Why Sid, you handsome (melancholy) devil! :) Great shots and a good
beginning for your website. I'll be cranking out a site soon too, I hope...
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Sid Barras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:43 PM
Subject: OT: My fine
Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
>
> Thanks again for taking the time to comment my PUG submission ...
> Best regards,
>Eduardo.
>
You're quite welcome. Shooting a symmetrical photo of a complicated
pattern is quite difficult. Critiquing one is easy.
Paul
-
--- Luis Pinar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> " Balconies in the Afternoon " by Jaume Lahuerta,
> Spain:
> This is an interesting subject, but I wish youd be
> able to isolate some detail with a longer lens. The
> lighting is pleasant, but the big shadow at the BLC
> breaks the pattern of the othe
Hi
It appears that some of my posts went out in HTML format. Could readers of
this message confirm (pls reply directly to me) that you have received this
as plain text.
Apologies for any inconvenience caused!
Regards
Patrick
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscrib
Sid Barras wrote:
> And I give silver stars to: Cory Waters, Frank Theriault, and William Johnson.
>
Thanks, Sid!
-frank
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery a
It seems that Mattias Klum shoot with a 35 mm Pentax (probably LX)
and FA* 600/4, A* 400/2.8, FA* 80-200/2.8.
Kodachrome 200 and a Gitzo tripod with Arca head are also
mentioned.
See:
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0106/feature3/index.html
Some of the pictures are truly
Thanks Lasse, I am glad you liked it.
When I took the picture, I was sort of thinking "Old stuff and New stuff"
hmm... might turn out
ok. You see I had just gotten in a couple of filters and lens and I was
dying to try them out. So my sister
and I went out to the Fort where we go fishing and I w
Frank:
Thank you very much for your kind comments. I was so faxcinated by the
unique qualities of Russian church architecture that I couldn't decide which
of these shots to submit, so I ended up using this montage. Unfortunately,
it doesn't show some of the detail as well as I the individual sh
Looks OK to me.
Dan
Patrick Genovese wrote:
> Hi
>
> It appears that some of my posts went out in HTML format. Could readers of
> this message confirm (pls reply directly to me) that you have received this
> as plain text.
>
> Apologies for any inconvenience caused!
>
> Regards
>
> Patrick
>
>
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:20:23 -0500 Darryl Lafferty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I happened to buy the only one in stock at Arlington Camera in Arlington, Tx and the
>price was
> 899.99. The quoted price on Adorama is 849.95. I would have to disagee about the
>overkill for a
> Pentax. This c
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
> Steve Larson: Cinderella's Castle
>
> That's a funny and creative way of solving your problem with the failed
original attempt at architectual shots.
> I like it, and I guess your daughter may enjoy it too. It would definitely
fit as an illustration to a/the tale.
> To
Sid Barras wrote:
> Bill Peifer's "Forbidden Tower":
[Comments snipped for brevity]
Hi Sid,
Thanks for the kind comments on my submission. I agree with you 100% on the
temptation to erase that other building in the upper left corner. I was
likewise tempted, and I may go back to the computer an
Yes - this was in plain text.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Genovese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:05 AM
Subject: OT: MESSAGES IN HTML
|
| Hi
|
| It appears that some of my posts went out in HTML format. Could readers of
| this
Todd wrote:
> The price will drop. Remember how much the PZ-1 was when it first came out?
Yes, it costed the same as the Nikon F90. I paid quite a lot for mine...
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Todd wrote:
> I seem to recall them selling for more than $800. The MSRP on the PZ-1p is
> $1048, btw. In a couple years we'll probably be paying $550-$600 for a new
> MZ-S.
Isn't the list price on the MZ-S around $1400? I woudn't bet on that the price will go
below $600 or even near that fi
From: "Jaros³aw Brzeziñski"
> >The MZ-S is a fine camera but quoting a price approximating one grand is definitely
>an
> overkill for Pentax.
$1000 for a Pentax overkill? I wonder what that make the LX? Multiple overkill?
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsub
Yeah but we got a better camera than the F90, too. I've owned both an N90s
and a PZ-1p and the PZ-1p is a whole lot better, although build quality may
be slightly less than the Nikon. Cracks in the battery cover door area kind
of piss me off about my PZ-1p. I really believe the MZ-S is pretty clo
> Well, my week long photo excursion is over, and I had a blast.
>
Of course you did, you got to see me. :)
>Ate some bad food.
Your one lucky guy aren't you?
>
> Grandfather is a great place to shoot. If you can get there, you should
> definitely check it out. You could incorporate it into a
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>
>
> > Absolutely. Seeing an LED bargraph go up for overexposure and down for
> > underexposure just plain makes sense.
>
> But the point wasn't if it makes sense isolated. But whether it
> makes sense in conjunction with its c
> Just to throw some proper spin on Tom's report, I offer the following
> observations:
And I am spinning your observations now.
>
> Beware of North Carolinians bearing Diet Dr. Peppers.
I thought they were good as far as Diet drinks go.
>
> After failing in his bid to shock any innocent coeds
> "Brewer, Doug" wrote:
> >
> > Jeepgirl really has a Jeep. It's not a =real= Jeep, though, because it
has
> > an automatic transmission.
>
> Plus it's yellow, and has tweety bird floor mats.
At least I have a little spirit in my car, its not black with a funny
antenna sticking out of the middl
Here's my thoughts. I found all three shots I was assigned to comment on
interesting and thought provoking. If I may make some suggestions... take
them with a grain of salt. What do I know?
" Roman Bath " by Donald Ross, Canada
I like this type of shot. It would make a nice wall-hanging,
They were out when I tried it last night - the 4 seconds is
the result of streetlights etc.
At 08:07 PM 6/11/01 -0700, you wrote:
Try it with all the room
lights out.
Regards,
Bob...
---
- - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino
Kalamazoo, MI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - -
"Isaac Crawford" wrote:
> Pål Jensen wrote:
> > Mark wrote:
> > > Absolutely. Seeing an LED bargraph go up for overexposure
> and down for
> > > underexposure just plain makes sense.
> > But the point wasn't if it makes sense isolated. But
> whether it makes sense in conjunction with its control
I would offer some wisdom, but I fear I would not be terribly understanding.
-Original Message-
>Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:43:00 -0700
>From: Sid Barras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Accept-Language: en
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: OT: My fine art/ photography exhibit
"Better to dare mighty things, even though checkered by failure, then to join ranks
with those poor
souls who neither suffer much nor enjoy much because they live in the twilight that
knows neither
victory or defeat." -- unknown
Congrats Sid,
Norm
Sid Barras wrote:
-
This message is from the
Thanks for your comments, Tom.
After a couple of comments it seems clear that the
picture worked for the first intention (to show the
whole building), and that the cropping only went
halfway to the work taht should have been done with a
tele.
About the tripod... I don't know if I would go to that
- Original Message -
From: "jeepgirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > So the next day rolled around, and Bill took us to a stream he knew
> > about. We shot for a while...I think someone may have fallen in. Luckily
> > the borrowed MZ-S and FA 400/5.6 didn't get wet...
> Serves you right for n
At 08:23 PM 6/12/01 +0200, Norman Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Better to dare mighty things, even though checkered by failure,
>then to join ranks with those poor souls who neither suffer much
>nor enjoy much because they live in the twilight that knows neither
>victory or defeat." -- unkn
29 matches
Mail list logo
