Hi,
So you cannot parse a short english sentence.
That's all.
It's pretty hard to parse a one word sentence.
Nonsense!
--
Cheers,
Bob
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:21:10 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Zaninovic Subject: Re:
Capture One Pro vs Adobe RAW converter
You are talking about cost to develop the software and I am talking
about cost per user of that software, these
Hi Tan
Congratulation on your work and I wish you all the best with your project.
I just had a first glance at the site and will comment in more detail later
and have a look at the photos ;-).
At first sight, I struggle to read the menu easily. It does indeed look good
but the font are not very
Hi Ann
did anybody tell you that the winder and shutter of the Pentax SFx series
are very l o u d.
No chance to take pictures unnoticed.
Otherwise I like them a lot.
greetings
Markus
Ohoh - sounds too good for me to sell it for her
on ebay - maybe I'll
take it for myself as my commission for
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's pretty hard to parse a one word sentence.
Nonsense!
You mean, like:
n o n s e n s e !
: - )
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, you're not a spirit after all...
wink
Everyone gets a little high-spirited about GFM, so you can't blame him
really...:-)
wink,
Jostein
Hi everyone
I'm considering taking the digital plunge probably an *istDs the dilemma
concerns the choice of lens.
Namely between the:
Pentax DA 16-45 f/4
vs
Tamron SP AF17-35MM F/2.8-4 Di
Based on the comments read here It seems that the 16-45 is a great lens and
I like this one. Nice composition, fun stuff. Did you just fire away or
did you speak to them first? Either way is fine. I'm just curious.
Paul
On Apr 15, 2005, at 10:19 PM, Peter Williams wrote:
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault
Interesting stuff. A little dark and a little green on my monitor,
however.
Paul
On Apr 15, 2005, at 11:11 PM, Cesar wrote:
Before I sit down to go through another 14 rolls of film from my trip,
I figure I would put up a couple of early scans.
The two shots up at the moment are
Hi Patrick
The advantage of the Tamron is that it will also give me an ulta
wide for my 35mm film bodies and that's cause of my dilemma. While
reviews of the Tamron abound I have found very little info on it
when used with a film body.
Popular Photography reviewed the lens with film, I
there is no Kirk L bracket for the *istD. you have to get the camera plate
and then add the generic L bracket. the generic L bracket attaches to the
camera plate via the tripod socket in the plate, which means it will no
longer attach to a regular 1/4-20 threaded tripod screw. i assume you are
John Francis wrote:
William Robb mused:
That's just your country, and it isn't supposed to happen until 2006 IIRC.
By 2008. Although as the Pres. has just woken up to what it is he
signed into law, and publicly stated he thinks it's a bad idea, I
rather suspect that after the 60-day public
Hmmm. If you're like most of us (not all, mind you, but most), use of
the lens on your 35mm film bodies won't be an issue.
Paul
(Who is planning to drag out his 6x7 kit and some BW film this weekend.
The darkroom is getting dusty.)
On Apr 16, 2005, at 6:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Keith:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/04/15/bush.passports.ap/index.html
Jim
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Francis wrote:
William Robb mused:
That's just your country, and it isn't supposed to happen until 2006
IIRC.
By 2008. Although as the Pres. has just woken up to what it is he
signed into
I suppose this should be a PESMOS (Photo Every Six Months or So) but
I'll try to contribute more frequently in future..
This photo was taken several years ago at Mungo National Park in south
western New South Wales, an area of spectacular landforms and
historical importance. I was only there
Very nice. It has a surreal quality that is quite fascinating.
On Apr 16, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
I suppose this should be a PESMOS (Photo Every Six Months or So) but
I'll try to contribute more frequently in future..
This photo was taken several years ago at Mungo National Park
Jim Hemenway wrote:
Keith:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/04/15/bush.passports.ap/index.html
Jim
thanks, Jim...
keith
did anybody tell you that the winder and shutter of the Pentax SFx series
are very l o u d.
No chance to take pictures unnoticed.
Otherwise I like them a lot.
Fortunately, Pentax did significantly lower the sound level in the SF-1n
and the SF-Xn, which is one of the main reasons to look for
Super shot Brian.
The contrast between the land that awesome sky is very striking.
Very well done.
Dave S
On 4/16/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. It has a surreal quality that is quite fascinating.
On Apr 16, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
I suppose this
Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~sgap/photos/paw/mungo-paw.html
Great shot Brian!
(And I almost didn't even bother to read your post because I assumed
Mungo Lunette was the latest teenage pop star!)
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
G'day Brian,
Brian Walters wrote:
This photo was taken several years ago at Mungo National Park
*jealous*
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~sgap/photos/paw/mungo-paw.html
Nice moonscape (pun sadly intended)!
Cheers,
David
Yes, the sky is superb. Was this taken on a tripod with a very slow
shutter speed at dusk?
John
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:36:10 +0800, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Super shot Brian.
The contrast between the land that awesome sky is very striking.
Very well done.
Dave S
On 4/16/05,
Sure.
Mishka
It's pretty hard to parse a one word sentence.
William Robb
I wouurd if yaou juust strted typeing in englesh. instead of metatastizing.
best,
mishka
On 4/15/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not getting personal at all ... I juust wouldn'rt expect you to see what
I'm talking about.
Shel
Three? I see only two Dee glasses there! Where's the third one?
mishka
From: frank theriault Subject: PAW: Three Dee Glasses
Ignacio and Bettina found that wearing the proper eyewear greatly
enhanced their Art Gallery Experience:
- Original Message -
From: Jim HemenwaySubject: Re: Gone Again and a GFM note
Keith:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/04/15/bush.passports.ap/index.html
Jim
Expect to see it rewritten so as to not be a requirement of US citizens.
It's the protectionist way.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Bob W Subject: Re: Hurrah for Shel Disrobing the Emperor
It's pretty hard to parse a one word sentence.
Nonsense!
At least you give more than one syllable to work with.
William Robb
I've done a little IR with the *ist-D and a Hoya RM 90 (Wratten 87B
equivalent, I believe.) Maybe this filter just blocks too much light, but
you need long exposures even at high ISO and bright light.
Here's a sample of a shot straight from the camera, with no adjustment:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino Subject: Re: IR with *istDS
I've done a little IR with the *ist-D and a Hoya RM 90 (Wratten 87B
equivalent, I believe.) Maybe this filter just blocks too much light, but
you need long exposures even at high ISO and bright light.
I did some IR
Hi,
It's pretty hard to parse a one word sentence.
Nonsense!
At least you give more than one syllable to work with.
Damn.
--
Cheers,
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Patrick
The advantage of the Tamron is that it will also give me an ulta
wide for my 35mm film bodies and that's cause of my dilemma. While
reviews of the Tamron abound I have found very little info on it
when used with a film body.
Popular Photography
Patrick,
I don't have either lens. You may already know this, but here goes anyway.
The PhotoZone survey for the Tamron has input from 6 users for 35mm film and
13 for APS-C dSLR; these two data sets are very consistent and rate the lens
quite highly for optical performance. The same PhotoZone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. If you're like most of us (not all, mind you, but most), use of
the lens on your 35mm film bodies won't be an issue.
Paul
(Who is planning to drag out his 6x7 kit and some BW film this
weekend. The darkroom is getting dusty.)
On Apr 16, 2005, at 6:19 AM, [EMAIL
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/firedrum.html
Caught these entertainers on Market Street in San Francisco. They were
putting on quite a show. Comments welcome. If you'd care to comment,
please let me know if this size allows you to see the entire photo and the
caption without scrolling.
I've read that the Hoya R72 is still the filter of choice for digital IR but
of course this all depends on the camera and such.
I will be picking up one today I think (67mm) as long as I can get a step
down ring for my lenses :)
Cheers
Dave
-Original Message-
From: William Robb
I doubt that. The suggested rule will almost certainly be amended to
exclude any additional requirements for Canadian citizens. The US auto
industry immediately screamed foul when the passport requirement was
suggested. Hundreds of truckloads of Canadian made auto components are
delivered
Bob wins. Nonsense isn't an English sentence. However, Damn is a
complete sentence if the word da,m is used as a verb and the doer of
the action is an understood you.
On Apr 16, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
It's pretty hard to parse a one word sentence.
Nonsense!
At least you give more
Thanks for the URL I would be interested in hearing from users of
the tamron especially those who own / have used both the tamron 17-
35 di and the pentax da16-45.
Sorry I have neither but the Tamron 28-75 is very good FWIW.
John
Some digitals did not incorporate as strong of an IR filter, or in come
cases, any IR filter at all, so you can get better results from them. The
RM 90 blocks everything below 820 nm in wavelength, so you are into the
purely IR end of the spectrum. This filter won;t work with near IR films
Three? I see only two Dee glasses there! Where's the third one?
You're only looking at the image in two dimensions - try looking at it in
three dimensions.
Fred
Shel,
Yes, with a total top/bottom clearance of 'prox 1/4.
Strange, but interesting 'action' shot.
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/firedrum.html
Caught these entertainers on Market Street in San
Francisco. They were
putting on quite a
I love the DA 16-45, but I haven't used the Tamron. Remember also that
Pentax is going to release a DA 12-25. That will provide an ultra wide
digital alternative.
Paul
On Apr 16, 2005, at 10:17 AM, Patrick Genovese wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. If you're like most of us (not all, mind
Hi Shel,
I can easily see the whole image. It fills less than 1/2 my screen.
It's a fun situation, but it gets lost in the pic. Of course the scene
is what it is, but the busy background is very distracting. The blazing
overhead light is unattractive. A little less contrast might improve
the
Seems like just about all the new lenses are zooms ... what primes has
Pentax released recently?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
I love the DA 16-45, but I haven't used the Tamron. Remember also that
Pentax is going to release a DA 12-25. That will provide an ultra wide
even more (by a huge margin) stuff that's produced from film
in the labs stinks.
so?
So you are a bad printer.
Thats all.
William Robb
So you cannot parse a short english sentence.
That's all.
It's pretty hard to parse a one word sentence.
William Robb
you
oh, i see. the third Dee glasses are supposed to be on the person looking at the
picture. silly me!
mishka
On 4/16/05, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Three? I see only two Dee glasses there! Where's the third one?
You're only looking at the image in two dimensions - try looking at it in
Hi Paul,
I played around with curves and with shadows/highlights, and was able to
get the contrast down a bit. In fact, after uploading the pic I decided i
wasn't satisfied with it and redid it with a little less brightness using
curves to tone down the highlights somewhat.
Yep, it's a busy
I read in today's paper of the imminent breakup of MG Rover.
Last large car maker in the UK.
Sad that!
They said some 5000 will lose their jobs.
Will Rover be able to survive on it's own?
keith whaley
Hello Brian,
Very nice image. Maybe you should try to get it scanned again, if you
can't come close to matching the original. Anyway, it has a
other-world style to it. The blue sky and very cool clouds help
remind me that this is an image of earth.
Nice job.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
D-FA 100mm and 50mm macros, DA 14mm, DA 40mm, not real earth shattering
but the did release them.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Seems like just about all the new lenses are zooms ... what primes has
Pentax released recently?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
I love the DA 16-45,
Pedant.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Bob wins. Nonsense isn't an English sentence. However, Damn is a
complete sentence if the word da,m is used as a verb and the doer of
the action is an understood you.
On Apr 16, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
It's pretty hard to parse a one word sentence.
Hi!
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/firedrum.html
Caught these entertainers on Market Street in San Francisco. They were
putting on quite a show. Comments welcome. If you'd care to comment,
please let me know if this size allows you to see the entire photo and the
caption without
Seems like just about all the new lenses are zooms ... what primes has
Pentax released recently?
Two DA lenses, Shel:
DA 14 f2.8
DA 40 f2.8 Limited
Got the last one two days ago and am going to head out to test it in a
few minutes.
Two more DA primes are forthcoming -- at about 25 and 65 mm.
Joe
Hello Shel,
First off, I can see the entire photo and caption with no scrolling.
Now on to the pic, the BW tonal range is very good - another
technically good shot/processing. Somehow, this shot doesn't quite do
it for me. I'm thinking that perhaps the angle with the fire just
doesn't show any
Hi Shel,
Pentax has already released a 40/2.8 pancake prime, a 50/2.8 macro, and
a 14/4 prime. A 50/1.4 is supposedly in the works. I think we can
expect a steady if slow stream of both primes and zooms.
Paul
On Apr 16, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Seems like just about all the
The D FA 50/2.8 macro, D FA 100/2.8 Macro, DA 14/2.8, DA 40/2.8 are
all primes and recent releases (in Pentax frame of reckoning grin)
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, April 16, 2005, 8:05:37 AM, you wrote:
SB Seems like just about all the new lenses are zooms ... what primes has
SB Pentax
Former English teacher.
On Apr 16, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Pedant.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Bob wins. Nonsense isn't an English sentence. However, Damn is a
complete sentence if the word da,m is used as a verb and the doer
of the action is an understood you.
On Apr 16, 2005, at
I'm considering taking the digital plunge probably an *istDs the dilemma
concerns the choice of lens.
Namely between the:
Pentax DA 16-45 f/4
vs
Tamron SP AF17-35MM F/2.8-4 Di
--
The DA 16-45 is excellent. At 16 mm. it outperforms the DA 14 f2.8. But
if you are
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/50web/index.htm
This is a small gallery of 11 shots I took this morning.
The last one (FocusPoint.jpg) shows the point I had
the camera, in spot focus mode, aimed at.
The first 5 (141-145.jpg) are manually focused shots
taken with the A50/1.4 at 1/2000 and 1.4.
The
I found this when going through some old stuff that my parents didn´t
want to keep.
http://www.foto.no/diskusjon/images/154698.jpg
DagT
Looks like an old rangefinder lens - one of those old school lenses that
have the shutter in the lens itself.
That's my guess - what do I win if I'm correct? :-)
Cheers
Dave
-Original Message-
From: DagT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 12:09 PM
To:
Continuing work on a number of static, textural compositions ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/16p.htm
Comments always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:47:04 -0600, Joseph Tainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember, there has to be a way that third-party manufacturers gain
their price advantage.
Joe
It's called volume. They are able to spread their design and tooling
costs over a far larger number of lenses sold.
Beautiful shot - very elegant the way the land formations and clouds work
together, and the colors are excellent.
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From:
Hmmm. Well, the autofocus shots are a lot closer than the manual focus
shots. Other than that, it's hard to draw many conclusions from this. I
guess you should have your camera checked out. It seems to be causing
you a lot of problems and aggravation. Since the autofocus shots are
closer than
Surely it's short for May God damn you. The understood you is the
object, whilst the good Lord is the subject.
John
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:33:39 -0400, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob wins. Nonsense isn't an English sentence. However, Damn is a
complete sentence if the word
It's certainly a shutter, with speeds from Time, Bulb, 1, etc, to 100.
Not an action freezer.
John
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:17:24 -0400, David Chang-Sang
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like an old rangefinder lens - one of those old school lenses that
have the shutter in the lens itself.
It's Rover that's closed. The name is owned by BMW, but a Chinese company
has the rights to make some of the cars. What they will be badged as is
anyone's guess.
John
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:21:00 -0700, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I read in today's paper of the imminent breakup
I suspect that this would work much better as a print than as a screen
image. I don't think the computer does it any favours.
John
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:25:41 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Continuing work on a number of static, textural compositions ...
The Wollensak Raptar was used as an enlarging lens. Note that there's an
area after the Wollensak name that's been blanked out. Check to see if it
say Dumont.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 4/16/2005 9:34:23 AM
Subject: Re:
pnstenquist wrote:
Some nice pics. Love those water droplets and the nice bokey. Did you
shoot RAW
or jpeg? On my monitor the greens are a bit muddy, and the contrast is a
bit
low. If you shot RAW you might adjust the tint a bit and perhaps up the
color
temperature slightly. A bit more
Thanks for the comment.
It certainly does a lot nicer at a much larger size and on paper.
Derezzing it for web page display knocks out textural detailing that
resharpening for the lower resolution cannot restore, although it does
image at least satisfactorily on my screen.
Godfrey
On Apr 16,
Hi,
Saturday, April 16, 2005, 3:22:52 PM, Shel wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/firedrum.html
Caught these entertainers on Market Street in San Francisco. They were
putting on quite a show. Comments welcome. If you'd care to comment,
please let me know if this size allows you
Hi,
Saturday, April 16, 2005, 3:33:39 PM, Paul wrote:
Bob wins. Nonsense isn't an English sentence. However, Damn is a
complete sentence if the word da,m is used as a verb and the doer of
the action is an understood you.
Actually, I wrote Nonsense! as well, so I win either way. In fact, I
Hi,
Saturday, April 16, 2005, 4:21:00 PM, Keith wrote:
I read in today's paper of the imminent breakup of MG Rover.
Last large car maker in the UK.
Sad that!
They said some 5000 will lose their jobs.
Will Rover be able to survive on it's own?
It's not imminent any more. It's a car
I realized that it could also be a macro lens. The cro on the lens
suggests that, and Wollensake did make a Raptar macro on that focal lengh
and aperture.
Shel
The Wollensak Raptar was used as an enlarging lens. Note that there's an
area after the Wollensak name that's been blanked out.
Thanks for making me understand...:-). I ordered for L bracket, body plate.
I found RRS's ballhead BH-25 very interesting because of its light weight
and also has Arca swiss QR platform.
My existing slik ballhead weights ~700 gms and can take 3Kgs load.
RRSs BH-25 weights 186gm and can take
To me it looks like it may be for a large format camera.
?
Dave S
On 4/17/05, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this when going through some old stuff that my parents didn´t
want to keep.
http://www.foto.no/diskusjon/images/154698.jpg
DagT
...and the shutter mechanism looks a lot like this one:
http://tinyurl.com/czyej
Dave S
On 4/17/05, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To me it looks like it may be for a large format camera.
?
Dave S
On 4/17/05, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this when going through some
Hi!
This is the result. It's still not quite true to the original but
it's getting there.
Comments, of course, are welcome. Click on the i icon for technical
and other info.
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~sgap/photos/paw/mungo-paw.html
Brian, technicalities aside, this is lovely picture. If you
Hi!
Continuing work on a number of static, textural compositions ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/16p.htm
Comments always appreciated.
It looks quite textural on my screen...
I should say I like it more than the previous one of the series you
posted. However, I do remember it, so
Hi!
Went to shoot some macro today. Very little luck with rather constant
very soft but annoying breeze...
My wife and daughter spotted this guy behind the window of the closed
restaurant. Perhaps I will make a print and hand it to the owners...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/boris71/9571234/
Hi,
Many of you are probably as fascinated as I am by human origins, so
I'd like to post this animation which reconstructs the spread of
people out of Africa, according to current theory. It seems to match
the paths traced by Stephen Oppenheimer in his recent book.
Warning: if you think it all
Hi Shel
the picture *and* its size is fine here with Avant Browser, 1 additional
search toolbar and 1280x960 resolution settings;-)
greetings
Markus
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/firedrum.html
Caught these entertainers on Market Street in San Francisco. They were
putting on quite a show.
Very interesting Bob. Thanks for sharing.
Dave S
On 4/17/05, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Many of you are probably as fascinated as I am by human origins, so
I'd like to post this animation which reconstructs the spread of
people out of Africa, according to current theory. It seems
Never so much as bumped it. (Yet)
The wierd thing is with 70mm and longer lenses
I can manual or auto focus with little problem.
Only the shorter ones, which should be easier to
focus, give me frequent trouble.
And as far as wide open goes I just took 6 shots
with the FA50/1.7 at F8 and as near as
Hi Godfrey
I would use this photo as a nice (text) background (for a flyer maybe or the
web) .
Alone it asks for a little bit more - for me.
greetings
Markus
Subject: PESO: Others 2005 - 16p - GDG
Continuing work on a number of static, textural compositions ...
Hi Boris
I like this photo a lot but not its mini size on Flickr ;-)
It would be even nicer if the record was played.
Giving prints to the owner or subject is always very nice and helps us
all.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble connecting to Flickr...
I'll try again later, just in case...
keith whaley
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Went to shoot some macro today. Very little luck with rather constant
very soft but annoying breeze...
My wife and daughter spotted this guy behind the window of the closed
restaurant.
Here is an infrared page with the Ds mentioned in comparison with other
cameras and he also has some samples from the ds and tips.
http://www.jr-worldwi.de/photo/index.html?Pentax_ist_DS_ir_sensitivity.html
Greg Cooper
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada
Keith Whaley mused:
John Francis wrote:
William Robb mused:
That's just your country, and it isn't supposed to happen until 2006 IIRC.
By 2008. Although as the Pres. has just woken up to what it is he
signed into law, and publicly stated he thinks it's a bad idea, I
rather
(That is) Nonsense! is just as much a sentence as Damn (you)
Paul Stenquist mused:
Bob wins. Nonsense isn't an English sentence. However, Damn is a
complete sentence if the word da,m is used as a verb and the doer of
the action is an understood you.
On Apr 16, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Bob W
Keith Whaley mused:
I read in today's paper of the imminent breakup of MG Rover.
Last large car maker in the UK.
Sad that!
They said some 5000 will lose their jobs.
Will Rover be able to survive on it's own?
There is no Rover as a separate entity.
Land Rover hasn't been part of the
I don't suspect the mirror, autofocus is as dependent on the mirror as
is manual focus. However the autofocus in Pentax cameras is below the
mirror and follows a different light path than the view through the
pentaprism. I suspect that the ground glass is in a different effective
plane than
LOL. Just remember Cesar, if you're going to get a 6x7 make sure it's
NOT a pretty one like Bob's, but rather one slightly brassed like
mine... And I do not plan on modeling this year, I fear I've aged past
my prime.
Norm (get out of my van) B.
Cesar wrote:
Norm!
Muito bem!
I have not had the
Cool stuff, but the colors seem a bit wanky on my monitor (not the lizard).
Norm
Cesar wrote:
Before I sit down to go through another 14 rolls of film from my trip,
I figure I would put up a couple of early scans.
The two shots up at the moment are
Hi,
there's a very long feature about Salgado in the current edition of
the New Yorker.
Their website has a recording and slide show:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/covers/articles/050418onco_covers_gallery
--
Cheers,
Bob
And there is no reference to *istD compatible L bracket in Kirk site.
Call them and tell them what you have and want. The L bracket I got was not
*ist D specific, it was for any camera that had one of their arca swiss
mounting plates.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Ramesh
Nice capture. Good exposure composition. The sky looks somewhat unreal
tho.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 7:54 AM
Subject: PESO - Mungo Lunette
I suppose this should be a PESMOS
In that type of shutter, it looks like wide angle lens for a 2x3 (or
thereabouts) press camera. It certainly has the age.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
Caveat: This information should be viewed critically. It may merit as much
technical excellence as a CBS news report.
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
