From: ann sanfedele
I see the little boxes all over the place... made of tickey tackey too
You monitor is too tilted.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Mark,
IIRC, someone had a blogpost somewhere about K20D having a systemic
fault that popped up in the same area for all affected cameras. In
case this is another one of those, would you mind describing where the
band occur in your images?
I'll check mine as soon as I get back from office. Thanks
Hey Lasse!
Hope you do us the honour of delurking for a while.
Cheers,
Jostein
2009/7/28 Lasse Karlsson ma20...@aland.net:
Hi all!
Just want to say hi to you all. I hope everything is well with everyone.
I guess most oldies remember me and may recall that I'm shooting Canon
nowadays, but I
2009/7/28 Paul Sorenson allarou...@earthlink.net:
Damn Lasse, you're a gluten for punishment.
That oughta take the starch out of his sails...
Another thread based on mis-spelt words.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sorry to hear that Mark.
The firmware update coming very very soon may help. I hope so.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Recently I had the pleasure of covering a full week of
athletics at what's
called The (Natwest) Island Games. I guess it's the only
competition/games
where qualification for participating is based purely on a geological
criteria - only island residents and teams can participate...
:)
On 27/7/09, Mark Cassino, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a sample - actual pixels of the very last shot I took yesterday.
(Apologies - the shot is not properly focused.) Guide arrows help
identify the hot pixel column.
http://www.markcassino.com/temp/IMGP1267.jpg
I'm sure I've seen this
On 28/7/09, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
Tommeltott,
Slikkepott,
Langemann,
Guldebrand
og lille Petter Spillemann
I haven't used the word 'spatula' since for years. We have a nice
collection of slikkepotts in our kitchen...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
If it's of any use, both have been tested on Photozone:
http://www.photozone.de/pentax/122-pentax-smc-fa-31mm-f18-al-limited-review--test-report
http://www.photozone.de/pentax/393-pentax_35_28
Along with the FA 35/2:
2009/7/28 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
I haven't used the word 'spatula' since for years. We have a nice
collection of slikkepotts in our kitchen...
Nothing like a slikkepott for a good spanking, eh?
:-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML
2009/7/28 Bob W p...@web-options.com:
How did we miss that event, leaving all the glory to plucky little Aland?!
We could have sent a team from GB, one from Australia, another from the
Americas and perhaps, stretching the rules a little, one from Eurasia,
another from Africa below the Suez.
On 28/7/09, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nothing like a slikkepott for a good spanking, eh?
:-)
Maybe with this?
http://tinyurl.com/lurvespat
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Ned Bunnell shares some background why they called it a macro:
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2009/07/da-35mm-macro-year-later.html.
The DA35 is simply amazing.
Toine
2009/7/28 Desjardins, Steve desjard...@wlu.edu:
I'm curious if anyone has any experience with both of these lenses. If not,
Makes me remember I had such a problem with my istD in Greece, years
ago: the embedded Jpeg was OK but the RAW was not.
It was the very singe time this happened to me. Maybe a card write
problem. I will never know.
hat K-7 thing however seem to be documented somehow. I still think
that might be
That's a Steikespade, not a Slikkepott.
But whatever tickles your... um... fancy...
BTW, I think I have a pic of you engaged in a fencing fight featuring
slikkepotter.
Jostein
2009/7/28 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
On 28/7/09, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nothing like a slikkepott for a
On 28/7/09, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's a Steikespade, not a Slikkepott.
You're just making this up!! ;)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
G'day all
Sadly, my FA 80-320 mm zoom has started to play up. It can no longer
focus at infinity beyond about the 180 mm setting. It seems to work OK
otherwise.
I'm considering the DA 55-300 mm as a replacement but I've seen a couple
of FA 100-300 zooms go for reasonable prices recently.
Does
No, not taken by me. I should be so lucky.
The page might take a while to load as there are 40 photos, but it's
well worth it.
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/2009_tour_de_france.html
Now I'd better get to bed, I'm going to be cranky in the morning...
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML
Your not helping here Paul.:-)
Dave
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:26 PM, paul stenquistpnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My battery grip for the K7 arrived today. While I like having the extra
battery capacity and the vertical controls, what really pleases me about the
grip is that it makes my
Bummer Mark, hope it gets taken care of.
Just a thought, does this happen on more than 1 card. Might be a bum card.??
Dave
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Mark Cassinomarkcass...@ymail.com wrote:
I got a new job and have been on the road traveling for 5 of the last 7 weeks
- which has left
Some have had good luck with the FA 100-300, but the consensus is that
it's not as good.
Check ebay. I sold my 80-320 two weeks ago on ebay. It went for $130
to a fellow in Australia. Shipping was $31, and it arrived in less
than a week.
Paul
On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Brian Walters
I was talked into buying a slim polarizer for my 16-45, one especially
for digital cameras, and an increase in cost of course.
Good information to know.
Dave
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Christine
Aguilacagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
I use the 16-45 regularly and have only a 67mm UV filter
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Ken Wallerkwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Nice shot Ken. Well framed and panned.
Dave
The MkIV GT shown here
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html is not an
original, but a well done replica by a group of private individuals.
Hope the car
Thanks, Jack - if it is a known isue at least I won't have to spend as much
time convincing Pentax or BH that it is a real issue. I'm seeing it at ISO
200, 400, and 800. (I haven't shot much at higher speeds...)
- MCC
- Original Message
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
Wish I
Thanks, Joseph - I didn't think of the pixel mapping thingy. I'll give that a
try tonight.
- MCC
- Original Message
From: Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com
Did you happen to run the Pixel Mapping procedure?
Not that I think in your case that it will repair your problem, but it
The bad column of pixels is # 1265, give or take one or two. That' sopening the
RAW file at 14.5 megapixels with no up or down sampling...
- MCC
- Original Message
From: AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:41:37 AM
I'll try to do some research on the update - hadn't heard about it but I've
been more or less off-line these last couple of weeks.
- MCC
- Original Message
From: Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com
Sorry to hear that Mark.
The firmware update coming very very soon may help. I hope so.
Har!
- MCC
- Original Message
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:35:57 AM
Subject: Re: Crap! K7 Sensor Problem
On 27/7/09, Mark Cassino, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a sample - actual pixels of the very last shot I took
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:31 AM, paul stenquistpnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
heck ebay. I sold my 80-320 two weeks ago on ebay. It went for $130
Crap. I wish i had known that. I would have but a bid in.
Live and learn
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
I sold my 80-320 to finance the 55-300. The 55-300 is much better
above 200 mm and it doesn't creep while walking around. My FA100-300
doesn't see any use.
It's for sale!
Toine
2009/7/28 Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm:
G'day all
Sadly, my FA 80-320 mm zoom has started to play up. It can
lurvespat
I don';t know what this is but it fits right in with the thread...
Cotty wrote:
On 28/7/09, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nothing like a slikkepott for a good spanking, eh?
:-)
Maybe with this?
http://tinyurl.com/lurvespat
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Seems to me that if you set the camera for the shortest
focal length of a zoom range that it would be correct
at that length and if you used longer zoom focal length
setting it would undercompensate which is still better
and definitely no worse than NO SR at all.
On the other hand, there may be
Another E-p1 shot for you cat lovers:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40620...@n04/3764882099/
If I only I could express that level of disdain on my face.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Desjardins, Steve wrote:
I'm curious if anyone has any experience with both of these lenses.
If not, can anyone tell me something about performance of the DA 35?
Thanks.
Steve, I have had the DA 35 for a year and a half and I love it. I use
it for both macro work and as a carry-around.
I wouldn't turn shake reduction off. That is a poor option.
I have mis-identified lenses (using a 300mm and calling it a 540mm (1.7x)).
Results were a little wierd, universally a little unsharp/blurred.
I suspect identifying a lens at XXX mm's will also affect focus
corrections, if any.
Regards,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:31 -0400, paul stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Some have had good luck with the FA 100-300, but the consensus is that
it's not as good.
Check ebay. I sold my 80-320 two weeks ago on ebay. It went for $130
to a fellow in Australia. Shipping was $31, and it
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:18 +0200, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
I sold my 80-320 to finance the 55-300. The 55-300 is much better
above 200 mm and it doesn't creep while walking around. My FA100-300
doesn't see any use.
It's for sale!
Based on that, and on Paul's post, I think I see a 55-300
At 8:57 PM +1000 7/28/09, Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
Sadly, my FA 80-320 mm zoom has started to play up. It can no longer
focus at infinity beyond about the 180 mm setting. It seems to work OK
otherwise.
I'm considering the DA 55-300 mm as a replacement but I've seen a couple
of FA
PJ,
It's that time of year.
I'm driving to the Oshgosh EAA fly-in on Wens.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:49 PM, P. J.
Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Ghost. It seems to be the month for unexpected flying objects. First the
Red Tail Hawk surprised the c*** out of me, then
J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
NO, THAT'S WHAT IT SOLD FOR AT AUCTION - its
not an asking price, it's a selling price.
Maybe he really wanted to buy it.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Home Page - www.jchriso.com
Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list -
Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
The featured Marquee was the Ford GT 40.
Vinyl roof version?
The MkIV GT shown here
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html is not an
original, but a well done replica by a group of private individuals.
--
PDML
Sold my FA 80~320 (eBay, $135+$15 shipping) a couple weeks ago. I'm expecting
delivery of a DA 55~300 (BH, $350 w/free shipping) in a couple days. While I'm
realistic about sample variations, I like the test numbers I've read along with
positive contrast reports. Therefore, am holding off on
Actually they mean thin filters. Narrow filter ring.
Jack
--- On Mon, 7/27/09, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: DA 16-45 f4 -- does it require slim filters?
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, July
Bob (and anyone else vacationing in/traveling to Wisconsin)
If you're in the Oshkosh area don't miss the photo exhibit at the Paine
Art Museum. The have 150+ masterpieces on loan from the George Eastman
House Collection. The exhibit runs through October 11.
http://www.thepaine.org/
-p
been there , done that :-)
ann
AlunFoto wrote:
Done.
Cast your votes, guys!
Jostein
2009/7/25 Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com:
As some of you may remember, I entered the PDML Photo Annual in the
Photography.Book.Now competition. Then main part of the contest is
judged by a jury but
From: Boris Liberman
Date: Saturday, July 18, 2009, 11:00 AM
Hi!
Evidently, putting zero on the left from the peso number
was too ambitious an idea.
Please be brutal and honest, and yes, I still have 800+
unopened messages labeled by PAW/PESO in my inbox.
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Best compromise for focal length using K and A zooms.
Any thoughts? Samples?
I mean is it better to over compensate for camera shake or over
compensate? I can't for the life of me figure out how I would do
repeatable tests. So
Desjardins, Steve wrote:
Another E-p1 shot for you cat lovers:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40620...@n04/3764882099/
If I only I could express that level of disdain on my face.
steve - thats a gorgeous shot! you don't have to be a cat lover...
(though I am) to see that.
and the cat is
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:00 -0700, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Actually they mean thin filters. Narrow filter ring.
Yeah - the 'slim' filter is built into the camera
:-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
I found the Tamron 70-300 LD Di to be very good, sharper than my FA 80-320 and
F 70-210. they're cheap to buy too. I've not tried the 55-300 but hear it's
very good.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:18 AM
Subject: RE: Summer greetings from Scandinavia!
Recently I had the pleasure of covering a full week of
athletics at what's
called The (Natwest) Island Games. I guess it's the
Hi and thanks, Paul.
I will let you know when I've finished a selection to show you.
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 4:28 AM
Subject: Re: Summer greetings from Scandinavia!
From: ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 4:51 AM
Subject: Re: Summer greetings from Scandinavia!
[re Cotty: Lasse thank God you've come home.]
you'll have to pardon Cotty, he only makes references for Brits and
Yanks...
No
In Swedish:
Tummetott, Slickepott, Långeman, Gullebrand och Lille Vicke Vire...
although I found me asking myself - was it really Vicke Vire? I'm starting
to forget my nursery rhymes... jeez.
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi all.
Film question.
Blacks cameras can do BW developing and scanning of 120 film. I just
talked to the closest store and i can get a roll developed for $7.50
and scanned at low res for $0.45 each. They send it out to a lab, were
i have no idea.
Question.
The low res is something like 1600 x
Hi there, Boris!
Nice to hear from you.
How are you, and how are things around you and your family in your
politically charged area?
Hope everything is well.
Lasse
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 5:50 AM
Subject:
Hi Bob, thanks.
Yes, things are pretty good, all things considered.
Feel tempted to borrow a phrase from a musician friend: overworked and
underpaid and excluding the overworked part... :)
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:35 AM, David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
Film question.
Blacks cameras can do BW developing and scanning of 120 film. I just
talked to the closest store and i can get a roll developed for $7.50
and scanned at low res for $0.45 each. They send it out
Thank you, Jostein!
Maybe I will, at least I'll try.
I think it's funny that I actually never unsubsribed, not even for a brief
period of time, during these eleven years, although there may have been a
year between my posts at times.
There's nothing like old friends, it seems. :)
(I guess
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:35 AM, David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Blacks cameras can do BW developing and scanning of 120 film. I just
talked to the closest store and i can get a roll developed for $7.50
and scanned at low res for $0.45 each. They send it out to a lab, were
i have no
The hi-res would definitely be better for any size print. However,
it's not very high resolution for 120 film, so you won't be taking
full advantage of the medium format 6400 x 4800 would be more in
keeping with the size of the negative.
Paul
On Jul 28, 2009, at 10:35 AM, David J Brooks
On 28/7/09, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
No, not taken by me. I should be so lucky.
The page might take a while to load as there are 40 photos, but it's
well worth it.
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/2009_tour_de_france.html
Now I'd better get to bed, I'm going to be
On 28/7/09, Lasse Karlsson, discombobulated, unleashed:
No need for Cotty to be pardoned at all, he was just wagging his tail and
I'm wagging mine. Us dogs recognize each other when we meet...
I wondered what that sweaty smell was!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
they whom i call Jack Davis wrote:
Actually they mean thin filters. Narrow filter ring.
BH carries 27 thin filters and 718 slim filters
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
As others have said the resolution seems a little low, heck the Epson
V500 flatbed will give you a 2400 DPI which should net you at least
twice the resolution of the high res scans, and you can get one for as
little as $170 US if you hunt around. I don't know what a commercial
concern would
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:09 AM, paul stenquistpnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
The hi-res would definitely be better for any size print. However, it's not
very high resolution for 120 film, so you won't be taking full advantage of
the medium format 6400 x 4800 would be more in keeping with the
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgigdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
High rez for sure ... that's just enough pixels for a 300 ppi 8x10 print.
I wonder what they're scanning with. A 6x7 negative scanned at 1200
ppi nets about that number of pixels.
Not sure, i did not ask. I will now
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Adam Maasa...@mawz.ca wrote:
Go for the high-res for 8x10 or larger.
The 8x10 is probably all i'll do anyway.
Dave
--
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:21 AM, steve harleyp...@paper-ape.com wrote:
they whom i call Jack Davis wrote:
Actually they mean thin filters. Narrow filter ring.
BH carries 27 thin filters and 718 slim filters
Wonder what Kirstie Alley uses.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Jack Davisjdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sold my FA 80~320 (eBay, $135+$15 shipping) a couple weeks ago. I'm expecting
delivery of a DA 55~300 (BH, $350 w/free shipping) in a couple days. While
I'm realistic about sample variations, I like the test numbers I've
Kirstie uses Ultra slim and fast filters...
David J Brooks wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:21 AM, steve harleyp...@paper-ape.com wrote:
they whom i call Jack Davis wrote:
Actually they mean thin filters. Narrow filter ring.
BH carries 27 thin filters and 718 slim filters
Wow! That sunflower/pack shot is a doozy. Stunning set. Thanks for
posting. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: Photos From Le Tour
On 28/7/09, David Mann,
Nice catch. Maybe you're having one of those interdimensional space-time
portal problems. Aim your microwave at them and see if they go away.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J.
Alling
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 12:49 AM
I've been watching myth busters, I've built a multi magnetron maser...
Desjardins, Steve wrote:
Nice catch. Maybe you're having one of those interdimensional space-time
portal problems. Aim your microwave at them and see if they go away.
-Original Message-
From:
Godfrey,
My first attempt at guessing which pics were yours was wrong (they
were by esubijano). My second attempt was correct though. I
should've guessed from the DiGiorgi Duotone :-) I like the locals,
chilllin'. They have faces that are asking for a photograph, huh?
I also participated in
Like William Robb, I've always input the shortest FL. Sometimes, if I
find I'm going to spend a while shooting at the longest FL of the
zoom, I'll change the SR FL to that value, but otherwise, it's just
the shortest. I simply bear in mind that I won't get the full benefit
of SR at the longest FL
2009/7/27 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
The FA31 is faster, larger, is practical for ambient light indoor
photography, and has a very particular rendering **I despair to describe.**
Graydon,
On behalf on the League of
2009/7/26 AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com:
Btw, Neither Bridge nor ACS recognises the 60-250 zoom yet.
I recently purchased a Tokina AT-X 400mm f/5.6, which Bridge
identifies as a 35-70mm. It's funny to open an image in ACR and read
35-70mm @ 400mm. Is that what you would call an overreaching zoom?
Marc,
Not that I want to alarm you, but you are not the only one with this
problem. In fact, we might want to call it an epidemic:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/65879-k7-busted-sensor-strikes-production-body.html
I'm sure a firmware patch will come soon, but I would
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:49:10AM -0400, P. J. Alling scripsit:
Ghost. It seems to be the month for unexpected flying objects. First
the Red Tail Hawk surprised the c*** out of me, then this. I was
taking a walk on the shore of New Haven Harbor, pretty much under the
flight path from
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:19:43PM +1000, Anthony Farr wrote:
2009/7/28 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
It reminds me of the brand (forgotten which one) which recently
declared that use of third party batteries would void a camera's
warranty. Do they have snoop-ware in the firmware
--- On Mon, 7/27/09, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Damn Lasse, you're a gluten for punishment.
I think you meant glutton, but this will get a rise out of him, at yeast if
he's a crusty sort...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:59:34AM -0400, Miserere scripsit:
2009/7/27 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
The FA31 is faster, larger, is practical for ambient light indoor
photography, and has a very particular rendering **I
I suppose I should reply off-list, which is what I am going to do.
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Hi there, Boris!
Nice to hear from you.
How are you, and how are things around you and your family in your
politically charged area?
Hope everything is well.
Lasse
From: Boris Liberman
William Robb wrote:
I think thats a really good shot Boris.
William Robb
Thanks, Bill!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Boris,
That is an interesting shadow image.
I like the way I must slow down to 'read' the picture.
It evokes memories of my kids on the swings.
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Thanks!
David J Brooks wrote:
Interesting light and shadows.
I like it.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thanks, Rick, this is one seriously flattering comment!
Boris
Rick Womer wrote:
Beautiful. Very nice composition, very intriguing... I lingered over
it and returned to it a few times. It's a difficult balance, having
an image complex enough to be intriguing, yet not so complex that
people
What Christine said.
Igor
Tue Jul 28 10:32:08 CDT 2009
Christine Aguila wrote:
Wow! That sunflower/pack shot is a doozy. Stunning set. Thanks for
posting. Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Not in relation to this problem, but I would recommend using IMAP
protocol (both Thunderbird and Gmail support it).
It works smoother in general, and you can avoid potential problems
if you access it from more than one computer.
BTW, with imap - it has a hickup once in a while, but it clears by
Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain je ne se qua that not one can measure
but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But compared to the DA35, it's
an expensive bit of français.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Graydon
Not mine, and yeah, the PhotoShopping is over-the-top on a few of the
items, but wow:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/madhukr/sets/72157621871890268/
-T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain je ne se qua that not one can
measure but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But compared
to the DA35, it's an expensive bit of français.
Do you need to take pictures in
Err.. or column, depending on how its implemented
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Gonzrgonzoma...@gmail.com wrote:
Not a card problem. Probably a row amplifier on the sensor itself.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:30 AM, David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Bummer Mark, hope it gets taken
Let me preface this by saying that if I had just bought a K-7 and
noticed this I'd be disturbed, if not angry. However in a lot of the
examples the issue is hard to see even in the enhanced images. Under
normal circumstances with a good exposure, not trying every Photoshop
trick to wring a
Not a card problem. Probably a row amplifier on the sensor itself.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:30 AM, David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Bummer Mark, hope it gets taken care of.
Just a thought, does this happen on more than 1 card. Might be a bum card.??
Dave
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:36:13AM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:19:43PM +1000, Anthony Farr wrote:
2009/7/28 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
It reminds me of the brand (forgotten which one) which recently
declared that use of third party batteries would
Me too. He said. guys, Ann.
Jack
--- On Tue, 7/28/09, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
From: ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Subject: Re: Vote for the PDML Photo Annual
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 6:32 AM
been there , done that :-)
ann
Graydon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain je ne se qua that not one can
measure but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But compared
to the DA35, it's an expensive bit of français.
Do you need to take
Actually, it's so thin it only has one side.
J
--- On Tue, 7/28/09, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
Subject: Re: DA 16-45 f4 -- does it require slim filters?
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2009, 6:37
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
