> fra: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 25 Nov 2004 at 23:06, DagT wrote:
>
> > No
> >
> > In some cases I´ve got some CA (or purple fringing) as you can see here:
> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2478716
>
> Thanks for pointing me to your example images, I assume you ar
> fra: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> DagT wrote:
>
> >> That's funny, because I thought the 4000 ppi scan on the Nikon made
> >> the up-rezed 1DS image look pretty sad in comparison. However, as
> >> somebody said--apples to oranges. Interesting to look at, but . . .
> >
> >
> > Lik
The best one is the one you own.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2035313
DagT
PS: Sorry... :-)
You should be. (Nice Photoshop though).
Wrong, no photoshop. The image is unmanipulated :-)
Double exposure then?
S
William Robb wrote on 26.11.04 5:18:
> That is the beauty of AA batteries, even NIMH ones.
> My buddy with the Canon Rebel has spent a couple of hundred dollars
> on batteries for his camera.
> I've spent less than 100 for my battery set, and I get twice the life
> he gets.
There is no reason to b
I use my *istD for shooting hockey, see the website I maintain for the hockey
team of my doughter, http://www.xs4all.nl/~wuthrich/MD1/fotos.html , click on
any of the links of 'foto impressie van de wedstrijd ...' .
Also you can see the collage I made of the individual team members and the team
So I'm in a strange mood:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP7964.jpg
Created using my *ist D and A15/3.5 and a blatant disregard for the sun :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distu
Rob Studdert wrote on 26.11.04 12:51:
> So I'm in a strange mood:
>
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP7964.jpg
>
> Created using my *ist D and A15/3.5 and a blatant disregard for the sun :-)
Wow! This flare is very nice :-) And it is not easy to obtain, at least not
in such a inte
If you mean the people in the front seat, they're probably not for
real. I would guess they're dressed and made up for the dream cruise.
They certainly don't make me want to barf. A lot of people wear what
amounts to a costume. I have a shot of Popeye somewhere. I usually wear
an Elvis wig, so
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
Subject: Re: PESO: Cruising Woodward
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2907524&size=lg
Yikes!
Thats enough to make one barf, on a couple of levels.
are they for real? Pretty scary stuff ;)
Now Ann, you know it's impolite to mock othe
On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:24 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Unfortunately it isn't a time warp :(
Hawaiian shirts are back in, btw.
You're wrong. It is a time warp. It's from the Dream Cruise, which is a
week long, retro focused, party, where those of us in Detroit celebrate
what we do here by driving up
On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:26 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Well, THAT is a relief! I was going to say it didn't look quite real,
but
thought it was.
There are people like that out there, alas.
You're right, there are some people, who actually dress like that and
just kind of live in the past. You'll fin
Paul Stenquist wrote:
If you mean the people in the front seat, they're probably not for
real. I would guess they're dressed and made up for the dream cruise.
They certainly don't make me want to barf. A lot of people wear what
amounts to a costume. I have a shot of Popeye somewhere. I usually
I deleted the second one. No one liked it. The main difference was the
lack of a mirror, but I sort of botched up my first attempt at
darkening the sky as well. The one that's up there now is a
modification of the first version.
On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Rats, I can't ge
Friday, November 26, 2004, 4:45:15 AM, Shel wrote:
SB> Maybe this has been posted here before. Rollei, in a joint venture with
SB> Maco, has announced a new B&W film that reprtedly spans an ISO range from
SB> 25 through 1600. Details can be found here:
Good! Just yesterday I found it in our loc
I had that very combination in my hands on Wednesday at my local Camera
House store. It felt fine although not as solid as the D, but still tight
and with no gaping joints or flexing casings to spoil the feel. The
Financial Controller was looking impatiently over my shoulder so it was only
a brie
> You're implying that Nikon Capture
will process RAW
from the *ist D?
>
> Kenneth Waller
No.
I just mentioned the istD and my D2h can handle preset WB and i was just
wondering what
people were
using for the preset,(ice,lights,towel as per WW)be it the
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Christian wrote:
> Don Sanderson wrote on 11/24/2004, 8:38 AM:
>
> > What flash diffusers have you found to be the:
> > 1.) Easiest to use.
> > 2.) Most effective given the ease of use.
> > 3.) Most portable as far as space and sturdiness so they
> > don't get mangled rid
> fra: Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2035313
> >>>
> >>>DagT
> >>>
> >>>PS: Sorry... :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>You should be. (Nice Photoshop though).
> >
> >
> > Wrong, no photoshop. The image is unmanipulated :-)
Thanks Kostas, and everyone, for the suggestions.
I'm ordering the Stofen and I also found this:
http://tinyurl.com/4sj6t
I had an inflatable diffuser once called the "AirBrella" and
it worked well, it's no longer made but this looks similar.
The AirBrella had an elastic band to hold it and this on
It's not a traditional emulsion, it's a chromogenic. But it has pretty good
credentials.
http://db.riskwaters.com/public/showPage.html?page=199364
For your consideration.
regards,
Anthony Farr
Anthony Farr wrote:
It's not a traditional emulsion, it's a chromogenic. But it has pretty good
credentials.
http://db.riskwaters.com/public/showPage.html?page=199364
For your consideration.
I'm pretty sure it's not a chromogenic, Anthony - it's a similar idea
(three emulsion layers of differi
So? There are people with all sorts of appearances and beliefs "out
there." Why be critical of anyone because of their appearance. I can't
help but think of all those tattooed bikers dressed in leather that descend
on Sturgis every year, most of whom ar doctors, businessmen, and just plain
folks
You certainly have a flare for the unusual
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So I'm in a strange mood:
>
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP7964.jpg
>
> Created using my *ist D and A15/3.5 and a blatant disregard for the sun
:-)
Hi folks,
Update from last week. The 35 and the 70-210 went pretty quickly, I am
surprised the FishEye did not generate interest. Let me know if
interested and we can discuss price. Prefer UK and EuroZone (as I
don't do PayPal), but will discuss other parts if you are interested.
All with my usu
I've read as much information as I could find on this film (even posted
some links to it as well), and saw nothing to indicate it's a chromogenic
film. How did you come to that conclusion? Heck, even the photo in the
link you posted shows standard developers and fix are used, and the link
below c
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/copper3.jpg
Shot this one just prior to the rock shot i submitted last week. She's on the
rock, but i
was shooting into
the setting sun and was trying for a bit of a silloette thingy. Very cloudy
overc
Oops. I read too quickly where it said that it was made by "a process
similar to colour film manufacture ", and considering its sensitivity of
ISO25 to ISO1600, I presumed it was another C41 process b&w.
Interestingly, Rollei's own page about the film,
http://www.rollei.de/index_e.html gives
I love the looks and shape (Leica like) of the Super-Takumar focusing ring!
I may even buy a Spotmatic F just to get one :-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. november 2004 13:11
Til: Sy
Who said I only have one?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 26. november 2004 10:34
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Pentax's Best 50mm Lens
The best one is the one you own.
they are sweet, too bad the days of solid brass are gone :(
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 7:35 AM
Subject: RE: Pentax's Best 50mm Lens
> I love the looks and s
Does anyone know if it's possible to get a brighter focusing screen (maybe
even split image) installed in a Spottie or Spottie F?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Pentax's Best 50mm Lens
>
> they are sweet, too bad the days of solid brass are go
The days of new brass lenses may be gone but
the M42 Takumars arent. I think the sole reason
M42 is still so popular is the very existance
of those superb Pentax Takumar Lenses TODAY.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Steve Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 10:49
Orange, tangerine, they look the same...
Jon Glass wrote:
On Nov 26, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Peter J. Alling wrote:
What if it's an orange Apple.
There were only Tangerine Apples... ;-)
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildin
The A 15mm f3.8 and M are for the most part optically identical.
David Mann wrote:
On Nov 26, 2004, at 11:01 AM, jayers wrote:
It would be interesting to compare the M15mm f3.5 lens to the DA14.
I assume you mean A instead of M :)
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
--
I can understan
Which is something that keeps us afraid, very afraid.
Cotty wrote:
On 25/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes. I think you've got it.
Oh I've got it alright yeah baby I've got it
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cot
I'd say have fun, but you know that would be dripping with sarcasm.
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
I'm dropping off the list for (hopefully) a day while I move into my
new house. Or should I say the bank's new house.
Provided nothing breaks or gets rained on, I should return within 24hrs.
Cheers,
- D
Alright then where can I buy one of those...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DagT wrote:
That's funny, because I thought the 4000 ppi scan on the Nikon made
the up-rezed 1DS image look pretty sad in comparison. However, as
somebody said--apples to oranges.
Yes, I agree on both counts.
Rob Studdert wrote:
So I'm in a strange mood:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP7964.jpg
Created using my *ist D and A15/3.5 and a blatant disregard for the sun :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PRO
AFAIK, there never was an M15/3.5 ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Peter J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 11/26/2004 8:09:50 AM
> Subject: Re: Samples from 14 2.8
>
> The A 15mm f3.8 and M are for the most part optically identical.
>
> David Mann wrote:
>
> >
Hi JC, good point!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 8:01 AM
Subject: RE: Pentax's Best 50mm Lens
> The days of new brass lenses may be gone but
> the M42 Taku
There was an optional split image screen for Spotmatics, but it wasn't
meant to be installed by consumers. I don't know where you would find
one, and I don't know how difficult it might be to install a new
screen. My Spotmatic Motor Drive had a split image screen.
Unfortunately, I sold that cam
correct, only K and A models.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: Samples from 14 2.8
> AFAIK, there never was an M15/3.5 ...
>
> Shel
>
>
All right how many 50's do we all have? JCO doesn't count since I think
he has at least a hundred.
Jens Bladt wrote:
Who said I only have one?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 26.
Probably, but at what cost.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to get a brighter focusing screen (maybe
even split image) installed in a Spottie or Spottie F?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pentax's Best 50mm Lens
they are sweet
There were factory split image screens available.
I have a few Pentax M42 few bodies with them.
I would think ( but not sure ) that you could
steal a K-1000 screeen and install in a spottie
if you wanted the split-image ( not sure if they
are brighter though ).
Regarding
the brightness issue, sure
Sorry, K, I should have corrected that. I'm still doped on tryptophan.
(At least that's my story and I'm stickin' to it).
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
AFAIK, there never was an M15/3.5 ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11/26/2004 8:09
Friday, November 26, 2004, 4:57:15 PM, Shel wrote:
SB> Does anyone know if it's possible to get a brighter focusing screen (maybe
SB> even split image) installed in a Spottie or Spottie F?
I think it's possible. Actually, I did so in my SP 1000. The assembly
would be probably the same.
I tried i
right, there is no "M" 15mm lens.
This brings up the question, did
pentax ever relabel any of the "K"
lenses as "M" with exact same optical
and mechanical design? ( i.e. they
relabelled it "M" because it was
already a very compact design by
industry standards when
initially released as a "K"?)
Im
Dag,
It's great fun to see how many people you trick by the orapple. :-)
It's a neat shot, though.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: P67 vs D1s -- photo.net
> > fra: Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROT
There's a better pun in asking Collin where he's going to for such an
occasion...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So you don't want to be what you eat?
>
> Cotty wrote:
>
> >On 24/11/04, Collin Brendemuehl, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
>
In M42 mounts, out of 11 total, I have (4) 50mm Takumars: 2 Super-Taks,
an S-M-C and an SMC.
Then, in K-mounts, out of 17 total, I only have (5) Pentax 50mms: an SMC
Pentax, 3 SMC Pentax-Ms and an SMC Pentax-A.
Ooops! Had 5. I donated 2 "-Ms" to Shel for his "school."
keith whaley
Peter J. Allin
Keith Whaley wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> > If you mean the people in the front seat, they're probably not for
> > real. I would guess they're dressed and made up for the dream cruise.
> > They certainly don't make me want to barf. A lot of people wear what
> > amounts to a costume. I have
Hi Paul ...
I know about the split image screen, however, my main interest is in a
brighter screen, and a brighter split image screen would be super. Thanks!
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There was an optional split image screen for Spotmatics, but it
I've got about seven or eight
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Peter J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 11/26/2004 8:26:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Pentax's Best 50mm Lens
>
> All right how many 50's do we all have? JCO doesn't count since I think
> he has at leas
The one's that I can think of at this moment are
M/1.4, A/1.7, A/1.4, with an FA/1.4 in the mail. BTW,
Shel asked what I was looking for in image quality,
and I guess I would lean towards overall sharpness.
However, I have learned so much from this group that I
will probably keep most of them for
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I deleted the second one. No one liked it. The main difference was the
> lack of a mirror, but I sort of botched up my first attempt at
> darkening the sky as well. The one that's up there now is a
> modification of the first version.
>
>From a purely compositional view I
Uhhh.
This situation is my kind of nightmare.
With the *istD, I find that flare occurs with the sun further outside
the frame than it used to with 35mm film. There's the curse of an
image circle larger than the sensor...:-(
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTE
Thanks for the clarification.
I'm looking for a RAW convertor ( better than the Pentax supplied plug in)
that will work with Windows 98 SE. I have access to the Nikon Raw convertor.
As far as white balance is concerned, I shoot all my stuff outdoors in jpeg.
and have been having good results with
So I guess this is a Solar Bear?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 6:51 AM
Subject: PESO Hail to the flare bear
> So I'm in a strange mood:
>
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IM
Hey, they can't all be gems. (Watch it there...)
Jostein wrote:
There's a better pun in asking Collin where he's going to for such an
occasion...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So you don't want to be what you eat?
Cotty wrote:
On 24/1
Dave, I like the pose and the background trees, but the exposure needs
help - way to dark on the face on my monitor.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 5:17 AM
Subject: Paw N'other one of Copper
>
>
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:26 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Well, THAT is a relief! I was going to say it didn't look quite real,
> > but
> > thought it was.
> > There are people like that out there, alas.
> >
> You're right, there are some people, who actually dress lik
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> So? There are people with all sorts of appearances and beliefs "out
> there." Why be critical of anyone because of their appearance. I can't
> help but think of all those tattooed bikers dressed in leather that descend
> on Sturgis every year, most of whom ar doctors, bu
> This brings up the question, did pentax ever relabel any of the
> "K" lenses as "M" with exact same optical and mechanical design?
I think that the K 100/4 Macro was "morphed" into the M 100/4 Macro
and the M 100/4 Dental Macro without any significant changes.
Similarly, I think that the K 400/
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:24 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> >>
> >
> > Unfortunately it isn't a time warp :(
> > Hawaiian shirts are back in, btw.
> >
>
> You're wrong. It is a time warp. It's from the Dream Cruise, which is a
> week long, retro focused, party, where those of us
Last count was:
3 Pentax M (One ea. 2,1.7,1.4)
3 Penatx A (One ea. 2,1.7,1.4)
1 Pentax KAF (1.7)
3 Pentax SM
3 Other brand K/KA
2 Other brand SM
Don (Asking himself why he still wants MORE?)
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 2
I think we are in a decade of no style, or every style, things from the
50's 60's 70's and 80's are in "style". Maybe 40's and 90's for that
matter.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:24 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Unfortunately it isn't a time warp :(
Hawaiia
Because you can :))
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Don said:
> Don (Asking himself why he still wants MORE?)
Peter J. Alling mused:
>
> All right how many 50's do we all have? JCO doesn't count since I think
> he has at least a hundred.
I've only got three; the A50/f1.7 I've had for ages (I believe I got
it in 1983 when I bought my Super Program), the A50/f1.4 I picked up
through rec.photo.marketplace
"Peter J. Alling" wrote:
> I think we are in a decade of no style, or every style, things from the
> 50's 60's 70's and 80's are in "style". Maybe 40's and 90's for that
> matter.
>
LOL! yeah - guess that's right...
ann
who likes the sentiment displayed on the French Connection United Kingdom
ab
...doesn't say anything about the glass in the A20/2.8... However,
the brochure does say it has a "Pentax original Floating Mechanism".
So I guess you'll be ok if it falls into a bucket of water.
Cheers,
Bob
I'll favor my K28/2 when I go canoeing then. Any other floating lenses?
Andre
2 50/1.4 Tak's, 2 50/1.4 SMCT's, 1 SMCK 50/1.2, 1 SMCK 50/1.4,
1 SMCA 50/1.4
I need to set the Tak's in a window for a while.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004
Quoting Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why be critical of anyone because of their appearance I'm
surprised at your seemingly narrow-minded
> comment, Ann.
Her comment rather took me by surprise, too -- like Keith, I wondered if she
was perhaps looking at a different picture.
I w
Hi!
KK> Asahi Pentax Takumar 17/4 Fisheye (M42) Mint
KK>
KK> In its original cardboard box, only missing the dedicated case (but
KK> the strap is in its original nylon bag!). No blemish of any kind.
Kostas, I wonder what is your price tag for this len
Quoting "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> All right how many 50's do we all have? JCO doesn't count since I think
> he has at least a hundred.
Three of them here -- M50/1.4, M50/2, F50/1.7
(Two were bought on purpose, the other came with an ME Super from a pawnshop
several years ago.)
Well I started it so I might as well contribute.
m42
Super Tak. 1.8,
SMC Tak 1.8 x 2 (So they're 55's close enough I guess.)
SMC Tak 1.4
K mount
SMCP 1.8 (see note above.)
SMCP-M 1.4 x 2
That makes 7 so I guess I'm a piker by comparison to some on this list.
I almost never use them since I find
Actually, that was an Apple-insider's joke. As in Apple computers. When
the Apple iBook first came out, one of their colors was Tangerine... it
wasn't allowed to call them "orange" only "Tangerine" as in a
"Tangerine iBook," _not_ and "orange iBook." :-D Sorry, OT...
On Nov 26, 2004, at 5:12 PM,
Hi!
lptc> What is the advantage of a pentaprism compared to the penta-mirror?
lptc> I have an MZ-6 with a penta-mirror.
I think it can be "measured" very simply. Take a soft lens, mount it
on MZ-6 and try to bring it to focus manually without electronics
helping you. Then, mount same lens of *ist
I would say that the K 50/1.4 was "downsized" into the M 50/1.4,
without any "major" optical changes (although there may have been a
wee bit of "tweaking" done...).
The M lens is a new design. Different elements dimensions, curves
and space between them. Boz' site for years had the same diagram
Your Copper looks a lot like the dog we had when I was
growing up--the trees in the background remind me of
our wooded back yard, too. It brings back nice
memories.
Apart from the dog's less-than-endearing facial
expression at the moment of the snap, I think the
picture could be improved through
On 25/11/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>That is the beauty of AA batteries, even NIMH ones.
>My buddy with the Canon Rebel has spent a couple of hundred dollars
>on batteries for his camera.
>I've spent less than 100 for my battery set, and I get twice the life
>he gets.
That is
Well, I did say "seemingly". As for smilies, perhaps you should add 'em
yourself ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'm glad at least you said you were surprised Shel :) Cause I don't
think I'm
> narow minded - in a socialogical sense,anyway - just op
Gee, what kind of PDMLer are you if you've not run at least some sort of
comparison test? Sheesh! The audacity of some people. At least put 'em
side by side and photograph them
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Three of them here -- M50/1.4, M50/2, F50/1.7
> ERNR
> wh
On 24 Nov 2004 at 20:49, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Just wondered if any Sydney people knows where I can get some big prints
> done from Pentax raw files. Did think of buying an Epson 2200 printer and
> doing
> my own, but figure it might be easier to get it done commercially if someone
> would ac
It's a fine lens ... got one a few months ago and initially wasn't too
happy with it, but after some use and closer examination of the photos and
scans, have been very pleased. It'll be great on the istD(s), and works
pretty well as a "wider" portrait lens on a 35mm slr as well. Plus, the
AOV mak
I dont doubt it. I had a hard time getting it to this stage.:-)
Its not a great image,just thought id pass it on until i get a better one going
next
week
Dave
> Dave, I like the pose and the background
trees, but the
exposure needs
> help - way to dark on t
On 26 Nov 2004 at 11:30, Don Sanderson wrote:
> Last count was:
> 3 Pentax M (One ea. 2,1.7,1.4)
> 3 Penatx A (One ea. 2,1.7,1.4)
> 1 Pentax KAF (1.7)
> 3 Pentax SM
> 3 Other brand K/KA
> 2 Other brand SM
I used to be like you, I had 4 x A50/1.2 and a K at one stage, I'm now back to
a far more s
"...but the focus point guidelines could be distracting"
One of the first things I did with my D was to turn these off. I'm sure
one can with the DS as well.
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Why be critical of anyone because of their appearance I'm
> surprised at your seemingly narrow-minded
> > comment, Ann.
>
> Her comment rather took me by surprise, too -- like Keith, I wondered if she
> was perha
How are you metering these images?
I would spotmeter the dog's face & compensate accordingly (bracket reduced
exposure around -1.0, <-1., -.5, -1.5>)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 9:52 AM
Subject: Re:
Hi Dave,
You know i"m a sucker for dog shots :-)
But this really doesn't work for me. The
background is just too grey and the dog isn't
sillhouetted enough. It looks like she has her front
lower canine tooth hooked over her top lip in that
goofy way that dogs often do when you want them to
pose
Hi Boris,
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Boris Liberman wrote:
> KK> Asahi Pentax Takumar 17/4 Fisheye (M42) Mint
> KK>
> KK> In its original cardboard box, only missing the dedicated case (but
> KK> the strap is in its original nylon bag!). No blemish of any k
On 26/11/04, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm dropping off the list for (hopefully) a day while I move into my
>new house. Or should I say the bank's new house.
Good luck Dave.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.
On 25/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Oooh, your bad.
I admit it.
Norm will appreciate that, when he logs on ...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 25/11/04, Steve Larson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hey Cotty :)) How ya be?
Never the same since you coerced me into bastardising a l'il ol' AF280T !
Where will it end?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 26/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>All right how many 50's do we all have? JCO doesn't count since I think
>he has at least a hundred.
I once bought a Tak 55 as an experiment. I have a K50 1.2 that I have
transformed into an EOS-K 50 mm 1.2 buit am selling it soon. When
On 26/11/04, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>So I'm in a strange mood:
>
>http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP7964.jpg
>
>Created using my *ist D and A15/3.5 and a blatant disregard for the sun :-)
What's the building Studdsy?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | P
*evil laugh* You can always just send that lil old flash to me, and pretend
it never happened. :)) Naw, we like your Frankenquipment.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Novemb
On 26/11/04, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Nothing to be afraid of in either crowd.
That's because I wasn't there.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
