: SMC-M 100/2.8
> I'm looking for a fairly decent po
What are "Kings" The female version of "Queens?"
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
> What was this surprise? my curiosity has peaked. As if you`re going to
tell
> me. Who
In a message dated 4/27/01 9:56:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 03:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: petit miam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Product Quote for MZ-S
Well, it means the 5th January to me.
> Anyway, if anyone is still confused I believe 5/01
> don't mean May
Sorry. I'm married to a cop, and I have a tendency to use their terms. Crank
is a street word for methamphetamine. It can also be called crystal, crystal
meth, etc. It is easily manufactured from various household toxins such as
lye, paint thinner, pool cleaner -- lots of ingredients like that, an
Frank Theriault wrote:
>
> I always wondered about how bad those little mercury cells could be for the
> environment. I mean they're so tiny, and they last for 5, 10 years or more
> - at least in Spotmatics.
>
>
> ...
Not much, Frank, but heavy metal pollution lasts forever (in human
lifespan
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 06:51:04 -0700 (PDT), petit miam wrote:
>What depth of field? Where? Why do you want DOF in
>macro shots anyway? I like my subject to stand out
>from the out-of-focus background.
>You certainly haven't convinced me. I'm going to stick
>with my analogue cameras for a very long
Cyril MARION wrote:
> LOL - Laughing Out Loud or Laid Out Laughing
> BTW - By The Way
> IMO - In My Opinion
> IIRC - If I Remember Correctly
> HAR - Har, a guffaw, not an bbreviation or acronym
> KEH - The name of a camera shop in Georgia
> HTH - Hope This Helps
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL
You didn't happen to take some photographs with an LX?
"Brewer, Doug" wrote:
>
> Several years ago I was lucky enough to be able to tour the old Dallas Dhu
> distillery. They were no longer producing for commercial purposes, but it
> was educational and fun anyway, especially inasmuch as couple
Ed,
I have this lens and use it quite alot. One of the unique things about it
is that it zooms from about 180 degrees down to a view that is close to a
standard 20mm rectilinear lens. It sort of allows you to dial in the
curvature that you want. I use the zoom quite a bit as many images don't
Hi listers,
I checked (maybe badly) the KMP but could not read the information. Does the
Z-1 / PZ-1 have this flash function ?
If I'm correct this feature allows flash synchronisation at the end ot the
exposure time (when the 2nd curtain starts), instead of at the biginning
(when 1st curtain sta
Hi,
At 27 Apr 2001 15:33:35 +0200,
Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote;
> I don't know how much the LX currently sells but would expect less
> than 1000/year.
Tha current sales number of LX was still larger than that of
PZ-1p in Japan, I heard recently from a Pentax person.
> The reason LX pr
Dear (European) Friends
This Friday evening (22.15) on ARTE TV : "L'agence Magnum"
Have a good time
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no rules for good photographs,
there are only good photographs.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Have one for me. I can't drink. I have been working
since 8am yesterday, and it is now 3am today. Well, I
did have a 1-hour lunch break and a 1-hour dinner
break, but that's all. The way it's going, I'll still
be here at 8am when thankfully someone else takes
over. At the moment, I am waiting for
Steve Larson wrote:
>
> What was this surprise? my curiosity has peaked. As if you`re going to tell
> me.
Oh, I'm not telling. It's fabulously appropriate, tho'.
> Who ya rootin for in the playoffs? My Kings are making a good
> showing, eh?
Obviously, we're cheering for the Leafs who've d
I thought that meant words to the effect of "So put
that in your pipe and smoke it"
> HAR = ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
I suppose the not a near relative doesn't apply in
some Southern states.
Jody (who used to be such a sweet innocent thing not
so long ago)
> ...(female with a pulse and not a near relative)...
> Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Would that be "Alive Or Best Offer" ???
> Jim
Hi Paul,
> Just out of curiosity how much is a new LX worth in Japan?
JPY150,000 without finder. Finder is JPY30,000.
Sincerely,
Take Ueda, Osaka, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.tripod.co.jp/hayatama/photo/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail L
Ahh...a nice 64oz sip of Gatorade...hey, i can't be breaking the law now
can i, only one more year til i'm legal, and even then i'd struggle to afford
natural light. Besides, i don't have much to mourn about the loss of the LX.
The closest i've ever gotten to one is looking at the specs on
At 02:41 PM 4/27/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Treena wrote:
>
>>.crank lab in his car.
>
>I can't make any sense of this. Care to enlighten me and,
>possibly, others?
>
Crank was a slag for a drug, not sure if heroine or methamphetimine,
so a Crank Lab is where drug is made, so its slang for a m
Or short of breath in the medical context (unless you
have a really obnoxious patient) :)
> > > I don't know what means, [...]
> >
> > son-of-a-b*tch?
>
> I think in this case it's more of a sound effect ...
> the sound of
> someone sobbing. Though S.O.B. certainly _does_ mean
> son-of-a-b*tc
OK. I am sitting here waiting for the "emergency"
department to phone. If I close my eyes a bit, I will
be in the "gray market" zone. Happy? :)
> I'm surprised the words "emergency" and "gray
> market" haven't
> popped up...
> Regards,
> Stephen Moore
> "You got a Zarg in here? Are you *nuts*??
I think it should be Marmite vs Vegemite. BTW Vegemite
is far superior.
Sorry, I am getting a bit carried away. It is 3:20am
and I am not allowed to go to bed. I get weird and
irrelevant when I'm tired.
Jody.
> All too often this list gets into Ford vs Chevy /
> Coke vs Pepsi
_
our petit miam wrote:
> > HAR = ?
> I thought that meant words to the effect of "So put
> that in your pipe and smoke it"
Well - Har! does imply a sort of antagonistic guffaw,
sort of daring the recipient to stage some sort
of e
petit miam wrote:
>
> Heyy, think it's time to change the subject. When
> I say no, I always mean no (I'm a hard woman).
Ah, I still don't believe you.
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forg
Heh. That would be fitting, wouldn't it? I believe in
those days I was still shooting with a Minolta X-370.
There's a photo around home somewhere of me standing
next to a sign that said, "Brewer's Office."
even then I couldn't resist a cheap joke.
Doug
Quoting Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi all,
Here's a question I've been thinking about lately. I finally found a
dedicated flash module for my Sunpak 444D flash, and I'm thinking of some
things to try with my TTL-capable body (an MZ-50). I'll get an answer for
myself with some upcoming experiments, but thought I'd ask the group a
Yoshihiko wrote:
> Tha current sales number of LX was still larger than that of
> PZ-1p in Japan, I heard recently from a Pentax person.
That somehow doesn't surprise me although I suspect it says less about the popularity
of the LX than the unpopularity of the Z-1p. In many markets (most?) th
OK - So which one of you (Bill & Doug) is Doctor Jekyll and which one is Mr.
Hyde?
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:40 PM
Subject: LX Gallery
> A bit of background is in orde
Cyril MARION wrote:
>
> Hi listers,
>
> I checked (maybe badly) the KMP but could not read the information. Does the
> Z-1 / PZ-1 have this flash function ?
Yes...kind of...you select it on the flash. The AF500FTZ will do it,
maybe one of the other FTZ flashes will too.
>
> If I'm correct thi
In a message dated 27/4/01 2:56:25 pm, you wrote:
<>
Today I held one, but not for long. This had no shroud for the shutter
release, but the meter was activated by the pentaprism removal button. It was
sent back to its' kennel.
Natch, the LX is still available, but only from certain dealers
For me, it's the fact that they were offered in a public auction format and
for such an exorbitant price.
It has a BLATANT APPEARANCE of trying to profit in a big way from the death
of another. It's not like he had the only pictures of the crash and was a
scant resource for documentary pictures,
Steve,
I hope you did. Funny, I opened up a bottle of red wine - I have to
look at the particular one I grabbed from my pantry 'cellar' and began the
toasting.
I pulled out two of my LXen, the third one is getting the metering
fixed, and the accessories I have and began to take
William Robb wrote:
>
> For me, it still comes back to auctioning off images of a
> persons death to the highest bidder for no other reason than
> avarice. Since he has taken the eBay route to sell his pictures,
> I can only presume that he has eschewed the news media because
> he thinks he can d
I, for one, fail to see any moral issue here, The pics are benign and are
not of Earnhart or his body or his family. The crash itself was not
particularly spectacular or heinous. Just because the driver died does not
make this some holy icon. Who says that the publication media is some sort
of
Ed Dombek wrote:
>
> I was playing around with this lens yesterday at a local shop and am seriously
>considering purchasing it. Can anyone relate their expeience with it? I could save
>a whole bunch of money and go with the Sigma or Phoenix but haven't ever used third
>party lenses. Comment
I just got home from going out and pricing polarized circular filters.
Well, I went to Camera America and told the guy what I was looking for.
He asked me if it was for a auto focus or manual focus camera. And I told him
that I have a ZX50 that I use in both modes. Also that most of the lens I ha
Hi Treena!
I was sort of trolling for a reaction. :-)
And I didn't intend any offense by my earlier "journalism" comments, which
is why I used the term stereotypically.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Treena Harp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27,
"Bojidar Dimitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> LOL = laughing out loud
...and then there's ROTFL. "Rolling on the floor, laughing."
> IMO = in my opinion
...and IMHO ("in my humble opinion"), and IMNSHO (add "not so").
Ah, and to keep things slightly on-topic: CLA means cleaning,
lubricati
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Norman Baugher wrote:
> One of the unfortunate realities of life, is that sometimes it's not fair.
> Learn to live with it.
> Norm
Fine. I propose that we introduce "Snow" and "Prairie" themes. Hell,
let's go all the way and have a "Canadian landscape" theme. After all,
l
No one theme is going to be accessible for all list members,
regardless of how universal we try to make them. If, for example
there's a wide angle theme, perhaps those that don't have a wide
will be excluded, but next month, if there's a telephoto theme,
those with no tele lenses will be exclude.
Hi,
so it's immoral not because it's exploitation, but because the
exploitation is blatant?
I've pursued this about as far as I want to now. If anybody's interested,
when I saw the pictures (and I'd never heard of Dale Earnhardt before he
died) I thought it was in rather poor taste, but I couldn
John Francis wrote:
>
> William Robb wrote:
> ...I'd assume he tried to sell them to the media,
> but had no success. It's old news, after all - not worth anything.
So is this thread, Very tired, repetitive and getting silly -- not to
mention OT.
Bob Harris
-
This message is from the Penta
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Norman Baugher wrote:
> You Canadians are so exclusionary! i.e. you don't even want to be the
> 51st state
>
> Norm
>
>
> Chris Brogden wrote:
>
*LOL* Thanks, Norm, I needed that. :) I'm getting too worked up about
this issue, I think.
chris
-
This message is from t
Hi,
they make whisky in Dallas? That would be from genuine Scottish
grapes, I suppose :o)
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, April 27, 2001, 2:45:53 PM, you wrote:
> Several years ago I was lucky enough to be able to tour the old Dallas Dhu
> distillery. They were no longer producin
You guys have such a low opinion of us females :)
- Original Message -
From: Jim Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 8:08 AM
Subject: RE: Miracles Happen! OT
>
>
> ...(female with a pulse and not a near relative)...
> Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> No one theme is going to be accessible for all list members,
> regardless of how universal we try to make them.
I disagree. Every past theme I can think of was wide open to
everyone. It might have involved a little creativity, but it was doable
with
You Canadians are so exclusionary! i.e. you don't even want to be the 51st state
Norm
Chris Brogden wrote:
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.k
First, many thanks to the multitude who responded to my original post.
What a wealth of solid information! Even though a few days of reflection
tells me -- somewhat embarrassingly -- that I pressed the freak-out button
'way too soon, you have provided a lot of stuff I'll keep in my mental
camera
>> > The new Nikon for medium format will probably hadle it.
>> > I am not sure it has the 35mm masks for this but it covers enough area
>> >
>> > The cost is way too high probably (I guess arround US $ 4000).
>>
>> That is _way_ over my budget :(
>
>I believe the price will actually be closer
Chris Brogden wrote:
> P.S. If anyone has any reasons why the lens-specific themes are not
> exclusionary, I'd love to hear it. But please, no more "life is
> unfair" responses that don't address the issue.
Have we had any lens specific themes? Details is the closest I
could find, and that rea
Hi,
I'd also like to suggest that if possible we should write a few words
with the submission about the LX that took the picture, or our own
experience of however many of them we own(ed).
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, April 27, 2001, 6:30:53 PM, you wrote:
> Hi John ...
> It's
This zoom distorts thru all the range? I thought it went from fisheye distortion
at 17mm thru (almost at least) rectilinear 28mm.
I also thought a lot in this zoom, but recently I bought a K 17 mm 4, and I
already have a 20mm Tak and an A 28mm 2.8, so I think I don't need it. And it's
not precise
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Have we had any lens specific themes? Details is the closest I could
> find, and that really wasn't lens specific. The upcoming "wide angle
> point of view" is not, from my POV, about using just wide angle
> lenses, so I don't see it as exclusionary.
In Jan. I started going out with a guy, who refuses to let me take a
picture of him, but he has a 2 yr old who is quite frequently the subject of
my photographs.
He however will not let me post them on the pug :( . I was walking with my
man and his son in the park the other day when I was asked
Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote;
> The reason LX production stops is lack of (electronic) parts.
I'm not surprised at all. Actually, I'm surprised they've been able to keep
making it this long (probably had parts in inventory).
I work in Components Engineering for a company that makes mili
The S20 is not so bad at 2400 dpi. I had one for a year and a half, and
after figuring how to get full 36-bit output, was quite pleased with the
results. I replaced it with a RFS3600, not needing the panaromic of the
S20. However, with just 24 bit output even at 3600 dpi, I don't think the
resu
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Have we had any lens specific themes? Details is the closest I
> could find, and that really wasn't lens specific.
The April 2000 "Normal Black & White" (Mono shots taken with a normal
focal length lens) was lens-specific, and that one seemed to work
I personally dislike the lens themes. I figure though if some individuals
can occasionally submit images taken with non-Pentax cameras, that I can
break the theme rules from time to time.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
> "Bojidar Dimitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > LOL = laughing out loud
>
> ...and then there's ROTFL. "Rolling on the floor, laughing."
...and the ever-popular ROTFLMAO. "...Laughing Me Arse Off."
TTFN,
Stephen Moore
_
Let's say there's a difference between 1) making a living and 2)
exploitation. Do you consider what this guy's doing to be #1 or #2?
> so it's immoral not because it's exploitation, but because the
> exploitation is blatant?
No, it's so distasteful because it's so blatant. There are in fact
di
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other members, thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started this
way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly in
you
I agree. Just a question, what about a Pentax body and non-pentax lens, or
a non pentax body (like my Chinon) with one of my Pentax lenses?
Jerry in Houston
-Original Message-
From: aimcompute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
the only filter that has to be for auto focus or manual focus is the
polerizer. circular polerizer for auto focus and regular polerizer for
manual focus cameras. it has to do with the auto focus system or the
metering system. i'm not sure.
I just got home from going out and pricing polarized
Rebecca wrote:
[Some comments from the camera store salesman about her ZX-50
and lenses -- snipped for brevity]
> Anyhow, I ended up leaving the store feeling pretty bad. Because
> now I have these lenses that I dont know if they will hurt my camera.
> Also, why would you have to buy a auto fo
HAR! You guys don't fool me. You are all drinking long neck
Buds. I can tell by your redneck posts. HAR, HAR!
--Tom
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http:/
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be included.
2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE.
3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed.
4 - Primes and zooms.
5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak, K,
At this very moment, I'm celebrating my retirement with some Killian's Iris
Red.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> HAR! You guys don't fool me. You are all drinking long neck
> Buds. I can tell by your redneck posts. HAR, HAR!
> --Tom
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To u
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
