In a message dated 3/4/2004 8:15:28 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a pure composition (I don't know how better to put it), it's
interesting. The shape of his dark jacket against the brighter background,
heavy at the bottom of the frame, lighter at the top.
As a human
In a message dated 3/4/2004 7:37:13 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, it's interesting, but I find it a bit overwhelming, for some reason.
I keep expecting the water to flow out either side. Weird.
cheers,
frank
That was why I wondered if the fish eye could have been
In a message dated 3/4/2004 3:26:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2147727size=lg
Back in 2000 we spent our vacation exploring the Canadian Maritimes.
One of the places we stopped at was the fishing village of Cheticamp,
on the
In a message dated 3/4/2004 12:32:13 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4/3/04, MARNIE THE FONDLER disgorged:
LOL!!
10D's, etc. D's, Nikon 70D (or whatever)? And not to mention all the
digital PS.
Are most people cool about letting you hold and fondle their cameras?
Reminds me of a lovely evening after being out on a small lobster boat at
Tanner's Cove, in Nova Scotia. Lobster season was officially over, and we went
out to bring in the few remaining traps. We also brought up three or four
lobster. Dinner that night was wonderful smile
Fond memories.
shel
Hi Frank ...
As a document for the protest, it doesn't work for me. Too many distracting elements,
a weak composition, and a lack of point of view.
I see at least two better photos in the scene.
However, from the POV of an interesting photo, it works for me. It's abstract enough
to almost be
Trademark and copyright are different things.
John
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:39:34 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, do you know why they chose BSD rather than Linux for the basis of
OS X?
I'd suggest that it has to do with Nextstep, which was the previous
Hi!
On the time line first we M42 lenses, then K lenses, then M lenses,
then A lenses, then F lenses, then FA lenses. So far so good g...
There is something that confuses me. Let us take for example 50/1.7
lens. As far as I understand the optical formula is precisely the same
through M, A, F, FA
Hi!
ft You're right, Boris, I did.
Phew! g My memory still holds... So seems to be the power sources...
ft She's a beautiful child, and you took a lovely photo of her.
ft I was just pulling your leg (slang for joking with you) is all.
I realized that. I wonder what is slang for opposite
Dear PDMLers,
I subscribed again, and this time hopefully not for only a few
months...
I'm Gabor Sas from Hungary, with lots of Pentax 35mm SLR stuff in my
bag and some let's say good slides made with them. You'll see...
I also use lots of non-Pentax gear, the most important one being a
Pat,
Are there people on this list still scanning!? I thought film dried
out in the digiland... ;o)
I wouldn't know about HP, but certainly the Minolta scanner software
is a joke when it comes to scanning negatives. Apparently it
heavily cuts the tones from both ends of the
Boz's site is a good starting point for research, but be warned that some
people on this group think that although two lenses may appear to be
optically indentical (apart from coating) in fact they may be different.
This is certainly possible, especially if the dimensions differ
considerably.
Can you locate a serial number?
Looking a my copy of McKeown, that seems to be a more positive way of
sorting them out, without a lot of back and forth questions. There are
so many models/variations!
keith whaley
Chris wrote:
Does someone on the list have any info/knowledge about Rolleiflex
That would really depend on the model also (DB8/9 does not indicate the model
... and Rollei made various TLRs with 2.8 Planars from the early fifties to the
mid seventies). Could you quote the camera serial number?
Sven
Zitat von Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wouldn't call this real
Hi,
What's a PAW actually?
Thanks,
Gabor
David Mann wrote:
On Mar 5, 2004, at 01:47, Keith WHALEY wrote:
FACT:
Just like the new XP interface, the Dock animation can be turned off.
On a Mac G4 running OS 10.2.6, the Dock's icon animation can be turned
off?
How?
Hmm, I wonder if turning it off is a new feature of
It's a Picture A Week.
Submitted to the list for consideration, delight, whatever, and criticism
if requested.
John
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 11:21:11 +0100, Sas Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What's a PAW actually?
Thanks,
Gabor
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
Hi,
I do not know whether it has been mentioned before, but in one of those
Pentax lens booklets from the 70s, Pentax claims that the K150/f4 was
one of the best medium telephotos on the market.
Arnold
Hi,
I've got a 17/4.0 super-tak (I'd really like the SMC if I could find
and afford it) which is small, light, and fun to play with but I'm not
yet convinced it is all that sharp. The A16/2.8 is sharper, and a
little better designed in some ways.
Not to forget that russian Zenitar 2.8/16
Just an interesting aside, a filler, on Kiron lenses:
With the purchase of one of my M42 bodies and a couple of other
lens/body items a little while ago, the seller just threw-in a Vivitar
85-205mm f/3.8 Tele-Zoom Auto. . . It must be brand new - it looks like
it's never been used!
A little
the attachments in this case were JPG and GIF files. since MS normally
configured these to open with IE, they were deemed unsafe and would not open
and could not be detached either, so you could never access them, but they
were still there.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: David Miers
On 4/3/04, VARIOUS PDML PILLARS OF SOCIETY disgorged:
I was thinking an SLR, but this thing is a SIGNIFICANT
improvement over the first Leica/Panasonic digital thingie
from what I can see.
I considered buying the first version, but the manual
functions were too hard to access and the AF
Thanks very Much John,Now I know the trail to follow.
With Appreciation
Chris Kennedy
What is your address?
- Original Message -
From: Nenad Djurdjevic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 10:32 PM
Subject: FS-various pentax gear
Pentax (P)Z1 Camera: with dateback and operating manual, exc cond.
Pentax (P)Z-1(P) gripstrap, boxed, exc
http://users.bestweb.net/~hchong/temp/
Very good shot, especially considering the distance and limited time
and equipment you had. It's easy to get motion blur in those
conditions, but your shot appears as sharp as the lens would allow.
CAUTION, GORY PARAGRAPH:
Did you notice the little
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:56:53 +1100
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:Rolleiflex Knowledge
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does someone on the list have any info/knowledge about Rolleiflex TLR
cameras?Dear friend's deceased partner's hidden('til now)locker has
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 03:06:40 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
You're absolutely right, frank - that's my main objection to the shot, too.
I was set up there to get shots of cars coming round the turn. Normally
cars are running at around 100+mph through that turn, so I was set up for
that. Then
2 working units with brackets
3 (maybe 4, I don't recall for certain) nicad packs
2 chargers
2 household slaves
2 shoe sensors with PC cords
8 C-cell NiMH cells
several sync cords
The nicad packs need the sub-c cells replaced.
But these are not only cheap, but I've seen
sub-C NiMH cells @
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 06:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always thought that the problem it is pretty hard to make a
photograph of something that did not PHYSICALLY exist at the moment you
triggered the shutter. You can imagine an elephant with 5 legs and paint
it, but to photograph such
I like the M20/4. Mine was inexpensive, and I like its small size, so
it has a built-in cost/convenience/value factor for me.
This weekend I plan to post some evaluation shots of the M20/4 using
the *istD, which won't help film users much because of the crop
factor.
--
John Mustarde
On 5/3/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
IIRC, leave Friday around 10:30 a.m. (we're bringing Ledo's Pizza), return
Sunday night.
Is that right Cotty? Or were we coming back Monday? I forget. Cotty's plane
tix determine when we come and go...
Yessir, arriving DC Thursday PM, be around to you
Lasse penned
Does this mean that you are now satisfied with what you get?
Anyway, I had this idea (which actually originates from a feeling similar to your
some
time back, when I could get my pictures look like I wanted them to look):
You pick one
Tom,
Joining your van-pool sounds good, we will have camping photo gear and
a big cooler. Also tell #7 that she should come, Wendy will be riding
down as well.
Geoff
Yes, another brand.
This is for an unemployed friend
(with whom I can sympathize well).
Minolta X-700 body, MD 50/1.7 lens, Tokina 70-210/4.5 zoom
manual, and case.
It's the original X700, not the later 'n'. Looks like very
modest use.
It's all in excellent, very clean condition. Works well.
Cesar,
That is completely unacceptable; in order to maintain your honorary
DCPDML status you must fly up here and ride down with us. ;-)
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 11:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith
Subject: RE: LX joy
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
Don't get me started on the LX. Why else could you explain
my having five of them?
I thought having three was bad!
Three seems about right.
William Robb
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiosity, how many other's have SO's coming who are not
planning to attend the presentations? #7 is waffling
Unfortunately, Lisa is going to be away that weekend. It's kind of a
shame because I think she'd enjoy meeting some of you lot.
Also, it's
At 10:29 PM 04/03/2004, you wrote:
Anybody want to speak up in favor of this lens from an optical standpoint?
I will!
I have an M20/4 and I like it very much. I'm not the sort of person who
takes lots of photos of brick walls and analyzes them for distortion. I use
cameras and lenses for the
David Mann wrote:
Safari is basically a tarted-up Mozilla
Konqueror, not Mozilla :-)
S
Boris,
Pentax has a long history with lenses back into the '50's.
Designs have been changed over time, often gradually.
Some of the evolution can be seen in the old screwmounts.
They had manual diaphrams, cocking diaphrams, semi-auto, and full auto.
The underlying optical designs changed as well,
FWIW, my one attempt to try Vuescan ended when it caused an instant
reboot of my computer. :-)
S
P Kong wrote:
Thanks to discussion on the list, I'm trying the Vuescan demo. I'm quite
surprised at the differences produced by Vuescan and the scanner's own
software. I am using an HP Photosmart
Hi, Frank
I like the photo, specially the relation between human
and plastic hands, a sort of visual ying yang. Maybe
you can burn the bikes a bit to darken them.
It's nice to see you are using a real lens, it's a
shame it isn't from a real brand ;-)
Regards
Albano
--- frank theriault [EMAIL
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:35:32 -0800, John Mustarde wrote:
Just curious - what shutter speed catches just the right amount
of motion blur when the subject is traveling 100 mph?
I generally use 1/125 for cars below about 80 mph and 1/250 for
anything faster. Of course, it also depends on which
Having too many LXen is like suffering from too much sex.
Regards,
Bob...
They call it PMS because Mad Cow Disease
was already taken.
- Anonymous, presumed dead.
From: Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
I disagree Bob!!! How can you have too much sex???
I couldn't have enough!!! vbg
I want more Lol
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Bob Blakely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LX joy
Having too many LXen is like
On 5/3/04, BATHROOM BABE disgorged:
Cotty
Cotty, remember you promised to meet up with me in the ladies room.
Marnie aka Doe ;-) Think I'll hold you to it.
S. We don't want it too crowded in there
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Hello PDMLers,
I just found an interesting webpage for Palm users, which features a
Pentax IR Remote database for Palm among other things (look at the
bottom of the page).
http://www.vex.net/~lawrence/download.html
It is a database for NoviiRemote containing the Pentax Remote Controls
D and F.
Hi,
I do not know whether it has been mentioned before, but in one of
those Pentax lens booklets from the 70s, Pentax claims that the
K150/f4 was one of the best medium telephotos on the market.
Arnold
In an older Asahi booklet, the Super-Takumar 150mm, probably version
1, was described as
So what are they then?
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 12:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: any feedback on M20/4.0?
BTW, I have only had a couple of individual Pentax lenses that were not
acceptable. They both clearly
Last chance!
For sale: Pentax MX winder with original box, manual, receipts.
This winder wasn't mine originally, but the original owner sent it in
to Pentax in 1980 for the remote modification that was mentioned
recently on the list and kept all the paperwork. The socket (the
standard
There is no problem in viewing either jpeg or gif files on my system at this
point in Outlook. Possibly in Microsoft's ongoing wisdom(meant to be
sarcastic!)(to Microsoft, not you Herb) they changed this around at some
point.
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
When Cotty is not kidding and/or joking he appears to be quite wise
g...
My comments interspersed.
C I think that there is plenty of room for criticism in art, and Marnie is
C right that any photograph can be criticised. However, it is whether or
C not the criticism is heard, or even
Well, there are 3 reasons that Pentax or anyone else would change optically
formulas.
1. Price, redesigning the lens to be more economically manufactured with
automated machinery.
2. Size, as with the M lenses, the whole thing could be made more compact. BTW,
AFAIK no M lens is the same
På 5. mar. 2004 kl. 06.48 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Had to think about that for a bit. But then it came to me that the
guys who make
catalog sketches and such are considered artists.
So why not photographers? Maybe because of the perception that
anybody can do
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also not all the unique. The K2 is almost exactly the same size and
shape. The ES and ESII both have mechanical shutter speeds from X to 1000
and electronic speeds from x to ~30 seconds, (Replacing the slow speed
mechanical timer with
I see it this way:
A photograph, video, newspaper story, book or story is a statement made
by human beings. The statements are no more reliable than the person
that made them.
I agree with you in that digital is a good thing, because it makes the
manipulative aspects of a photograph more
Hi all
HI still got some nice Pentax items for sale:
Bodies:
Pentax K1000, excellent condition
Pentax P50 (P5), excellent condition
Pentax P30n (P3n),excellent condition
Lenses:
SMC M 1.7/50mm, very good condition
SMC A 1.4/50mm, very good condition
SMC A 4-5.6/35-80mm (Standard lens for MZ-M),
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, I'd like to know how many of modern Pentax lenses are original!
optical design? It would seem that some lenses are carry over from
previous generations.
I think a lot of the older M/A/F designs have been replaced by zooms
and newer aspherical designs.
From: Arnold Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do not know whether it has been mentioned before, but in one of those
Pentax lens booklets from the 70s, Pentax claims that the K150/f4 was
one of the best medium telephotos on the market.
If they don't say so themselves...
I'm pretty sure it was the
One was an M50/1.4 and the other was a M28/3.5 though what good that information
is without the serial numbers (which I no longer have) is I have no idea. 3
other M50/1.4's that I have had were fine, as was the one other M28/3.5.
--
Andy Chang wrote:
So what are they then?
-Original
http://www.news2web.com/cgi-bin/dnewsweb.exe?cmd=articlegroup=rec.photo.marketplace.medium-formatitem=11082utag=
Subject: FS: Lowepro Zoom pouch for Pentax 6x7
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 08:44:07 -0800
From: Lunaray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: rec.photo.marketplace.medium-format
I just
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:35:32 -0800, John Mustarde wrote:
Just curious - what shutter speed catches just the right amount
of motion blur when the subject is traveling 100 mph?
I generally use 1/125 for cars below about 80 mph and 1/250 for
anything faster. Of course, it also depends
Thanks for the comments.
Frank - You really should take the time to visit Cape Breton,
the Cabot Trail is absolutely stunning, with wonderful vistas around every
bend.
No-one commented on my portrait - I think its a good likeness (and
remember I'm the one on the left !).
Welcome back, Gabor.
cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Sas Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:06 AM
Subject: old-new member
Dear PDMLers,
I subscribed again, and this time hopefully not for only a few
months...
I'm Gabor
On 5/3/04, ROBERTS THE RUNNER disgorged:
Oh man, she's always looking for an opportunity to use her surgical
skills on me. I'd appreciate anyone who could provide a diversion :)
I've filmed open heart surgery with Stephen Westaby, an operation to
correct a squint, reconstructive surgery on a
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You pick one of your pictures (one that you typically had difficulties in gettng
right),
fresh out of the scanner - send it in a reasonable size to a number of volunteers on
the
list (I'll be one of them) who will do their finishing and adjustments according to
From: Keith WHALEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kylie has a very nice face, but Agnetha is reeking class all the way.
. .
That reminded me to put on an ABBA recording. . . g
Btw. Agnetha has recorded a new album, or do you call them CD:s, for the first time in
17 years, planned to be released this
Thanks Shel
These are brilliant photographs (http://www.edkrebs.com/) - what is the
English expression? In Denmark we would say life confirming photographs -
they are so full of the joy of life. Great work. Interesting to see how
little the IT-age have contributed to the photographic art - really!
Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this first round on Dave's picture we've so far got
Larry from Prescott
Butch Black
Paul Stenquist
and me
as volunteers.
But there is room for more.
Sounds fun. I'll have a go.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I love it! I love it! I love it! I love it! I love it! I love it! I love it!
I have two of them one heavily used and one like new.
From the optical point of view: I never shot Testtargets but i was
always satisfied with the results and at least at k=8 its very sharp
IMO. Flare was never a
- Original Message -
From: Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What d'ya all think?
Shall we give it a try as an ongoing project?
I'm in.
Jostein
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3800946535
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Rolleiflex Knowledge
Thanks Shel
These are brilliant photographs (http://www.edkrebs.com/) -
I liked the complaint department and the thought for the day the
best.
William Robb
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3800946535
Maybe some people really need the manuals?
Most independent repair shops can service lenses. You have to find one
in your area. In Michigan, I use Oakland Photographic Repair. Shel has
a list of recommended repair facilities on his website.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2004, at 10:19 AM, Stephen Moore wrote:
O List --
Earlier this week I visited the
Hello,
Last weekend I was out shooting gulls. I shot almost 2 rolls of film,
so maybe I will post more, or put them on a site. Don't know if this
works for you, I just love birds. Let me know what you think.
Disclaimer: No animal was hurt during the shooting:-)
Attila
Silly me, forgot to include the URL... Here it is:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2186032
Attila
Hello Shel,
Friday, March 5, 2004, 6:51:56 PM, you wrote:
SB I wanted to see what, if any, reactions there'd be to such a
SB photo, how much, if anything, people would put into it ...
SB maybe the experiment failed as there have been few comments,
SB or maybe it succeeded ... don't know.
From: Boros Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:40 PM
Subject: PAW - The Gull
Hello,
Last weekend I was out shooting gulls. I shot almost 2 rolls of film,
so maybe I will post more, or put them on a site.
Please do.
Don't know if this works
From: Boros Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boros Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: PAW - The Gull
Silly me, forgot to include the URL... Here it is:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2186032
Attila
That's neat. I like it.
There are some
Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3800946535
Maybe some people really need the manuals?
The people bidding on this need a manual to tell them how to drink a
glass of water without drowning.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
I find throwing a lens against a brick wall is a quick way to check it
out.
Upon first reading, I found myself wondering how many lenses showed
excellent optical quality after this particular test! G
Of course I only have two ratings for lenses: professionally acceptable,
and
unacceptable. If
I've taken a few rolls with the FA77mm and I love it. Haven't had time
to scan everything, but a selection of the ones I like are on my website
(link below, under the heading Tina). Aside from the lovely results,
it is just a pleasure to hold (and even manual focus). Creamy silky
bokeh, and
William Robb said:
I was quite surprised when I came onto this list and discovered that
some of my favourite lenses are considered to be crap.
I like the M28mm f/2.8, and I have the really bad one with the chrome
trim ring, not the less awful one.
Not that I like the 28mm focal length that
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 21:08, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You pick one of your pictures (one that you typically had difficulties in gettng
right),
fresh out of the scanner - send it in a reasonable size to a number of volunteers
on the
list (I'll be one of them) who
LOL You got the location right ... ;-))
P Kong wrote:
At 10:43 AM 3/4/2004, Shel wrote:
Just a little experiment on a couple of levels ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/shattuck1.html
comments, as always, welcome ...
Let me guess... Shattuck Allston? A block or so either
On 5/3/04, WW disgorged:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3800946535
William Robb
Yes.
PS - interesting - I have not come across a feedback of 3454 @ 100%
beforeunless you know better?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 5/3/04, MARK ROBERTS FOR IT IS HE disgorged:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3800946535
Maybe some people really need the manuals?
The people bidding on this need a manual to tell them how to drink a
glass of water without drowning.
Oh come on Mark, for heaven's sake! You
Hi,
I have made a photograph of an elephant in Kenia, and according to our
local guide the male elephant had 5 legs. For Tanyas sake I won't go
into details.
I have some photos I took in India of an African elephant (yes!)
putting his 5th leg to good use. I swear that thing had a mind and
On 5 Mar 2004 at 23:41, Boros Attila wrote:
Silly me, forgot to include the URL... Here it is:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2186032
Great shot, amazing symmetry, surreal shape of the watery reflection including
the hint of a beak. I'm not a gull lover, they are great pests in
This is my PAW#1
All comments most welcome.
Tech detail: *istD, FA*400/5.6 @ f/8, 1/3200 sec. ISO 400, auto wb.
-
Now, if Canon could invent a glass with the equivalent of that image
stabilization thing they have on their lenses, it would be of great
assistance to me at 2am, trying to down that last Beamish, before I go
staggering out the doors of the bar...
No more spilled beer! What a concept! vbg
Shel,
I was in the Magdellan Islands (in the Gulf of St. Lawrence) about 18 months
ago. It's my paternal family's ancestral homeland, as it were.
One day, my cousin, who summers there regularly, stopped in on a distant
relative of ours, to introduce us. She (the relative) told us to come
and the link...
http://home.online.no/~jooksne/paw/paw1.html
I mumbled:
This is my PAW#1
All comments most welcome.
Tech detail: *istD, FA*400/5.6 @ f/8, 1/3200 sec. ISO 400, auto wb.
Cheers,
Jostein
Lon and Francis,
Thank you.
Pretty in Pink by Kevin Thornsberry
Wonderful photo. Almost 3-D like.
Kevin Thornsberry Pretty in Pink,
the hands and the cap's
angle make the shot. The pink
doesn't hurt either. Nice grab.
Kevin
Hey, Fred,
I know, I know. Everyone tells me that about Cape Breton, and the Cabot
Trail in particular. Funny thing is, I have distant relatives there. My
maternal grandmother is from Janvin Island, which I think is up around Cape
Breton somewhere.
My existing family all live either in
AACCCKKK!!!
It's a Canada Goose! You guys have those over in Europe too? I thought
they were a North American thing.
I hate Canada Geese. I'm glad you called it a beast, Jostein.
Other than the goose thing, it's a lovely shot. And, the non-fowl mammal is
quite lovely,
- Original Message -
From: Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Christian Skofteland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 7:34 AM
He has a D... and yet I've still seen him cart around his defiled LXen...
Christian
Defiled!
Yesterday I was meeting a friend at a nearby BART station.
BART is our local subway, underground, metro ...
While waiting for her to arrive, this little scene caught my
attention:
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/bart1.html
The colors are the result of mixed light - incandescent
below and
yeah, it's as good as the lens allows. if i didn't have the 80-320, i
wouldn't have had a shot at all, just a speck in the distance. there is a
slight bit of motion blur, but i was able to shoot at 1/1000 and that
helped. of the 24 shots i took, 5 are good and distinct enough to be usable
for
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
