On 4/10/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Is there gonna be a cool scar? Will you look just like a pirate? Or
>a gangster?
But Mark already looks like a pirate or a gangster...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cott
I just stick my fingers in my ears, if the sound goes away, I figure I
have to worry about it . My usual tinnitus sounds like tree frogs,
I hate the sound of tree frogs! A while back I made a CD with an hour
long rain recording, playing it distracts me from the TF's.
--
graywolf
http://www.gra
Sutures?
I'm jealous, all I ever get is staples! ;-)
Don (Whose belly looks like Zorro got him!)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Mark Roberts
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:52 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Home recovering
frank theriault wrote:
>
> On 10/3/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's interesting when you can take photos of birds from above them...
> >
> > http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_withfurtheregret.html
> >
>
> I think that's One Terrific Shot, Peter.
>
> Unfortunately,
I believe it comes with windows, no choice there, unless you do a custom
install.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>> --
>>
> Actually...
> I asked that NO g
Matt Kelch wrote:
> In trying to disassemble a lens I accidentally dislodged a few parts
> without getting a good look at how they went together and where they
> went. I would greatly appreciate any help. BTW, it is a SMC PENTAX-A
> 70-210mm lens.
>
> http://www.vulc4n.com/images/lens1.jpg
>
John Coyle wrote:
>
> Hi Ann:
> I can help with these:
> 1. Open Windows Explorer.
> Click "Tools/Folder Options"
> Click on the "View" tab
> Under "Advanced settings", uncheck the option "Hide extensions for
> known file types".
> Click on the "Apply to all folders" button.
>
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Ah yes. It's been far too long...
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/cormorant3.jpg
> :-P
>
Damn, Tim, you made the big time!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Why wouldn't they?
>
> Shel
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Ann Sanfedele
>
> > Actually...
> > I asked that NO games be installed on my
> > computer but they wouldn't honor that
>
Who the F knows?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdm
I d'know, Mark, I faint pretty easily. Be sure and warn everyone if you
put up a photo of that gruesome looking (shudder) inch long incision.
8-/
Jack
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I feel a bit of a prat about the subject line, even though I
> *did*
> have surgery today. It's
Jostein Øksne wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
>
> When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
> reaction to Becky Carter's imagery from last time around. The word
> "molested" slid very easily into my brain then. I suppose a hyphen
> between "photoshop" and the said word would have been m
On 10/4/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sadly, the work was done by an excellent plastic surgeon (selected by
> Dr. Lisa) and the final result will likely me almost undetectable :(
> I was getting ready to think up cool stories to explain it...
>
> I particularly like your pirate s
Now you ruined my keyboard, my brand new laptop!
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
W
Sent: 4. oktober 2006 20:54
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Need help: Photoshop molested chi
frank theriault wrote:
>On 10/4/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, I feel a bit of a prat about the subject line, even though I *did*
>> have surgery today. It's just that, considering some of the health
>> problems experienced by some other PDML'ers, it's quite trivial. I had
>> a
Ah yes. It's been far too long...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/cormorant3.jpg
:-P
--
Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/4/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I feel a bit of a prat about the subject line, even though I *did*
> have surgery today. It's just that, considering some of the health
> problems experienced by some other PDML'ers, it's quite trivial. I had
> a small (1 cm diameter) cyst r
OK, I feel a bit of a prat about the subject line, even though I *did*
have surgery today. It's just that, considering some of the health
problems experienced by some other PDML'ers, it's quite trivial. I had
a small (1 cm diameter) cyst removed from my left cheek today. It was
*much* larger a few
Mark,
I had a K 200/2.5 CLA'd by Eric Hendrickson:
www.pentasx.com
I was happy with his work. You might want to at least check with him
about your lens. You can find quite a few positive comments about him
on the web.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, October 4, 2006, 1:01:37 PM, you wrote:
MR> Can anyo
How about replacing it with a reindeer?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: 4. oktober 2006 18:22
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: PESO - Another Cormorant
On 4/10/06, Tim Øsleby, discomb
> Can anyone recommend a good repair shop to do a CLA on my K 15mm
> f/3.5? Pentax Colorado doesn't do it any more and says they actually
> used to send them back to Japan when they did accept them for service
> because of the specialized tools needed for aligning the elements.
> This last bit does
You are a poet Mike ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike
wilson
Sent: 4. oktober 2006 14:52
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: PESO - Another Cormorant
>
> From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAI
The ring is flare. I was quite surprised the direct sunlight into the lens
didn't provoke more flare.
It is cropped into square format. That's all.
It is a bit soft. I believe that's partly because of vibrations, partly
because of the bugs in the air.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian
Second version is a lot more subtle.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P.
J. Alling
Sent: 4. oktober 2006 17:52
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Another Cormorant
I like version
John Celio wrote:
> Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
> *weeps*
>
> I fear for the future of the company I am leaving. I thought things were
> turning around, but they just laid me off. Me, the cheapest graphic artist
> in California. As far as my boss would tell me, the reason he laid m
Thank you Frank :-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: 4. oktober 2006 20:19
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Another Cormorant
On 10/4/06, Tim Øsleby <[EMAI
COUNTRY: USA
LOCATION: Torrance, CA
NAME: Dean`s Camera Repair
ADDRESS: 1055 West Carson Street
PHONE: 310-782-8619
COMMENTS: Dean is as sharp as some of my lenses. He has fixed a Super
Program, and he is working on one (two, cannibalizing one) of my lenses
now. As soon as my LX comes back f
Can anyone recommend a good repair shop to do a CLA on my K 15mm
f/3.5? Pentax Colorado doesn't do it any more and says they actually
used to send them back to Japan when they did accept them for service
because of the specialized tools needed for aligning the elements.
This last bit doesn't give m
I've known that "buggery" is a synonym for anal sex since I was a wee lad, and
I'm an American. However, I think that in both America and England, the word
has been used so freely to describe any mildly deviant activity that it has
lost its edge. The same is true of "sucks" when used to denigra
> Note, too, the difference in meaning of "sodomize". In British
> English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in American
> usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
> from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for example, is often
> described as sodomy (especi
>From the Writers Alamanc - from American Public Media - from 9/28/2006
It was on this day in 1066 that William the Conqueror of Normandy arrived on
British soil. He defeated the British in the Battle of Hastings, and on
Christmas Day, he was crowned King of England in Westminster Abbey.
One of
Maybe you ought to look into lightweight 4x5 cameras
And lenses. They are lighter than P67 and much higher
Image quality than both P67 and P645.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter Jordan
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:25 PM
To:
I've found the ball bearing, the spring is in the picture I believe.
(Its partially inside of the piston looking thing) I'm just lost at
this point how it all goes together.
Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Matt,
> look for a little ball bearing and a small spring that I don't see.
> They make the 'click
Very, very nice. The boat and colors cooperated
perfectly!
I grew up outside New Haven, and love your steady
stream of Connecticut pix!
Rick
--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One last PESO for a while.
>
>
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_sunset.html
>
> Technical
On 10/4/06, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, there is! It's very simple and easy to understand, provided you
> can read and speak Anglo-Saxon, Old Norse, Latin and Norman French,
> and fully understand the history and background of the Great Vowel
> Shift.
Ah yes. The Great Vowel Shift (or
Matt,
look for a little ball bearing and a small spring that I don't see.
They make the 'click stops' on the lens.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/4/06, Matt Kelch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In trying to disassemble a lens I accidentally dislodged a few parts
> without getting a good look at how they wen
This is why I like the Tamron 28-300 on the *istD. My current condition
makes it extremely difficult to carry around extra lenses. However, I hope
to improve enough by next spring to take my full complement of lenses to
GFM.
Bill
> > Of course, I suggested he goes with the K10D, saying that it
> You know, getting the finer points right with slang terms is the
> toughest challenge with English. It's even worse than seeing the
logic
> in the pronounciation...:-)
>
> Jostein
> ===
> That's because there isn't any. Logic, that is.
>
> Marnie aka Doe ;-)
>
Oh, there is! It's very sim
>
> Note, too, the difference in meaning of "sodomize". In British
> English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in American
> usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
> from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for example, is often
> described as sodomy (esp
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Adam Maas"
> > Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
> >
> >
> > In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or
> sexual. Damn
> > and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say
> french, where much
> > rude s
What a bummer. Sorry to hear that.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of John Celio
> Sent: 04 October 2006 17:21
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Laid Off
>
> Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
> *weeps*
>
> I fear f
The Commonwealth is not offended. It's still compulsory in most
schools.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of P. J. Alling
> Sent: 04 October 2006 19:21
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop
>
> I always hear voices in my head, Shel. The trick is to ascertain
> which ones are real and which ones are imaginary. I find when I
wear
> my aluminium foil helmet, it allows the real ones through, while
> fending off the fake ones.
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/
I have
it's not a particularly rude word in English. There's even a series of
books aimed at teachers called "Getting the Buggers to xxx" where xxx
is something like 'Read' or 'Learn Maths'.
The only time I can think of it being used particularly negatively is
when homophobic types use it. Although, of c
Tom C wrote:
> So you are the two guys that gave me all the free diskette media for my Sony
> Mavica and then started filling up my mailbox with CD-ROM's?
LOL, those guys were dumped about a month ago. :-) No more CDs required!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-D
John Francis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:52:20AM +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>>I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
>>
>>To bugger someone means to have anal intercourse with them. Seems to
>>be this parlance that is more British English than American English,
>
On 10/4/06, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I took my latest enablement for a test spin. I took a lot of boring
> photographs of tiny birds in middle of frame (they where far from the shore
> yesterday). But this fella had come back to it's regular spot.
>
> I was shooting almost direct
Sorry to hear that John.
No worries about betrayed trusts, I agree with Shel that is anyone was
betrayed, it was you.
Here's hoping for new, better opportunities coming soon!
j
On 10/4/06, John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
> *weeps*
>
> I fear for the
In trying to disassemble a lens I accidentally dislodged a few parts
without getting a good look at how they went together and where they
went. I would greatly appreciate any help. BTW, it is a SMC PENTAX-A
70-210mm lens.
http://www.vulc4n.com/images/lens1.jpg
http://www.vulc4n.com/images/par
My condolences, John; I just got off a three-month stint as a man of
leisure myself. Stay positive and network with your family and friends
and acquaintances.
t
John Celio wrote:
> Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
> *weeps*
>
> I fear for the future of the company I am leaving. I thoug
The DA 12-24 is quite excellent. I've used it for a wide variety of shots and
have been impressed with its corner sharpness and minimal barrel distortion.
-- Original message --
From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Pål Jensen wrote:
> > Any experience with this le
At least the Diskettes were usable for something...
Tom C wrote:
>So you are the two guys that gave me all the free diskette media for my Sony
>Mavica and then started filling up my mailbox with CD-ROM's?
>
>
>
>Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss
Sorry to hear that John. Hopefully you'll find something quickly.
-Adam
John Celio wrote:
> Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
> *weeps*
>
> I fear for the future of the company I am leaving. I thought things were
> turning around, but they just laid me off. Me, the cheapest graphic arti
> I can't explain why, but I like it.
That's all that matters.
I like it too !
Good subject, color & composition.
It looks like it is cropped. Yes/no ?
Is that flare - the ring like radiation from the ULH corner ?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Here's a shot with the 12-24 at 12mm on the *istD. No perspective correction.
The only PhotoShop adjustment was a curves adjustment to darken the sky.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4895914&size=lg
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Pål Jensen <[EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:52:20AM +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
>
> To bugger someone means to have anal intercourse with them. Seems to
> be this parlance that is more British English than American English,
Quite. I'm often amused w
Christian wrote:
> John Celio wrote:
>
>>Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
>
> That blows dude, sorry. I've been there in the past. And my current
> employer (a large "online" company in "America") is going to dump
> something like 7000 positions worldwide in the next few months.
>
>
So you are the two guys that gave me all the free diskette media for my Sony
Mavica and then started filling up my mailbox with CD-ROM's?
Tom C.
>From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: Laid Off
>Date: Wed, 04 Oct
Well, you only offended the commonwealth, most Americans have no idea
what Buggery is.
Jostein Øksne wrote:
>Thanks Dan,
>
>When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
>reaction to Becky Carter's imagery from last time around. The word
>"molested" slid very easily into my bra
Hell, the Commonwealth sshouldn't be offended either. No less a man
than Winston Churchill described the "Real traditions" of the English
Navy as "rum, buggery, and the lash."
Jostein Øksne wrote:
>Thanks Dan,
>
>When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
>reaction to Beck
Pål Jensen wrote:
> Any experience with this lens? A good one?
> I'm planning to buy the DA* 16-50/2.8 lens for the K10D in due course.
> However, I need something wider as well and Pentax doesn't offer a prime
> lens that is wider than 16mm except for the 14/2.8 which is too close to the
> 16mm
> Except for me. I say nothing of note.
>
> Marnie aka Doe :-)
Thanks, I'll make note of that. ;+}
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pentax Life
> In a message dated 10/3/2006 7:49:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Th
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Martin Trautmann wrote:
> On 2006-09-29 14:25, Juan Buhler wrote:
> > Of course, I suggested he goes with the K10D, saying that its specs
> > are closer to a D200 than to a D80. He's leaning towards it, but says
> > that he likes that Nikon has an 18-135 le
Any experience with this lens? A good one?
I'm planning to buy the DA* 16-50/2.8 lens for the K10D in due course.
However, I need something wider as well and Pentax doesn't offer a prime
lens that is wider than 16mm except for the 14/2.8 which is too close to the
16mm to make much sense. Hence,
Hey John,
sorry to hear! Let's hope you can find a new job soon.
I hope your old boss is a more trustworthy guy when it comes to our orders!
Peter, Uppsala
Sweden
>Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
>*weeps*
>
>I fear for the future of the company I am leaving. I thought things were
>turning
John Celio wrote:
> Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
That blows dude, sorry. I've been there in the past. And my current
employer (a large "online" company in "America") is going to dump
something like 7000 positions worldwide in the next few months.
--
Christian
http://photography.skof
John,
Very sorry to hear about that. It is always such a shock and bad
feeling when that happens. I hope you land on your feet and end up in
a better place in the end. Always best to take this as an
opportunity.
One angle to consider is that perhaps the company was looking at your
drumming up
Both nice. I'm curious on the first one - the horizon seems quite
sloped - some kind of hill or something? The lighting and exposure
look pretty good.
Second one - very hard to take a bad picture of a sweet child. She is
adorable!
--
Bruce
Wednesday, October 4, 2006, 6:58:35 AM, you wrote:
On 10/4/06, John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
> *weeps*
Sorry to hear that, John.
Hopefully this will be a positive; in other words, you'll be able to
take advantage of other and better opportunities.
Best of luck!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a
David:
>An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it quite
>heavily:
>
Now, that's funny!!! Hey I'll admit I'm not part of the PC (politically
correct) crowd . It is almost as funny as this one (I think it was
Aussie):
http://www.mme-ia.com/humor/video/lv03.mpg
Easily en
Actually there's historic logic in the pronunciation. Remember English
pronunciation was being codified when the entire ruling class was
clobbered by French speakers. No one much cared about the proper
pronunciation of English for a couple hundred years after that, since
the Court Language wa
Ann, Windows Power Toys at various times included a quick resolution
change utility that installed as a monitor icon in the system tray
allowing you immediate access to every resolutions that your
card/monitor combination would support. It was incorporated into
various sub versions of Windows
I think with the proper post-processing techniques it will be very
possible. Upsizing using PSCS2 and ACR is my preferred method.
A jpeg straight out of the camera? Meh, probably not so big.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Pål Jensen wrote:
> The Pentax K10D brochure claim
In a message dated 10/4/2006 9:51:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know, getting the finer points right with slang terms is the
toughest challenge with English. It's even worse than seeing the logic
in the pronounciation...:-)
Jostein
===
That's because there isn't a
Really sorry to hear that John, I know how it feels.
John Celio wrote:
>Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
>*weeps*
>
>I fear for the future of the company I am leaving. I thought things were
>turning around, but they just laid me off. Me, the cheapest graphic artist
>in California. As f
I am so sorry to hear this, John, for numerous reasons.
You didn't betray anyone's trust. Mike Reed encouraged you to come here
and drum up some business for him, and then he cut you loose. IMO, if any
trust was betrayed, Mike betrayed yours. He's certainly going to benefit
from whatever time a
Rats!!
Jack
--- John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
>
> *weeps*
>
> I fear for the future of the company I am leaving. I thought things
> were
> turning around, but they just laid me off. Me, the cheapest graphic
> artist
> in California. As far as
Yes, I'm sure the monitor, monitor settings, ambient lighting conditions,
etc., all affect how an image looks and ultimately how a viewer feels about
the image.
This subject is somewhat of a pet peeve of mine. If a viewer does not like
an image (composition and subject matter aside) then they
The Pentax K10D brochure claim print size up to 50 X 70cm. Is this just hype
or what? I certainly cannot print that large from my 645 slides.
- Original Message -
From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it depends. I've made 20x30 inch prints from 6mp (*ist D) by upsizing
and interpol
On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Gonz wrote:
>> Why not just adjust the white balance until it is correct and never
>> mind what color temperature the RAW converter wants to report?
>
> Because its nice to start with a reference you know and adjust from
> there, instead of blindly moving the white bal
Peter Jordan wrote:
There is an inevitable trade off between image size, camera size and
convenience.
Each of us will have a point at which they feel comfortable in this
continuum. For some who value image quality above all, they're willing to
carry a 10x8 field camera around with them, for ot
Only a bit? I'm not trying hard enough.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 10/4/2006 8:50:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Well isn't that what buggery is stuffing something up?
>==
>Now it's getting a bit offensive.
>
>Marnie :-)
>
>
>
--
Things shou
Pål Jensen wrote:
>How big enlargements can one expect to get out of a 10mp DSLR like the K10D?
>A3 format?
A3 should be no problem at all.
The size to which you can enlarge depends greatly on the subject
matter. Subjects like portraits work very well in digital even at huge
enlargement sizes -
Why wouldn't they?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Ann Sanfedele
> Actually...
> I asked that NO games be installed on my
> computer but they wouldn't honor that
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>From www.onelook.com:
"Quick definitions (pom)
noun: a disparaging term for English immigrants to Australia or New Zealand"
Sooo... er...
Thanks, I guess...
hm.
Jostein :-)
On 10/4/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/4/06, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10
Charles Robinson wrote:
>
> On Oct 4, 2006, at 1:23, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> > I stumbled around and found I had it done without really
> > thinking how i did it :)
> >
> > Now I"m slothfully overloading on freecell
> >
>
> There's something delightful about a person spending upwards of
> $1,000 o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 10/3/2006 11:07:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> it doesn't take care of everything, actually.
>
> I've been treating myself to freecell - however, I can't
> bring the freecell window up
> to fill up the screen.. although t
Thanks Dan,
When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
reaction to Becky Carter's imagery from last time around. The word
"molested" slid very easily into my brain then. I suppose a hyphen
between "photoshop" and the said word would have been more
appropriate.
My apologies if
I've gotta run out now, and will be looking forward to the responses and
ensuing discussion when I return. This promises to be most interesting.
I've got some thoughts on the matter as well. Thanks for posting the
question, Bruce, and for providing entree into a possible discussion on
this subje
Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
*weeps*
I fear for the future of the company I am leaving. I thought things were
turning around, but they just laid me off. Me, the cheapest graphic artist
in California. As far as my boss would tell me, the reason he laid me off
is entirely due to money.
Bob W wrote:
>> Well stated Keith!
>>
>> Especially the part about Bob W. and Christian being ~both~
>> wrong.
>>
>
> Keith's wrong about us both being wrong. Keith and Christian are both
> wrong, so obviously you're wrong about Keith being right - he's wrong.
> Right?
>
> Bob
Uhhh, yes.
kei
On 4/10/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
> http://www.photosight.org/photo.php?photoid=44261&ref=author
Lovely pic Tim. You might clone out the cormorant, it's a tad distracting ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottys
There is an inevitable trade off between image size, camera size and
convenience.
Each of us will have a point at which they feel comfortable in this
continuum. For some who value image quality above all, they're willing to
carry a 10x8 field camera around with them, for others it's a Minox 35m
What is upsampling and how is it done?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
> If more print output density or a larger print is desirable, you
> upsample either in the RAW conversion processing or in post
> processing. You get no more detail but the rendering is usually
>
I have observed over time some preferences among many of the listers
concerning how a photo should 'look' - I'm sure that some of it is in
relation to the monitor that it is being displayed on, but some of it
seems to be a preference.
Back in the film days, you could look at a slide or print of th
On 10/4/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, not that one - the starry night shot showing the roof of the house.
> This one:
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#4978870170851409938
>
>
Sorry, Shel, I misunderstood. I don't recall the ISO right now. I'll
take a
In a message dated 10/4/2006 8:50:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well isn't that what buggery is stuffing something up?
==
Now it's getting a bit offensive.
Marnie :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
You're right the little 35 to 70mm isn't the sharpest lens Pentax ever
made. It isn't even the sharpest zoom that Pentax ever made. It falls
short a bit short when compared to the 20-35mm f4.0 or it's original
stablemate the 70-210mm f4-5.6. But then the 20-35 is damn near the
sharpest zoom I
On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Pål Jensen wrote:
> How big enlargements can one expect to get out of a 10mp DSLR like
> the K10D?
> A3 format?
I find 180 to 200 ppi produces very satisfactory rendering quality
for A3 and A3 Super sized prints. A K10D body produces full-frame
image with 2592x3
Pål Jensen wrote:
> How big enlargements can one expect to get out of a 10mp DSLR like the K10D?
> A3 format?
> I've never used a digital camera
>
it depends. I've made 20x30 inch prints from 6mp (*ist D) by upsizing
and interpolation. The level of detail is pretty darn good too. Of
cou
Very very nice!
Tom C.
>From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: PAW - "Sunflower"
>Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:23:00 +1300
>
>Back to the pretty flower photos. I might print this one tomorrow.
>
>http://www.bluemoon.net.nz
101 - 200 of 301 matches
Mail list logo
