I was frustrated with the lack of a ~50mm f2.8 1:1 MF macro lens in
K-mount from Pentax until a found a Vivitar that did the trick. It's
a 55mm f2.8 MF macro that does 1:1 without an adapter. I never could
get used to AF macros, and I didn't want to go to the original Takumar
macro (the only Pent
Dang. And here I was hoping for at least one good argument on missile defence.
Ah well...
Oh, I've got a few gmail invites to give away, so if anyone's
interested, write me off-list. You get 1GB of storage, the ability to
send 10MB attachments, and a cool interface that groups threads as a
seri
Come on Rob, you've got to get it so I can have a go (-:
Seriously, doesn't 1:1 and QSF appeal to you? (Unseriously -) The lure
of something new and shiny? (-:
The other glut I've noticed on eBay is the 40mm M pancakes. Odd.
You wonder if people actually invest in lenses - and when they think
tha
Err... forgot to show you cave wheels:
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/x/47859
Herb, they had to set up the tooling for the mount they are using now,
it would have cost no more to set up
tooling for a mount with full compatibility, your argument holds no
water, it is pure sophistry.
Herb Chong wrote:
on a different assembly line from one that had the tooling already in pla
Also known as a bitch-wagon. Wonder how a real man like Bill could have
such poor taste when it comes to buying his truck.
Daniel Matyola wrote:
Looks like a real Gas Guzzler.
-- Original Message --
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
it starts with laughing.
-- Original Message --
From: Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:31:14 -0400
>That's OK, they are laughing at you because your tastes and
behavior are
>a bit different than theirs.
>
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:12:40 -0400, Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same here. I've found that showing some photos taken with the Optio S or
> Optio MX and printed on the Frontier 375 show the average consumer they
> NORMALLY don't need more than 3 megapixels for the usual 4x6 snapshot.
>
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Keith
My email to you keeps bouncing. Seems I, or my ISP, are on your blocked
list. So, here's my response to your public and private email.
Something wrong with my ISP, it seems. You aren't alone in being bounced...
All in the last couple of days.
=
I was hoping for a year of "homework".
Gives people a chance to pick up a book & learn a technique.
1. Single-light portrait or still life.
2. 1-second exposure
3. 1/1000-second exposure
Think outside the mirror box.
Sincerely,
C.Brendemuehl
"Politics is sup
Looks like a real Gas Guzzler.
-- Original Message --
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:09:05 +0100
>Excellent taste in transport!
Sent v
Chris Brogden wrote:
Whatever happened to politics, Mafud, and C/N bashing?
Bush will win anyway, Mafud is gone and we all switched either to C or
N. So we just post some pics from time to time and debate metering.
Sorry, Chris
For "the more moronic ones"? Nice. I was tying to give you the
benefit of the doubt, but you are making it hard.
-- Original Message --
From: Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:28:59 +0200
>And Daniel, I
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:57:35 -0400, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can shoot totally manual too, even without a light
> meter. What does that prove with regards to the subject?
> Nothing. I was arguing open aperture TTL metering
> is better than stop down TTL metering, not whether I
I am currently selling all my Pentax gear. I have been hanging on to my
Tonkina AT-X 300 2.8 just in case I decided to get an IST-D, but I have gone
the Nikon route
If you are interested drop me an E-mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I can
give you any details. If not it will be on E-bay som
whatever you do, note that usually archival life goes way down on a lot of
papers. you may find that the Epson inks on Epson papers last the longest.
did you receive your 4000 yet?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday,
On 25 Sep 2004 at 11:12, David Nelson wrote:
> You're still planning to get the D-FA right?
Not sure, not all that impressed with Pentax at the moment and my current kit
is doing all I expect it to do.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob,
Thanks! Very helpful. I'm assigning your response to a
folder for future reference. Considerate of you to
take the time.
Jack
--- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 Sep 2004 at 14:33, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > I'm curious about all things photographic
> including
> > digital. Si
Hahnemuhle Fine Art is perhaps a slightly nicer texture than Epson's,
but the ink chips off much easier. It's a great paper, but the finished
prints are very fragile.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2004, at 9:12 PM, Larry Hodgson wrote:
I would like some recommendations from users who have personally used
fin
Bingo! I'd say that's a wrap. Good thinking from both you and Frank.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2004, at 7:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Steady" responded to knarf's post thus:
Some good ideas here. I especially like the food gallery and the
anachronisms. I'm not much of a food photographer, but I'm very f
Great shot. He's lucky that she loves him for his politics :-)
Paul
On Sep 24, 2004, at 7:36 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Even in the midst of mass protest, the call for popular revolt and the
demand for the overthrow of our government, love will find a way
:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_
I would like some recommendations from users who have personally used fine
art papers for printing. What papers have you used and liked or disliked? I
have some 13x19 Velvet Fine Art from Epson, so I know about it. Hahnemuhle
has a large number of papers but I know nothing about how they perform. A
Yeah, I've noticed... mostly posting to the US only otherwise I'd
be sorely tempted. But of course, we all want the D-FA don't we (-:
I can imagine all those poor people selling their 50 macros being rather
upset about not having one for ages until the D-FAs turn up in the shops (-:
Actually, the
Click on the "Full Size" button at the bottom-right of the screen (not on
"Previous" or "Next") and you'll see the full monti!
Maris
frank theriault wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:08:50 +0200, Jens Bladt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here's a photograph I took this morning, right after sunrise
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ann Sanfedele"
> Subject: Re: A random snapshot
>
> >(snip)
> >
ann said
> > Your hands are a lot steady than mine - :)
>
> Bruce Rubenstein said the same thing.
>
LOL!
> Thanks for looking
> b
thanks for shotting something wo
On 25 Sep 2004 at 1:34, John Forbes wrote:
> Rob,
>
> Any chance you could post samples of similar images recorded initially as JPG
> and RAW? Or at least point to a URL? I have resisted buying PS CS (have
> Elements) so far, and want to try and evaluate how big the difference is, and
> whethe
And another fantastic photo!
Thank you once again.
Maris
Jens Bladt wrote:
> Here's a photograph I took this morning, right after sunrise (7:30
> AM).
> I enjoy making panoramas for my employer/work. I shot these (25
> shots) in RAW format with the *ist D and my SMC M*4/300mm. Then
> converted
on a different assembly line from one that had the tooling already in place
for about 10 years, it costs a lot.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: istDs - what a great camer
You weren't?
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: PESO: John Coyle
A very nice portrait, Ryan. You've made a pdml member look kind,
caring and gentle. The things one can to with a dslr!
Oh right, and next you are going to say that I lo
Think about it, the tooling would have cost the same either way. It's
not exactly like a new design was necessary.
Re-tooling would add to the project cost, if it were done now.
I'm not even sure that re-tooling would be necessary, I haven't taken a
*ist-d apart, anyone been that brave yet?
Her
Rob,
Any chance you could post samples of similar images recorded initially as
JPG and RAW? Or at least point to a URL?
I have resisted buying PS CS (have Elements) so far, and want to try and
evaluate how big the difference is, and whether, for my less critical eye,
it is worth paying for C
On 24 Sep 2004 at 17:21, John Bailey wrote:
> What was wrong with it?
It was a lovely high quality piece of plastic that scratches very easily and
needs to be cleaned often.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.a
Had anyone seen how many A50/2.8 macros have been flooding though eBay of late?
I wonder why they have all come out of hiding of late? The imminent
introduction of the FAD50 macro perhaps?
In any case they seem to be going for a song, so if anyone wants a pointer to a
serious lens that works r
Nice, Frank.
Joe
Alan,
So you actually got a Hoya SHMC uv filter and
"modified" it to fit?
JB
--- Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do wear glasses. The new glass eyepiece was
> made from the HOYA HMC SUPER
> UV filter.
>
> Alan Chan
> http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
>
> >Do you wear glasses? What exact
On 24 Sep 2004 at 14:33, Jack Davis wrote:
> I'm curious about all things photographic including
> digital. Since I own nine 35mm Pentax lenses, seems
> logical to check out the *ist D. While several have
> been playing with the phrase; "*ist D..what a
> wonderful camera", I've also noted the many
What was wrong with it?
JB
--- Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are crazy, Alan. But that doesn't mean you
> are not smart. You have
> been complaining about that eyepiece for as
> long as I remember, now you
> have fixed it. Way to go.
>
> --
>
> Alan Chan wrote:
> > Am I crazy or n
That's what I thought when I first saw it, apparently Zenit copied the
Pentax 110 look for a "modern" 35mm model.
Graywolf wrote:
It is a fake article. That is a Pentax 110 SLR in the photo.
--
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Andreas Wirtz wr
Frank, you don't know how hard Ryan had to work to get that impression! It
was near midnight and I was definitely feeling like a GOM (grumpy old man,
for those who didn't work it out).
Tanja was sorely missed, but we'll be able to get together again next month,
she tells me - and at least she h
On 24 Sep 2004 at 19:51, Caveman wrote:
> 3 fps wouldn't be that bad, you go move a light then come back at the
> camera and take a look etc question is can you do that without pressing
> the shutter release and actually writing and filling up the memory card
> ?
That's 3fps without demosaicin
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:56:37 -0400, Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's them Bell Sympatico acting again, their web hosting servers are
> working with interruptions. I also get low transfer speed and extremely
> poor name server services (I have to try 3-4 times until a name resolves).
> Can
Nice pic. Others (!) might have cropped it, but in fact the two faces
either side frame it well and reinforce the feeling of being in a crowd.
And I hate to use the F word, so I won't. There's no need.
Can't argue with his taste either!
John
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:36:24 -0400, frank theria
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:54:04 -0700, Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They sure need a shampoo!
>
Apparently, hygene is a bourgeois concept, as well as sharpness.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hi Keith
My email to you keeps bouncing. Seems I, or my ISP, are on your blocked
list. So, here's my response to your public and private email.
=
Hi Keith ...
What details do you need? What must I do to persuade you to part with a
camera or two?
It's them Bell Sympatico acting again, their web hosting servers are
working with interruptions. I also get low transfer speed and extremely
poor name server services (I have to try 3-4 times until a name resolves).
Can anyone recommend me some reliable DSL service provider in Montreal
area ? I
frank theriault wrote:
Even in the midst of mass protest, the call for popular revolt and the
demand for the overthrow of our government, love will find a way
:
They sure need a shampoo!
I remember a long time ago, when a drinkin' buddy and I used to visit a
couple of local pubs after work, and s
Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is a fake article. That is a Pentax 110 SLR in the photo.
>
> --
Hi Tom,
The article is probably fake, but the camera is a Zenit KM, or
at least almost identical to that.
See: http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/zenit_cameras.htm
and http://www.rugift.com/
Some good ideas here. I especially like the food gallery and the
anachronisms. I'm not much of a food photographer, but I'm very fond of
food :-).
Paul
On Sep 24, 2004, at 6:41 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:54:17 -0400 (EDT), CRB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Have the themes fo
the cost of the part would have been minimal, but the assembly line tooling
wouldn't have been. for a camera that has to cost Pentax at most $500 to
make, and probably under $400, a production run of well under 100K, on a
brand new line, when the company had lost money for 3 years in a row before,
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:26:22 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> He's on leave.
> WW
>
After the harrowing journey back from Afghanistan on one of our leaky,
rat-infested troop carriers, he deserves a vacation...
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri C
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 02:04:12 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, If anyone on the list is living in, or near, Kelowna, BC, Canada,
> could you please contact me offlist at:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks
>
> William Robb
Left something behind at a bar?
-frank
--
"Sharpness is
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 02:39:47 +1000, Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Earlier this evening we had a super mini- BrisbanePDML, aka the Tanless
> Evening (Tanya didn't show up because.. well, Tanya you
> explain..).Nevertheless, more scrumptious (courtesy Jan Coyle, ta!) food for
> the 3 of us (T
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:31:21 -0400, Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Click on the "previous" button and you'll get to the really good stuff
> ;-) ;-) ;-)
Hey, now ~that's~ a great shot!!
Such vivid colours, great composition/framing, beautiful lady. What's
not to like?
cheers,
frank
--
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:54:17 -0400 (EDT), CRB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Have the themes for '05 been set yet?
Not that I've seen or heard.
HEY, LET'S PLAY A GAME!!!
I think that we should get going with some suggestions. That way
Adelheid will have something to work with (she'll only ha
Click on the "previous" button and you'll get to the really good stuff
;-) ;-) ;-)
frank theriault wrote:
http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p7816978.html
Sadly, the pano is so small on my screen, I can't really get an proper
idea of how it looks.
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:45:52 +0100, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is that the five minute relief, or the full half hour?
I paid for five minutes, but it didn't take nearly that long.
-knarf
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I would have thought that a maximum sensor shift of 1-2mm would be sensible to give
1-2 stops improvement. It's about 10% of the linear image dimension. Anything more
than this wouldn't be compensating for camera shake, it would be used for earthquake
stabilisation.
Nick
-Original Message-
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:08:50 +0200, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a photograph I took this morning, right after sunrise (7:30 AM).
> I enjoy making panoramas for my employer/work. I shot these (25 shots) in
> RAW format with the *ist D and my SMC M*4/300mm. Then converted them to
>
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:05:58 -0400, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To impress the chicks, man!
>
Well, it hasn't worked so far...
-theriault
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I've seen two SMCP-A* ED Macro 200/4 sell on eBay, and have not yet seen a
listing for one at any of the online stores I watch, including B&H, KEH,
Adorama and many others. One of them sold on eBay in March 2003 and the
other in June 2004. Their sale prices are recorded on page 6 of the June
upda
Don,
I happily paid a list member $750 for one several years ago. This is a really rare
lens. I've seen it go for over $1,000 (US) on ebay in recent months.
I shot next month's (Oct'05) PUG contribution with it.
Regards, Bob S.
>>From: Don Herring
Subject: Lens Value
Greetings,
I'm comi
I'm curious about all things photographic including
digital. Since I own nine 35mm Pentax lenses, seems
logical to check out the *ist D. While several have
been playing with the phrase; "*ist D..what a
wonderful camera", I've also noted the many serious
praises.
Please help me understand what I rea
Working in the advertising biz, I've spent hundreds of hours searching
Getty. Good stuff. it's the number one rip-off source for art director
comps. Of course Getty knows that and they even help enable the ADs
with relatively high res samples. But Getty is also the number one
selling stock hous
I don't remember the exactly value, but if the body looks clean, it should
go for at least USD800+. I have a new tripod adaptor for this lens btw,
anyone wants it? Make me an offer.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I'm coming out of lurk mode to inquire about a site or book where I could
Here's a photograph I took this morning, right after sunrise (7:30 AM).
I enjoy making panoramas for my employer/work. I shot these (25 shots) in
RAW format with the *ist D and my SMC M*4/300mm. Then converted them to
JPEG's in Phase One SE (trial version) and stitched them together in Foto
Vista 3
I do wear glasses. The new glass eyepiece was made from the HOYA HMC SUPER
UV filter.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Do you wear glasses? What exactly is this mc
eyepiece. I couldn't tell from your gallery
shots.
John B
_
P
...and how to get some:
http://www.gettyartists.com/article.asp?article_id=720
Their main website is worth browsing: http://www.gettyimages.com
They also have a Central London gallery which I saw last week for the
first time. Some very interesting photos there - worth half a hour of
anybody's ti
Graywolf said:
> With this post I realized I should have been taking notes from this
> thread.
You could always do that from the archives -- a rainy day project, perhaps?
> What a great bunch of ideas for photos for my press camera
> website. Photos that would show both sides of this argument
With this post I realized I should have been taking notes from this
thread. What a great bunch of ideas for photos for my press camera
website. Photos that would show both sides of this argument are nonsensical.
I think that no one is thinking here. It has just gotten to the point of
"I'm right
It is a fake article. That is a Pentax 110 SLR in the photo.
--
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
No, in theory bumblebees can fly fine. The engineers just did not
understand some things that bumblebees did 50 years ago. Like the
fuzziness broke up the laminar airflow and reduced drag exponentially.
You ought to check out those hoary old cliches before using them, we
actually know a bit mor
Yes, yes you can.
Keith Whaley wrote:
You can put any price you want on an item that is an April Fool's joke...
keith
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Ah, that looks like one of those questionnaires that provide them with a
valuable, sellable, mailing list. I would not give my bank some of that
information.
--
mike.wilson wrote:
Hi,
Pentax appears to be collecting data on purchasers with a hook of
entering you for the cash prize draw.
Can an
You are crazy, Alan. But that doesn't mean you are not smart. You have
been complaining about that eyepiece for as long as I remember, now you
have fixed it. Way to go.
--
Alan Chan wrote:
Am I crazy or not?
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/pentax_z1p_custom_eyepiece
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Don Herring"
Subject: Lens Value
> Greetings,
>
> I'm coming out of lurk mode to inquire about a site or book where I
could
> get an estimate on the current value of a lens? Specifically a SMC
A*
> 200/F4 Macro ED (if anyone knows off the top of their head).
Added P.S. --
I have some 35mm film (36 exposure, Supra 400 Pro color neg.) that is
slightly out of date, but good stuff. Has always been refrigerated.
I'd be happy to send 6 or 8 rolls of that along too.
Lemme know.
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This is my third week teaching at the Sixth Street P
Hi!
ft> When you're dull and boring like me, you try to make yourself seem
ft> more interesting by hanging around interesting people.
Frank, it is not your choice to decide whether above is correct. You
might want to consult your lawyer friend for proper explanation ...
Excellent site and pict
Greetings,
I'm coming out of lurk mode to inquire about a site or book where I could
get an estimate on the current value of a lens? Specifically a SMC A*
200/F4 Macro ED (if anyone knows off the top of their head).
Any assistance would be appreciated.
Don
I can shoot totally manual too, even without a light
meter. What does that prove with regards to the subject?
Nothing. I was arguing open aperture TTL metering
is better than stop down TTL metering, not whether I
absolutely depended on either...Its an OPTIONAL feature,
an inferior OPTIONAL feature
This is my third week teaching at the Sixth Street Photography Workshop
(http://www.sixthstreetphoto.org) in San Francisco. It's a volunteer
position. I'm teaching a few basic photography classes and doing
some darkroom work for them, printing for an upcoming exhibition.
As with many non-profit g
Based on 19th century Victorian physics a honey bee cannot fly, it does
anyway so the theory had to be re-evaluated. We now build flying robots
based on the new theory. Wheatfield is just a bit behind.
Caveman wrote:
Which theory is that, Wheatfield ?
William Robb wrote:
In theory, bumblebees
Very nice shot. In some cities, lik Amsterdam, the windows in the red light
district look like this. Except it would be real women displayed:
http://www.fotokritik.dk/visstort.html?pic=65027
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse--
You can put any price you want on an item that is an April Fool's joke...
keith
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't see it as unfair at all. See my most recent post. I think
JCO is
arguing on one level, others on a different level. Theory may be
fine, but
practical experience is paramount.
The nub of the matter, indeed. But to me it went like this:
Larr
Which theory is that, Wheatfield ?
William Robb wrote:
In theory, bumblebees cannot fly.
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
Hear, hear!
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Bill, why do you waste your time with JCO on this issue. The friggin
thread's been going on for a week or so, nothing's going to get thru to
JCO. He's busy talking theoretical hyperbole, you, Paul, and others are
talking about what's practical, realistic, and wha
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman"
Subject: Re: OT - An interesting fake?
>
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> > Theory may be fine, but
> > practical experience is paramount.
>
> Cut the crap, Shel. This sounds sooo Rubensteinian. Theory comes
from
> practice too.
In theory, bumblebees c
Seems like a good moment to repost the Cottycam photo:
http://www.pbase.com/ccanuck/image/33130041
Cotty wrote:
Hey Fred. Just converted a K15mm 3.5 to EOS mount. Details soon ;-)
[sigh]
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
You still havent got it yet. Let me explain
for the 4th time.
It's been noticed before..
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: A random snapshot
> You still havent got it yet. Let me explain
> for the 4th time.
>
No John, I get it, you don't understand that for something that is
only going to affect my life once a decade, I am not going to pay
much heed
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: 4x5 experience - not Pentax WAS: Even more compatibility
issues again!
> Try one in daylight. It is very possible
> to get much faster shutter speeds than
> you are suggesting. Guess you missed my post stating the
> fact that pre
Thanks Paul and Maris.
Luckily, I am paid to do stuff like this, so I'm very happy, you think it's
OK. It's a great pleasure for me to be able to do photgraphs and fly, at the
same time. Both are among my favorite activities!
Our cunsultants will blend the photgraph with a computer model (AutoCad)
- Original Message -
From: "John Bailey"
Subject: 4x5 experience - not Pentax WAS: Even more compatibility
issues again!
> JC,
>
> What direction is the sail boat moving? I tried
> shooting a river boat on the Mississippi River
> with my 4x5 several years ago and I believe it
> was blu
Nice shot, Jens. Love that Velvia color.
Paul
> As some of you may remember I have promised to post a 6x6 photograph from my
> helicopter in the beginning of this month.
> This is the 6x6 phoptpgraph (here it's croped and compressed), which was
> chosen to be used in the project for our 42 ha hab
I read the article about the new Minolta in pop photo, but thinking back
now I am confused by something. I don't have the magazine here to
check, but I swear they said they put a 500 mirror lens on the camera
and that the image stabilized through the viewfinder when they engaged
IS. How could the
They do that at the expense of image smear. That would not be good for
stills.
rg
Graywolf wrote:
Tell that to the video camera makers, they apparently don't know that.
--
Gonz wrote:
Do you mean electronically? That would not work. Image stabilization
can only be done mechanically, either at
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
> Mr. O"Connell:
>
> I could give more serious consideration to your point of view if
you
> could try to be a little less arrogant.
Whee, I missed that one.
For the record, my initial metering was done severa
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes"
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
> Talking about interesting juxtapositions, look at the shape of the
parking
> meter.
I could have positioned that better.
b...
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
