While the new Optio MX might have a Sharp LCD, since it claims CG Silicon
technology.
Dario Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Casio/Pentax
Indeed. The 33WR I disassembled had many
And now for something completely different:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2448548size=sm
Comments and criticisms welcome as usual :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15 Jun 2004 at 19:02, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Shel,
Thanks for the thoughtful comments throughout the post, I didn't mean to come
across to be too critical, I obviously clumsily mis-read your intents.
Remember, I may be one of the only people on this list, perhaps the only
one, who has
Very nicely done Rob.
Antonio
On 16 Jun 2004, at 11:34, Rob Studdert wrote:
And now for something completely different:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2448548size=sm
Comments and criticisms welcome as usual :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
That's a great shot, Rob!
I selected large image, and it became about twice life size. Plenty of
detail. Reach right in and drag it out of the screen!
How interesting...seems you have an internal filter in there. Dial it in
or out.
I just turned down [the purchase of] a Sigma XQ Filtermatic 24mm
from a full charge, i believe that the 2G Microdrive is as much as can be
safely copied from Microdrives. i did the numbers once and it seems that
about 3G is where it is expected to run out of power. i'm thinking of
getting the Flashtrax myself, but will use only solid state memory cards
with it.
[...]
I looked at all of your photos and must say that I am almost sure you are
all nice people and it is a damn pleasure to be here with you :-) And you
had a great time as I have seen :-) I really hope I would be able to meet
you in the future - I'd love too!
But we had a great time here in
on 16.06.04 11:34, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now for something completely different:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2448548size=sm
Comments and criticisms welcome as usual :-)
I really like this shot, I always appreciate nature shots of so difficult to
find
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Bob W wrote:
1. Is photography officially allowed inside the airport buildings?
That varies from country to country. (...)
2. Is photography officially allowed on the planes?
I have never had any problems with this.
That would probably also vary from contry to
Hi!
And now for something completely different:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2448548size=sm
Comments and criticisms welcome as usual :-)
Is it yours? You're one lucky fellow g...
Boris
P.S. I do appreciate your opinion of my comments.
And increase digital production. Who's next?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0406/04061601nikonexitfilm.asp
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
BTW, it totally sucks shooting on commercial airline. The windows are two
layers, and made of this plasticky stuff. There is usually fingerprints and
scratches and stuff all over them.
The figerprints and scratches would be so totally out
Herb Chong wrote this in response to my speculation on how image
stabilization could be done:
that's how it's done in Nikon and Canon and how IS binoculars from various
vendors work too. software implementations require sensors and image
processors far faster than can be reasonably powered right
Read again... they talk about compact film cameras.
Alex Sarbu
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And increase digital production. Who's next?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0406/04061601nikonexitfilm.asp
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
on 16.06.04 13:21, Sarbu Alexandru at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read again... they talk about compact film cameras.
Compact cameras will be first to burn: will begin to move out of production
of film cameras, starting with compact film cameras., so it is clear, that
SLRs will be next...
--
Best
Yes, they did say compact film cameras would be the first to go...then
others too follow no doubt.
Cheers
Shaun
Sarbu Alexandru wrote:
Read again... they talk about compact film cameras.
Alex Sarbu
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And increase digital production. Who's next?
Super shot. Well caught.
John
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:47:48 +0200, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all
a family with 2 girls and a boy where playing hiding, I took several
shoots with the Pentax SFX and 35-135mm zoom on autofocus setting but
still
had some problems with focusing and
Yes, but please ignore Phil's comments and read only
the article. Kimura said Nikon had no plans to stop
producing film SLRs, but that it may next year start
considering pulling out of the film compact camera
business due to a sharp plunge in demand.
It's clear that SLRs will be next, but imho not
Crazy shots, crazy guy!
(To paraphrase Glenda Slag, a well-known British columnist).
Easily the best of the people pics, Frank. (IMO).
John
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:27:18 -0400, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got back a coupla rolls o' colour today. These are all the arm's length
Thanks Dave, for perservering through two
posts to make those
comments. When I saw those fences and fields, I asked my friend (the
driver) to quickly stop the car so I could get the shots. I think he
was minorly annoyed, but oh well...
Bruce
How about P.K.Dick, anybody? :)
_fra_
Tuesday, June 15, 2004, 11:43:03 PM, Peter wrote:
PJA That's something to look for...
PJA Cotty wrote:
On 15/6/04, GIANFRANCARLO, discombobulated, offered:
[* I had a brilliant job today - met one of my all-time
heroes - Gerry
Anderson.
Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 12:15:47 AM, Yefei wrote:
YH Who's directing the film? It may end up the same disaster as
YH Hollywood's Solaris -- Average movie goers got bored by it,
YH fans of Tarkovsky's version despised it, and fans of
YH Stanislaw Lem's book hated it ( many of them felt
Sidewalk! He took it from your sidewalk!
Damn, I'm living in the wrong place...
Regards, Bob S.
PS: Looked at my daughter's Optio S4 after a year at college in her purse. It's a bit
scratched up, but otherwwise fine. She still carries it everywhere.
Tom C. writes:
Here's the right link.
And increase digital production. Who's next?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0406/04061601nikonexitfilm.asp
Konica-Minolta, who else? g
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
Free yourself from those irritating pop-up ads with
Northern Idaho is probably the most rugged part of the lower 48. There really is
a Treasure Mountain there (for the Louis Lamure fans). I once had lunch in a
restaurant near that mountain. They had a snow cat (big red thing with 4
catapiller treads, not a Ski-doo) parked in the driveway. It
AH don't disturb much. Maybe they add some hazyness but most often the images
AH get quite hazy anyway at those heights.
For BW, just use yellow, orange or red filter. Lot of the haze should
be removable by it.
Best regards,
Frantisek Vlcek
It's clear that SLRs will be next, but imho not in the
near future.
The market has been changing so fast we really wouldn't know, would we? :-)
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and
Nice () View. So whats the backyard view like?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Optio S40
Here's the right link. I'm a dufus sometimes...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation?presentation_id=250983
Tom C.
Interesting comparison - analog *ist vs *istD for these, who would like to
print directly from digital :-) Oh, and Herbert has bought *istD too ;-)
http://popphoto.com/article.asp?print_page=ysection_id=2article_id=964pag
e_number=1preview=
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Pentax is probably closer then Konica-Minolta, since they are actually in
the D-SLR market. Minolta just has a prototype with a bunch of engineers
with their fingers up their ***.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:33 AM
To:
On 16 Jun 2004 at 14:57, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Interesting comparison - analog *ist vs *istD for these, who would like to
print directly from digital :-) Oh, and Herbert has bought *istD too ;-)
http://popphoto.com/article.asp?print_page=ysection_id=2article_id=964pag
e_number=1preview=
On 16 Jun 2004 at 9:03, David Miers wrote:
Pentax is probably closer then Konica-Minolta, since they are actually in
the D-SLR market. Minolta just has a prototype with a bunch of engineers
with their fingers up their ***.
Pentax didn't pull theirs out until a relatively short time ago
Anyone here use both?
How would you compare them?
TIA,
CRB
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
on 16.06.04 15:15, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if he has learned to use it properly yet? I found it amazing that he
compared colour casts between the film and digital prints when he had
knowingly set the *ist D to AWB. Secondly his latitude comparison would have
been a
I've always had a fascination for eyes
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/bb2.html
comments and criticism gleefully accepted ;-))
Shel
On 16/6/04, STUDDY, discombobulated, offered:
I'm sure, it was last back in 2001 that we had and kind of lengthy chat. I'm
hoping that I can get back to the US next year.
Er, would that be anytime around the beginning of June?? ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
And it doesn't come from your computer or server. I get many bounced mails from
supposedly sent from me that and incorrect address. I didn't send them but when they
bounce they come to me. I get lots of junk mail from people at major corporations,
that I know there servers are not infected,
Given that most people use film I think it is perfectly legitimate to
compare film with digital.
Herbs article makes some valid points about the digital darkroom and
its drawbacks , and I think that its good discipline for both film and
digital practicioners to look to getting the best image
Let's also remember that there are only so many semiconductor
fabricators out there. Open up a Canon or Nikon and you'll
find other names as well.
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
IMO, Keppler failed to take advantage of the D's adjustable white balance.
I seldom use AWB, and find the preset or manual settings much more accurate
at color reproductions.
Bill
He died young with no one to protect his legacy. (If you want to see an
adaptation that hoovers read Heinline's Starship
Troopers before you see the movie, I have nothing but revulsion for the
sequel, not yet released).
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 12:15:47 AM, Yefei wrote:
I just picked up an F 28/2.8 from KEH, and I will try to make some
comparisons with the FA 28/2.8 I have in the next couple of weeks.
I did have an A 28/2.8 for a while, which is the same formula as the
F lens, and it never significantly impressed me. Some of that may
have been that the PZ-1 I
In a message dated 6/15/2004 11:10:09 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
Where did you get your Vosonic in the US?
---
Don't know that mine is Vosonic. When I went to double-check where I got it,
the web page is not coming up.
But I got mine at
Tom Reese wrote:
And increase digital production. Who's next?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0406/04061601nikonexitfilm.asp
I think it's a very far jump to reach that conclusion. I do not believe that
Nikon will abandon the film SLR market. Compact cameras are an entirely
different product for an
Hi Ryan,
on 17 Jun 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
...
The good kilogram sushi scorpion mustache!
Very cool.
ROTFL! I'll take a dozen...
Try http://www.excite.co.jp/world/english/web/ (you have to choose the
right button below the input field). Excite works better than babelfish,
sometimes. But I
on 16.06.04 18:28, Keith Whaley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ARE Pentax dropping the MZ-S?
At least it disappeared from Pentax Germany price list and it is no longer
available at biggest German internet shop www.fotokoch.de that fully suports
Pentax. Just *ist, MZ-60 and MZ-M left.
--
Best
Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 4:53:19 PM, Peter wrote:
PJA He died young with no one to protect his legacy. (If you want to see an
PJA adaptation that hoovers read Heinline's Starship
PJA Troopers before you see the movie, I have nothing but revulsion for the
PJA sequel, not yet released).
I did
I have this lens and I think I paid around USD160 for it second hand
Great lens, worth every penny for it!
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 11:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SMC K 2.8/24mm
Does any of you
It's funny, the SF community is much like the Pentax community, they
feel they're in some kind of a getto and most
of them are friends.
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 4:53:19 PM, Peter wrote:
PJA He died young with no one to protect his legacy. (If you want to see an
PJA
Keith Whaley wrote:
I am concerned about Pentax though. Their marketing segment is
significantly
smaller than Canon and Nikon and dropping the MZ-S could be a very bad
sign.
ARE Pentax dropping the MZ-S?
They are. I've been told that in practice you can no longer sell anything
costing more
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Andy Chang wrote:
I have this lens and I think I paid around USD160 for it second hand
Great lens, worth every penny for it!
I believe that the A 24/2.8 has the same optics. Since most Pentax
bodies no longer work with pre-A lenses as well as post-A lenses I
would suggest
The backside is against a very steep hill so there's not alot there but
trees and bushes. If I walk out away from the house 200ft in the direction
the picture was taken I have about a 270 degree mountain view.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On 16 Jun 2004 at 14:57, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Interesting comparison - analog *ist vs *istD for these, who would like to
print directly from digital :-) Oh, and Herbert has bought *istD too ;-)
http://popphoto.com/article.asp?print_page=ysection_id=2article_id=964pag
I don't often do a PAW, I think this is my second.
This is the site in a field a few miles from home:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic32.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
I have been told, by a Nikon sponsored pro, that there will be no new Nikon SLR film
camera.
Now I guess the question is what does new mean? Would a slightly modified F5 count as
new or not?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Sarbu Alexandru [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nikon to
OMG, a film version of I,Robot? I must have completely missed the
news. If the Solaris analogy applies, I would dislike it, because I am
a lover of Tarkovskij version. And of Stanislaw Lem. BTW, how many US
PDMLers know St. Lem? Or brothers Strugackijs? These are one of the
world's best
Hi Rob,
on 16 Jun 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
I wonder if he has learned to use it properly yet? I found it amazing that he
compared colour casts between the film and digital prints when he had
knowingly set the *ist D to AWB.
I felt the same reading Keppler's article. You have to use a DSLR
Thanks, I will try to look for an A version. I'm glad you (Andy) think it's
a good lens, 'cause my 20mm is too wide sometimes.
I don't know which Pentax bodies, that will not work with K and M lenses,
Alex???
I use my M85mm, K105mm, K135mm, M35mm, M50mm and M*300mm with all my
Pentax'es from
Powerful shot annasan! Brilliant.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. juni 2004 09:22
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Steep grade (was: GFM 2004 links as at 14th June.)
Ann
Sylwester Pietrzyk replied to Keith Wheley's reply to my reply as follows:
KW ARE Pentax dropping the MZ-S?
SP At least it disappeared from Pentax Germany price list and it is no
longer
available at biggest German internet shop www.fotokoch.de that fully
suports
Pentax. Just *ist, MZ-60 and
More on the film versions, poor great PK Dick must be rotating in grave
because of all the bad adaptations of his work into movies. Except
Blade Runner, all of the other movies hoovered big time. It's
strange that of all writers, his were adapted often, but very badly.
Actually the original
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
I don't know which Pentax bodies, that will not work with K and M lenses,
Alex???
They will allow work, but many won't meter properly. Sorry, I don't
know the models of the exact film cameras which this is true for.
When I bought my MZ-5n it was true of
I guess all real future innovation in camera technology will be in the
digital department. However, most of our film cameras will still work fine
in twenty years. At least I believe my K1000 will still be working fine when
*ist D, Canon EOS 1Ds, Nikon 2DH etc. are long dead and gone. Of course, I
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:04:12 +0100, Malcolm Smith wrote:
**As Doug F has kindly provided a web page for the GFM 2004
links, this will be the last one**
These updates are now online on the web page
http://www.NutDriver.org/GFM2004.shtml
I will try to catch updates as they go by on the
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
on 16.06.04 18:28, Keith Whaley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ARE Pentax dropping the MZ-S?
At least it disappeared from Pentax Germany price list and it is no longer
available at biggest German internet shop www.fotokoch.de that fully suports
Pentax. Just *ist, MZ-60 and
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:15:08 +0200, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
OMG, a film version of I,Robot?
Based on the (very short) trailer or ad I saw the other day, I expect
it to bear only the weakest resemblance to the written tales. It'll
have robots and humans in it, but that looks like where the
This type of shot (large field of something) is one that I really like
to look at. There are some great elements in this one - the poppies,
the sky, the clump of trees in the background - about the only thing
that doesn't grab at me is the color. Seems just a bit weak (maybe I
have seen too many
What did the MZ-S sell for? I've no idea..
Not that I need another Pentax body (!) but...
keith
Tom Reese wrote:
[...]
The new price list did not contain the MZ-S. Adorama has dropped it from
their website. RitzCamera.com and CameraWorld.com both list the BG-10 but
neither has the MZ-S. I think
I doubt that they would put any more RD or retooling into film SLR's.
So to me it would mean no changed to the current line unless there
were a simple firmware change that could be made. I just suspect that
they couldn't recoup the cost.
My local store here (Nikon Pentax) that stocks everything
Nice, Cotty!
You should see acre after acre of California poppies, when they bloom...
A rich orange, several fields of them is really gorgeous!
Well, you've been here, you know...
keith
Cotty wrote:
I don't often do a PAW, I think this is my second.
This is the site in a field a few miles from
on 16.06.04 19:15, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't often do a PAW, I think this is my second.
Just like me, i did it only once ;-)
This is the site in a field a few miles from home:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic32.html
Wow! Wonderful place, great photo - you
Hi!
SB Boris, you seem so heavy of heart sometimes. Coming from one, I can say
SB that you sometimes epitomize the stereotypical Russian Jew. You should
SB meet my grandfather (on my mother's side) ;-))
Well, you are actually correct. But please allow me not to elaborate
on this.
SB You
Hello there.
C I don't often do a PAW, I think this is my second.
C This is the site in a field a few miles from home:
C http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic32.html
Tilted a little, but nice. We had our season of poppies some months
ago... Oh well, nothing is uniform, climate
Hi!
BD Boris,
BD You thought of one that I didn't. I was thinking along the lines of
BD accusation - Me? No, I didn't eat those... kind of thing.
BD Thanks for looking and I hope you enjoyed it as I did.
Actually it is from yet another joke, not about Jews this time
though... So it is not an
Hi!
SB I've always had a fascination for eyes
SB http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/bb2.html
SB comments and criticism gleefully accepted ;-))
Shel, please take what I am going to right as a piece of reasoning,
not emotion, ok? g
I've seen quite a few of your PAWs and few times I had
Hi!
SD Being too lazy to build an entire website, I will release these slowly:
SD http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardi/
SD and the PAW action ought to make Shel happy ;-)
It is technically very competent. The flower itself is beautiful. But
it is yet another... Yet another excellent technically
Hi!
TC Well Boris,
TC Thank you for your response... I guess what's special about it to me is...
TC How many times have you been able to get within five feet of a fox pup and
TC photograph it? Also this was a picture in the wild, not a shot made in a
TC controlled environment, or even with a
Frank,
Don't you think that she is also smiling a little?
I wish I could do same magic... Well, not just yet.
Boris
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In a message dated 6/16/2004 10:42:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Here is one more - if I can get all my chorse
done before I depart I'll
do an HTML instead of the sep jpgs...
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/steepgrade.jpg
Love that
I noticed all your victims, myself included, had the I'm afraid of Frank's camera!
look on their face
Norm
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:27:18 -0400
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got back a coupla rolls o' colour today. These are all the arm's length
self-portraits plus vicitm(s).
Keith Whaley wrote:What did the MZ-S sell for? I've no idea..
Not that I need another Pentax body (!) but...I don't remember what I paid
for mine. That wasclose to two years ago (I think). Current streetprices are
between $750 and $800 US.That camera is one of my two favorite
possessions(the other
Hi!
SJ http://www.elvum.net/gallery/paw/chris_bike2
SJ I'll explain what's going on in a later post, if people don't want to
SJ guess. :-)
SJ Pentax ME Super and SMC Pentax-M 50/1.4 at f1.4, 1/30s (I think) on
SJ Kodak 200. Scanned from negative, with histogram adjustments and
SJ greyscale
Hi!
JB I'm doing a lot of panoramas these days. In PhotoVista 3.0.
JB This one shows the new buildings fronting the harbour of Helsingborg in
JB Sweenden:
JB http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p5168813.html
JB All the best
Quite magnificent. Technically the clouds are a little burned.
However, I
on 15.06.04 18:01, Tom C at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=250938
So you had this once in a lifetime occasion to meet a fox personally :-)
Nice animal portrait, with good framing, I would just adjust a little
levels, photo seems to be a
Hi!
I am replying to myself in order to reply to all of those who replied
to the questions themselves.
I suppose I will grab a shot or two in the waiting hall should I be
permitted. I am going to ask for permission.
I don't think I will try to shoot while on the plain. It wouldn't make
much
Hi!
RL In new mid-term management plangrowth and enlargement in keyword, the
RL technology which covers long time the ? ? ? ? with the centralized ? ? ? the
RL good ? ? ? ? ? kilogram sushi ? scorpion mustache ? ? ¬ and others, it
RL raises technical power, brand power and profitability in the
Hi!
CW Does anyone know anything about this lens. Is it worth buying.
My co-worker has it. I used it once or twice having borrowed it from
him...
I cannot say much about it except that it did work properly with my
MZ-6. That is AF focused and exposure was correct. I cannot say how
old is this
Hi,
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic32.html
Wow! Wonderful place, great photo - you couldn't do it better and choice of
wide angle was just right here! In Poland it is rare to see that many
poppies in nature - perhaps because their stalks were used to make heroine
Thanks, Jostein,
As you likely noticed, I gave the folder a French title, to make it sound
all artsy and pretentious. But, if you as the viewer found humour in it,
that's fine too, and I'm not at all insulted.
The French, after all see Jerry Lewis as a genius, while Americans see him
as a
Hi,
http://www.leca.com/engelsk/lecas-verden/lecas-verden.html
Appeals to the mechanical engineer in me! And the do-it-yourself strain
in me! g
What an interesting product! I never knew it existed...
the sort of career every small boy dreams of - to make the floating
layer for liquid
Boris, Helsingborg Harbour Panorama now repaired/improved (colour of the
sky/burned out clouds) - new link:
http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p5215131.html
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman
Boris,
It certainly looks to me like she might be smiling. Her cheeks have that
look to them, don't they?
I was more concentrating on him looking through the viewfinder, though.
Until a moment before that shot, her back was to me, and I hadn't seen her
face at all. The point I was making
Yeah, what was up with that?
Geez, Cotty had the fake squirting cam, not me. Did he spook everyone?
vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Norman Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed all
Thanks, Peter.
I guess it's the models with crippled KAF mounts :-)
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. juni 2004 23:04
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SMC K 2.8/24mm
Hi,
I missed on few PAWs probably as I still haven't recovered the computer
enough to access old archives and I have not been shooting anything
interesting to use new photos for PAW.
This is from an paintings exhibition opening, where there was this fashion
show (the people doing
oops, forgot to add the link url...
http://fotof.wz.cz/paw
fra
John Francis wrote:
Look at the film he loaded into the *ist; Kodak Gold 800.
I agree, but...
It isn't a
bad film, but it's definitely aimed at the tourist snapshot market.
That's the audience this article is written for.
Which will buy a digital PS instead of the *ist D.
Almost useless
Pretty much...
Jens Bladt wrote:
Thanks, Peter.
I guess it's the models with crippled KAF mounts :-)
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. juni 2004 23:04
Til: [EMAIL
Ah, but is it necessary to understand the subject matter of a photograph
in order to offer an opinion on its technical and artistic merits? :-)
FWIW, the explanation: he's stitching handlebar tape onto his bike's
handlebars.
S
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
SJ
Took me a while to find this one again, so it's not exactly news anymore,
but I think this one is neater than the first.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/venustransit2.html
Cheers,
Jostein
-
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
