FWIW, I saw the post on the list and even sent a suggestion. However, that
message has neither turned up on the list nor in the archives.
You're comparing a 16-bit PSD viewed in Photoshop with a compressed 8-bit
image shown outside Photoshop. How to the JPEGs look when viewed within
Photoshop?
What RAW converter are you using, John?
Adobe Camera Raw, I think version 2.4. I don't think the RAW converter
caused this, though.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
AIM: Neopifex
"Hey, I'm an artist. I can do whatever I want and pretend I'm making a
statement."
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: Is this what I think it is?
Some of you may have heard of the latest art stunt by Spencer Tunick.
I was kind of curious, and had a look at some photos of the event. One of
the photos showed Tunick with his camera. His camera looked ver
On Apr 22, 2006, at 3:17 PM, George Sinos wrote:
I think the bottom line is, if you use Adobe RGB it will look washed
out when viewed with a windows based browser that expects sRGB.
That's why all my posted web photos have been converted to sRGB. AND
have an sRGB ICC profile embedded.
G
Hi!
Just need a few thoughts on this.
Would it be better to upgrade to CS2(cost about $450 or so to upgrade
my PSEL3) or get a single dedicated Raw program like Raw shooter or
Capture one.
El3 and CS can open every raw file i need, except the new D200. I can
get the plug in for EL3 but not for
Hi!
Here's another one from the Cassis little harbor town in France
riviera (some of you will remember the lighthouse).
http://www.lacouture.nom.fr/gallery/v/pano/pano-screen.jpg.html
Not very original, and I'm a bit disappointed that the harbor area
contains so many elements that impact the r
Hi!
Haven't posted a PAW in a couple of weeks (missed last weekend because
I was away for Easter weekend), so here's the first of a couple:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367720&size=lg
Hope you enjoy. Thanks in advance for looking!
Whoa! The non-smiling man in the glasses jus
Hi!
Two from this afternoon in Birmingham, Michigan. I couldn't decide
between these, so I posted them both.
Smoke Break:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367972
Got it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4368301&size=lg
I gather it is at least warm in Birmingham, Michi
Hi!
Another view of the Santa Cruz wharf ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/05.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
Each time I see a square black and white photography, I think of my
Perkeo I...
Very well done!
Boris
Paul, I got this around 8:oopm today.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Two walkaround pics -- resend
This never appeared in my mailbox. Sorry if it's a duplicate for you.
Two from this afternoon in Birmingham, Michigan. I
Hi!
From last Sunday morning's visit to the Santa Cruz wharf:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/04.htm
It works best in a large print. I've included a 1000x1500 pixel
rendering to see it better, if you have the bandwidth and display space.
Comments, critique, all appreciated.
I saw this earlier today and commented on it.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Old Stone Wall--repost
Sending this again, because after 5 hours it has still
not appeared on the list.
Three weeks ago we were trav
Sorry,
paul, but neither one does anything for me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Two Walkaround PIcs
Two from this afternoon in Birmingham, Michigan. I couldn't decide
between these, so I posted them both.
Smoke Bre
so do I.
in fact, as i read rave reviews of noise ninja, i bought myself a license
last year, and after a few attempts to master it, came to conclusion that
with it, the hi-iso images too look better as they are, than processed.
i also find idt-dl noise at 1600 quite acceptable.
best,
mishka
On
Sure, also Rover V8 :-)))
Still a Ford
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT - an interesting (and enabling) 24 hours
On 22/4/06, Kenneth Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, weren't/aren't they Ford powered?
Sure,
I would too Shel, but since the image has already been taken, an improvement
would be to eliminate the partial face as shown.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PAW - The Smile
I'd have liked to have seen more of the face on
Aaron wrote:
Happens with mine all the time. Maybe you need a CLA.
Thanks for the tip, Aaron! Now I can define the indefinable feeling that it
wasn't working 100%. I'll book a CLA on Monday!
Pat White
This never appeared in my mailbox. Sorry if it's a duplicate for you.
Two from this afternoon in Birmingham, Michigan. I couldn't decide
between these, so I posted them both.
Smoke Break:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367972
Got it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4
While it looks like a line of trees and a line of rocks I am sure it was a
stone wall at some time. What is the archeological insight into the
photograph? I like the monotone nature of the color photo with the green
veg and rocks standing out.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Wome
Fascinating. Where is it? How old is it? Nicely captured.
Very little has appeared on the list tonight. Only one of three posts
that I sent has appeared. Something is amiss.
Paul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 11:03 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Sending this again, because after 5 hours it has still
not appear
I like everything about this one.
Very well doe.
Dave S.
On 4/23/06, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Haven't posted a PAW in a couple of weeks (missed last weekend because
> I was away for Easter weekend), so here's the first of a couple:
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo
Something is definitely amiss with the list, because
two messages have not appeared in 5-6 hours after
posting. Herewith the other from me.
Pursuing the suggestions posted here, I changed the
color space to sRGB, and checked the "ICC Profile" box
in the control panel that choosing "S
Sending this again, because after 5 hours it has still
not appeared on the list.
Three weeks ago we were travelling in Connecticut, and
I came upon this classic (but tumbledown) New England
stone wall while wandering with my ist D:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367728
On Apr 22, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Pat White wrote:
Wait a minute, that doesn't happen with my 67! Is the power in the
wooden grip?
Happens with mine all the time. Maybe you need a CLA.
-Aaron
SIGHT OF MIGHTY P67 CAUSES MODELS TO DOFF CLOTHES AND HUG NEAREST PERSON!!!
Wait a minute, that doesn't happen with my 67! Is the power in the wooden
grip?
Pat White
On behalf of overweight middle-aged white guys with poor posture
everywhere, I ask, How Dare You?!
*>UncaMikey
Smoke Break:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367972
Frank, I think you nailed that one perfectly. Just right! TEETH!
*>UncaMikey
On Apr 22, 2006, at 5:36 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Haven't posted a PAW in a couple of weeks (missed last
weekend because I was away for Easter weekend), so here's
the first of a couple:
http://www.photo.net/
Kenneth Waller wrote:
BTW - what is SIGGRAPH?
It's the Special Interest Group (SIG) for Graphics of the Association
for Computing Machinery (ACM). The ACM is a professional organization
for computer people, mostly software and firmware.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
Some of you may have heard of the latest art stunt by Spencer Tunick.
I was kind of curious, and had a look at some photos of the event. One of
the photos showed Tunick with his camera. His camera looked very familiar.
Is it what I think it is?
Warning, this link contains people without clothes!
h
Makes sense to me. Obviously you would have moved it if you didn't want
it in the shot. I thought of that right after I hit the send button:-)
Paul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 7:48 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Paul Stenquist suggested that I clone out the third shoe, the one in
the
upper LH corner. I did
Two from this afternoon in Birmingham, Michigan. I couldn't decide
between these, so I posted them both.
Smoke Break:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367972
Got it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4368301&size=lg
Paul Stenquist suggested that I clone out the third shoe, the one in the
upper LH corner. I didn't read the comment on the list, but, rather in the
archive.
Paul, had I not wanted that shoe exactly where it is, it would have been
easy enough to move it. However, I like where it is, I think it ad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What caused this phenomenon? Is it simply an effect of the petals being out of
focus?
Yeah- I think so. I think the out of focus (and esp. in front of the
focus) area is just plain strange looking. Very shallow depth of field,
but since you captured that in focus
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0100, Cotty wrote:
> On 22/4/06, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >For at least *some* Pentax content, here's a couple of snaps:
> >
> >http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/MyNewCar1.jpg
> >
> >http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/MyNewCar2.jpg
>
>
> Nice
This one I really likes. It has a dreamy atmosphere. I imagine myself going
down the street. And suddenly, out of nowhere, this 1000 watt smile pops at
me.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke
Oh yes - that happened three years ago.
The reason we picked up the Mini then was that the Range Rover
had lunched it's engine - it managed to overheat, and warp the
block. The replacement estimates were at a minimum 8-10K, and
may very well have gone higher, and we'd have ended up with a
car tha
The guy that wrote those articles is Chris MacAskill, President of
Smugmug, the photo sharing service.
He's done a bit of research on this topic to help his customers get
predictable results.
I think the bottom line is, if you use Adobe RGB it will look washed
out when viewed with a windows base
I like it. It tells a simple little story. The colours, the texture, the
composition. For some reason the third shoe bounces my eye back to the
frame.
Perhaps I would have liked it less without your little "ah there you are
again" story.
BTW. Your shoes, just like mine, needs a bit of TLC ;-)
T
On 22/4/06, Kenneth Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Cotty, weren't/aren't they Ford powered?
Sure, also Rover V8 :-)))
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Both are very good. Compelling and interesting. Nice work.
Paul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Mark Stringer wrote:
I am familiar with all the rules of composition blah, blah blah, but I
can only say if I like a photo or not.
The portrait is wonderful. An entire story can be conjured up about
Wasn't Kodak's entry into the DSLR market a decade ago?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Pentax 645D (WAS: Mamiya is history)
Date: Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:18 pm
Size: 484 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
"It is supposed to use a Kodak sensor
Excellent! Super shot. Hooked me right off the bat. Good work.
Paul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 5:36 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Haven't posted a PAW in a couple of weeks (missed last weekend because
I was away for Easter weekend), so here's the first of a couple:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?phot
Interesting. Deep, saturated color. i'd clone out that third shoe.
Paul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
While getting dressed this morning, and playing with Tyler, these shoes
caught my attention. I kicked 'em off last night, and this morning
there
was something about the wa
Beautiful car, congratulations. I'm jealous. The brick wall is okay
too:-).
Paul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 5:32 PM, John Francis wrote:
So there I was, on Thursday night, with about 40 minutes to
kill before going to a talk at the local SIGGRAPH chapter.
I decided to take the opportunity to go and h
I'd have liked to have seen more of the face on the right ;-)) The scowl
on the slightly OOF visage would yield a great counterpoint to the smile.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Kenneth Waller
> Knarf - I like it, a great smile. I could do with out the partial head on
> the RH side, it d
Hey, Frank ... welcome back. I missed having your pixels prance across my
screen.
You've pretty much echoed my feelings about the pic.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: frank theriault
> I like it. I'm not sure why, but I do.
>
> Maybe it's just the "everydayness" of the scene, or maybe th
http://www.neovenator.com/special/magenta_fringing.jpg
First take a look at the flower petals near the top left corner.
Now take a look at the top petals of the center flower. The
edges have a dark fringe around them, which I've never seen
before in an image like this.
--
Yes, I s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey everybody. I've been in super-lurk mode the last couple months, but I have
a strange image that I'd like to ask about. First, the image in question:
http://www.neovenator.com/special/magenta_fringing.jpg
The flowers in this photo are real, and I did nothing to th
Cotty, weren't/aren't they Ford powered?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT - an interesting (and enabling) 24 hours
On 22/4/06, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
For at least *some* Pentax content, here's a couple of snap
I am familiar with all the rules of composition blah, blah blah, but I can
only say if I like a photo or not.
The portrait is wonderful. An entire story can be conjured up about this
person. She is pretty, has always been pretty and has a sad, thoughtful
expression Her beauty makes it pleas
Knarf - I like it, a great smile. I could do with out the partial head on
the RH side, it detracts somewhat from the great smile. The two guys in the
back, OOF, looking at you are a plus.
Do you know the subject or was he just passing by?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "fran
Congratulations, John! I notice the Land Ranger's not in the garage. Did
you get rid of it for the Mini?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis
> For at least *some* Pentax content, here's a couple of snaps:
>
> http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/MyNewCar1.jpg
>
> http://panix.com/
On 22/4/06, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>For at least *some* Pentax content, here's a couple of snaps:
>
>http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/MyNewCar1.jpg
>
>http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/MyNewCar2.jpg
Nice motor John! That's a keeper.
I'm about 20 years away from my l'il British
On 4/22/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While getting dressed this morning, and playing with Tyler, these shoes
> caught my attention. I kicked 'em off last night, and this morning there
> was something about the way they looked that intrigued me. I suppose it's
> like a still lif
Rick, technically well done, but the subject doesn't do anything for me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Old Stone Wall
Three weeks ago we were travelling in Connecticut, and
I came upon this classic (but tumbledown) New Eng
Pursuing the suggestions posted here, I changed the
color space to sRGB, and checked the "ICC Profile" box
in the control panel that choosing "Save for Web"
brings up.
The "Save for Web" images, on both the left and right
sides of the screen, are still considerably brighter
and less contrasty than
Looks like a nice ride. Enjoy it!
Hope you enjoy it as much as I'm enjoying my 05 Boxster S.
BTW - what is SIGGRAPH?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT - an interesting (and enabling) 24 hours
So there I was, on Thursday night
Even more cosmic is this shot:
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/mansitting.html
I like your "Shoes" shot ... would like to see it larger.
Whoops, didn't see the link to the larger size. Cool!
BTW, of all the C41 B&W films I've tried, various Kodak emulsions gave me
more of what i wanted tha
Haven't posted a PAW in a couple of weeks (missed last weekend because
I was away for Easter weekend), so here's the first of a couple:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367720&size=lg
Hope you enjoy. Thanks in advance for looking!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."
Three weeks ago we were travelling in Connecticut, and
I came upon this classic (but tumbledown) New England
stone wall while wandering with my ist D:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367728
FA 16-45, ISO 400, f/11, and for some reason PE4 isn't
showing the shutter speed.
All comment
Shel, there is a certain attraction to this image for me but I can't put my
finger on the reason why.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Shoes
While getting dressed this morning, and playing with Tyler, these shoes
caught
So there I was, on Thursday night, with about 40 minutes to
kill before going to a talk at the local SIGGRAPH chapter.
I decided to take the opportunity to go and have a chat with
imy local BMW dealership in person (yes, the one where their
internet salesman treated me like a mindless moron), and
So much for global warming!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ist DL2 offer in UK
BBC News reports that Hell has frozen over completely.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cott
BBC News reports that Hell has frozen over completely.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hey everybody. I've been in super-lurk mode the last couple months, but I have
a strange image that I'd like to ask about. First, the image in question:
http://www.neovenator.com/special/magenta_fringing.jpg
The flowers in this photo are real, and I did nothing to the color saturation
in proc
Peter Jordan wrote:
Not all that keen on the feel myself, and the viewfinder does look like
looking down a long dark tunnel, but in terms of portability &
performance for the price, you can't beat it.
Peter
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Satur
Dave, you should be able to get CS2 upgrade for under $200 US by having a
student purchase from a college/university bookstore.
I upgraded to CS2 mainly to get RAW conversion (cost me $169 to upgrade -
from PS7)
My recommendation would be to go for CS2 over Elements.
Kenneth Waller
- Origi
Nice work, it looks eerie and intense. Interesting feel.
Godfrey
On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:08 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?
action=view¤t=web-4718.jpg
Cold, raining all day and i have another Gout attach going on, so
i'm experimenting.
Shot into t
Hi all. Last night I decided to send a couple of snaps along to you
folks and was putting together an email just now. Then I noticed
that Shel posted a PESO with the same title. Cosmic.
I've been playing with C-41 B&W films lately. I've pretty much
settled on Kodak BW400CN as being the bes
With faster lenses at wide aperture (e.g. f/1.7), the AF indication is
not precise enough to give any good indication for very narrow Depth of
Field. With a careful focusing, I only get to focus where I want about
once every 3 to 5 shots at f/1.7 (perhaps I'm not the most talented guy
at this,
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: What's up with the list?
FWIW, its been doing it at my end for several weeks. I though Dog was
cutting me off, but he says no.:-)
Isn't stopping you from being mean to him though.
William Robb
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=web-4718.jpg
Cold, raining all day and i have another Gout attach going on, so i'm
experimenting.
Shot into the sun.
istD 16-45 iso 1600 R72 filter Manual WB.
Channel mixer R-86, G-3, B-6. Sepia filter at 50, red curve adjust sligh
You have 3 feet?!
If Van Gogh can do it, I guess we all can:
http://artchive.com/artchive/V/van_gogh/vangogh_shoes.jpg.html
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 April 2006 20:24
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: PESO -
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/Vivitar8518/
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
While getting dressed this morning, and playing with Tyler, these shoes
caught my attention. I kicked 'em off last night, and this morning there
was something about the way they looked that intrigued me. I suppose it's
like a still life of sorts, instead of fruit or flowers, it's my big shoes
h
Not all that keen on the feel myself, and the viewfinder does look like
looking down a long dark tunnel, but in terms of portability & performance
for the price, you can't beat it.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 05:58:19PM +1200, David Mann wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2006, at 8:22 AM, Bob W wrote:
>
> >The best water I ever tasted I drew from an old-fashioned well in a
> >remote
> >valley in northern Romania.
>
> Artesian beer? Why did you come back?
Burton-on-Trent made some good b
I couldn't agree more Shel.
Despite this, I can't think in the lines Bob suggested. Not now.
In not too distant future, I'll probably buy the new body with shake
reduction. Then, I'll be using the DS as a backup body. With an "obsolete"
backup body I might be willing to take the risk.
If I drop
Kodak's 14mp DSLR's did not use Kodak sensors. It used a third party
CMOS sensor. Kodak doesn't (or at least didn't at that time) make CMOS
sensors. Kodak's sensors were too expensive to use in a camera at that
price point.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/gray
David Savage wrote:
Ha :-)
As soon as I saw it I could here McEnroe screaming "You can't be
serious, you jerk"
That's more or less exactly what I did, too, when I spotted this ;-)
I like the shot but I think it needs more contrast to make he racket
stand out from the background.
Hmmm..
For a mere $19.95, an old t-mount Vivitar 85/1.8.
With M42 T-mount attached.
Now to go out & test it. : )
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim
On Apr 22, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
Nobody has MF cameras that are used commercially.
Har!
Phase One, Leaf, Hass/Fuji, etc. must all be imaginary then.
Don't forget Sinar. The Sinar-M autofocus SLR is a gorgeous camera
with some great Zeiss lenses.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you buy a digi-back, you're stuck with the camera, but have a new back.
If you buy a dedicated digi-camera, your stuck with both the camera AND
the back.
Your argument doesn't make sense this time, Pål.
If this was such
Very interesting indeed.
As always in weapons races, countermeasures will eventually be
developed. For instance, a filter that modifies these noise patterns to
make it unrecognizeable. I'm not sure if their technology allows this
sort of countermeasures, as I have only basic knowledge of crypt
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You forget that the digital back cost 2-3 times the price of a
digital camera. And that you are stuck with that same old camera.
You also forget that hardly anyone in the grand scheme of things are
using digital backs anywa
"It is supposed to use a Kodak sensor. Officially it is still
18Mp but some speculate it is really 22mp. Is there anything
wrong with the Kodak sensor?"
Kodak's entry in the DSLR market was apparently very noisy. I
have been concerned about this since I heard that Pentax would
use a Kodak sen
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jessops Metro Centre had one in today. Note the past tense.
Batteries on charge, pictures at 11.
hmmm...
Preparing for something, aren't you? :-)
Jostein
And now Cath can take the pictures whilst I'm
Bob W wrote:
I saw that offer too a few days ago, in CameraWorld, I think, and was very
surprised that they're so cheap. I'm almost tempted by it myself. What are
the lenses like?
--
Cheers,
Bob
Black. Glass in the middle. 8-) Not got it going yet (sigh) Will call
back tomorrow.
All s
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jessops Metro Centre had one in today. Note the past tense.
Batteries on charge, pictures at 11.
hmmm...
Preparing for something, aren't you? :-)
Jostein
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Mike,
Wasn't it you not too long ago who said that he'd never go digital?
Anyway, have fun ;-))
Shel
Never said that. Just that I wasn't ready for it. Once Cath got hold
of the DL, apparently I was. 8-)
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
Jessops Me
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I hope you are correct. But I keep worrying that it is a Kodak sensor that
Pentax will be using.
It is supposed to use a Kodak sensor. Officially it is still 18Mp but some
speculate it is really 22mp. Is there anything
I saw that offer too a few days ago, in CameraWorld, I think, and was very
surprised that they're so cheap. I'm almost tempted by it myself. What are
the lenses like?
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 April 2006 17:56
> To: pen
If a Pentax dsLR can deliver a sensor twice the size of a canon
and with much better dynamic range, why shouldn't it be viable
if the price is right?
Pål
--
I hope you are correct. But I keep worrying that it is a Kodak
sensor that Pentax will be using.
Joe
can't say I blame you. Having waded into the saltmarsh here at low tide a
few years ago, I would not do it again. On that occasion I had (I think) a
Leica M3 and 2 lenses with me. I sank up to my nuts in mud and had great
difficulty extracting myself. Fortunately no harm came to the cameras or to
m
"tweet the corporation?" Indeed, let's tweet the corporations.
Tweet software too.
Cheers,
Gautam
--
No, it's "o tweet the corporation." Sing it to the tune of "Oh
say can you see"
Joe
Very interesting.
Film might be the best solution for nefarious types :-)
Thanks for posting it.
Dave S
On 4/23/06, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is interesting. From the article linked below:
>
> Every original digital picture is overlaid by a weak noise-like
> pattern of pixe
On Apr 22, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Denny B wrote:
I am anticipating purchasing a Pentax Digital DS2 body.
Can I use my manual Pentax lenses I have collected over
the last 35 years on the DS2 body, Some lenses
are A-lenses, some are just SMC non A-lenses.
Can I focus these lens manually and observe
I like how the water sparles seem to lead you to the boat and then background.
Nice contrast and comp
Dave
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Another view of the Santa Cruz wharf ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/05.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
en
This is interesting. From the article linked below:
Every original digital picture is overlaid by a weak noise-like
pattern of pixel-to-pixel non-uniformity. Although these patterns are
invisible to the human eye, the unique reference pattern or
"fingerprint" of any camera can be electronically ex
The gout medication effects my bain.
Dave
btw i hate gout.
Dave
Quoting Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 22/4/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I though Dog was
cutting me off, but he says no.:-)
LOL
Dave your Freudian slips are the best.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
