A couple comments from Ned Bunnel on al the buzz about the next Pentax:
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2009/04/op-ed-thoughts-by-spa.html
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user
Reading the section about square sensor and full frame. My conclusion
is forget full frame and maybe a square sensor.
Toine
2009/4/26 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
A couple comments from Ned Bunnel on al the buzz about the next Pentax:
Rick Womer wrote:
Alas, our time in this green and pleasant land is rapidly drawing to a close.
My only other opening is 13-14 June.
Probably feasible for me. I have a course at York in June but I think
it's later than that.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
IMO forget the square as well for two reasons:
1/ using a square ensor with the same horizontal size of the current
APS-c sensor would mean some parts of the square sensor would be out
of the current theoretical image circle.
2/ Why would Pentax offer a battery grip with the K-7 if the sensor is
I've never considered the square sensor as a credible option. IMO, the whole
square sensor thing originated from a leak about the X70 (misunderstood for
the new DSLR), which has the option of the square format among others.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Bob W wrote:
I've tentatived it
Hello, breakfast. Again.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Oh, click on the image provided by Ned (the soft one) in his post and
look carefuly :) :) :)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple comments from Ned Bunnel on al the buzz about the next Pentax:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Toine wrote:
Reading the section about square sensor and full frame. My conclusion
is forget full frame and maybe a square sensor.
Forget both. It's interesting that even after Ned pointedly said that
there will not be a full frame Pentax DSLR any time soon,
Maybe, but why does he explain in detail why full format won't work
and only mentions a square sensor in the first line. it would explain
the larger pentaprism. It would be nice ;)
2009/4/26 Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it:
I've never considered the square sensor as a credible option.
Uh, Cotty, are the criteria drifting a bit as the horrifying prospect of cap
mastication looms anew?
It would take a lot of digging through the archives, but as I recall the
original criterion was a truly pro-level camera, with things like a sealed
metal body and 100% viewfinder. I seem to
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:13 -0400, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
wrote:
I like it.
Thanks for looking Dave. And thanks also Ann, Ken, Christine, Cotty,
Tim, Toine, Frank, Luiz and Doug.
I never did find any contact details for Sandra. Probably just as
well.
It seems to me there
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:37 +0100, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Thousands of acres of rice fields around this area are in the
process of being flooded for planting. Little yellow
bi-planes have started their planting dance among the many
power lines.
Somewhat hazy morning, but I
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:09 +1000, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au
wrote:
I admit I am more than a little ambivalent about ANZAC day. But it still
makes me happy that the day isn't about displaying weapons and military
might. Plus the young are marching when the old can't. So, not a
I like what you did with number 3 and 5.
Not sure i know what ANZAC day is.
Dave
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I admit I am more than a little ambivalent about ANZAC day. But it still
makes me happy that the day isn't about displaying weapons and
Not sure i know what ANZAC day is.
I think its mostly got to do with biscuits (cookies), these days.
- Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Thanks Ann, Paul Jack and Bob for your comments.
I drive, bike, walk by this every day of the week, and for some reason
never had a camera with me.
Ken;s comment earlier this week, about people not looking for proper
light for lanedscapes, or something along that line, got my creative
juices all
I'm thinking of getting the iwatermark program.
Any one bought from the site, script software. Are they legit etc.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today, shooting some footage of the
London Marathon - more of that later. I took this picture of Canary Wharf
last night while we were having a pint at my local:
http://www.web-options.com/L152.jpg
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Sure it was only 1 pint Bob.:-)
Interesting
Dave
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today, shooting some footage of the
London Marathon - more of that later. I took this picture of Canary Wharf
last night while we were
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wro
tripping over their own feet, getting involved in irrational arguments,
general clumsiness.
Just another day in the offices of PDML central.
Dave
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Absolutely. Only one at my local.
Didn't say anything about how many at other pubs...
Bob
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of David J Brooks
Sent: 26 April 2009 13:00
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Canary Wharf
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Absolutely. Only one at my local.
Didn't say anything about how many at other pubs...
True.
Next time turn the SR on.:-)
Dave
Bob
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:37:31PM +0100, Bob W scripsit:
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today, shooting some footage of the
London Marathon - more of that later. I took this picture of Canary Wharf
last night while we were having a pint at my local:
Yeah, Cary and I. ;)))
Jack
--- On Sat, 4/25/09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
Subject: RE: PESO: Duster
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, April 25, 2009, 10:37 PM
Thousands of acres of rice fields around this area are
in
Uhhu..a real nice plane. ;)
Jack
--- On Sun, 4/26/09, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
Subject: RE: PESO: Duster
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, April 26, 2009, 3:30 AM
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:37 +0100, Bob W
I suggest you use a tripod next time. BG
Jack
--- On Sun, 4/26/09, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
Subject: Canary Wharf
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, April 26, 2009, 4:37 AM
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today,
Dario Bonazza wrote:
I've never considered the square sensor as a credible option.
The square sensor idea was ridiculous fantasy from the very beginning.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Bob W wrote:
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today, shooting some footage of the
London Marathon - more of that later. I took this picture of Canary Wharf
last night while we were having a pint at my local:
http://www.web-options.com/L152.jpg
Looks as if you had more than one pint
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:01 -0400, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not sure i know what ANZAC day is.
April 25 is a public holiday in Australia and New Zealand. ANZAC is an
acronym for Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. The day commemorates
the servicemen and women who served
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
I've never considered the square sensor as a credible option.
The square sensor idea was ridiculous fantasy from the very beginning.
Not if the world was flat.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
I've never considered the square sensor as a credible option.
The square sensor idea was ridiculous fantasy from the very beginning.
It makes sense in terms of getting the most out of your lenses.
For any given criterion of what
Sandy Harris wrote:
Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
I've never considered the square sensor as a credible option.
The square sensor idea was ridiculous fantasy from the very beginning.
It makes sense in terms of getting the most out of your lenses.
For any
In a message dated 4/23/2009 8:12:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384_N3Nso/1/518817441_cAcPH/Large
ann
==
They might want to think twice about that. Heh.
Good one, ann.
Marnie :-)
In a message dated 4/22/2009 1:34:47 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
li...@thrane.name writes:
Everyone else is talking about the new camera while I´m playing with
an old MX, Fisheye 17mm f/4 and b/w film .-)
http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=905836
DagT
=
Very nice
In a message dated 4/24/2009 6:49:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
supera1...@fastmail.fm writes:
G'day all
Wandering around Johnstons Bay, Pyrmont (Sydney) a couple of days ago, I
came across a couple of large marine boilers that had been installed as
a feature in a local park. I was
In a message dated 4/25/2009 6:12:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
It has a rather ominous feeling to it... an illustration for a tale of
scary woods, perhaps...
OR the woods eager to take back the land from the developers... cue
scary music
nice grab!
ann
Nice set! I agree with Frank...
Cheers!
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:47 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:33 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
Everyone else is talking about the new camera while I´m playing with an old
MX, Fisheye 17mm f/4 and b/w
Sorta related in more ways than one...
An outrigger used for fishing...taken by an old KX ;-)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/3403411735/
Btw, its my latest photo accepted in PPG (Jack: it's the one that was
hanging in there...!)
Bong
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:33 AM, DagT
Quite legitimate. Good software. Lots of people use it.
I'd buy it if I hadn't developed my own watermarking script already.
I might yet.
G
On Apr 26, 2009, at 4:20 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I'm thinking of getting the iwatermark program.
Any one bought from the site, script software. Are
So I've made a few changes to my website. Some things I wanted to do,
some things you all suggested.
I'd love to hear what you all have to say about it. Thanks!
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
Yes, it would need a different mirror/viewfinder assembly. It would increase
sensor cost significantly, for sensor area that wouldn't even be used most
of the time (except when shooting in square format -- a rarity for
I agree. Most of the web surfers I run into are pretty impatient ...
if a site doesn't load pretty quickly, they're off the next and have
forgotten about it.
It's why I try to keep my web images a reasonable size when I post
simple JPEGs for the PESOs, i keep my website pages small. It's
Certainly not marketable. Most photographers are conditioned to using
the rectangle to shape their work. I shot 6x6 for many years. Never
did like it, never will. Square is definitely a niche market. And
yes, Hasselblad and other MF makers have been successful in that
niche, but it's
hi,
one from the beach today. shop's open:
http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/Peso#5329014586482455282
and soon enough, there's a customer:
http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/Peso#5329016827149731602
yeah, two OT PESOs actually. canon g2, iso 400...
regards, subash
--
PDML
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: OT GESO - ANZAC Day
I like what you did with number 3 and 5.
Not sure i know what ANZAC day is.
It's their equivalent of out Rememberance day.
William Robb
And the band played Waltzing Matilda
And the old men still answer
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: Canary Wharf
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today, shooting some footage of the
London Marathon - more of that later. I took this picture of Canary Wharf
last night while we were having a pint at my local:
I have breakfast with friends every Thursday morning at a favorite
cafe in Palo Alto. This past Thursday the camera came out while we
were goofing around ...
http://www.gdgphoto.com/dfirregulars/
All photos with Olympus E-1 fitted with Panasonic/Leica 14-50/2.8-3.5
ASPH OIS.
This
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:01:40PM -0400, John Francis scripsit:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:22:19PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
Are proper monopods easier? Is there a mental trick to avoiding the
wobble?
Most of the time I used a monopod it was to provide some level of
support for a long lens
I grew up with a Rolleiflex TLR. I love square photos, although for
practical reasons most of my photos are rectangular. 2:3 format always
seems too oblong for my taste, I find 3:4 and slightly squarer
proportions more appealing. It's definitely one of the reasons I like
FourThirds format.
SQUARE has two huge advantages:
1. No need to rotate camera for portrait orientation if using a cropped
retanglular subset of the square
2. More efficient usage of the lens image circle if and when the full
square image is used.
The key to making #1 advantage work is to have a specailly marked
oooh nice shot !
nit-wise - I'd shave a bit off the bottom, were it mine... just to the
edge of where the reflection starts...
ann
Bob W wrote:
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today, shooting some footage of the
London Marathon - more of that later. I took this picture of Canary
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Certainly not marketable. Most photographers are conditioned to using
the rectangle to shape their work. I shot 6x6 for many years. Never did
like it, never will. Square is definitely a niche market. And yes,
Hasselblad and other MF makers have been successful in that
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: GESO 2009 - Douce France Irregulars - GDG
All photos with Olympus E-1 fitted with Panasonic/Leica 14-50/2.8-3.5
ASPH OIS.
Do you even use any Pentax equipment any more?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: JC OConnell
Subject: RE: Square sensor, was Re: Pentax K7
SQUARE has two huge advantages:
1. No need to rotate camera for portrait orientation if using a cropped
retanglular subset of the square
2. More efficient usage of the lens image circle if and
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Square sensor, was Re: Pentax K7
Hasn't even Hasselblad dropped square format?
No.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Certainly not marketable. Most photographers are conditioned to using the
rectangle to shape their work. I shot 6x6 for many years. Never did like it,
never will. Square is definitely a niche
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Hasn't even Hasselblad dropped square format?
No.
I meant with regard to digital. In film there's little cost increase
associated with square format (because the camera maker doesn't have to
provide the sensor) so it's
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:02:13AM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
mkdir $1
date
ls /media/disk/dcim/*/* |wc
mv /media/disk/dcim/*/* $1
date
I'm a little paranoid -- I mount the filesystem read-only, and I use rsync
to transfer, because it verifies file checksums after transferring, which
means no
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Mark Roberts
Hasn't even Hasselblad dropped square format?
No.
I meant with regard to digital. In film there's little cost increase
associated with square
Do you have enough room on your other pages (weddings, fine art, etc) to
make the thumbnails the same size as the ones on the Essay page? It's
kind of disconcerting to see the ones on your index page then bounce to
the tiny thumbs on the subsequent pages. (IMHO)
My preference is to
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:55:30AM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've done this with every flash media I've owned since the beginning.
Memory Stick, Memory Stick PRO, CF, SD, SDHC, xD ... all of them. No
difference at all.
I've *definitely* seen glitches in xD with my wife's Fujifilm F31fd.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:12:25PM +0100, Bob W wrote:
I should think the difference is fairly minimal. To delete all, the system
probably just sets a 'deleted' status for each file entry in the FAT,
whereas to format the card I expect it simply writes a new FAT. In either
case I'd be
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:02:05PM -0400, Matthew Miller scripsit:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:02:13AM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
mkdir $1
date
ls /media/disk/dcim/*/* |wc
mv /media/disk/dcim/*/* $1
date
I'm a little paranoid -- I mount the filesystem read-only, and I use
rsync to
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:10:35PM -0400, Matthew Miller scripsit:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:12:25PM +0100, Bob W wrote:
I should think the difference is fairly minimal. To delete all, the system
probably just sets a 'deleted' status for each file entry in the FAT,
whereas to format the
Ah, good for you, Bong! I didn't even get a chance to vote yes on it.
Jack
--- On Sun, 4/26/09, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO- fishing boat (was: PESOs - Fishy)
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:13:02PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
I'm a little paranoid -- I mount the filesystem read-only, and I use
rsync to transfer, because it verifies file checksums after
transferring, which means no loss due to USB glitch or whatnot. Then
That's a *lot* paranoid, unless
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:21:33PM -0400, Matthew Miller scripsit:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:13:02PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
I'm a little paranoid -- I mount the filesystem read-only, and I use
rsync to transfer, because it verifies file checksums after
transferring, which means no loss
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:10:35PM -0400, Matthew Miller scripsit:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:12:25PM +0100, Bob W wrote:
I should think the difference is fairly minimal. To
delete all, the system
probably just sets a 'deleted' status for each file entry
in the FAT,
whereas to
So I've made a few changes to my website. Some things I wanted to do,
some things you all suggested.
I'd love to hear what you all have to say about it. Thanks!
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
I preferred the earlier first page. I liked that you had different sizes of
picture - it gave
I like what you did with number 3 and 5.
Not sure i know what ANZAC day is.
It's their equivalent of out Rememberance day.
William Robb
And the band played Waltzing Matilda
And the old men still answer the call
But year after year, their numbers grow fewer
Someday no one
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:26:09PM +0100, Bob W scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:10:35PM -0400, Matthew Miller scripsit:
On my K10D, it's significantly slower to delete-all.
Delete all = couple hundred to a couple thousand operations on the
FAT, depending on the
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today, shooting some
footage of the
London Marathon - more of that later. I took this picture
of Canary Wharf
last night while we were having a pint at my local:
http://www.web-options.com/L152.jpg
For the longest time, we had a
On Apr 26, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Certainly not marketable. Most photographers are conditioned to
using the rectangle to shape their work. I shot 6x6 for many years.
Never did like it, never will. Square is definitely a niche market.
And yes,
On Apr 26, 2009, at 8:32 AM, William Robb wrote:
All photos with Olympus E-1 fitted with Panasonic/Leica 14-50/2.8-3.5
ASPH OIS.
Do you even use any Pentax equipment any more?
I still own Pentax equipment, including lenses I occasionally use on
the E-1 and L1, and the Pentax 645 camera
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Square sensor, was Re: Pentax K7
The company Victor Hasselblad doesn't exist anymore. Hasselblad today
is just a brand, the cameras are built by Fuji. The classic Hasselblad
6x6 film cameras are all out of production,
Great capture. And a little scary :)
2009/4/26 David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
Nice day in the hood today, so i went for a bike ride. We have a bit
of a cedar bush left in town, that was left after some town house were
built about 15 years ago.
There is some interesting light that gets
And DOS did it that way up until 6.0 or so -- delete wildcard was get
everything that matches wildcard; apply delete to each thing in the
resulting list, one at a time.
Maybe, but I don't think the cameras are using DOS. One system using a bad
design doesn't mean they all do, 30 years on.
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: GESO 2009 - Douce France Irregulars - GDG
Do you even use any Pentax equipment any more?
I still own Pentax equipment, including lenses I occasionally use on the
E-1 and L1, and the Pentax 645 camera that I haven't found
Since I process my own images, I'd love the aspect ratio flexibility provided
by a square format. IOW, if I were given an equal IQ choice of either square or
rectangular, it would be no contest.
Shot with a Mamiya6 for some years.
Jack.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Certainly not marketable. Most photographers are conditioned to using the
rectangle to shape their work. I shot 6x6 for many years. Never did like
Thanks Ann. Here are some more shots from the pubs:
http://www.web-options.com/Boozer/
Bob
oooh nice shot !
nit-wise - I'd shave a bit off the bottom, were it mine...
just to the
edge of where the reflection starts...
ann
Bob W wrote:
Cotty has been over here yesterday and
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Cotty has been over here yesterday and today, shooting some footage of
the
London Marathon - more of that later. I took this picture of Canary Wharf
last night while we were having a pint at my local:
http://www.web-options.com/L152.jpg
Looks as if you
20 seconds!? It takes that long to transition for you?
Does anyone else have that same problem?
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
So I've made a few changes to my website. Some things I wanted to do,
some things you all suggested.
I'd love to hear what you
On Apr 26, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com
wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Certainly not marketable. Most photographers are conditioned to
using the
rectangle to shape
Huh?
20 seconds!? It takes that long to transition for you?
Does anyone else have that same problem?
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
So I've made a few changes to my website. Some things I
wanted to do,
some things you all suggested.
I'd
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:01:34PM -0500, Nick Wright scripsit:
20 seconds!? It takes that long to transition for you?
Does anyone else have that same problem?
It takes between six and eight seconds for any of the essays to load if
I click on them.
Given the response time thereafter, I would
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com
wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Certainly not
On Apr 26, 2009, at 9:43 AM, William Robb wrote:
Do you even use any Pentax equipment any more?
I still own Pentax equipment, including lenses I occasionally use
on the
E-1 and L1, and the Pentax 645 camera that I haven't found time or
reason
to use yet.
Fair enough.
I'm just
On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
The info you were getting sounds a lot more like 'I heard it from a
salesguy' than an 'industry source', considering that it's about as
accurate as most 'Pentax/Leica is dead' type rumours.
My sources are the owners of a commercial photographic
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
The info you were getting sounds a lot more like 'I heard it from a
salesguy' than an 'industry source', considering that it's about as
accurate as most 'Pentax/Leica is
On Apr 26, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Nick Wright wrote:
So I've made a few changes to my website. Some things I wanted to do,
some things you all suggested.
I'd love to hear what you all have to say about it. Thanks!
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
- I like the control layout more. Easier to see,
On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
And thanks for confirming the 'I heard it from a salesguy' provenance
of your info. Retailers, unless you're talking about BH or Robert
White sized ones, are not 'Industry Sources', even if well-connected.
I've heard far sillier things from the
On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Graydon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:01:34PM -0500, Nick Wright scripsit:
20 seconds!? It takes that long to transition for you?
Does anyone else have that same problem?
It takes between six and eight seconds for any of the essays to load
if
I click on
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
And thanks for confirming the 'I heard it from a salesguy' provenance
of your info. Retailers, unless you're talking about BH or Robert
White sized ones, are not 'Industry
Okay, made a few more slight changes.
Re-did the front page again.
Are the java script slideshows particularly a problem?
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Graydon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:01:34PM -0500, Nick
As to the difference between horizontal and vertical I'm just not sure
what to do about that.
I want my photos as big as they can be. And verticals just don't fit
well on a computer screen.
I think I'm going to have to seriously consider switching over to a
square format. ;;)
On Sun, Apr 26,
they whom i call Stan Halpin wrote:
Related to the ongoing thread about what is a professional...
One characteristic of many professions is the development of a
specialized language. This facilitates communication among members of
the profession and serves to exclude outsiders.
An example I
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of Nick Wright
As to the difference between horizontal and vertical I'm just not sure
what to do about that.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I like 1st two best ... first one I think would be nice in bw
nice angle of um repose :-)
ann
Bob W wrote:
Thanks Ann. Here are some more shots from the pubs:
http://www.web-options.com/Boozer/
Bob
oooh nice shot !
nit-wise - I'd shave a bit off the bottom, were it mine...
just to
??
I don't get it.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of Nick Wright
As to the difference between horizontal and vertical I'm just not sure
what to do about
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
