So I'm taking pictures at a show, and the *istDS locks up.
Out of nowhere, it sets itself in bulb mode, won't let me trip the shutter,
won't let me do anything.
Turn the camera off, turn it on, it pops the flash, the back displays VERSION
1.0 and goes black, and same story.
Annoyed now,
Good choice. I have Optio S4 - maybe it´s the same? 4 megapixels.
I´m thinking about upgrading to Optio SV because it´s slightly bigger,
easier to hold.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Optio S4i is even better: smaller still and with 3x zoom. Optio SV has 5x
zoom but it is slightly bigger - 5 megapixels, not bad.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Nick Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On 18 Dec 2004 at 19:29, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This is something I've advocated for the longest time. In some instances
going up two sizes is also acceptable. Just don't be afraid to experiment
a bit, and use the largest hood feasible for a given lens. Invariably the
sliding hoods on a lot
On 18 Dec 2004 at 19:54, Luigi de Guzman wrote:
Buying a microsoft operating system is just a bunch of cash I'd rather save
for
a 35/2 lens.
An OEM licence is generally provided with machines at a cost far less than that
of a 35/2 lens but I can appreciate that it's not in your budget.
On 19 Dec 2004 at 1:02, Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Rob
hey, Winter with snow in Zurich just started some ours ago here and you have
tomatoes in the garden! Sorry, but somehow I like the soft look of Steve's
photo
more, your photo looks more like a real tomato :-) greetings Markus
Yes it's
Hi all,
I've been messing round with my flash lately (although I abhor using it) I
made a make-shift omni bounce thing out of a milk jug and some hot glue.
The camera that I'm using doesn't have TTL flash metering so I'm wondering
how the diffuser (or ceiling bounce) will effect the exposer.
Hi all,
I've been messing round with my flash lately (although I abhor using it) I
made a make-shift omni bounce thing out of a milk jug and some hot glue.
The camera that I'm using doesn't have TTL flash metering so I'm wondering
how the diffuser (or ceiling bounce) will effect the exposer.
Not only did I get it twice, but now I've commented twice! vbg
Ooops! :-O
For some reason your first comment didn't turn up in my mailbox. :(
I guess my ISP choked on it.
Liked it then, like it now. I asked in my previous comment, did you
desaturate everything but the yellow of the daisies?
--- Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been messing round with my flash lately (although I abhor using it) I
made a make-shift omni bounce thing out of a milk jug and some hot glue.
The camera that I'm using doesn't have TTL flash metering so I'm wondering
how the diffuser (or ceiling
Hello all,
I am in the market for a new printer to print off a few images from
time to time and occasional other stuff as well.
The question is do I go for an ink jet printer or a colour laser
printer?
The laser seems cheaper to run and a bit more to buy. The laser also
has advantages in the
Francis wrote:
Hi all,
I've been messing round with my flash lately (although I abhor using it)
I made a make-shift omni bounce thing out of a milk jug and some hot
glue. The camera that I'm using doesn't have TTL flash metering so I'm
wondering how the diffuser (or ceiling bounce) will effect
Hi,
A*200/2.8 as examples), and even on other brands of lens (notably some
Leica lenses) are way too shallow to handle many lighting situations.
the problem with doing this with rangefinder cameras though is that
the longer hood can obscure the viewfinder even more than the correct
hood does.
Except the fac that you can cheat wit ha bit of modding as Michel
describes pretty well on his website.
You can use matrix mùetering, PTTL atc even with M42 lenses if ya want :D
-
Thibouille
Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
Steve Pearson a écrit :
Ok, I picked up the 360 flash today. I
What's the website address?
Don
-Original Message-
From: Thibs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 5:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istD w/ SMC-M lens-wireless 360 flash?
Except the fac that you can cheat wit ha bit of modding as Michel
describes
I thought a film camera was the requirement.
If digital then the Pentax 43WR isn't bad, especially if you want a waterproof
camera, but it is a bit slow and the control over settings is limited. LCD
isn't good in daylight either. Image quality is good, and it can get those
pictures when most
Paul.
I dont have a diagram, but I believe I have drawings of the parts somewhere.
As for the circuits, it's quite easy because different contacts inside the
flash has to be used for NiCads or normal batteries/AC-DC units. I use a 1,5
amp paoer unit, as shown in the photograph. For a few dollars
Now that I do not have bellows any more the Slide Copier A needs a good
home. It is free, I would like to get postage, though.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
The *istD will do strange things when the batteries are almost dead. I
suspect the S is the same. I would guess there's a momentary voltage
drop that causes computer glitches. Never shoot without backup
batteries.
Paul
On Dec 19, 2004, at 3:34 AM, Luigi de Guzman wrote:
So I'm taking pictures
So what's the correct pronunciation for Scheimpflug?
Pop Quiz:
Who knows what it is without looking it up?
For the record, I do.
Well, with Austria being our close neighbour I know how to
pronounce good ole' Theodor Scheimpflug's name. But I guess those
who know German are excluded from
Luigi de Guzman wrote:
Sun, 19 Dec 2004 00:43:04 -0800
So I'm taking pictures at a show, and the *istDS locks up.
Out of nowhere, it sets itself in bulb mode, won't let me trip the shutter,
won't let me do anything.
Turn the camera off, turn it on, it pops the flash, the back displays VERSION
Thanks Jens, any extra information will be useful.
Paul
I went a-wandering this morning to try and find a tree that would look
nice for next months PUG. Today's the first sunny day that I've had a
chance to go out with my new *istDS so I thought I'd have a bit of an
experiment. Suffice to say, the experimentation didn't go too well and
my tree shots
I have now posted three aditional photgraphs (click next), showing details
of the battery attrap.
I'll try to find the drawings during the Christmas Holidays.
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p10029920.html
All the bst
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
True, that's why a more careful choice may be required. The 46mm Heliopan
tele hood is fine on the Leica 90mm Elmarit, yet the Contax hood (G3 I
believe) is a bit more intrusive, although I don't think (can't remember)
if even it intrudes into the 90mm frame line. Plus, as Rob noted (and you
I very much like the Heliopan hoods, expensive as they my be. Much to my
chagrin, the source I had (SpeedGraphic in the UK) no longer carries them,
and I've never been able to find them here in the US. However, over the
years I've discovered that hoods from different cameras will work great on
Hi,
However, I randomly spied a couple of birdies up in a tree and got a
few shots. http://cowfish.org.uk/paw/birds.html is my favourite (270kb
I'm afraid...)
Although what rather tropical looking birds like these are doing in
Gunnersbury Park in west London in December I'm not sure.
If
On Sunday 19 December 2004 05:28, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 Dec 2004 at 19:54, Luigi de Guzman wrote:
Buying a microsoft operating system is just a bunch of cash I'd rather
save for a 35/2 lens.
An OEM licence is generally provided with machines at a cost far less than
that of a 35/2 lens
Great shot. They appear to be parakeets or some near relative of the
same. i'm surprised that you find them in London.
On Dec 19, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Billy Abbott wrote:
I went a-wandering this morning to try and find a tree that would look
nice for next months PUG. Today's the first sunny day
PS:
I'm almost embarrassed, that my little invention looks so primitive.
However, I can assure you that this practical gadget, of which I have four,
have worked nicely for more than a decade.
If you are a skilled craftsman, you can no doubt make it look a lot better.
If the centre column is made
On Dec 19, 2004, at 3:00 PM, Billy Abbott wrote:
However, I randomly spied a couple of birdies up in a tree and got a
few shots. http://cowfish.org.uk/paw/birds.html is my favourite (270kb
I'm afraid...)
Although what rather tropical looking birds like these are doing in
Gunnersbury Park in west
You are right, William.
I certainly would appreciate a Guide Number 60 (metric) flash for the main
light, 45's for fill-in, background etc. Maybe Ill get one cheaply someday,
but they are qiute rare at the used market :-)
Today I use a professional studio (Courtnay and Visatec), but if I use the
Beautiful shot Billy!
I agree, looks like someones pets escaped.
Wrong country for those.
I'm not a bird fancier but I do know any
specimen of the parrot family is in the
neighborhood of $500-$1000+ around here.
Might even be some reward money there!
(Ooh, Ooh, a new lense!!) ;-0
Don
Billy,
Nice catch! Fortunate general lighting, to say the
least.
Did you note the focal length setting? Cropped?
Anticipating possible surprises always enriches the
hunt even when working a particular theme.
Noel,
Jack
--- Billy Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went a-wandering this morning
- Original Message -
From: Luigi de Guzman
Subject: weird *istDS glitch
My batteries were close to being totally discharged, though. (they
were fully
depleted by the end of the night)
One problem causing a series of other problems.
These things don't like to have weak batteries.
It's strange that Sigmas website doesn't say anything
about P-TTL for Pentax.
I wonder if they have or will add this feature to
the top of the line DG Super too?
The one the link takes you to is the ST standard
version, nice flash but for $50.00 extra the Super
gives a lot of additional features.
Hi Shel,
IIRC the cine format for 35mm film is roughly similar to APS digital
format. Some are of retrofocal design, so adoption could be perhaps
possible (I don't know what is they register of Arri bay mount). There
are some outstanding lenses like UltraPrimes from Zeiss, e.g. 16mm
Distagon-T
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's strange that Sigmas website doesn't say anything
about P-TTL for Pentax.
I wonder if they have or will add this feature to
the top of the line DG Super too?
Actually, it's *only* the DG Super that has this feature. (Sorry for the
incorrect link in the
Whenever I go photogaphing with one of my Metz CT 45 flash units, I use a
home made battery container. This will allow me to shoot lots and lots of
photographs without running out of batteries.
The container is pictured here:
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p10035293.html
LOL
Seems like some people will never understand the risks of introducing
foreign species.
These days, in Bergen, they are hunting for four racoons. Illegally
imported as pets and currently on the run...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
I'm still on the list, just too busy to read it every day. Thanks for
the off-list heads-up, Bill.
Don's Photo can order the MX screens for you if they're still
available from Pentax, but we don't have them in stock at the moment.
We won't be ordering anything before Christmas, so you're
On 19/12/04, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have now posted three aditional photgraphs (click next), showing details
of the battery attrap.
I'll try to find the drawings during the Christmas Holidays.
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p10029920.html
Hey Jens, not bad. I hereby award
Hi,
Seems like some people will never understand the risks of introducing
foreign species.
These days, in Bergen, they are hunting for four racoons. Illegally
imported as pets and currently on the run...:-)
Over here the wild boar have us on the run:
On 19/12/04, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
they
must be descended from Jimi Hendrix's pet parrots.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/3869815.stm
during the summer I saw a couple of exotic birds on a pavement in
Southwark. When I approached them they flew up a tree where they
remained
On 19/12/04, Jon Glass, discombobulated, unleashed:
They certainly look like a pair, however. I wonder if you
could find them again, and try to rescue them with some food or
something. I can't imagine that they will do well this winter.
Au contraire mon frere. We here in Britain bask in mild
F Figure about 6.000-15.000 Euro for one prime!!!
Of course, some older lenses would be much cheaper. Some even under
1000$. The information whether they are retrofocus or not and what
their registration dist. is rather hard to find though :-(
I would have myself liked such a beast, finally a
On 19/12/04, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
You would have few problems though:
1) weight - from 1 to 3 kg for primes, few times that for zooms...
2) price...
3) price...
4) price...
Figure about 6.000-15.000 Euro for one prime!!!
The man's right about price.
Here's a suitable lens:
On 19/12/04, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
Of course, some older lenses would be much cheaper. Some even under
1000$. The information whether they are retrofocus or not and what
their registration dist. is rather hard to find though :-(
This may be a starting point Fra:
Hi,
Au contraire mon frere. We here in Britain bask in mild winter sunshine,
coconut palms waving idly in the breeze. Why just the other day a herd of
elephant loped gaily past my house.
they'd be pink, then, would they?
--
Cheers,
Bob
On 19/12/04, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
. Why just the other day a herd of
elephant loped gaily past my house.
they'd be pink, then, would they?
By golly they were!
In fact I have a feeling that they'll be back this evening.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
Sh** it seems it doesn't work anymore with *ist, *ist-D and *ist-DS. A
shame :(
That said, if ya need that for any AF body (other than these)
Site is in french: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/pentax/multizone.htm
and here are a couple more basic infos in english which were used by
Michel:
cousins of these in this article in a New YOrk paper ???
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/brooklyn/nyc-birds0209,0,107050.story?coll=nyc-topheadlines-brooklyn
annsan
Billy Abbott wrote:
However, I randomly spied a couple of birdies up in a tree and got a
few shots.
Hi Rob
I scanned it as a negative, so the backlit of the scanner was on.
But taking photographs with a manual Pentax makes me feel a lot more like
an artist ;-)
I will soon try some of your and others tips with different (Ikea)light and
without flash or
with the soft ball at least
greetings
Hi Bob
yes ,I was quite surprised about the quality and will sometimes (ab)use the
scanner if I need a picture of a flat thing quickly for a selling auction,
because my cameras are analog and will be for the next time to come
I'm still thinking about the reference thing, a coin is good but
Hi Don
very useful information and exactly what I was looking for, thanks.
I will, of course, not ask now, whether there are any third party lenses
(for ex. from Ricoh) which are equal or even better than their Pentax
counterpart, will I ;-)
thanks
Markus
Try these two links:
Yes, quite easy to make yourself.
But it's kinda convenient to just put one, that does this, in the camera hot
shoe.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 18. december 2004 19:19
Til:
Hello Leon,
Not much to pass on, but here it goes. So far, I haven't seen a color
laser print that really looks like a photograph (unlike the inkjets).
Seems that color lasers are more useful for things like business
graphics.
Other things to consider - do you want to print on 4x6 paper?
Hi Leon
I had the chance to print for free on a friends Canon A3 CP660 color laser
printer some times ago.
In the default settings, the pictures where way too dark and to much red and
blue.
Interestingly, Red seems to be the most critical color to print.
The printer can be adjusted in it's menus
You know our motto: If it isn't Pentax, it's Cra*!
Honestly though I own about 10 brands of lenses, some
are great, some are not.
My opinion won't agree with anyone else here 100%.
But if Cotty goes to all that trouble to mount
Pentax glass on his Canonwell, enough said!
Don
Laser printers are for mass production and speed. If you want photo quality
prints, you have to go with an inkjet. I've printed for gallery shows, my
portfolio and various other critical projects with my Epson 2200. The quality
is outstanding.
Paul
Hello Leon,
Not much to pass on, but
hehe
Both of which once naturally belonged to the fauna of the British
isles.
Sounds like a good idea. Could structure the rabbit populations a bit
too, I suppose. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 6:20
RS I don't know of any serious Linux apps for photo-imaging, unfortunately Gimp
RS isn't a consideration for anyone wishing to maximize their post production
work-
RS flow, consistency and quality. Not all applications for Windows cost,
NeatImage
RS provides a stand-alone application for free,
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: OT: Ink or Laser printing
Laser printers are for mass production and speed. If you want photo
quality prints, you have to go with an inkjet. I've printed for
gallery shows, my portfolio and various other critical projects
with my Epson 2200.
On Dec 19, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Cotty wrote:
This parrot is dead:
http://www.sfon.tv/Images/ringlogo_Dead_Parrot.jpg
No, no, no, no 'e's _restin'_. ;-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As soon as I mentioned to people here in London that I was shocked to
find parrots everyone told me about the mysterious breeding
populations with a surprised didn't you know that? i thought everyone
did.
We've got a puma in Surrey though, why not parrots in Ealing? :)
billy
If anyone's interested, here is the OSRAM Pilot I mentioned earlier. Four of
these was what got
me started building my own studio falsh outfit many years ago.
Even after 12-14 years it still works fine:
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p10042157.html
The downside of working with stuff like this
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 07:55:35 -0800 (PST), Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Billy,
Nice catch! Fortunate general lighting, to say the
least.
Did you note the focal length setting? Cropped?
Anticipating possible surprises always enriches the
hunt even when working a particular theme.
It
Really? My digital minilab does decent work, but they get $10 for an 11x14. I
can print a far superior 11x 17 for about $4 on my Epson 2200. And I get to
keep the full frame without going up another print size.
Paul
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: OT: Ink or Laser
Hi,
Billy Abbott wrote:
However, I randomly spied a couple of birdies up in a tree and got a
few shots. http://cowfish.org.uk/paw/birds.html is my favourite (270kb
I'm afraid...)
Ringnecked parakeets, breeding from a few escapees about 30 years ago.
Not heard of any records from London before.
Bob W wrote:
during the summer I saw a couple of exotic birds on a pavement in
Southwark. When I approached them they flew up a tree where they
remained for quite a long time before flying out of sight. They were
not parrots, but had (iirc) blue, red, green and yellow plumage.
European Bee eater?
Cotty wrote:
On 19/12/04, Jon Glass, discombobulated, unleashed:
They certainly look like a pair, however. I wonder if you
could find them again, and try to rescue them with some food or
something. I can't imagine that they will do well this winter.
Au contraire mon frere. We here in Britain
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 20:10:14 +, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Billy Abbott wrote:
However, I randomly spied a couple of birdies up in a tree and got a
few shots. http://cowfish.org.uk/paw/birds.html is my favourite (270kb
I'm afraid...)
Ringnecked parakeets, breeding
Hi guys,
One of my labs does excellent work from scanned files as well as negs.
While they may cost a bit more than an inkjet print, I don't have the
investment cost of buying the printer to deal with, so, for the time being,
it's a great deal for me. The quality is quite good, especially when
I'd be happy to make you a print, from one of your files or mine.
Paul
Hi guys,
One of my labs does excellent work from scanned files as well as negs.
While they may cost a bit more than an inkjet print, I don't have the
investment cost of buying the printer to deal with, so, for the
Yah, one has to be careful. Remember what happened in Jurassic Park (grin).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Seems like some people will never understand the risks of introducing
foreign species.
These days,
Hi Don
We don't know what else Cotty breeds in his Frankenstein laboratory, bit you
have a valid point here for sure :-)
greetings
Markus
You know our motto: If it isn't Pentax, it's Cra*!
Honestly though I own about 10 brands of lenses, some
are great, some are not.
My opinion won't agree with
Well, no in fact it is just the opposite. My 55mm 1.8 has a 52mm thread
and I thought (didn't check, stupid heh?) it was 49mm, just as he TAK one.
So I'm left with a Tak 55mm circular metal hood with a 49mm thread - I
wanna use it on my 50mm's.
Thibouille
Kostas Kavoussanakis
Hi Jens
The first link shows me only an empty page...
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p10042157.html
a lovely portrait of Nanna , I enjoyed it.
I understand that I *must build some kind of softbox too, but I have two
left hands.
greetings
Markus
I eventually ende up makine home made soft
Hi,
Ringnecked parakeets, breeding from a few escapees about 30 years ago.
Not heard of any records from London before. They go along with the
scorpions in Sussex, the wallabies in the west midlands and the lowland
gorillas in the bottom reaches of the Clyde valley. Guess which of
those
Hi Shel
color prints from my Epson 2100 on good paper are *much* better than from
the color lasers I have seen.
Color lasers are very good for business chart prints but not for *critical*
photos
like portraits with skin tones or large uniform areas of color.
I think I already know the results of
Has anyone tried this in versions of Photoshop earlier than CS? I have 7.0.
Thanks,
Joe
maybe this link helps a bit choosing the right printer:
http://www.laser-printer-reviews.org/
greetings
Markus
In a message dated 12/19/2004 6:02:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, any advice on a free image manipulation program for Windows
would be great - my trial period for PSP ran out the day I got the DS
and I need something to tide me over until the new year, when I can
On 19 Dec 2004 at 20:29, Frantisek wrote:
The free version of NeatImage is quite cr*p. It removes noise but
introduces so much JPEG compression that the picture is worse off than
before.
Nothing excellent comes for free, not even co-developed Linux apps, the problem
is the cost of those
How about using a wedding band as a reference?
Size will vary somewhat, but gross size is less variant than coins
across borders.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:43:34 +0100, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bob
yes ,I was quite surprised about the quality and will sometimes
Of course these are all lasers. They're okay for business, but not suited for
fine arts. I've reviewed a couple of hundred pro books in the last year. I
don't remember one that wasn't exclusively inkjet prints. I've never seen a
laser print in a good photographer's portfolio. They just don't
Hi,
during the summer I saw a couple of exotic birds on a pavement in
Southwark. When I approached them they flew up a tree where they
remained for quite a long time before flying out of sight. They were
not parrots, but had (iirc) blue, red, green and yellow plumage.
European Bee eater?
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Adobe RAW Converter
Has anyone tried this in versions of Photoshop earlier than CS? I
have 7.0.
No, but for anyone interested, the Beta version of 2.4 does support
the istD.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: OT: Ink or Laser printing
Really? My digital minilab does decent work, but they get $10 for
an 11x14. I can print a far superior 11x 17 for about $4 on my
Epson 2200. And I get to keep the full frame without going up
another print size.
I
Hi Paul
please look again.
They do compare lasers from the newest generation to inkjets.
And I have to admit that the lasers are getting better
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 10:45 PM
To: [EMAIL
I used to work with a guy we called Oran Utang.
His knuckles occaionally dragged on the ground.
And Jon is right, that parrot is just resting - not dead.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:09:42 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ringnecked parakeets, breeding from a few
I make several 11x17 prints every week. I tried the digital minilab. They
couldn't deliver pro quality prints. I was coming very close to making great
prints with my epson 1200, but it was worn out. So I bought the 2200. I think I
paid less than $400, and I have a three year replacement
Hmmm. Sorry, I went back, but I still don't see any real comparisons. The site
is obviously a promo for laser printer manufacturers. And I'm sure they have
improved their quality in recent years. But as I said in another post, I don't
know a single pro photographer who prints his or her
So get a step ring ... problem solved.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Thibs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, no in fact it is just the opposite. My 55mm 1.8 has a 52mm thread
and I thought (didn't check, stupid heh?) it was 49mm, just as he TAK one.
So I'm left with a Tak 55mm circular metal hood
Great capture. The bird on the left is a little hot on my monitor.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Billy Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 9:00 AM
Subject: PESO - A Pair of Birds
I went a-wandering this morning to try and find a
Billy
IrFanView has only the one setting (that I've found so far) for
sharpening and I was also thinking it was a bit too much, but it's
better than without the sharpen. WHEN I get ps/psp everything will
be
better...well, less polar in sharpening at least :)
In the meantime you might
Hi,
Bob W wrote:
during the summer I saw a couple of exotic birds on a pavement in
Southwark. When I approached them they flew up a tree where they
remained for quite a long time before flying out of sight. They were
not parrots, but had (iirc) blue, red, green and yellow plumage.
European Bee
No, it won't - at least for me - I have to actually SEE results and to
direct comparisons. Net based images and reviews are, IMO, close to
worthless.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12/19/2004 1:32:09 PM
Subject: OT color lasers
Whoa! Less than $400.00 for a NEW Epson Photo Stylus 2200? That sounds
like an amazing price. Everywhere I checked the price was around $650.00
or so.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] So I bought the 2200. I think I paid less than $400,
and I have a three year
On 19 Dec 2004 at 20:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? My digital minilab does decent work, but they get $10 for an 11x14. I
can print a far superior 11x 17 for about $4 on my Epson 2200. And I get to
keep
the full frame without going up another print size. Paul
I must have hit the
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
