Hi,
if i will get 100/3.5, I'll probably end up with 100/2.8 some day anyhow...
I know myself. Our local Pentax dealer offered me all mentioned four for
testing (I work for a local photo magazine time to time and therefore know
those people). First I have to finish some urgent works and after
Hi all
I too have taken a few shots at a very young person.
This is my 6 months old grandaughter Karla. I shot it indoors yesterday
afternoon with my SONY DSC F717.
Handheld at 1/30sec., fully open aperture and no flash.
I'm quite impressed with that small 5MP camera.
All the best
It's a nice shot, but...
I would have prefered some visible contact between the two.
Mayby the womans hand on the husbands arm, rather than at her mouth.
Technically I have no problems - it nice and a good atmosphere
All the best.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Hi Bruce...
I wouldn't say weakest part. Au contraire, think that hand in front of
the girl's face lends a bit of tension to the photograph. She's looking
intently at something, and the fingertips by her lips injects emotion.
In fact, the man's pose and tilt of head are ambiguous, so far as the
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 23:24:34 -0400, Clint Austin wrote:
In the next several months I will be purchasing a new SLR body. I have
...
My first question is this: Should Istay with Pentax?
Find a camera you are happy to use. One that meets your requirements.
IF that is Pentax then that's
Boris wrote:
It makes you wonder what it is they're looking at.
Eccactly - I'd say a text to the photograph could be:
Oh my, he's looking at that gastly yong woman again!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Keith Whaley
Hi,
frank theriault wrote:
There was a movie about that. Heavy water factory in Norway somewhere.
Heroes of Telemark? Something of Telemark? Don't remember much else
but the heavy water, and they had to ski to get there (the saboteurs,
that is).
Quite a bit more complicated than that,
My first ever, and keeping with the theme of HAPPY EASTER...
My little boy, his easter bonnet (decorated with xmas tinsel! lol), his
easter eggs, and his painted fingernails (he did them himself! don't ask!
lol)...
http://www.tanyamayer.com/paw.jpg
Shot with *istD (of course!), FAJ 18-35mm @
It depends on what type of professional work you're looking at.
Weddings? Don't use 35mm. For $500 you can get a good medium format
starter (Fuji 645) that will improve your pictures significantly.
Your Pentax gear will be perfect for the candids side.
Portraits? Even for simple senior and
I was in much the same situation as you a few months ago. Although most
of my lenses are K series, I went with the *ist D. I have found that it
functions quite well with these lenses. It gives you very adequate
center weighted metering and open aperture focusing. It will function
much the same
David Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't seem to find the new DA 14mm 2.8 lens anywhere. Are we still
waiting for a release date?
They're expected to start arriving in late May (at least here in the
U.S.) or thereabouts. There are rumours we may have one or two to
experiment with at
Well, I only just got my ist-D so I'll have to experiment for a bit
before I come up with my suggestions.
I'm sure they'll come, though :)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Well, finally I seem to be getting the hang of this digital thing. I have
had two weddings these past two weekends that I would consider to be ok.
I have also discovered the virtues of using the FAJ 18-35mm lens, and have
achieved some interesting results. I am still having some blown highlight
HI Boris -
Looking at it in that perspective, the photo works very well.
I started to write a critique last night, but left off because I wanted to
see the image fresh. Your title - i.e. subject of the post - confused me. I
did not see anything in this photo that indicated a bride and groom,
I like this one Tanya.
Nice background.
Dave
My first ever, and keeping with the theme of HAPPY EASTER...
My little boy, his easter bonnet (decorated with xmas tinsel! lol), his
easter eggs, and his painted fingernails (he did them himself! don't
Very nice, Tanja. The balance of graytones is very good. On my monitor
the only pure white is in the background.
Paul
On Apr 12, 2004, at 9:04 AM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
A figure study, fairygirl style...
*istD, FA 28-105m pz @ f9.5, 1/45, af360fgz, window light and white
reflector.
I
Unlikely for the IS lenses. I'll bet that Pentax will go with the in-camera
stabilization by moving the sensor like Minolta-Konica. This is a much easier
approach compared with replacing the entire lens line. I now this does nothing for
film, but Pentax just can' afford to invest much in
Hi!
JF In view of your explanation of the background to the picture, perhaps all
JF it really needs is a suitable caption to put it in context.
JF Oh, God. We're next!
JF John
I can see now my mistake in full size. Looking forward (for our
wedding) is the title and I really neglected to add
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: renewed faith in digital... (and a boring show and tell!)
I am guessing this problem is due to the P-TTL flash prefire on the
AF360fgz, but I am starting to wonder if P-TTL really stands for
P(ain in
the arse)-TTL. I am
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
Going into competition, John?
He's setting up a mailing list dedicated to cameras and photography,
and leaving you with the one about racing cars, beer, scotch whisky,
and politics.
William Robb
Nicely done family snap!
Jens Bladt wrote:
I too have taken a few shots at a very young person.
This is my 6 months old grandaughter Karla.
http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p3771635.html
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Weekend update
Made a brief trip to Rochester Saturday and Sunday. Did some
shopping
and saw some friends. Talked to several who work at Kodak. Morale
is at
an all-time low there from what they tell me :(
No surprise there. In a few
Hi Tan,
Nice concept, and the DOF is perfect ;-)) However, seeing a
bit more of the hand might improve the shot. At least it
would for me.
shel
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
My first ever, and keeping with the theme of HAPPY EASTER...
My little boy, his easter bonnet (decorated with
At 10:14 AM 4/12/04, throwing caution to the wind, William Robb wrote:
He's setting up a mailing list dedicated to cameras and photography,
and leaving you with the one about racing cars, beer, scotch whisky,
and politics.
William Robb
hmmm. Seems like I should get first choice of the two.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
hmmm. Seems like I should get first choice of the two.
You do get the racing cars and the beer..
William Robb wrote:
I don't think Pentax is ever going to be state of the art again. The
Spotmatic days are long gone.
If you can live with a camera that is a couple of steps behind the
state of the art, and (I think more importantly) like the lenses,
then the istD is a good camera.
This
1.Fix the door/strap problem
2. Make the 4 way switch bigger.
3. Give us more configuration choices such as instant histogram
display or preview that stays until you hit a button that makes it go
away. Or set preview to always zoom so that you can check focus.
4. In camera IS.
5. I agree
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Doug Brewer
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
Going into competition, John?
He's setting up a mailing list dedicated to cameras and photography,
and leaving you with the one about racing cars, beer, scotch whisky,
and politics.
Well *I'm* setting
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a few years, all Kodak will be making is colour
paper and chemistry, and a very downsized film coating plant.
I don't know; they are putting a lot of RD into things like inkjet
paper. Also, most of the DIY digital print kiosks I've seen are Kodak.
That's
Hi Tan ...
On my monitor the background looks a little different in
each shot. Some frames have more detail, others less. If
that' how the bg actually appears, imo, it distracts from
the montage.
Here in the US what you've done could be considered child
pornography in some places.
IAC, I like
After a totally nightmare-ish 2003, 2004 is finally starting to look up.
I got a job! A real one with regular pay and benefits!
The icing on the cake would be a letter from immigration Canada confirming my
permanent residence status (now, that would be a miracle!)
Anyway, something else which
When eating in LA ...
1) pick up some imodium. the liquid works fastest.
2) enjoy a Tommy burger. Local cult favorite sandwich.
3) there's a good middle-eastern restaurant on Pico, in W. LA.
CRB
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax just can't afford to invest much in film anymore.
Want a future collectible? Buy an *ist (not the digital).
It'll go down in history as the last 35mm film SLR from Pentax.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I stuck with Pentax, and happy I did. I proudly own and MZ-S and an istD.
They do everything I need them to do - take great pictures!
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: Clint Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 11,
Cute shot, Tanya. Captured his priorities all right.
Are you having any trouble using the AF360FGZ flash on the *ist D? I've
been considering it, but some list members have reported exposure
problems using it on the D.
Thanks,
Joe
erm, Collin, what is imodium?!?
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Collin Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 April 2004 1:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LA Pdml'ers...
When eating in LA ...
1) pick up some imodium. the liquid works fastest.
2) enjoy a Tommy
Hi Shel, thanks for taking the time to comment!
Shel said:
On my monitor the background looks a little different in
each shot. Some frames have more detail, others less. If
that' how the bg actually appears, imo, it distracts from
the montage.
Yep, that's how it is meant to look, it is kind
Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice Mark - gawd, I want that lens, sooo bad!
You should, it's a gem! It's my number 1 lens in terms of generating
keeper shots. I used to disdain zooms until I got this one.
Until I recover financially enough to buy a 31 Limited I'm
Great news on all fronts!
wendy beard wrote:
After a totally nightmare-ish 2003, 2004 is finally starting to look up.
I got a job! A real one with regular pay and benefits!
The icing on the cake would be a letter from immigration Canada confirming my
permanent residence status (now, that
wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a totally nightmare-ish 2003, 2004 is finally starting to look up.
I got a job! A real one with regular pay and benefits!
The icing on the cake would be a letter from immigration Canada confirming
my permanent residence status (now, that would be a
Hi Tan,
Yep, photography sure is subjective ...
It could well be that you relate to the pics in a more
motherly fashion, both as a mother to the child and as a
mother to the photographs. I can certainly relate to
that.
As for the clid porn comment, don't take it too seriously.
The climate
Without reading any of the other replies to this complaint (closed eyes)
I'd bet a nice camera it's absolutely due to the pre-flash that's become
so popular.
The concept of a pre-flash is acceptable, if the human system worked as
the designer anticipated, but almost invariably the first flash
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bruce...
I wouldn't say weakest part. Au contraire, think that hand
in front of the girl's face lends a bit of tension to the
photograph. She's looking intently at something, and the
fingertips by her lips
Tanya Mayer wrote:
the remaining 133
rejects were thrown away due to people CLOSING their eyes!! That is a
HUGE amount, and all I can say is that I am LUCKY that I usually shoot
multiples of most shots. In the second wedding in particular, there were
three separate ladies who had their
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: a little something i've been working on...
Here in the US what you've done could be considered child
pornography in some places.
Shel, explain this please. I thought Canada had some pretty
ridiculous kiddie porn laws.
If this
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Weekend update
I don't know; they are putting a lot of RD into things like inkjet
paper. Also, most of the DIY digital print kiosks I've seen are
Kodak.
That's not a consumer product but it's a fairly viable market.
Still,
that
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just took delivery of a brand spanking new copyprint station.
The harware is IBM, the dye sub printers have been made by Codonics
in the past, I don't know if Kodak is making their own now, or just
buying off the shelf,
Smart money says off-the-shelf...
- Original Message -
From: David Madsen
Subject: RE: which way would you go...
I stuck with Pentax, and happy I did. I proudly own and MZ-S and
an istD.
They do everything I need them to do - take great pictures!
I am pretty sure that unless you are among the 1/100th of 1% of
Bill,
There are so many jurisdictions, and so many variations on
the law that it would be impossible to quote anything.
Most of what I've read about and seen deals with subjective
interpretation of what constitutes pornography. My comment
to Tanya was made because recently a couple was
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Weekend update
BTW: Tomorrow I start working part-time at a local camera store and
photofinishing lab.
May God have pity on your soul.
William Robb
Bill,
Both my friend and I are bringing DSLR's.
Bruce
Monday, April 12, 2004, 6:14:58 AM, you wrote:
BO How many of you are bringing an *ist D to GFM, or other DSLR for that
BO matter. We may ask some of you for suggestions on how to set up a contest
BO using digital photos.
BO Bill
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Tan ...
On my monitor the background looks a little different in
each shot. Some frames have more detail, others less. If
that' how the bg actually appears, imo, it distracts from
the montage.
Here in the US what you've done could be considered child
pornography in
I keep forgetting that your statutes are mostly administered by the
individual states.
If your kiddie porn laws are anything like ours, the kiddie in the
bathtub might well cross the line.
Our law doesn't even require nudity. All that is required under
Canadian law is for the subject to appear to
That is good news Wendy.
The prize picture is just fantastic.Almost like a painting.
Dave
After a totally nightmare-ish 2003, 2004 is finally starting
to
look up.
wendy beard
ottawa, canada
http://www.beard-redfern.com
wendy beard
ottawa, canada
In a message dated 4/12/2004 6:16:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How many of you are bringing an *ist D to GFM, or other DSLR for that
matter. We may ask some of you for suggestions on how to set up a contest
using digital photos.
Bill
I was wondering about
Congrats on the job.
What will you be doing?
CRB
--
-
It is only when you are asked to believe in Reason coming from non-reason that you
must cry Halt. Human minds. They do not come from nowhere.
C. S. Lewis
--
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: a little something i've been working on...
Well, according to what I've read, the child in the bathtub
had no private parts revealed either. The concern in some
jurisdictions is not so much about the actual nudity, but
that
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Yet another PAW
William Robb
---
I like it. OTOH, her hair bothers me. The lump where she is pushing
it up.
Makes me want to straighten it out. But I am
auto is not TTL, and using my Metz 40MZ-2 with TTL doesn't work as well
on the *ist D as it does on the PZ-1. Also using the flash on auto with
the *ist D works better then with TTL. Or were you trying to say the
same thing?
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 15:11, Bill Owens wrote:
1. TTL Flash is not so
As someone so crudely posted, on one of my many lists, just because a
certain obnoxious woman legislator had all the female parts necessary,
that didn't make her a woman of the streets, did it?
Of course, the language was a bit -- well, a LOT -- more colorful, but
the gist is there.
I do
Whether this would be considered child porn (even in this little corner of
hard-core right-wing America) would depend a great deal on who possesses it.
A parent in possession of photos such as these or who has them on a family
website - most wouldn't bat an eye. However, if these photos were found
I wish I could find the news stories about the particular
case in question.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: a little something i've been working on...
Well, according to what I've read, the child in the bathtub
had no private parts
William Robb wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/IMGP2786.html
The eyes. Not sure about this one. Umm!
Malcolm
Aha! Very well done, William.
It has a bit of the professional flavor to it, because of the excellent
lighting and the pose, and that alone categorizes it...but the slightly
messed up hair scuffs the edge off that opinion, and lends just a little
mischeviousness to it, doesn't it.
Thankfully,
Hi,
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
As a result of this, I just tried to pull the image down but I can't connect
via ftp for some reason at the moment. Anyways, as soon as I can, it will
come down cause I just feel sick to think that anyone would see my little
boy in such a way, and even worse
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
http://www.tanyamayer.com/weddinggalleriesprivate/bean/images/Bean0259.jpg
My favourite (and difficult to make).
Malcolm
The two brands of CD-R that come up most often when talking
about durability, longevity, and freedom from errors are
Mitsui and Taiyo Yuden. They are generally only available
by mail order.
Fuji CDs in slim jewel cases available in Canada are (still) made
by TY, but not the ones sold in towers.
Get those trees outta there. Looks like big antlers growing
from the bride's head.
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
http://www.tanyamayer.com/weddinggalleriesprivate/bean/images/Bean0259.jpg
My favourite (and difficult to make).
Malcolm
Child porn laws are vague because the definition of porn is vague. Most
prosecutors are not going to go after parents taking bath tub photos, but
because the perverts are sneaky the laws have to cover a broad definition.
Nudity and pornography are not necessarily the same thing, it is the intent
- Original Message -
From: David Madsen
Subject: RE: a little something i've been working on...
Child porn laws are vague because the definition of porn is vague.
Most
prosecutors are not going to go after parents taking bath tub
photos, but
because the perverts are sneaky the laws
Dag,
You wrote:
Thomas Cakalic - Desert Mist
I think the interesting part of this photo is the tree and background on the
left. The right and lower parts doesn´t add anything to the picture,
especially not in view of the title. Use some extra time, take another photo
and the result will be
I'll have mine, although I also have a bunch of 120 film I have to use.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had the same thought when I saw that one.
Bruce
Monday, April 12, 2004, 11:29:11 AM, you wrote:
SB Get those trees outta there. Looks like big antlers growing
SB from the bride's head.
SB Malcolm Smith wrote:
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I had the same thought when I saw that one.
Shel wrote:
SB Get those trees outta there. Looks like big antlers growing from
SB the bride's head.
SB Malcolm Smith wrote:
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Taken last fall, on a very frosty morning, in the U P of Michigan.
Comments - likes/dislikes - what would you have done differently
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Thanks in advance for looking /commenting.
Kenneth Waller
nice. the detail and crispness of the shot makes me feel like I'm there...
I just shivered...
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 3:17 PM
Subject: PAW - Week of 4/12
Taken last fall, on a very
Nice picture Ken.
I think the contrast between the colour in the leaves and the frost... IS the
shot.:-)
Dave
Taken last fall, on a very frosty morning, in the
U P of Michigan.
Comments - likes/dislikes - what would you have done differently
Thanks John and Shel.
Imagine it's shot at full aperure (2.04), Rather good Caræ Zeiss lens, I
think.
all the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. april 2004 15:12
Til: [EMAIL
On 11/4/04, KEITH discumbobulated:
Well, I'll tell ya this, aka Doe, they sure don't say, over there, Keep
your penguin up, mate. g
keith
We say 'keep your pecker up'.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Going into competition, John?
He's setting up a mailing list dedicated to cameras and photography,
and leaving you with the one about racing cars, beer, scotch whisky,
and politics.
William Robb
So you'll be sticking around then Bill?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
erm, what the hell is a penguin?! The mind boggles...
tan.
q.v. Monty Python's Flying Circus.
'Nuff said.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
On 11/4/04, VARIOUS discumbobulated:
Dunno about Japan, Tanya, but when you get to GFM please don't forget to
get me Cotty's autograph.
Thanks,
Joe
---
So... Cotty's famous?
My penguin's been on the telly.
Cheers,
Cotty
---
Oh, do'h. I always thought that was some
On 12/4/04, UNCLE BILL discumbobulated:
How many of you are bringing an *ist D to GFM, or other DSLR for that
matter. We may ask some of you for suggestions on how to set up a contest
using digital photos.
Bill
Hi mate,
Yup. D60 and some lenses plus MX and some lenses.
How about shooting on
Congrats on the job and pic Wendy. Well done.
XX
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
erm, Collin, what is imodium?!?
anti-diorh... anti-diarrh...anti-d...
it stops you having the screaming poohs
Thanks for the reminder groan
Norm
John Forbes wrote:
Dollars are now worth about .83 of a Euro.
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
So you'll be sticking around then Bill?
Me? Off topic?
You mock me.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Cakalic
Subject: RE: April PUG - comments - long
Tom delurks.
Welcome back.
William Robb
It is sad that the straw-man arguments about child porn so often
defer to these clearly innocent, not at all purient, pictures of
children. But so often these argumetns are used as a continuing
perjorative against any morality imposed on an art expression.
Let us not take the side of defending
Tanja, Tanja, Tanja...
Don't take the pictures down. They're completely innocent. I can't
imagine anyone seeing them in any other way. And they're quite good as
well.
On Apr 12, 2004, at 11:22 AM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
BUT, Shel, this comment that you made;
Here in the US what
There's no such thing as scotch whiskey!
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/04/04 15:48:41
Well *I'm* setting up a mailing list dedicated to racing motorcycles,
beer, scotch whiskey and politics.
Thanks... I love you guys...
Tom
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: April PUG - comments - long
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:01:52 -0600
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Cakalic
Subject: RE: April PUG - comments -
I think this is well executed on your part. Turning her head in a bit
more and perhaps using a slightly longer lens would have helped flatten
out her nose. The position of her left arm may be a bit awkward, but I
guess she's shielding her breast. If I was going to crop her left
elbow, I might
In a message dated 4/12/2004 12:40:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi mate,
Yup. D60 and some lenses plus MX and some lenses.
How about shooting on a CF card (like you do) and then deleting
everything that you don't want to enter, then handing over the CF card to
a judge
Wow! Great shot. What would I have done differently? Nothing
substantial in terms of exposure, composition, framing, or subject
matter. But I would have cheated. I would have cloned out a couple of
the little defects on the leaves. No one would ever have known g.
Paul
On Apr 12, 2004, at 3:17
Of course this was an unfair assessment of LA eateries. I've eaten in
many of the world's best restaurants and LA is right up there with NY
and Paris. If you don't believe me, try Wofgang Puck's Chinois on Main
Street in Santa Monica or Georgio De Baldi on West Channel in the same
city, or
Tanya,
I must have missed the first post. Unfortunately I don't have any good
suggestions for cheap lodging in LA and I'm working both Thursday and
Friday. I hope you you'll enjoy LA and you can meet up with someone else
when you're here.
Paul
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering about that when I read the program. Seems out-of-date now to
limit the contest to just slide film. Or to not have one for DSLRs. All it
would need is a decent lap top to display the images.
We've been through this already (we being the staff,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems out-of-date now to limit the contest to just slide film.
Or to not have one for DSLRs. All it would need is a decent
lap top to display the images.
We (the organizers, staff and assistants at the Nature Photography
Weekend) have discussed this and it would take
Yes, LA does have a downtown, although most Angelenos don't go there.
And while most of what I shot during my last trip to lala land is
mountains, flowers, beaches, and bikinis, I shot a few things downtown
as well. This was from the roof of the Standard Hotel at twilight.
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
