Hi,
Its a lovely shot. Did you lie on the beach for it? If so you got wet?
What type of equipment did you use?
Cheers,
Ronald
Christian wrote:
- Original Message - From: Kenneth Waller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So it's a Joisey bird!
with the accent and everything! :-)
I like
Thanks David,
I might visit the place on my next trip to South island,
Cheers,
Ronald
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 12, 2005, at 11:28 PM, Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
Wonderful picture. You really got the rocks right. Is it some kind
of limestone?
Yes, it's limestone. The river has been
Hi Ralf,
I kind of think its a cool picture. I like the stars from the lights.
They ad to the mood.
Cheers,
Ronald
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
First tests with DRI. I'm not exactly happy with the result. I find it
looks a tad dull, but all attempts to raise the contrast or saturation
make
Hi,
I actually think it gies some extra depth to a picture when small river
rocks are sharp. I howver liked the framing better of your first picture.
Cheers,
Ronald
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:56 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
What bothers me:
Just doesn't appear sharp - the walls
I agree about Minolta software. I've been using the Scan Dual II
since 2000 and the supplied software is junk.
Vuescan works just great for me, I've been using it for years and
thousands of scans so i know it very well now. If you want something
that might be easier/slicker, do a google
On Dec 12, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
First tests with DRI.
What is DRI?
Oh, and did I say I hate those stars?
Use a larger aperture.
Any suggestions other than repeating the shot with medium format which
is what I'll do anyway on saturday?
You need to learn how to
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/12/13 Tue AM 05:39:26 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Outdated ektachrome???
I'm trying to decide if it's even worth shooting this stuff. I've got
several rolls of 120 size Ektachrome dated 1999. It's all e6
professional and
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/12/13 Tue AM 05:50:46 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: For Roberts, Brewer and others who ride on two wheels
On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:09 AM, Cotty wrote:
How about this...a Bugatti VeyronUK motoring journo Jeremy
On 13/12/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's not their job to publish inspirational and joyful photos. The world is
awash with that type of photo. What it's short of is good hard news
photography.
It's their job to provide a balanced view of good hard news. Speaking of
which - here's
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I was thinking about this last night. It seems that most everyone on the
list, at least from the usual gang of regular posters, has made the move
to digital. Who hasn't,
I haven't. But you knew that already.
and who have no plans to do so in the near or
foreseeable
mike wilson wrote:
E, it's not his show. He's just a Sun journo that got a
lucky break. His co-presenters regularly show him up for the
grunting buffoon that he is.
It's an amusing programme, which has very little relevance to the average
motorist. Much of the time is spent on cars
Sorry guys, just nailing my flag to the mast. i think Top Gear is
brilliant, and one of the few TV progs that has me laughing out loud,
and top=notch production values. The coverage of the cars is first rate,
camera and editing. Clarkson and the others are just puffed egos but it
works fine for
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:34:57 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I agree about Minolta software. I've been using the Scan Dual II since
2000 and the supplied software is junk.
Vuescan works just great for me, I've been using it for years and
thousands of scans so i know it
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The cars are the real stars.
They are certainly more interesting than anything else on the programme. With
the possible exception of putting people in a car to do a timed lap.
m
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Cotty wrote:
Sorry guys, just nailing my flag to the mast. i think Top Gear is
brilliant, and one of the few TV progs that has me laughing out loud,
and top=notch production values. The coverage of the cars is first rate,
camera and editing. Clarkson and the others are just
Hi Ralf,
I think you can achieve what you want by using curves. Try adding some anchors
along the straight line, and then pull the lower 1/4 a bit down. If you think
that the adjustments affects the wrong range of tones, try moving the anchors
up and down along the diagonal and play around until
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/12/13 Tue AM 10:15:49 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Top Notc^H^H^H^HGear [Was: Re: OT: For Roberts, Brewer and others
who ride on two wheels]
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Cotty wrote:
Sorry guys, just
I've just been informed of the sad decision to close the Pentax Benelux
branch and the relevant repair lab next April. That lab in Breda is the most
renowned Pentax service, the only one capable to solve the hardest technical
problems for all European branches of Pentax.
A petition to Pentax
HI,
The texture isnt cracks - thats correct. I once upon a time was a
geologist before rurning into earthquakes. The tecture of rock e.g.
limestone, is due to - 1. The deposits (coral reef or whatever was the
basis for the limestone) are layered and when squeezed deeper into the
Earth they
If it's been refrigerated, It's probably good. I've shot some very old
ektachrome with good results.
Paul
On Dec 13, 2005, at 12:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I'm trying to decide if it's even worth shooting this stuff. I've got
several rolls of 120 size Ektachrome dated 1999. It's all e6
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Outdated ektachrome???
I'm trying to decide if it's even worth shooting this stuff. I've got
several rolls of 120 size Ektachrome dated 1999. It's all e6
professional and it's been kept refrigerated. Anybody have any
experience
Hi,
It's the only negative/slide scanner I've ever used, so I can't
provide any useful comparisons for you. However, I think that if you
can afford a more expensive scanner you should go for it. If you do
get the Dimage IV, at least do yourself a favor and buy better
software to run it.
:'(
I had to go t them a couple of times and they always served me very well.
Also their Belgian centre is/was established just next to my parents
home so it was really easy for me. My ist-D and me would like to thank
them ;)
--
Thibouille
--
Same here. If it's been refrigerated it should still be good for
quite a while.
Bob
On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
If it's been refrigerated, It's probably good. I've shot some very
old ektachrome with good results.
Paul
On Dec 13, 2005, at 12:39 AM, P. J. Alling
Igor,
Yes, they are the gaming card.
I don't know what you do to get the discount.
I bought one in the store.
Speed has not been much of a concern with my *istDS.
I'm just looking for the capacity.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/12/05, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
am I correct that you
On 12/12/05, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, prohibition hurt the big breweries worse. Most of the small
breweries were producing bootleg beer during prohibition and simply went
legit in 1933. The big breweries were monitored much more closely. BTW,
prior to 1920 there were
I can see that you're an agitator
Actually he's a spin doctor.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Velvia example for Kostas
I can see that you're an agitator
Some of the puns may be really Fab, but the list will Gain
Judging from the small thumbs there are some really stunning photos there. I
only wish I could see them bigger. In fact most (read all) of them looks
great.
Good work. You do deserve your beauty sleep.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in
Ann
This looks like a great body of work. Nice job! I couldn't imagine this in B+W.
Its valuable to step back once a while and look @ one's photography in this
context.
Reminds you of where you've been where you might go.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL
Hi Cotty ...
I agree with most everything you've said except that, for the most part, I
don't think the photos are particularly good. Quite a few wouldn't work at
all without greater context or without an explanation. While they may be
representative of the event for which they were taken,
We (in the USA) were getting Top Gear , for a while this fall on the Discovery
channel. I my wife enjoyed it immensely.
Can't seem to find it now. Apparently it was a trial balloon that went pifft.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: For
My complaint would be that they're really not very good photos,
depressing or not.
Bob W wrote:
It's not their job to publish inspirational and joyful photos. The world is
awash with that type of photo. What it's short of is good hard news
photography.
The big news stories of the year have
Does anyone know anything about this lens? Its a manual focus Sigma XQ
200mm/f3.5 on an interchangeable lens mount.
The focusing mechanism is interesting. It has a quick focusing ring, and
a second, fine focusing ring that gets it into the macro mode,
although I think it is actually
I left out a portion of a sentence. This paragraph:
There are those who subscribe to the idea that news an PJ photos need only
deliver the information, however, I believe that a photograph, regardless
of its purpose, needs more. It needs a strong image, that sense of
composition I
Took me a while but:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Bruce Dayton wrote:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1080.htm
I have tried and tried to capture the spring mood of the unopened
Narcisus; while still missing something, this I find to have the
right feel.
It's a US magazine, more than half the pictures are about news where US
citicans are involved. This reflects the US view on what is important news.
That is only natural, although a little sad.
I have seen lots of better pictures from other stories.
DagT
fra: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dato:
Ann,
You have enough terrific images there for five years of calendars.
You're doubtless a prolific shooter, but aren't you planning on more
calendars in the future? I imagine now is not the time to make that
decision. Wait 'til you catch your breath and consider the wide
acceptance of this issue.
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Arvidsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its a lovely shot.
Thanks!
Did you lie on the beach for it? If so you got wet?
Yes I was lying on my belly with the camera and lens mounted on a ballhead
that was secured to an aluminum frying pan that I use as a
Dario,
First, my sympathies.
In case you have the input, and I'm sure it's superficial to many, I
can't help making a couple content changes to the petition language.
The word enthousiats should be spelled enthusiasts and the word
for should be substituted for to at the end of the last heading
This reflects the US view on what is important news.
I think, more correctly, this reflects A US view on what is important news.
Time doesn't speak for the US anymore than the BBC speaks for England.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 13, 2005 9:12 AM
Since I'm from Missouri, I'll mention a couple of my favorite local
breweries. The St. Louis Brewery in, er, St. Louis brews a wide
selection of very good beer under the Schlafly name. Around the St.
Louis area their pale ale is very popular. I prefer the Summer Kolsch
or the Pilsner. Anyway,
Tom Reese wrote:
Shel Belinkoff tried to cause trouble when he wrote:
...Who hasn't (made the move to digital) and who have no plans to do so in
the near or foreseeable future?
That would be me.
Tom (Slides-R-Us) Reese
yawn - dog bites man :-)
ann
p.s. well maybe there were
Kostas,
I do appreciate your words or lack of words.
Thanks,
Bruce
Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 6:07:58 AM, you wrote:
KK Took me a while but:
KK On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Bruce Dayton wrote:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1080.htm
KK I have tried and tried to capture the spring mood of
Hi Jack,
I'm not the organizer of that petition. Please contact Mike Muizebelt at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ciao,
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: Planned closure of Pentax
graywolf wrote:
Actually, prohibition hurt the big breweries worse.
Not true. AB survived prohibition and maintained profitability by
pursuing an array of endeavors. Most of the big breweries have a
history page that goes back to the 1800's and they are still here.
Most of the small
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Ann
This looks like a great body of work. Nice job! I couldn't imagine this in
B+W.
Thanks Ken and right, not bw stuff - weel, a
couple of them maybe.
Its valuable to step back once a while and look @ one's photography in this
context.
Reminds you of where
I mentioned a little bit of history about AB. Here is a link to Miller's
history. Not as big as AB, but a very similar story:
http://www.millerbrewing.com/aboutMiller/aboutHistory.asp
rg
graywolf wrote:
Actually, prohibition hurt the big breweries worse. Most of the small
breweries were
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Judging from the small thumbs there are some really stunning photos there. I
only wish I could see them bigger. In fact most (read all) of them looks
great.
Good work. You do deserve your beauty sleep.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
And I got some sleep
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2451.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
Jack Davis wrote:
Ann,
You have enough terrific images there for five years of calendars.
You're doubtless a prolific shooter, but aren't you planning on more
calendars in the future? I imagine now is not the time to make that
decision. Wait 'til you catch your breath and consider the wide
The more pictures I see from the A70-210/4, the more I like it.
Maybe I'll put that on my wishlist for after Christmas.
In this picture, I think the bokeh of the background, and the
tack-sharp leaves make the picture.
Excellent picture, Bruce. I'd hang it on my wall.
-Mat
On 12/13/05, Bruce
David Savage wrote:
HA!
I have a short attention span. What was it I was supposed to be thinking
about.
...oh that's right:
http://www.time.com/time/yip/2005/
Sorry folks.
Dave
Dave - you NOT posting the link gave us much
merriment - certainly forgiven.
Now I hope they forgive
P. J. Alling wrote:
No Idea, but if you're friends with a lawyer, I'd run it past him/her first.
I've already rejected it - having gotten a reply
to my rejection, I was more
convinced it was trash.
ann
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I haven't looked at his site yet - should I be
leary of it?
Interesting concept, well executed. Good choice on the stop. I like the DOF and
resulting bokey. Excellent work.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/5.6
Bob,
Aah, ok.
Having been burnt once, I care for the speed of the card.
I tried to buy a new MMCplus card from ATP which presmably should
be at least as fast as UltraII card (according to the manufacturer's
technical support), even for the 7(9) pin devices such as *istDS is.
I could notice a
Forwarded today.
Jack
--- Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jack,
I'm not the organizer of that petition. Please contact Mike Muizebelt
at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ciao,
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
html.
Do you have a favorite program for such?
Jack
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Ann,
You have enough terrific images there for five years of calendars.
You're doubtless a prolific shooter, but aren't you planning on
more
calendars in the future? I
Could one of you guys in the USA who has Windoze
and Adobe Acrobat take
my MS Word 97 file for the calendar and make it a
PDF? The person I thought
who could and would do it for me turns out not to
have the stuff for it.
I know I can get one free conversion from Adobe on
line but I'm on dial up
Tom wrote:
OK... Jack... now show us a shot that's in focus or where there's not a
breeze... I think the colors of the leaves and such are just fine...
obviously shot in low light with a lot of contrast, hence the very dark
almost silhouette... but I don't find the colors, which are supposed
I like the subject color pallette. I don't care for the composition tho. The
relatively blank bottom is distracting. Taking a vertical rectangular crop
roughly out of the center, more or less centered on the golden leaf, not
including a complete leaf, would be an improvement -IMHO.
Kenneth
Nice, Bruce!
An example of when a rule defying center placement of a primary
element, it exactly right.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting concept, well executed. Good choice on the stop. I like
the DOF and resulting bokey. Excellent work.
Paul
-- Original message
I'm not using digital. I've just ordered an Nikon 9000ED scanner and plan to
stick with film for a few more years. Besides, Pentax digital offerings are
quite underwhelming in my opinion, and doesn't trigger a hint of gearlust in
me at least...
Pål
The more pictures I see from the A70-210/4, the more I like it.
Indeed. ;-)
Fred
My LX was serviced by Belgium center.
Ronald
Thibouille wrote:
:'(
I had to go t them a couple of times and they always served me very well.
Also their Belgian centre is/was established just next to my parents
home so it was really easy for me. My ist-D and me would like to thank
them ;)
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2451.htm
Do you have the EXIF-type info for the other photos (the Next, and the
Next, etc.), too, Bruce? Thanks.
Fred
Pål Jensen wrote:
Right. One of the reason Velvia became the benchmark for outdoor use is
that it actually convey the concept or green or yellow for that matter,
something that is not always true for other films. There are no film known
to man that copy the world as it is. Our brain
Hi Bruce ... essentially a nice photo. You've got a unique eye for such
things. IMO, the composition leaves something to be desired. Cropping out
the OOF leaf on the right, just at its tip, is an improvement.
Shel
...
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
Wow Ann! That looks very nice! If you get enough print orders you may be
spending some of that money on a new printer. Have you considered putting
it on e-bay?
Tom C.
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Fred,
Let me know which images you want and I'll be more than happy to get
it for you.
BTW, thanks for the tip on the A 70-210/4 - what a great lens!
--
Bruce
Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 9:36:43 AM, you wrote:
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/5.6
Hi Bruce,
I've taken quite a few shots similar to this and my satisfaction rate is
pretty low. I like this one. The colors and bokeh are really pleasing.
The first thing that hits me is the out of focus leaf on the right. May be
better w/o it.
Somehow I think it's difficult for shots
Hi, Bruce.
Let me know which images you want and I'll be more than happy to get
it for you.
OK, howzabout -
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2191a.htm
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2471a.htm
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2427.htm
Thanks.
I know that I can always save a JPG to my
Pål Jensen wrote:
I'm not using digital. I've just ordered an Nikon 9000ED scanner and
plan to stick with film for a few more years. Besides, Pentax digital
offerings are quite underwhelming in my opinion, and doesn't trigger a
hint of gearlust in me at least...
What would it take for
Hi, Pal,
You're, of course, right in your statement that no image capture will
exactly replicate nature as presented to one's eye.
All is relative. 'Close to honest' is my standard in this medium.
I, also, agree that Velvia's greens and yellows are less offensive than
others in this film's unique
At 11:15 AM 12/13/2005, you wrote:
Could one of you guys in the USA who has Windoze
and Adobe Acrobat take
my MS Word 97 file for the calendar and make it a
PDF? The person I thought
who could and would do it for me turns out not to
have the stuff for it.
WordPerfect will also produce a PDF.
Here you go,
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2191a.htm
Pentax *istD, Tamron 90/2.8 AF Macro, handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/5.6, Manual mode, Center weighted metering
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2471a.htm
Pentax *istD, A 70-20/4, handheld
ISO 200, 1/180 sec @ f/5.6, Manual mode,
There have been several comments concerning cropping on this one.
What I am wondering is how much of the right leaf to take out and
whether I should rebalance the left side with a similar crop.
It was my original intent to show the leaf in a group of leaves so
that it could be picked out.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're, of course, right in your statement that no image capture will
exactly replicate nature as presented to one's eye.
All is relative. 'Close to honest' is my standard in this medium.
I, also, agree that Velvia's greens and
Hi I just recently bought a ist* DL and have been using it for a
couple months...
Although now I wish I had the DS2, but it wasn't out then.
Anyway, I'm interested in buying a fast 50mm fixed lens, but I'm not
sure which ones are compatible.
I don't know what all the letters in front of the lens
Hi Sunny, welcome to the list. The following resource will explain things
better than I can, well worth a look:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/index.html
Best regards,
John
John Whittingham
Technician
you can't be optimistic with a misty optic
-- Original Message ---
From:
Sunny Chung wrote:
Hi I just recently bought a ist* DL and have been using it for a
couple months...
Although now I wish I had the DS2, but it wasn't out then.
Anyway, I'm interested in buying a fast 50mm fixed lens, but I'm not
sure which ones are compatible.
I don't know what all the letters
Welcome Sunny. The DL will work fine with all pentax 50mm lenses. Any
lenses that do not have an A setting (M and K lenses) will work also,
but you are going to have to set the camera to manual and allow it to
use such lenses, which should be in your user's manual. Sigma lenses
made for
On Dec 13, 2005, at 2:10 AM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:34:57 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree about Minolta software. I've been using the Scan Dual II
since 2000 and the supplied software is junk.
Vuescan works just great for me, I've been
Well, if one wants to follow the history thing through the years, I
don't think prohibition hurt Canadian breweries at all grin.
Prohibition did in many US breweries. Then the great depression of the
1930's did in most of those without deep pockets, and thus the big
breweries started to
On Dec 13, 2005, at 10:45 AM, David Oswald wrote:
... An SMC Pentax-M lens doesn't support AF nor does it have an
auto-diaphragm. In other words, it doesn't support auto aperture.
Mounted on one of Pentax's DSLR's, you have to jump through an
extra hoop to get it to meter for you. Many
Hi Ann, I left this on the list because it may be of
use to others.
If you go to www.download.com and search for:
PDF Printer Driver or Convert to PDF or
Print to PDF
you will find several small programs that install
like a printer driver.
You then simply print _any_ document to it and it
turns it
Get the SMCP-FA 50/1.4 - it is a legendary prime lens worth every penny.
On 12/13/05, Sunny Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I just recently bought a ist* DL and have been using it for a
couple months...
Although now I wish I had the DS2, but it wasn't out then.
Anyway, I'm interested in
In a message dated 12/13/2005 10:23:14 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There have been several comments concerning cropping on this one.
What I am wondering is how much of the right leaf to take out and
whether I should rebalance the left side with a similar crop.
It was my
If you haven't found anyone else, I'd be happy to do it. Just send me
the file and I'll get the PDF back to you either e-mail, CD or both.
-P
Gary Sibio wrote:
At 11:15 AM 12/13/2005, you wrote:
Could one of you guys in the USA who has Windoze
and Adobe Acrobat take
my MS
Just had to jump in here for a second to re-iterate what a
great list this is.
3 very helpful responses in 25 minutes!
AND no one tries to make you feel like a dummy.
(Like some other lists)
Till they know you that is! VVBG
Welcome Sunny, I'm glad to be a member here and I'm sure
you will be too.
Thanx once again tom.
Don
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 1:12 PM
To: Pentax Discussion Malling List
Subject: PDML Mini-FAQ Link
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 13, 2005, at 10:45 AM, David Oswald wrote:
... An SMC Pentax-M lens doesn't support AF nor does it have an
auto-diaphragm. In other words, it doesn't support auto aperture.
Mounted on one of Pentax's DSLR's, you have to jump through an extra
hoop to get it to
Wow that's a first.
Subject said Whatta a List when I sent it.
(Really, I just checked!) ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 1:18 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Whatta Lias! _was_ Lenses
Jack Davis wrote:
html.
Do you have a favorite program for such?
Jack
UM... for what? I write raw html code for my
homepage - was that your question?
The contact sheet was made in photoshop elements -
the photos were all numbered
in the order they appear on the calendar. Then it
becomes a
Gary Sibio wrote:
At 11:15 AM 12/13/2005, you wrote:
Could one of you guys in the USA who has Windoze
and Adobe Acrobat take
my MS Word 97 file for the calendar and make it a
PDF? The person I thought
who could and would do it for me turns out not to
have the stuff for it.
Paul Sorenson wrote:
If you haven't found anyone else, I'd be happy to do it. Just send me
the file and I'll get the PDF back to you either e-mail, CD or both.
-P
Paul -
I actually got not one but two offers jsut a while
ago :)
I'm waiting for first guy's snail mail addy
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:59:32 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 13, 2005, at 2:10 AM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:34:57 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I agree about Minolta software. I've been using the Scan Dual II since
2000
Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Ann, I left this on the list because it may be of
use to others.
If you go to www.download.com and search for:
PDF Printer Driver or Convert to PDF or
Print to PDF
you will find several small programs that install
like a printer driver.
You then simply print _any_
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:18:27 +0100, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
If you want to get an inexpensive non-AF lens that is
truly excellent try the SMC Pentax-A 50/1.7, cheap and
very, very good.
Don is absolutely right: with regards to value for money, the A50/1.7 is
_very_
On Dec 13, 2005, at 11:21 AM, David Oswald wrote:
While on the topic of lenses, I have a love hate relationship with
my 16-45. I love it because it's so good that I don't get that
feeling of I wish I had taken that shot with a prime. I hate it
because it is so good that I can't seem to
As I look again, I think for a small print, the leaf in question is probably
not a problem. If I were to crop it...
Looking at the out of focus leaf on the right and where it contacts the leaf
to it's left, one can see a heart-shaped 'window' to the backgound.
Personally I would crop just
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
